the multi-tasking capabilities of the expanded system. Hardwareprototyping using an FPGA provides hands-on experience that can’t be obtained by simulationalone.Student feedback was collected from the Student Evaluation of Learning survey, using a five-point Likert scale: 1. Strongly Disagree (SD), 2. Disagree (D), 3. Undecided (U), 4. Agree (A),5. Strongly Agree (SA), Number of Responses (N). The results are very positive and shown inFigure 8. Student Evaluation of Learning SD D U A SA N Mean My ability to identify, formulate, and 0 0 0 0 4 4 5.0 solve complex engineering problems by applying principles of engineering, science, and mathematics has
response when the task was framed as “draw an engineer” vs.“draw yourself as an engineer.”AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to acknowledge the children who participated in this research study andthe SEEK mentors and site coordinators who worked with the children and supported our datacollection. This material is based upon work supported by the National Science FoundationDivision of Research on Learning under Grant Numbers DRL-1614710, 1614739, and 1615143.Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are thoseof the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Wealso would like to thank Christopher Wright for their feedback and input on earlier versions ofthis
technology. In contrast, colleges and universitieshave a long history of prestigious theoretical academics. As engineering moved into colleges anduniversities after WWII, naturally the discipline became more theoretical and academic and lesshands-on. Even today engineering programs focus heavily on advanced science and mathematicstheories. However, by the 1970s industry started to complain that graduating engineers couldn’t“do anything” [8]. They did not have the teamwork, creative or communication skills that theyneeded to design new technology. During the 1980s and ‘90s, new hands-on design-basedcourses began to appear. These became the “Freshman Experiences” and “Senior DesignCourses.” These classes focused on the design process, creativity
engineering 3. “Flip” the course using web-based lectures andeducation. The project’s learning objectives are that assessments in conjunction with hands-on, problem-students will be able to successfully integrate digital and based-learning laboratory activities.physical design, develop a navigation algorithm, and A prior college taskforce had identified emphasis areasimplement it in Arduino C, in order to allow an that included professional skills such as technicalautonomous robot vehicle to successfully navigate a communication and an ability to work in teams as well as thecourse. Students use modern, industry-standard engineering fundamentals of applying
, computer science, or management information systems. For the minor weintroduced three undergrad courses in cyber security which were to be used as the ninestandalone credits. The focus of the three new undergraduate courses was hands-on, activelearning labs and are the core of the new cyber security major. (Details on the courses areincluded below.)Shortly after inception of the minor, the cyber security external advisory board challenged thedepartment to create an undergraduate degree in cyber security, while maintaining the qualitiesof engineering we instill in our graduates. The advisory board wanted employees with theproblem-solving abilities of a computer engineer coupled with the knowledge of cyber securityproblems. In other words, they did
2022 ASEE Illinois-Indiana Section Conference Proceedings | Paper ID 36106 Metrology Education Including GD&T in Engineering Technology Joseph Fuehne* Purdue Polytechnic Columbus jfuehne@purdue.eduAbstractWhile engineering programs tend to focus on theory, engineering technology programslike those at Purdue Polytechnic Columbus focus on practical and applied conceptsrelated to manufacturing which includes standardized drawings and GeometricDimensioning &Tolerancing (GD&T). This paper introduces how metrology and GD&Tare adopted in the classroom work and how hands-on activities are integrated toreinforce the learning of
realistic vision of the practice ofEnvironmental Engineering. Complete case studies present problems in rich detail.Students can (and must) pour over this information and synthesize a considerable amountof detail before experimenting with potential solutions. Clearly, one must apply this typeof assignment with care, but it can be an extremely valuable learning experience as acomplement to traditional homework assignments. Unfortunately, it is difficult for oneperson to repeatedly generate the volume of resource material required for a real casestudy. Further, problems lose impact with reuse because students begin recycling ideas.Therefore, the idea emerged that if we could share such resources among a larger group ofprofessors, we could all
13.540.3Although it is well established in the literature that the number of degrees awarded inengineering and technology have been decreasing for over a decade, the Bureau of LaborStatistics expects a 3% to 9% growth in engineering occupations between 2002 and 20127, 8These statistics suggest that the United States will be facing a shortage of engineers in the nearfuture. If American companies cannot recruit and train domestic engineers, they will either goabroad to recruit engineers or they will move their engineering operations overseas.1 TheNational Science Board’s, Science and Engineering Indicators—2002 states: “The United States has long relied heavily on scientists and engineers who were born abroad, and increasingly so in the closing
Educational Award forsignificant contributions to teaching, research, and student development. Furthermore, theAmerican Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) has a council on Education and theAmerican Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) has the Education Activities Committee whichboth seek to improve engineering education. Other societies not associated with the engineeringprofession are also promoting teaching excellence. The International Society for ExploringTeaching Alternatives (ISETA) looks for ways to move from standard lectures to other methods Page 2.395.11 This work was supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation
their educators. Her research focuses on articulating frameworks for precollege engineering education.Dr. Darshita N. Shah, The Pennsylvania State University Darshita (Dipa) Shah is the Curriculum Director for Youth Engineering Solutions at The Pennsylvania State University. Dipa has spent her career grappling with the challenge of how to best design motivating and engaging curriculum materials for students across the K-16 spectrum that can be practically imple- mented across the rich variety of our nation’s educational contexts. Most recently, Dipa was the senior associate director with MIT’s Teaching and Learning Lab where she facilitated workshops for campus educators on how to design curricular materials
with the direct experience of a real ocean,especially by someone who has never experienced an ocean. Both passages suggest thatrepresentation as a means of effective communication may have inherent problems.In a broader sense, science and technology routinely rely upon visual representations toefficiently communicate concepts and summarize information. By “representation”, it is meantthat some visual symbol (often simple in nature), diagram, or other communication device isemployed to represent or model a more complex “real” object. Often the represented object is infact “real”. For example, a mechanical engineering text may present a simple diagram intendedto represent an actual pump (see Figure One). Sometimes the represented object is an
constructed a particular narrative around engineering. Rather thanacknowledging the personal values and material realities of students, engineering social practiceshave been characterized by the lack of acceptance of difference and an emphasis on academicsurvival [7], and the importance given to work that produces capital and material results [8].Thus, the Discourse created around engineering—the things that are valued and acknowledged—may not align with students’ personal values. Nonetheless, these Discourses may perpetuate theidea of how students see themselves as future engineers and how they may want to enact theirpersonal values.In an attempt to challenge students to critically reflect on their own personal values as well ashow they envision
“dowhatever you want” which was “a lot faster and a lot quicker” than she thought.On the other hand, one civil engineering persister found that the college of engineering had been“extremely supportive towards women” and didn’t think women engineering students need anymore women support programs to ensure higher success probability of women students inengineering. And different departments have their own style, one material engineering majortook classes in both material science and engineering and electrical engineering and felt that shehad “more interaction with the material science faculty” than she did with the electricalengineering faculty.Overall, all the above identified factors are by no means exhaustive and mutually exclusive toeach other
to choose engineering and stay in engineering through their careers and how different experiences within the practice and culture of engineering foster or hinder belongingness and identity development. Dr. Godwin graduated from Clemson University with a B.S. in Chemical Engineering and Ph.D. in Engineering and Science Education. Her research earned her a National Science Foundation CAREER Award focused on characterizing latent diversity, which includes diverse attitudes, mindsets, and approaches to learning, to understand engineering students’ identity devel- opment. She is the recipient of a 2014 American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Educational Research and Methods Division Apprentice Faculty Grant
unsuccessful in convincing Xerox to bring products based on these developments to market. By understanding something about what went right and what went wrong at Xerox PARC, students in the honors section learn more about engineering and business in the real world.The primary focus of having the students read books like Soul of the New Machine, TheCivilized Engineer, and Dealers of Lightning is to introduce them to the professionalpractice of engineering. Although they are, for the most part, freshman, it is importantthat they learn about the engineering profession beyond the science and technology thatthey inherently know they will be studying. From these works, posted notes on the Website that takes them to additional
project, I develop interactive activities at different development stages, including projectproposal, proposal peer review, project interview, preliminary report, and final report. The assessmentof the effectiveness of this new class was conducted by comparing exams and feedback of students bythe end of the semester. This class provides students with sufficient knowledge of both fundamentalstatistics and practical data analytical techniques for engineering fields, comprehensive experience indata analytic workflow, and the opportunity to exercise their data analytical skills in engineeringapplications.Introduction and BackgroundData science is an emerging field based on statistical methods and machine learning techniques toconvert extensive
focus exclusively on CS1programming fundamentals. This shift aims to help students build a strong foundation in coreprogramming skills.The redesigned lecture topics are outlined in Table 3, organized into two weekly sessions. Thecurriculum begins with fundamental Python constructs, including Python data types, Booleanoperations, and loops, and gradually introduces advanced concepts such as pseudocode anddebugging. Later in the semester, students are introduced to widely used Python libraries likeNumPy and pandas and learn to apply these libraries to solve engineering problems throughmini-projects. From Week 3 onward, lab sessions reinforce lecture material through retrievalpractice and hands-on exercises. The course concludes with review
. Articulation agreements provide opportunities for students to complete their first twoyears of study at one university before transferring to a cooperating university to complete coursework for their engineering degrees. UW-Platteville has completed engineering articulationagreements with several other institutions in the UW System, including UWC-Baraboo/SaukCounty, UW-Fox Valley, UW-Richland, UW-Parkside, UW-Stout, and UW-Whitewater (1). The industrial engineering program at the University of Wisconsin – Platteville has beenin existence since 1970, it was accredited by EAC/ABET in 1988. The Bachelor of Science inIndustrial Engineering (BSIE) degree requires at least one of the four defined emphasis areas tobe completed: Production Systems
offered in a typicalcurriculum, with benefit both to students and faculty. Additionally, a university can serve as arepository of knowledge, which extends beyond the life of an industrial contractual relationship.This paper presents methods on how to implement into an aerospace engineering or spacephysics curriculum the knowledge and foundation needed to understand space debris problems,and by extension many interdisciplinary problems and other areas of science and technology.1. Astronautics Courses & Space Debris EducationThe topic of space debris affects three of ERAU’s major programs in Prescott, AZ. Theseprograms are Aerospace Engineering, Space Physics, and Global Security & Intelligence Studies.The interdisciplinary nature
, have field experience labs as part of the curriculumthroughout the United States. This is a useful skill for Environmental Engineers going into theconsulting or research industries.Two field sampling experiments were incorporated into an environmental engineering class heldin the Spring 2012 semester. The lecture material discussed different sampling techniques andthe lab portion had the students learn “hands-on” proper sampling methods. The remainder ofthe lab time was spent learning field equipment for water and air quality analysis. A mainlearning objective in the class was for the student to be able to determine the most appropriatesampling technique for a specified situation. To assess student learning a practical exam wastaken by all of
-technical coworkers and clients throughin-depth discussions on software requirements, design, and implementation. Clearly,communication skills are an important skill set to software engineers. Yet computerscience undergraduate students, many of whom will become software engineers after theygraduate, receive little training in teamwork and communication skills, especially in thecontext of computer science coursework and projects. As a result, many computerscience students do not recognize the importance of communication and do not possesssatisfactory communication skills. For example, in Spring Quarter 2004, on ananonymous comment card collected from CS456/556, a software engineering courseoffered at Ohio University, one student complained that: “I
engineering modules in the winter combined with the spring design projects werevery successful, they were also expensive. The number of faculty involved in the winter andspring (not including the computer programming section) resulted in a student faculty ratio ofabout 9:1. The projects are also expensive in terms of equipment and materials costs.The spring of 1998 was the last time that the large design projects were offered. Assessmentsrevealed that the addition of the two courses to the freshman year resulted in a workload thatmany freshmen could not handle. There was also an increasing sentiment in the division thatstudents should be spending more time on their math and science courses. The new Dean ofEngineering entering in the fall of 1998
technology education teacher that was involved in thisstudy, including one mathematics and science teacher, completed 120 hours of professional Page 12.443.4development related to infusing engineering concepts into high school technology education.During this professional development, the eight technology education, one mathematics, and onescience teacher helped to develop the 20-class session unit of instruction and the activities thatsupported infusing engineering concepts into the curriculum. These teachers were chosenbecause they were already participating in the NCETE professional development from which thestudy emerged. In addition, these
thatstudent learning styles may differ substantially from what most professors believe and that thesestyles are firmly in place by the time a student reaches the university. Students showed muchless preference for visual input than expected. The preferred learning style of the majority ofstudents as was found to be kinesthetic (hands-on) mode, either by itself or in combination withother learning styles (multimodal). A discussion of the class results compared with activitiesdesigned to reach students through multiple modes proved easy to discuss with the students andopened up the discussion of study habits and active learning in the classroom.I. IntroductionAlthough the roots of learning theory can be traced back to Descartes and Hobbes, the science
Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at ASU from 1993-2004. Anderson-Rowland was named a top 5% teacher in the Fulton Schools of Engineering for 2009-2010. She received the WEPAN Pres- ident’s Award 2014, WEPAN’s Engineering Educator Award 2009, ASEE Minorities Award 2006, the SHPE Educator of the Year 2005, and the National Engineering Award in 2003, the highest honor given by AAES. In 2002 she was named the Distinguished Engineering Educator by the Society of Women Engineers. She has over 190 publications primarily in the areas of recruitment and retention of women and underrepresented minority engineering and computer science students. Her awards are based on her mentoring of students, especially women and
intervention in building resilience. One alumnus specifically mentioned that engineeringscience “is the one place that taught me that I can’t actually know everything and I’m going tofail at stuff.”In addition to becoming resilient learners, both faculty and alumni mentioned developingmetacognition skills, or knowledge and regulation of cognition [37], [38] as a result ofteaching/learning for depth and breadth. Specifically, a few instructors indicated that ifnecessary, engineering science graduates are equipped to learn new material even if they don’thave the background. This was echoed by a few alumni, with one noting that “you have theconfidence to kind of figure things out yourself and kind of systematically learn”, and thatengineering science
proposals. The faculty members then develop materials around their research area that Ambassadors can incorporate within their presentations and take on the road. Rensselaer is a key university partner for a NSF-funded Smart Lighting Engineering Research Center (ERC). The ERC sponsors up to four Engineering Ambassadors each semester to develop presentations and hands-on activities related to the digital lighting technology. The final presentations are incorporated within the Ambassador outreach to middle and high school students throughout the region. The partnership between the ERC and the Ambassador program enhances the presentation offerings to include interesting real world engineering
presentations on the book material. Thisapproach has been adopted both to help the students truly engage with at least a subset of therequired reading material and to give all of them additional practice presenting to a group.Students typically find senior design to be a rewarding opportunity. They enjoy being able tocreate something they can be proud of, work closely with a faculty member and with otherstudents on a realistic engineering project, and gain valuable hands-on experience. EGEE/EGCP-4810 Class Schedule 2019Date Reading Speaker TOPIC Thurs Lab Assignments Due Wed, Aug 21 Design CH 1 Professor
Paper ID #15855Business Program Participation and Engineering Innovation: An Explorationof Engineering Students’ Minors, Certificates, and ConcentrationsMs. Emily Cao, Stanford University Mechanical Engineering student at Stanford University.Dr. Shannon Katherine Gilmartin, Stanford UniversityDr. Qu Jin, Stanford University Qu Jin is a postdoctoral scholar in the Designing Education Lab at Stanford University. She earned her Ph.D. degree in Engineering Education from Purdue University in 2013, M.S. degree in Biomedical En- gineering from Purdue University in 2009, and B.S. degree in Material Science and Engineering from
college. Previously, she taught 8 additional courses at the college level and 13 different high school courses in mathematics and science. She has worked with teacher professional development for over 20 years, and served as mathematics curriculum coordinator for 7 years. She works with teachers from all corners of Texas with teacher quality grants, including a number of teachers in the juvenile justice schools.Dr. G. Donald Allen,Dr. Jim Morgan, Charles Sturt University Jim Morgan is the father of two daughters and the spouse of an engineer. Before joining Charles Sturt University as Professor of Engineering and Inaugural Course Director in 2015, he was on the faculty in civil engineering at Texas A&M for over 30