Conference Session

Elementary School Engineering Education

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Katie Bush, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Jennifer Gray, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Megan Holmes, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Karen Kosinski, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; John Orr, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Leena Razzaq, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Jill Rulfs, Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

establishing small scale K, 1 outreach. In American Society for Engineering Education4 Torres, K., and Casey, M. (2001) Electrical Engineering Technology Experiences for Kindergarten Students. In American Society for Engineering Education5 Fidan, I., Laurila, M., and Clougherty, R.J. (2004) The Development of an Online Engineering Alphabet. In IEEE/ASEE Frontiers in Education6 Erwin, B., Cyr, M., and Rogers, C. (2000) LEGO Engineer and ROBOLAB: Teaching Engineering with LabVIEW from Kindergarten to Graduate School. International Journal of Engineering Education 16 (3)7 Royce, C.a.W., D. (1996) Children's literature and the teaching of science: possibilities and cautions. The Clearing House 70 (1

Conference Session

Emerging Trends in Engineering Education

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Vijay Rajappa; Steve Watkins; Ray Luechtefeld

Session number 2004-1340 Differentiated Team Training in a Multidisciplinary Engineering Projects Course Dr. Ray Luechtefeld, Dr. Steve E. Watkins, Vijay Rajappa University of Missouri-RollaAbstractThe ability to function effectively in teams is an important contributor to career success inengineering. Unfortunately, specific training designed to improve team effectiveness is not oftenincorporated into engineering education. Even when such training is provided, the absence ofclear comparisons makes it difficult to evaluate effectiveness. Providing two kinds of teamtraining to

Conference Session

Innovation in Design Education

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Eric Ford; Vincent Wilczynski; Gregg Dixon

forHigh School Students, Proceedings of the 2001 ASEE Annual Conference5. Hyman, Barry I., Fundamentals of Engineering Design © 1998 by Prentice-Hall, Inc., NJ Page 7.153.10 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationGREGG W. DIXONGregg Dixon is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Head of the Mechanical Engineering Program at the U.S.Coast Guard Academy. He received an M.S. degree in Engineering Science in 1966 from Stanford University in acombined B.S./M.S program. He received a

Conference Session

Laboratory Courses and Programming in the Aerospace Curriculum

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Waterloo Tsutsui, Purdue University at West Lafayette; Ruben D. Lopez-Parra, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Genisson Silva Coutinho, Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia da Bahia; Alberto W. Mello, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University; Michael David Sangid, Purdue University; Tamara J. Moore, Purdue University at West Lafayette

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Aerospace

Lafayette Ruben D. Lopez-Parra is a graduate research assistant at Purdue University pursuing a Ph.D. in Engi- neering Education. Previously, he worked as a Natural Science teacher in High School where he, as a scholarly teacher, constantly assessed his performance to design better learning environments that pro- mote students’ conceptual understanding. In 2015, Ruben earned the M.S in Chemical Engineering at Universidad de los Andes in Colombia where he also received the title of Chemical Engineer in 2012. His research interests include cognition and metacognition in the engineering curriculum.Prof. Genisson Silva Coutinho, Instituto Federal de Educac¸a˜ o, Ciˆencia e Tecnologia da Bahia Genisson Silva Coutinho

Collection

1998 Annual Conference

Authors

Michael Safoutin; Jens Jorgensen; Joseph A. Heim; Dale E. Calkins

types (from those required for product dissection exrcisesto those required for technical report production and presentation preparation) are available forthe complete “hands-on” experience. In this environment, the students are observed to take morepersonal responsibility for their work.References[1] DeMeter, E., Jorgensen, J., and Rullan, A., “The Learning Factory of the Manufacturing Engineering Educational Program,” Proceedings of the International Conference on Manufacturing Education, SME, San Diego, CA, March 1996.[2] Lamancusa, J., Jorgensen, J., and Zayas-Castro, J., “The Learning Factory-An Approach to Integrating Design and Manufacturing into the Engineering Curriculum,” ASEE Journal of Engineering

Conference Session

Design Methodologies 2

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

J. Blake Hylton, Ohio Northern University; Patrick James Herak, Ohio State University; Todd France, Ohio Northern University; Sherri Youssef, Ohio State University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Ashland University - Columbus Branch (Science Education), a position he still currently holds. Dr. Herak currently serves as a Senior Lecturer in the College of Engineering at The Ohio State University. Dr. Herak has presented at education conferences at the state, national and international level including the Science Education Council of Ohio, National Science Teachers Association, International Consortium of Research in Science and Math Education, First Year Engineering Education conference and American Society for Engineering Education conference.Dr. Todd France, Ohio Northern University Todd France is the director of Ohio Northern University’s Engineering Education program, which strives to prepare engineering

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Eduaction - Poster Session

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gül Okudan, Pennsylvania State University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

, Zsuzsanna Szabo and Darrel Sabers (2004) Assessing Student Learning about Engineering Design in Project-Based Courses, Proceedings of ASEE Conference & Exposition, pages 753 – 766. 3. Reid Bailey, Zsuzsanna Szabo and Darrel Sabers (2004) Integrating Education Students in the Assessment of Engineering Courses, Proceedings of ASEE Conference & Exposition, pages 7661 – 7667. 4. Janet K. Allen, Assessment of Engineering Design by Design (1997) Frontiers in Education conference, vol - 2, page 694. 5. Reid Bailey and Zsuzsanna Szabo (2006) Assessing Engineering Design Process Knowledge, International Journal of Engineering Education, vol-22, no. 3, pages 508 – 518. 6. Denny C. Davis, Kenneth L

Conference Session

Re-Imagining the Higher Ed Classroom -- Tablet PCs

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dewey Spangler, Virginia Western Community College; Kimberly Filer, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

will be trainedon the use of this technology. Typical sophomore enrollment in mechanical engineering atVirginia Tech is between 300 to 350 students spanning seven to eight fall sections of ME 2024of 30 to 33 students each. Further development also involves the enhancement of junior andsenior level mechanical engineering courses over the next two years.BibliographyKarl T. Ulrich, Steven D. Eppinger. (2004), Product Design and Development. Third Edition, McGraw Hill press.290-291.Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334.Duncan, T. G. & McKeachie, W. J. (2005). The making of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. Educational Psychologist, 40(2), 117-128

Conference Session

Research on Engineering Design Education

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ryan C. Campbell, University of Washington; Ken Yasuhara, University of Washington; Cynthia J. Atman, University of Washington; Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

AC 2012-5232: EXPLORING IF AND HOW KNOWLEDGE OF A HU-MANITARIAN DISASTER AFFECTS STUDENT DESIGN THINKINGRyan C. Campbell, University of Washington Ryan Campbell is pursuing his doctorate through the University of Washington Graduate School’s inter- disciplinary Individual PhD (IPhD) program, in which he combines faculty expertise in the College of Engineering and the College of Education to create a degree program in the emerging field of engineering education. Campbell earned his M.S. in electrical engineering from Sungkyunkwan University, Republic of Korea, and his B.S. in engineering science from Colorado State University, Ft. Collins, Colo. Camp- bell’s research interests include engineering education, ethics

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Pamela Brown; Melanie Villatoro, New York City College of Technology; Elizabeth Milonas, New York City College of Technology; Benito Mendoza, New York City College of Technology; Hon Jie Teo, New York City College of Technology; Mohammad Razani, New York City College of Technology; Diana Samaroo

nanomaterials. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Building Capacity: Enhancing Undergraduate STEM Education by Improving Transfer SuccessAbstractSeveral evidence-based practices were combined to reduce barriers to transfer from associate tobaccalaureate programs, and baccalaureate degree completion. The first strategy was creation ofthe STEM Transfer Collaborative (STC), an adaption of the CUNY Pathways general educationarticulation initiative (1). The STC focuses on collaboration by both the sending and receivingcollege faculty to begin transfer preparation and support before transfer occurs, througharticulation

Conference Session

Concurrent Paper Tracks Session I - Skills Development

Collection

2017 ASEE International Forum

Authors

Daniel Christe, Drexel University; Jay J. Bhatt, Drexel University (Eng. & Eng. Tech.)

Tagged Topics

Main Forum (Podium Presentation)

late NAE president Dr. Charles Vestand other have called for deep integration of the liberal arts with engineering(4, 7, 40), as part of a broadertransformation of engineering education. Along this thread, the EAC placed emphasis on transdisciplinarygrand challenges to made the game interesting to non-engineering students as well.Figure 5: A breakdown of the players’ prior experience using the Knovel and EngineeringVillage discovery platformsDevelopment of Future Learning ExperiencesAt the time of writing, an international Engineering Academic Challenge focus group of educators andstudents was created to provide detailed feedback shaping future EAC experiences. In addition to the globalmultiple choice game with automated scoring, future EAC

Conference Session

FPD5 - Teaming and Peer Performance

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kerry Meyers, University of Notre Dame; Stephen Silliman, University of Notre Dame; Matthew Ohland, Purdue Engineering Education; Leo McWilliams, University of Notre Dame; Tracy Kijewski-Correa, University of Notre Dame

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

engineer at Honeywell International. Dr. McWilliams received his B.A. in economics, B.S.E.E., M.S.E.E. and Ph.D. from the University of Notre Dame.Tracy Kijewski-Correa, University of Notre Dame Dr. Kijewski-Correa is the Rooney Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil Engineering and Geological Sciences at the University of Notre Dame. Her research focuses on structural dynamics, wind effects on structures, and the use of novel sensors to assess structural health and integrity. Page 13.315.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Comparison of Two Peer Evaluation Instruments for

Collection

2019 ASEE Midwest Section Conference

Authors

Kishore Chidella; Srikanth Gampa; Abdulrahman Almohaimeed

educators” https://www.nxp.com/pages/codewarrior- academic-development-tools-for-students-and-educators.-:CW_ACADEMIC. (July 10, 2019). [12] Padmaja, A., Ramana, V.S.V.L. and Reddy, P.R., (2015). “Importance of research at undergraduate level”. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Transformations in Engineering Education, R. Natarajan, Ed. Springer India, pp. 631-632. [13] Petrella, J.K. and Jung, A.P., (2008). “Undergraduate research: Importance, benefits, and challenges”. International journal of exercise science, 1(3), p.91. [14] Pusca, D., Bowers, R.J. and Northwood, D.O., (2017). “Hands-on experiences in engineering classes: the need, the implementation and the results”. World Trans. on

Collection

2000 Annual Conference

Authors

Stephen G Ritchie; Carlos C. Sun

Session 2793 OAK-TREE: One-of-A-Kind Transportation Research and Education Experiment Carlos Sun1, Stephen Ritchie2 1. Faculty of Engineering, Rowan University, Glassboro, New Jersey 08028-1701 2. Faculty of Engineering, University of California, Irvine, California 92697-2175Abstract - This paper chronicles the traffic control course/laboratory named OAK-TREE (One-of-A-Kind Transportation Research and Education Experiment) at the University of California atIrvine and discusses a proposed implementation at Rowan University. In order to address thechanging nature of transportation and civil

Conference Session

Architectural Engineering Education II

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Don Bury; Bruce Mutter

utilizing an internal, limited Page 10.720.13scope CAD program. No additional software will be required. AutoDesk, Inc. and Proceedings of the 2005 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society of Engineering EducationEducational Testing Services (ETS) have devised such a CAD system and the program isworking on acquiring a licensed version for use within our CMS. The exam solutions willbe stored on site for retrieval and grading by the instructor. Graded exam results are thenposted for student review.6. Dissemination PlanThe ARET Department will devise a

Conference Session

Mobile Robotics in Education

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

David Ahlgren; Igor Verner

(2001-2002),” Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Inc., Baltimore (http://www.abet.org).[9] IGVC Home Page: http://www.secs.oakland.edu/SECS_prof_orgs/PROF_AUVSI[10] Verner, I., Waks, S., and Kolberg, E. “Upgrading technology towards the status of high school matriculation subject: A case study.” Journal of Technology Education, 9(1), 1997, 64-75.[11] Verner, I.; and Betzer, N. Machine Control - A Design and Technology Discipline in Israel's Senior High Schools. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 11(3), 2001, 263-272.[12] Jones, J.; Seiger, B.; and Flynn, A. 1999. Mobile Robots, Inspiration to Implementation, 2nd ed. Natick, Mass: A. K. Peters

Conference Session

Perspectives on Engineering Education During COVID-19

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Keven Alkhoury, New Jersey Institute of Technology ; Ahmed Z. Edrees, University of Jeddah & New Jersey Institute of Technology; Jaskirat Sodhi, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Ashish D. Borgaonkar, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Prateek Shekhar, New Jersey Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

Paper ID #33255Investigating Students’ Expectations of Instruction in EngineeringLaboratory Courses During the COVID-19 PandemicMr. Keven Alkhoury, New Jersey Institute of Technology I am a Ph.D. student in mechanical engineering at the New Jersey Institute of Technology. The focus of my research is on the continuum-level coupled multiphysics behavior of polymeric materials. During the last year, I was also interested in investigating the impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the quality of education, which resulted in this publication.Mr. Ahmed Z. Edrees, University of Jeddah & New Jersey Institute of Technology Ahmed

Conference Session

Tricks of the Trade II

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Edward Gehringer, North Carolina State University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

their confidence by contact Page 14.1379.21 At many schools, teaching assistants are routinely called “GTAs” for “graduate teaching assistants.” Since thematerial described in this paper applies to undergraduate TAs as well, I have opted to use the abbreviation for themore general term.Proceedings of the 2009 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition 1Copyright 1 2009, American Society for Engineering Educationwith someone “like them” who has recently mastered the material. When they see the instructorpresenting the material, they may think, No wonder he understands it

Conference Session

Student Learning, Problem Solving, & Critical Thinking 1

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stephanie Marie Kusano, Virginia Tech; Aditya Johri, George Mason University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Engineering Education. (2013). Transforming Undergraduate Education in Engineering (TUEE): Phase I: Synthesizing and Integrating Industry Perspectives. Arlington, VA3. National Academies Press, (2005). Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century: The National Academies Press.4. Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 103-120.5. Felder, R. M., Sheppard, S. D., & Smith, K. A. (2005). A new journal for a field in transition. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 7-10.6. Prince, M. (2004). Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the REsearch

Conference Session

NEE 2 - Strategies to Improve Teaching Effectiveness

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joanna Wright, University of Washington; Lauren N. Summers, University of Washington; Denise Wilson, University of Washington

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

potential roles of socioeconomic status, ethnicity, gender, and other political identifiers in determining undergraduate engagement across a variety of majors, including engineering.Dr. Denise Wilson, University of Washington Denise Wilson is a professor of electrical and computer engineering at the University of Washington, Seattle. Her research interests in engineering education focus on the role of self-efficacy, belonging, and other non-cognitive aspects of the student experience on engagement, success, and persistence and on effective methods for teaching global issues such as those pertaining to sustainability. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019

Conference Session

Exploring Student Affairs, Identities, and the Professional Persona

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jillian Seniuk Cicek, University of Manitoba; Sandra Ingram, University of Manitoba; Marcia R. Friesen, University of Manitoba

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

accreditation framework developed by theCanadian Engineering Accreditation Board (CEAB) is lifelong learning. It is a competencydefined by CEAB as an ability to identify and to address [students’] own educational needs in achanging world in ways sufficient to maintain their competence and to allow them to contributeto the advancement of knowledge7. The ABET Criterion 3 a-k learning outcomes also include anoutcome for lifelong learning, although these criterion are under review: i) A recognition of theneed for, and an ability to engage in, lifelong learning8. Lifelong learning is an outcome and attribute that is often held up as an exemplardemonstrating the difficulties inherent in assessing graduate attributes and student outcomes,particularly

Conference Session

Pedagogy and Its Impact on Faculty and Students

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Julia F. Kerst, University of Michigan; Hanna Pfershy, University of Michigan, Engineering Education Research; Robert Matthew DeMonbrun, University of Michigan; Cynthia J. Finelli, University of Michigan

Tagged Divisions

Continuing Professional Development

Paper ID #19730Long-Term Impact of a Faculty Development Program on Student Evalua-tions of TeachingMs. Julia F. Kerst, University of Michigan Julia Kerst, a native of Ann Arbor, MI, is a third-year undergraduate student in Electrical Engineering at the University of Michigan. She is also the Internal Vice President of the Society of Women Engineers at U of M. She has been doing research in Engineering Education since May 2016, and focuses on student responses to faculty trying new learning techniques.Ms. Hanna Pfershy, University of Michigan, Engineering Education Research Hanna is a third year undergraduate student at

Collection

2013 Pacific Southwest Section Meeting

Authors

Jin-Lee Kim

., Bank, L. C., and Shapira, A. (2007). “Education in construction engineering management built on tradition: Blueprint for tomorrow.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 133(9), pp. 661-668.22. Sacks, R., and Barak, R. (2010). “Teaching building information modeling as an integral part of freshman year civil engineering education.” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 136(1), pp. 30-38.23. Siddiqi, K. M., Chatman, D., and Cook, G. (2008). “Role of education and industry towards more sustainable construction.” International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management, 8(2/3), pp. 310-321.24. Thomsen, C. (2008). Program management: Concepts and strategies for managing capital

Conference Session

Inservice Teacher Engineering Education

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Kathleen Crowe; Kris Wood; Richard Crawford; Daniel Jensen

MBTI “Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education”Tables 2 and 3 show the quantitative rankings (Table 2) and associated percentiles (Table 3)when they are broken down by MBTI types. Recall that there are four designation letters perMBTI type: I vs. E, S vs. N, T vs. F, and P vs. J. Quantitative ratings are tabulated separately foreach of the two letter options. Table 2 – Rankings Categorized by MBTI Type Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 avg 1-3 avg 4-6 avgType-I 3.79 3.94 3.80 3.85 3.95 3.94 3.84 3.92 3.88Type-E

Conference Session

Engagement in Practice: Bridging Engineering Education and Community Impact through Collaborative Design and Construction

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sally Njoki Kimani, Tumaini Innovation Center ; Mary Wambui Muigai BSc. (Information Technology) – Ongoing, Tumaini Innovation Center; Claudia Chebet Chemweno, Tumaini Innovation Center; Dhinesh Balaji Radhakrishnan, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PWL) (COE); Nrupaja Bhide, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI); Jennifer Deboer, Purdue University – West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Community Engagement Division (COMMENG)

transition of the new teachers into the CoP. Getting funding for capacity building and professionaldevelopment support for the instructors, is a priority and continues to be one of the key challenges in our work,aimed at improving on both their engineering knowledge and skills hence improving the content delivery in class.References[1] ​ D. A. Delaine et al., “A systematic literature review of reciprocity in engineeringservice‐learning/community engagement,” J. Eng. Educ., 2023, doi: 10.1002/jee.20561.[2] ​ P. Lumb, “Strategic International Partnerships: Global North and Global South Discourses,” Comp. Int.Educ. Éducation Comparée Int., vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 110–126, 2023, doi: 10.5206/cie-eci.v51i2.15155.[3] ​ B. I. Omodan, “Building reciprocal

Conference Session

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE) Poster Session

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jennifer Kouo, The Institute for Innovation in Development, Engagement, and Learning Systems (IDEALS) at the Johns Hopkins University School of Education; Jeannie Chipps, Johns Hopkins University; Rachel Figard, Arizona State University; Kenneth Reid, University of Indianapolis; Katey Shirey, eduKatey LLC, STEAM Education Services; Stacy S. Klein-Gardner, Vanderbilt University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)

. L. Downey, “PDS: Engineering as Problem Definition and Solution,” in InternationalPerspectives on Engineering Education, S. H. Christensen, Ed. Springer International PublishingSwitzerland, 2015, pp. 435–455. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-16169-3_21.[2] M. Schwartz, K.M. Smits, J.M. Smith, T.J. Phelan, and R. O’Brien, “Teaching Students toIncorporate Community Perspective into Environmental Engineering Problem Definition throughIterative Conceptual Site Models,” ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2022.[3] G. R. Date and S. Chandrasekharan, “The socio-technical connection is plastic, but onlywhen design starts from need formulation,” ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2016. doi:10.18260/p.27019.[4] J. A. Kuczenski, “Design for community

Collection

2001 Annual Conference

Authors

Rick Duley; A Boyanich; S P Maj

transmitted (I!i) then the obvious solution is to reduce the depth in which thatinformation is studied (D!d). The question often asked is whether such a reduction isacceptable in SE education. In the authors’ view the real question is whether or not a SE studentactually needs the knowledge of the inner workings of a VLSI chip, CD-ROM, a Zip Drive orModem which is appropriate to a Computer Scientist or Computer Systems Engineer. Wesupport the case that it is not since an SE is a user of computers rather than a maker of them andthat students need to be familiar with the tools of the trade at the user (not designer) level5.Therefore, we believe that a conceptual understanding of such devices would adequately serve— at least in the initial stages. This

Conference Session

Potpurri Design in Engineering Education

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Daniel Jensen

methodology includethe use of educational objectives as design “functions” and the use of pedagogical theoriesand learning style information as part of the “analysis” step in the design process. Detailsof each step in the process are presented. The methodology is used to compare the use oforiginal and redesign projects. This comparison highlights some distinct advantages ofredesign oriented hands-on projects.1. IntroductionThere is considerable literature that addresses the advantages of using hands-onexperiences in engineering curriculum [1-14]. Although assessment indicates that theincorporation of hands-on experiences almost always improves a given course, thereappears to be a dearth of information regarding the effective design of hands-on

Conference Session

Virtual Training, Online and Open Education; Instructional Technology

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Behlul Kula, Michigan State University; Andreana Louise Roxas; Kristen Sara Cetin P.E., Michigan State University; Annick Anctil; George Berghorn, Michigan State University; Ryan Patrick Gallagher

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

. Ahmad, "Learning styles and critical thinking skills of engineering students," in 2017 IEEE 9th International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED), 2017.[5] E. E. Miskioğlu and D. W. Wood, "That's not my style: Understanding the correlation of learning style preferences, self-efficacy, and student performance in an introductory chemical engineering course," in 2014 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) Proceedings, 2014.[6] R. J. Kapadia, "Teaching and learning styles in engineering education," in 2008 38th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, 2008.[7] D. Rohrer and H. Pashler, "Learning Styles: Where's the Evidence?.," Online Submission, vol. 46, p. 634–635, 2012.[8] J

Collection

2014 ASEE Zone 1 Conference

Authors

Mohammed-Noor Naher Al-Maghrabi; Ahmed A. Abdou El-Abbasy

. This software helped students tounderstand the nature of dynamic loads and their effects onbodies. The final results of students and their grades wereimproved comparing with their results without this suggestedsoftware. Dynamics topics covered by the software and itscomponents are illustrated in the paper. This software hasproved its capability to improve teaching of dynamics andearthquake engineering. The software is also a helpful tool formaking any parametric studies consuming long times ofrepetitive calculations. Index Terms—Dynamics of structures, education, simulation,software I. INTRODUCTION AND LITERATURE REVIEWT HE destruction caused by the 1906 San Francisco earthquake marked the beginning of a long and richhistory