Conference Session

Technological and Engineering Literacy - Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James Schreiner, United States Military Academy; Leang Tri, Missouri S&T

, Virtual Reality Technologies were researched, and design commenced. In1960, the term “virtual reality” officially appeared in many research papers and in 1963, Hall andMiller described the first virtual reality head-mounted display (HMD) [3]. By the 1990s, VirtualReality Technologies entered the consumer market as emerging gaming devices. Products such asNintendo Virtual Boy and Sega VR-1 supplied users with a full view gaming experience throughimmersive sight and sound. However, the products failed to provide a quality experience at anaffordable price. For example, Nintendo Virtual Boy was priced at $180 with graphic colors ofonly red and black and was difficult to control in a comfortable position [4]. Despite some failuresin gaming market

Conference Session

ECE Division Technical Session 2: Long-Term Institutional Outcome Evaluations and Capstone Innovations

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Filip Cuckov, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Marisha Rawlins, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Wayne Bynoe, Wentworth Institute of Technology; James McCusker, Wentworth Institute of Technology

-9735-3.[15] L. Lolong Lacatan and G. Mendoza Penuliar, “Competency-Based Mapping Tool in Personnel Management System using Analytical Hierarchy Process,” in 2021 The 4th International Conference on Machine Learning and Machine Intelligence, New York, NY, USA, Sep. 2021, pp. 57–64. doi: 10.1145/3490725.3490734.[16] H. A. Ochoa and M. V. Shirvaikar, “A Survey of Digital Systems Curriculum and Pedagogy in Electrical and Computer Engineering Programs,” presented at the 2018 Gulf Southwest Section Conference, Apr. 2019. Accessed: Feb. 04, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/a-survey-of-digital-systems-curriculum-and-pedagogy-in-electrical-and- computer-engineering-programs[17] M. Ghorbani, A. A. Maciejewski, T. J

Conference Session

Systems Engineering Division Technical Session 4 – Systems Thinking Integration and Systems Engineering Skills Evaluation

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Federica Robinson-Bryant, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University- Worldwide

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering

including instructor’s Think Aloud examples, the MAI and SystemsThinking Scale assessments and the systems thinking rubric and (C) discuss ways the interventioncould be adapted in alternative delivery modes.References[1] U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Digest of Education Statistics, 2010-2014 Data (NCES 2016-006), 2016, Available: http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d15/tables/dt15_322.10.asp[2] K. Mulder, J. Segala and D. Ferrer-Balas, How to educate engineers for/in sustainable development: Ten years of discussion, remaining challenges. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 211-218, 2012.[3] S. Huang, K. Muci-Kuchler, M. Bedillion, M

Conference Session

Biomedical Division Poster Session

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Martin T. Spang, Ohio State University; Aaron Strickland, Ohio State University; Deborah M. Grzybowski, Ohio State University

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

describedabove. These posters are then printed and supplied for a final competition. The poster serves as avisual aid for a brief presentation given by all group members to judges. Students are givenaccess to guidelines, a template, an outline, and samples as a starting point for creating theirposters. Students are typically judged three times. Judges come primarily from academia,including faculty, graduate students, and undergraduate alumni of the course; students areguaranteed one judge from each category. As seen in Figure 1 below, the environment is similarto a poster session at a technical conference. Figure 1: Microfluidics poster competition

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 2B: Strategies for Writing and Communication Courses

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Penny Kinnear, University of Toronto; Micah Stickel P.Eng., University of Toronto; Brian M. Frank, Queen's University; James A. Kaupp, Queen's University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

writing tutors, preceded by a 1-hourbenchmarking session. In all, 315 diagnostics were analyzed at University of Toronto, and 37 atQueens University.At Queens University about half of the 37 students writing the diagnostic received a score of 70or higher and appeared to have no difficulty with the time limit. All students had sufficient timeto at least start all the questions, and only 2/37 did significantly poorer on question 3 than theother two questions for reasons that appeared to be due to time. The mean score on each of thethree questions was similar.At University of Toronto a preliminary analysis of the diagnostic results identified four classes ofsupport needs. Overall, timing did not appear to be a concern for most students with 85% of

Conference Session

Engineering and Public Policy Division Technical Session 1: In the Classroom

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Reza Kamali, Utah Valley University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering and Public Policy

enoughknowledge of radio frequency systems and related techniques, they are not familiar with radioregulation and spectrum engineering requirements. Topics such as frequency assignments,allocation, allotment, licensing and etc. are not completely covered. This paper studies usefulfrequency engineering policies for educators and students.Spectrum engineering is the technical skill to solve problems in spectrum management, andincludes privacy of the channel, licensing, electromagnetic compatibility (EMC), radioregulation, and spectrum planning1. In order to improve Spectrum Engineering, RF hazards ofEMC and potential safety hazards due to human exposure to RF energy were addressed inprevious publications2,3. However, adding the EMC subject has improved the

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 2B: Strategies for Writing and Communication Courses

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Patricia R Backer, San Jose State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

Migration Review, 38(3), 1160-1205.6 National Center for Educational Statistics, Available: http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/2010/section1/indicator05.asp7 California Department of Education, Dataquest, http://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/sd/cb/dataquest.asp8 Reid, J. (1997). Which non-native speaker? Differences between international students and U.S. resident (language minority) students. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 70, 17-27.                                                                                                                                                                                                 9 Mott-Smith, J. (2009). Responding to high-stakes

Conference Session

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division (TELPhE) Technical Session 4

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sayyad Zahid Qamar, Sultan Qaboos University; Tasneem Pervez; Nasra Al-Maskari, Sultan Qaboos University; Sayyad Basim Qamar, Texas A&M University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division (TELPhE)

2020].Creativity as a Student OutcomeAccreditation bodies like ABET and similar organizations worldwide are increasingly recognizingCreativity as a vital student outcome. ABET’s Student Outcome 3 [ABET 2023] explicitly emphasizes theability to “develop solutions that meet specified needs” by incorporating technical knowledge, creativity,and consideration of societal, cultural, and environmental factors. Other accreditation bodies similarlyhighlight creativity as a critical component of engineering education. Some of these bodies are EuropeanNetwork for Accreditation of Engineering Education [ENAEE 2024], Washington Accord (a multinationalagreement among bodies responsible for accrediting engineering degree programs) [WA 2024], andEngineers

Conference Session

Biomedical Division Postcard Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jeffrey A. LaMack, Milwaukee School of Engineering; Larry Fennigkoh P.E., Milwaukee School of Engineering; Paul Licato, Milwaukee School of Engineering

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical Engineering

] Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET), November 24, 2018.[3] B. Harding and P. McPherson, “What do employers want in terms of employee knowledge of technical standards and the process of standardization?,” in Proceedings of the 2010 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Louisville, KY, USA, 2010, pp. 15.1364.1 – 15.1364.10. [4] D. Purcell, “Report on a survey of schools of engineering in the United States concerning standards education,” The Center for Global Standards Analysis, Spring 2004.[5] H. de Vries and T. Egyedi, “Education about standardization: Recent findings,” International Journal of IT Standards and Standardization Research, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 11

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Strategies Beyond the Classroom to Tackle Gender Issues

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nora Madjar, University of Connecticut; Bryan Douglas Huey, University of Connecticut; Leslie M. Shor, University of Connecticut

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

non-work relationships and their effect on creativity at work. Her scholarly work also explores different ways to structure jobs to facilitate creative work. She has multiple articles on creativity published in the Journal of Applied Psychology, Journal of Management, Academy of Management Journal, and Journal of Organizational Behavior among others. Professor Madjar teaches management and negotiations courses at both the undergraduate ad MBA level and coaches MBA students for international negotiation competitions. She also is a co-principle inves- tigator on a NSF Grant for stimulating creativity in engineering education and connected with the grant developed and is currently teaching an interdisciplinary course

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division (FPD) Technical Session 6: Learning by Doing - Contextual and Community-Based Engineering

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rebeka Lynn Yocum, Oregon Institute of Technology; Ashton Danielle Greer, Oregon Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs Division (FPD)

by professionals in the civil engineering field. The course goals areaccompanied by four objectives.Upon completion of ENGR102, students should be able to:1. Function effectively in a group setting to solve engineering problems,2. Follow design constraints and adhere to changing specifications and/or requirements,3. Use oral and written communication skills to present technical material effectively, and4. Use engineering problem solving methods, experimentation, and common engineering tools.Though not explicitly mentioned, the engineering design process and development of projectmanagement skills are implicit in the fourth course objective and, as such, in the Introduction toEngineering II curriculum. Historically, a project-based approach

Conference Session

Energy Conversion and Conservation Division Technical Session on Conservation and Optimization

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Farshid Zabihian, California State University, Sacramento

Tagged Divisions

Energy Conversion and Conservation

, Engineering and Technology Conference; Canadian Congress of Applied Mechanics;American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) North Central Section Conferences;ASME Early Career Technical Conference; The Science, Technology and Research (STaR)Symposium; and International Conference on Energy Systems. They also presented 36 postersinvolving 96 students. It should be noted that these publications and their research have beenbased on the student research in both typical thermofluid courses and capstone projects and insome of them the students had co-advisors. Initially, the author had a difficult time to convincethe students that undergraduate research is important for their career. This was evident instudents’ unwillingness to attend conferences to

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division (FPD) Technical Session 12: Bridging the Gap - Strategies to Support Diverse Learners in Early Engineering Courses

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brainerd Prince, Plaksha University; Sohan Panda, Plaksha University; Shubham Goel, Plaksha University; Tanmay Ravi Chowdhary, Plaksha University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs Division (FPD)

that‘engineering thinking’ is a special type of thinking which is formed and revealed duringtechnical problem-solving, which ‘provides quick, accurate and original solving aimed atmeeting technical knowledge, ways and technique demands to create technical means andtechnologies’ [2]. Engineering thinking is not innate; it is a learned skill that requires consistentengagement with a broad spectrum of fields to explore and understand problems deeply. Allsoppacknowledges the potential disconnect engineering students may feel between theoreticalpedagogy and their preferences for active learning approaches. In his work, he argues forembracing new modes of thought and digital tools to bridge this gap and create a more engaginglearning experience for students [3

Conference Session

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division (TELPhE) Technical Session 2

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Adeel Khalid, Kennesaw State University; Sanjeev Adhikari, Kennesaw State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division (TELPhE)

. References[1] A. D. Samala et al, "Unveiling the landscape of generative artificial intelligence in education:a comprehensive taxonomy of applications, challenges, and future prospects," Education andInformation Technologies, pp. 1–40, 2024.[2] E. Eliseeva et al, "Enhanced Training of Creative Specialists Based on the AdvancedEducation System Implementation," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues,vol. 6, (1), pp. 57–62, 2016.[3] R. B. Hill, "New perspectives: Technology teacher education and engineering design,"Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, vol. 43, (3), pp. 45, 2006.[4] K. Porayska-Pomsta, "AI as a methodology for supporting educational praxis and teachermetacognition," International Journal of Artificial Intelligence

Conference Session

Manufacturing Division Session: Make-it!

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Joseph Dennis Cuiffi, Pennsylvania State University, New Kensington; Haifeng Wang, Pennsylvania State University, New Kensington; Josephine Heim, Pennsylvania State University, New Kensington; Brian W. Anthony, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Sangwoon Kim; David Donghyun Kim, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

data, rose to the top. This is a key learningactivity for the course, where we are trying to stress data understanding and decision making. Figure 3. a) (left) Student final perception of the topics in relation to their career. b) (right)Average student change in perception. Each student’s perception change was quantified and then averaged per topic. Scale: 4 – Very Important, 3 – Important, 2 – Slightly Important, 1 – Not Important.For the current workforce manufacturer training, we held four sessions (2hrs each, 8 hours total)for 18 employees from local companies. The goal was to present overviews of SmartManufacturing topics as well as deeper-dive demonstrations to showcase the possibilities

Conference Session

ECE Division Technical Session 2: Long-Term Institutional Outcome Evaluations and Capstone Innovations

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sanjeevi Chitikeshi; Shirshak Dhali, Old Dominion University; Vukica Jovanovic, Old Dominion University

Negative 2 3 Shoulder Closed Raising Shoulder Positive 4 4 Base Open Rotating CW Negative 6 5Motors to PLC CardsOnce the sensors were connected the next step was to connect each motor. In general, thesemotors are all rated at 30V, 2A. However as described in the previous section, a power supplyvoltage of 15 V was used for both the sensors and motors. Therefore, the motors were set tooperate at 15 V and 1 A. The table 4 identifies each motor (as labeled on its cabling) with whichpins it was connected to on the internal circuit board (for easy reconnection), and how it wasconnected to the PLC

Conference Session

Technological and Engineering Literacy - Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Angela Bielefeldt, University of Colorado Boulder

Faculty Director of the Sustainable By Design Residential Academic Program (2014-2017), Director of the Environmental Engineering program (2006-2010), and ABET Assessment Coordinator for the CEAE Department (2008-2018). Bielefeldt is active in the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), serving on the Civil Engineering Program Criteria Task Committee (2019-2022) and the Body of Knowledge 3 Task Committee (2016-2018). She is the Senior Editor for the International Journal for Service Learning in Engineering (IJSLE) and a Deputy Editor for the ASCE Journal of Civil Engineering Education. Her research focuses on engineering education, including ethics, social responsibility, sustainable engineering, and community

Conference Session

Biomedical Division Postcard Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jennifer H. Choi, University of California, Davis

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical Engineering

clinicalobservations at both the medical center and school of veterinary medicine. Each internunderwent 3 weeks of clinical observations at each clinical site, with a minimum of seven daysin any one clinical department. Participating clinical departments are indicated in Figure 1.Interns were required to document their clinical observations in a physical notebook and provideweekly summaries of observations in a shared Google drive document. Virtual group meetingswere also held weekly for a discussion and debrief session. In addition to clinical observations,students participated in a Biomedical + Engineering Entrepreneurship Academy (BMEA) hostedby our institution’s institute for innovation and entrepreneurship, housed in the School ofManagement. The BMEA

Conference Session

Biomedical Division Poster Session

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yakov E. Cherner, ATEL, LLC; Bruce R. Van Dyke, Quincy College

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

learning situations that are familiar to students as the context for virtual science, engineering and technology investigations. He also pro- posed and implemented the pioneering concept of integrated adjustable virtual laboratories. To facilitate these methodologies for academic education, corporate and military training, his company developed new ground-breaking e-learning solutions, as well as relevant assessment and authoring tools. Dr. Cherner holds an MS in Experimental Physics, and Ph.D. in Physics and Materials Science. He published over 90 papers in national and international journals and made dozens presentations at various national and international conferences and workshops. Dr. Cherner has served as a

Conference Session

Civil Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Philip J. Parker P.E., University of Wisconsin, Platteville; Carol Haden, Magnolia Consulting, LLC

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

. Some teams lacked focus and spent too much time in debating the content and coverage for each lesson. Other teams left with their lessons nearly complete. In the months after the workshop, teams continued to complete their lessons. Lessons 1-3 were completed by October 2016 and the remainder were completed in the Spring of 2017.  Internal peer review – once a lesson was completed, the lesson leader shared it with the other two team members and requested feedback. The feedback was then incorporated to improve the lesson.  External peer review- once a lesson had completed the internal peer review process, it was sent to 5-7 external peer reviewers. A rubric was provided to reviewers. Reviewers

Conference Session

Mathematics Division Technical Session 5: From Functions to Big Data–A Hands-on Challenge

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Emre Tokgoz, Quinnipiac University; Hasan Alp Tekalp; Elif Naz Tekalp; Berrak Seren Tekalp, Quinnipiac University

Tagged Divisions

Mathematics

is positive and negative. 2. Action-Process-Object-Schema (APOS) TheoryBreidenbach, Dubinsky, Hawks and Nichols studied students’ conceptual view of the function in 1992 ([3]) thatrelied on Piaget’s study of functions in 1977 ([8]) in mathematics education used for forming action-process-object idea ([8]). APOS theory is applied in 1997 ([1]) to mathematical topics (mostly functions); the theory isexplained to be the combined knowledge of a student in a specific subject. It is used for observing conceptualconstruction of students on sub-concepts and schemas; researchers used this theory to observe mathematicslearners’ ability to build on their existing knowledgebase. APOS theory was not always appropriate for dataanalysis of pedagogical

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division (FPD) Technical Session 12: Bridging the Gap - Strategies to Support Diverse Learners in Early Engineering Courses

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Junior Anthony Bennett, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Karle Flanagan, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Michelle Perry, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Jason W. Morphew, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI); Tiffany Reyes-Denis, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Sourabh Garg, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Logan Hillary Lauren, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Shereen Oca Beilstein; Robb Lindgren, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs Division (FPD)

. 21, no. 2, pp. 247–286, Apr. 2012, https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2011.611446[5] A. B. Hostetter and M. W. Alibali, “Visible embodiment: Gestures as simulated action,” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 495–514, Jun. 2008, https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.3.495[6] D. Abrahamson, “Building educational activities for understanding: An elaboration on the embodied-design framework and its epistemic grounds,” International Journal of Child- Computer Interaction, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–16, Jan. 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2014.07.002[7] M. J. Nathan, “An embodied cognition perspective on symbols, gesture, and grounding instruction,” in Symbols and embodiment: Debates on meaning

Conference Session

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division (TELPhE) Technical Session 1

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Chun Kit Chui, University of Hong Kong; LEI YANG, The University of Hong Kong; Ben Kao, University of Hong Kong

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division (TELPhE)

of this team was toidentify core technical competencies and create learning materials in generative AI for the2,800 undergraduate users of the Inno Wing. Additionally, these pioneering interns undertook Figure 1. The walkthrough hosted in the podcast studio, which has been upgraded with high-performance computing facilities to power the computationally extensive gen-AI software.initiatives to identify and address real-life problems. The experiences, results, and findingsfrom these real-life projects are being shared with the student community through knowledgeexchange workshops and seminars. For the 2023/24 academic year, the team consists of ninestudent interns.To ensure a comprehensive approach, the team actively engaged

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Poster Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michelle Marincel Payne, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

American Society of Civil Engineering Department HeadForum.Table 1. CE Board of Advisors survey questions 1 In your current role, do you have the ability to make hiring decisions? 2 Is it ethical for university engineering faculty to teach technical subject matter to engineering students without professional licensure? Describe below. 3 Is it ethical for university engineering faculty to teach technical subject matter to engineering students without design work experience? Describe below. 4 How do you think design work experience compares to licensure? Describe below. 5 Does the coverage of licensure for faculty in an engineering program/institution impact your perceptions of the engineering program/institution? Describe below. 6 Does the

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Understanding and Improving Female Faculty Experiences in STEM

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yang Lydia Yang, Ph.D., Kansas State University; Doris Wright Carroll Ph.D., Kansas State University

Tagged Topics

ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity, Engineering Deans Council

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Paper ID #14857Understanding Female STEM Faculty Experiences of Subtle Gender Biasfrom Microaggressions PerspectiveYang Lydia Yang, Ph.D., Kansas State University ”Lydia” Yang Yang is Assistant Professor of Quantitative Research Methodology at College of Education, Kansas State University. She received her Ph.D. in Curriculum & Instruction from Florida International University. Her research interest include quantitative research design, recruitment and retention of women in STEM fields, motivation and self-regulated learning.Doris Wright Carroll Ph.D., Kansas State University PhD University of Nebraska-Lincoln, MS

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division (ENT) Technical Session 5: Exploring and Re-Examining Ideas in Engineering Entrepreneurship and Innovation Education

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Azadeh Bolhari P.E., University of Colorado Boulder; Angela R Bielefeldt P.E., University of Colorado Boulder

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division (ENT)

weakeralpha with only 4 items is not unexpected. The innovation interest scale had improved reliabilitywhen the 4th item was removed (Cronbach’s alpha increased to 0.6189 and standardized alpha to0.6145). This was not unexpected to the second author, who perceived the face validity of thisitem to be weak from an environmental engineering perspective. The career goals innovativework scale (CGIW) had good reliability; the reliability metrics were not improved by removingany 1 of the 6 individual items. Table 1 - Internal consistency reliability. Scale # items Cronbach’s Standardized 3 factor model loadings avg alpha alpha (range) Innovation Self- 5

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 8: Academic Progress, Retention, and Mathematics

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yanfen Li, University of Massachusetts Lowell; Na'imah White, University of Massachusetts Lowell; Karoline Evans, University of Massachusetts Lowell; Douglas Correa Ospina, University of Massachusetts Lowell

,” 2021.[3] S. Haag, N. F. Hubele, A. M. García, and K. McBeath, “Engineering undergraduate attrition and contributing factors,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 929–940, 2007.[4] R. Stevens, K. O’Connor, L. Garrison, A. Jocuns, and D. M. Amos, “Becoming an Engineer: Toward a Three Dimensional View of Engineering Learning,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 355–368, 2008, doi: 10.1002/j.2168- 9830.2008.tb00984.x.[5] E. Crede and M. Borrego, “The Effect of International Diversity on Graduate Engineering Education: A Literature Review,” 2010. doi: 10.18260/1-2–15975.[6] M. C. Paretti and L. D. McNair, “Analyzing the intersections of institutional and discourse identities in

Conference Session

NSF Grantees’ Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Chelsea Mann, Arizona State University; Kristen Parrish, Arizona State University; Mikhail Chester, Arizona State University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

management course, Construction Materials, Methods andEquipment (CON252) and an upper-division/graduate cross-disciplinary course between civilengineering course, sustainability, and planning, Urban Infrastructure Anatomy and SustainableDevelopment (CEE 598). CON252 focuses on the building design and construction process,ranging from excavation to material choice to various building systems. CEE 598 focuses oninfrastructure systems from the technical and environmental perspectives and examines theinterdependences between these infrastructures.This poster summarizes the progress and accomplishments of the project during years one andtwo. We review the development of final project assignments for the two courses involved in theproject and discuss how

Conference Session

ECE Division Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yuting W. Chen, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

report, Carnegie Mellon University, 1985.[2] A. T. Chamillard and Kim A. Braun. Evaluating programming ability in an introductory computer science course. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 32(1):212–216, 2000. ISSN 00978418. doi: 10.1145/331795.331857. URL http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=331795.331857.[3] Mary Elaine Califf and Mary Goodwin. Testing Skills and Knowledge: Introducing a Laboratory Exam in CSl. In Proceedings of the 33rd ACM technical symposium on Computer science education - SIGCSE ’02, page 217, 2002.[4] Karla Steinbrugge Fant, Branimir Pejcinovic, and Phillip Wong. Exploring Proficiency Testing of Programming Skills in Lower-division Com- puter Science and Electrical Engineering Courses. In ASEE Annual Conference

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 7: Teamwork, Reflection, and Wellness

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Constantine Mukasa, Northeastern University

: A Protocol for Peer Evaluation of Individual Contributions," Journal of Management Education, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 570-591, 2006/08/01 2006, doi: 10.1177/1052562906286713.[7] D. D. Gransberg, "Quantifying the Impact of Peer Evaluations on Student Team Project Grading," International Journal of Construction Education and Research, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 3-17, 2010/03/05 2010, doi: 10.1080/15578771003590326.[8] V. Braun and V. Clarke, Successful Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide for Beginners. SAGE Publications, 2013.[9] J. Saldana, The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. SAGE Publications, 2015.[10] M. Williams and T. Moser, "The Art of Coding and Thematic Exploration in Qualitative