Paper ID #22790Design of an International Bridge Program for Engineering CalculusDr. Sandra B Nite, Texas A&M University Sandra Nite, Ph.D., is a Research Scientist in the Department of Mathematics at Texas A&M University, where she has taught 10 different courses in mathematics and mathematics education. She has served on several committees in the mathematics department, including course development for teacher education in mathematics. Her research agenda includes engineering calculus success, including high school prepa- ration for college. Previously, she taught 8 additional courses at the college level and
Education Innovation Center The Ohio State Univer- sity Columbus, OH 43210 Rogers.693@osu.edu Rogers joined the university in October, 2008 bringing with him 35 years of industrial experience. His career includes senior leadership roles in engineering, sales, and manufacturing in robotics, electron- ics, sensors, and controls industries. Throughout his career, Rogers has developed products using an innovative process consisting of multidisciplinary teams focused on understanding customer needs and converting them to commercially viable products and services. He brings this experience to the university where he leads the effort in developing company-sponsored, product-oriented Capstone design programs. As part of the
project, are oftena part of a curriculum plan to satisfy the ABET educational outcomes. The ABET ‘a through k’educational outcomes are divided into the technical skills and the professional skills. In Table 3,items a.,b.,c.,e.,k. comprise the technical skills and items d.,f.,g.,h.,i.,j. are the ‘soft’ orprofessional skills.Engineering education has historically focused on the technical skills with adjustments andrefinements to curricula to ensure the proper and current technical content of coursework.Recent work as described in Shuman et.al.8 has provided perspective on the importance of theprofessional skills and the growing demand for these skills in the industrial workplace. Inaddition to providing a good environment for technical skills
manufacturing disciplines stronglyencouraged taking a second language. Further discussion appeared to indicate that of all thedisciplines, commercial piloting tended to has the most restricted interaction with personnellocated at international stations. This may account for the opinions expressed.The ATIAC strongly endorsed development of aviation specific study abroad opportunities andinternational internships. Industrial members agreed to provide contact information at theirinternational locations for the visitation teams. Page 6.524.2 Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition
Fidan, Tennessee Tech University Dr. Ismail Fidan is an Associate Professor in the Manufacturing and Industrial Technology Department, College of Engineering, Tennessee Tech University, Cookeville, TN. Dr. Fidan received his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in 1996. His teaching and research interests are in computer-integrated design and manufacturing, electronics manufacturing, rapid prototyping, e-manufacturing, online teaching, and manufacturing processes. Page 11.209.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Overview of an
Society for Engineering Education Session 2209design experiences for freshmen (2). These freshmen experiences have been set-up tomotivate students early in the curriculum, and to introduce students to engineering skills.At MSOE the faculty have incorporated design throughout the biomedical engineeringcurriculum to allow the students to develop their design competence as they maturetechnically and to allow them to experience design in a more realistic fashion. Becausethe students are learning in design lecture about design, they apply many of thecomponents of the Kolb cycle as they relate to their specific project (3).Eight years ago we started the freshmen to senior
learning outcomes, including retention, persistence and completion, and • close performance gaps.“When I Am in the ITLP, I Feel Like an Engineer.” (Student)In our 34,000 square feet of lab space, the ITLP team of full-time engineers, manufacturingspecialists, and student staff offers approximately 1,000 skill-building workshops each year toover 8,000 non-unique participants. The workshops span over 20 unique topics related toprototyping, manufacturing, mechanical and electronic CAD, materials testing, and electronics.Every year, the team supports over 3,000 unique students, 50 courses, and 150 sections of thosecourses across ten departments and programs. Through carefully designed curriculum andcurated resources, we offer lab modules and skill
completing testing.Aerospace engineering students specialize in either aircraft design or spacecraft design. Therecently formed ME degree program is also tailored to have an aerospace flavor, and the seniordesign specializations are air-breathing propulsion and robotics. Proceedings of the 2010 American Society for Engineering Education Zone IV Conference Copyright © 2010, American Society for Engineering Education 314A 20,000 square foot manufacturing and laboratory facility was completed and opened in May20063, and is dedicated solely to the AE and ME degree programs. This facility more thandoubles the existing
outcomes that programs must demonstrate their students attain, the following 7 have a professional component to them [8]: (c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability (d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary team (f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility (g) an ability to communicate effectively (h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context (i) a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning (j
AC 2012-3216: A PRACTICAL AND COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH OFASSESSING ABET OUTCOME ACHIEVEMENT IN COMPUTER SCI-ENCE AND COMPUTER ENGINEERINGDr. David Wilczynski, University of Southern California David Wilczynski has a long history at USC. He was the first Ph.D. graduate from theUSC Information Science Institute in 1975, where some of the initial work on Arpanet was done. His research specialty at the time was in knowledge representation. In 1984, he left USC for almost 20 years to be an entrepreneur. Most of his work was in manufacturing, both in Detroit and Japan. During that time, he worked on programming real-time systems using an agent methodology, which he now teaches in his CSCI 201 class. He returned to USC in
students of both departments, and is open to graduate students. Developmentof this course and enrollments of the course by students previously exposed to the teamingexercise were used to evaluate the impact of the teaming exercise on the curriculum and onstudent motivation.Results and DiscussionSuggestions for Reducing Environmental Risks by Students in CE 587The majority of the suggestions provided by students in CE 587 to students in MATE 232 wererelated to identifying and adopting green methods for manufacturing silver nanomaterials. Greensynthesis methods have several advantages, which include using environmentally friendlyreactants and avoiding the formation of harmful byproducts. Additional suggestions were related
training (nurture). Wong et al. developed Wong’s Emotional Intelligence Scale (WEIS),which found that “incremental validity,” exists between the subject’s emotional intelligence andsales performance.4 Murray and Robinson discuss the need for comprehensive sales training andpresent a study detailing “personal development and enterprise skills” which are required in salesversus “traditional academic skills.”5 Murray and Robinson also note the importance ofintegrating sales training earlier in university curriculum, which has been done with theTechnical Sales for Engineers I course. Our study uses this previous work as a foundation tostudy students’ perceptions of sales skills in the results and discussion sections.Research MethodsIndustrial
generated. At the top of the reality chart would becourses which address the myriad of stakeholders one finds in industry, such as the FDA, U/L,end-users, manufacturing, service, financial, legal, etc.Real-world experience and exposure can be achieved through a number of mechanisms includingdesign courses, computer simulation, laboratory experiments, guest speakers, industrialsponsorship of design projects, field trips to hospitals and medical industry, internships andcooperative education. In this paper, we describe the mechanisms currently being used inbiomedical engineering curricula to create real-world experience and suggest future directionsfor incorporating the real-world into undergraduate curricula.II. Real World SkillsWhen incorporating
. Her primary research foci include graduate student and faculty development, graduate well-being, asset-based approaches to engineering education, and mentorship of women in STEM. Her background is in advanced manufacturing and design. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 WIP: Chemical Engineering Faculty Attitudes towards Evidence Based Instruction Practices and Growth MindsetJennifer S. Brown, Karen High, Mechteld V. Hillsley, Michael J. Janik, Stephanie B. VelegolIntroductionIn the Chemical Engineering (CHE) department at a large public R1 university, we are workingon changing the climate and culture of our department through a multipronged approachinvolving
, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability (d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams (e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems (g) an ability to communicate effectively (h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context (k) an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice An ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineeringEven more specifically, Criterion 5 Curriculum states (p. 4) “Students must be prepared forengineering practice through a curriculum culminating in a major design experience
, Industrial Engineering Technology, and AutomationRobotics curriculum into the Manufacturing Technology Degree Program. Currently, allengineering technology programs at the college are under review, due to low enrollment, with theprospect of further combining of the programs being a real possibility.Initially all of the degree programs had their own respective orientation classes. These classes hadreal merit in that they were quite focused, and allowed the individual programs to provide trainingwithin these courses in subjects which the students would later need. These courses did, however,have some shortfalls in areas which today are becoming more and more important. For example, ageneral overview of the entire engineering technology area was not
typically depends more heavily on the fiber/matrix bond than strength in the transverse direction.Q12 (T/F) The Halpin-Tsai model is an empirical fit to experimental data and not based on a first- principles derivation of material behavior.Q13 (T/F) It is possible to construct a quasi-isotropic laminate from orthotropic laminae.Table 3: Pre- and posttest questions related to student confidence in applying and understanding the coursematerial.Q14 I can select an appropriate composite material, fiber geometry, and manufacturing technique to meet specified design requirements.Q15 I feel confident discussing composite material behavior with my peers.Q15 I feel
Michigan State University. Dr. Briedis has been involved in several areas of education research includ- ing student retention, curriculum redesign, and the use of technology in the classroom. She is a co-PI on two NSF grants in the areas of integration of computation in engineering curricula and in developing comprehensive strategies to retain early engineering students. She is active nationally and internationally in engineering accreditation and is a Fellow of ABET.Dr. Neeraj Buch, Michigan State UniversityThomas F. Wolff, Michigan State University Dr. Thomas F. Wolff is Associate Dean of Engineering for Undergraduate Studies at Michigan State University. In this capacity, he is responsible for all activities related to
mandatory workshop for my people. Allthe hosts were very kind and patient. Very good exposure to engineering. Very gooddiscussions about the art and science of teaching engineering or anything for that matter.”“I really appreciate the focus on project based learning. The Parallax microcomputer onboardwith CD and text is an excellent curriculum to teach digital circuits, robotics and electronics.This was the best workshop I have seen in years for technology education.”“Too many short hands-on workshops are not as useful as fewer more in depth workshops.More emphasis on secondary classroom friendly labs. What we did (lab) today might make agood field trip for students (high school).Establish “pre-approved” “Continuing education” credit with area
application in construction. My research has been published in several peer reviewed journals and presented at international conferences. I am the recipient of many awards like "NKU Faculty Summer Fellowship" in 2019,2020, 2021 and 2022, “Robberson Summer Research and Creative Activity Fellowship” in 2017, “Calvin & Marilyn Vogt Endowed Scholarship” in 2016, “Outstanding Teaching Performance Award” in 2014 & 2015, and “Creativity, Innovation and Entrepreneurship (CIE) Scholarship” in 2014.Mahdi Yazdanpour (Dr.)Sean P. Foley (Northern Kentucky University) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com
manufacturing systems; computer-aided design methodology; and engineering education. His work has been published in the International Journal of Production Economics, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, and the Journal of Engineering Design.Mrs. Elif Ozturk, Texas A&M UniversityJoshua Johnson, Prairie View A&M University Teaching AssistantDr. Bugrahan Yalvac, Texas A&M University Bugrahan Yalvac is an Assistant Professor of science education in the Department of Teaching, Learning, and Culture at Texas A&M University, College Station. He received his Ph.D. in science education at the Pennsylvania State University in 2005. Prior to his current position, he worked as a learning scientist for the VaNTH
Promote Multidisciplinary Skills in a Freshman Engineering ProgramIntroduction This paper addresses the lack of student interest in topics outside of their discipline; thisis even true for some students in all courses regardless of topic. However, all topics, especiallyfundamental ones are important in an engineering education because engineers are facingincreasingly complex challenges and opportunities; consequently, collaboration betweenengineers of multiple disciplines becomes very important. ABET goes as far as to list “an abilityto function on multidisciplinary teams” as a required student outcome for an undergraduateengineering program to be accredited. Engineering curriculums are somewhat designed toaddress
American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2001, American Society for Engineering Education discussions with ABET and/or attendance at one or more annual meetings, such as EAC Day.5. Curriculum. Curriculum must be developed to reflect the program philosophy and mission. Two essential ingredients are (i) a thorough process of “benchmarking” with similar programs at other institutions, and (ii) close interaction with industrial constituencies.6. Student Recruitment. The challenge of recruiting students to a program that exists only on paper requires a great deal of inventiveness, individual hard work, and help from the institution, particularly the Office of
advanced human-machine systems, usability evaluation of everyday products and services, and research in multimodal systems and virtual environments. His current research interests include virtual reality applications in manufacturing, multimodal interaction design, audio interfaces, advanced usability evaluation techniques, simulating complex human-machine systems, and advanced application of statistical techniques. Dr. Ahmad is a Certified Simulation Analyst and a Certified Six Sigma Black Belt.Miss Jerie Pedescleaux, Northwestern State University Industrial Engineering Technology Graduate of Northwestern State University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017
Electricity Generation, a second semester freshmantutorial course in the Plan II honors program at the University of Texas at Austin. This coursefocuses on the impact of technological development and is one of several "substantial writingcomponent" courses in the curriculum. Students in the Plan II program are purposefully chosenfrom a wide range of degree programs in Natural Sciences, Engineering, Social Sciences, LiberalArts, Public Policy, Languages and Performance Arts. The classes are intentionally composed ofmixed majors to provide a broad perspective in the discussions. I found the style of teachingrequired a refreshing change from my usual classroom experience. The standard engineeringlecture format is, of necessity, used very sparingly
circuitry, and excellent software development tools (Code Composer Studio) thatinclude an optimizing C compiler, debugger, assembler, and linker. This meets our criteria oflow cost, sufficient processing power, ample memory, and a versatile software developmentenvironment. Furthermore, while other companies such as Analog Devices and Motorolaalso manufacture DSP microprocessors, we have been unable over the years to elicit interestfrom any other company in the educational segment; only TI has consistently demonstratedsuch interest. See reference [19] for details on this DSK, and see reference [20] for moreinformation on TI DSP products and support in general.Unfortunately, to keep costs down, the native codec on the C6711 DSK board is the
Carolina University requiresinterdisciplinary integration of electrical, mechanical, and systems topics. Thisintegration demands creative pedagogy to ensure coverage of necessary content withinlimited time. With a brief introduction of the features of the newly-built program, thispaper describes methodology required by the curriculum structure. It then presents anefficient method to deliver electrical engineering subjects with two examples.Preliminary results of this initial work are further discussed.MotivationBenjamin Franklin’s famous saying ─ Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember.Involve me and I learn ─ suggests ways educators should deliver knowledge to theirstudents. This is particularly true for the new general engineering program
education, engineering predictive assessment models that support students’ learning, classroom management techniques, and best teaching practices. Dr. Akintewe’s teaching, mentoring, and academic efforts have received recognition, including the 2022 Women in Leadership & Philanthropy, Kathleen Moore Faculty Excellence award, the 2021 USF STEER teaching scholars award, and the USF BMES chapter Faculty of the year award. Her mission is to teach, mentor and coach the next generation of students that succeed in STEM fields while promoting learning, diversity, and leadership.Jamie Chilton (Instructor I) Jamie Chilton is an Assistant Professor of Instruction in the Department of Industrial and Management Systems
from a wide variety ofuniversities, including those without PhD programs. This was of great value for several studentmembers, including three of the authors, who were searching and found positions at these types ofinstitutions, which focus on undergraduate education. Attending presentations at conferencesgave the student members the chance to see techniques that other engineering educators aretrying. Several members have written and presented their own papers at conferences as part oftheir commitment to engineering education.Another significant benefit for the members was participation in the chapter events, such as paneldiscussions and teaching workshops. Topics for panel discussions included finding an academicjob, curriculum vitas, proposal
Higher Education as the Senior Project Associate under Project Directors Lisa R. Lattuca and Patrick T. Terenzini on two NSF-funded stud- ies of engineering education: Prototype to Production and Prototyping the Engineer of 2020. She also worked with colleagues Lisa Lattuca, Patrick Terenzini, and J. Fredericks Volkwein on the Engineering Change study, a national study of the impact of engineering accreditation standards on student learning and engineering programs. Betty completed her Ph.D. in Higher Education at Penn State with a minor in Educational Psychology and graduate certificate in Institutional Research in May 2008. She was the recipient of graduate fellowships from both the Joseph M. Juran Center for