Huong is the Quality Assurance Coordinator for Arizona State University’s Representative Office in Viet Nam. In this position, she provides technical expertise and assists with a variety of Higher Education qual- ity initiatives in Vietnam. These initiatives include Vocational University Leadership Innovation Institute (VULII), Building University-Industry Learning and Development Through Innovation and Technology (BUILD-IT) and Higher Engineering Education Alliance Program (HEEAP). She also acts as a resource to various Vietnamese institutional quality assurance teams as they work to improve their quality as- surance processes, implement continuous improvement systems and seek international recognition and
mechanical engineering students. In Concordia University, he has offered courses in Quality and Systems Engineer- ing for graduate students with different engineering backgrounds. In University of Calgary, Dr. Li is one instructor of the final-year design course and offers a new technical elective ”Design for Sustainabil- ity”. Currently, he is the capstone design instructor in the Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Assessing the Efficacy of Supplemental Online Lecture Modules in a Core Mechanical Engineering Undergraduate CourseAbstractIn this paper, we report on a study performed in a core, 2nd year mechanical
and social cultures among the various STEM disciplines will undermine a ‘onesize fits all’ retention plan. Based upon departmental needs analyses and published research onpossible ‘fits’ from successful STEM initiatives at other institutions, we designed PRIMES toblend two general strands that would support these anticipated outcomes: 1. Transform Teaching and Learning: Improved retention as a result of expanding our undergraduate teaching assistance (UTA) programs and institutionalizing a formal UTA training pedagogy. A working knowledge in best practices will enable them to be both effective and engaging in the laboratory and/or classroom. 2. Increase Faculty and Student Interactions: Improved retention as a
Page 26.710.9factors that the team was missing and not considering. A great learning experience, without a doubt. The technical adviser benefited from the experience as well because the project gives awindow of opportunity to showcase the universality of the technical concepts covered in theclassroom. And finally, the project benefited the sponsor by getting a needed piece of equipmentat an affordable price.In conclusion, this type of projects are a win-win-win situation that do lend themselves for manyother uses in academics. Students have the satisfaction of producing results in a morechallenging situation, even the faculty member proposing the project was not sure if the projectwill generate enough interest and students will bid on it. Most
& Business Development Professionals to Create Globally Competent Engineers via On- and Off-Campus ActivitiesAbstractEfforts to scale curricular and co-curricular experiences designed to foster globally competentengineers sit at an important crossroads. Education for global competency, along with thedevelopment of other “professional” or “soft” skills, is an important part of the formation of 21stcentury engineers. There is broad agreement that, “US engineers [of 2020] will face totallydifferent problems from the ones we face today” and “will have to be open to different religions,different ways of thinking, and different social values.”1 However, consensus does not existregarding how to cultivate globally
to develop global competencies has become apressing necessity for engineering programs given the highly global nature of engineering workthat requires the ability to work productively with other cultures. Study abroad programs, virtualglobal courses, and courses and modules focused on engineering for a global society, are allpedagogical approaches to improving engineering students’ global competencies. Although theseformal education approaches can be highly effective, they are not always accessible to a widepopulation of students and largely engage students for only a single and short portion ofstudents’ academic experiences.1 Increasingly, extracurricular activities, such as EWB, haveemerged as another an alternative that offer students an
focused coding established emergentcategories related to students’ definition of belonging and additional theoretical coding narrowedto key, shared themes from students. This study was approved by our Institutional ReviewBoard.Table 1: Participants and identities Low First Pseudonym Race (Self Description) Gender income* Generation Alexus Indian American (subcontinent) Woman N N Aziz White Woman N N Breonna Caucasian Woman N Y Camila
actions (student activities to improve learning without any evaluation grades,namely, 1.Student support; 2.Technical Staff; 3.Video classes, and 4. Teaching service) anddirect learning actions (student activities to improve learning with evaluation grade, namely, 5.Online exercises; 6. Pre-Exam; 7. Laboratory reports; 8. Active Learning Projects; 9. LaboratorySeminars, and 10. Preparatory Discussion Laboratory Questions).Keywords: Physics, Engineering Education, Active LearningIntroductionLearning is a process. The assessment of learning is a powerful diagnosis that allows teachers toredirect their efforts towards assisting the weaknesses of the learning process as presented bystudents. This paper discusses 10 ways to improve learning Physics as
hours of training in academic coaching to become a certified Affiliate Coach with LifeBound, Inc. with a specialized focus in serving Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) populations nationwide. Additionally, she has facilitated numerous national workshops on academic coaching which have been well received by a variety of audiences, including undergraduate and graduate students, fac- ulty and staff in higher education, and corporate representatives. In addition to leading these engaging sessions, Dr. Groh integrates coaching into WIEP programming, student mentoring, and her personal life.Darshini Render, Purdue University, West Lafayette Darshini Render is an Assistant Director for Student Success in the
research summarized byBressoud, et. al.3Boise State University’s efforts have been successful because we identified and capitalized ontwo important sources of momentum: 1) efforts to reframe calculus content and 2) facultydevelopment supporting calculus instructors. In 2010 we were awarded a National ScienceFoundation Science Talent Expansion Program grant, specifically aimed at increasing STEMgraduates by improving first-time, full-time student retention. One of the elements of the projectwas the support of three, year-long, STEM-specific faculty learning communities (FLCs) (e.g.see Cox, 2001).4 Based on interest from numerous math faculty, coupled with Calculus Ileadership by one of the co-PIs on the grant, the latter two FLCs became exclusively
objectives. The project is now in its fifth semester and has reached a steady state wherethe reformed practices are normative within the subset of instructors who might be called upon toteach Calculus I. Gains from the project include a rise in the pass rate in Calculus I, greaterstudent engagement, greater instructor satisfaction, a general shift toward active learningpedagogies, and the emergence of a strong collaborative teaching community.Project leaders are seeking to expand these gains to other areas of the curriculum and to broadenthe community of instructors who are fully accepting of the reforms. Common concernsexpressed by faculty resistant to the overhaul include suspicion that pass rate gains might reflectgrade inflation or weakened
literacies on the part ofemployees and employers. The use of communication technology can be found among thefour ‘mega trends’ that Shuman et al.[1] specifically identify for the field of engineering,alongside changes forced by the fragile world economy, student and professional mobility,and the increasingly loud voice of the social imperative. This poses challenges foreducational institutions which, beyond helping students become subject experts, need to takethe responsibility for preparing them to ‘deal with global communicative practices online, inall their complexity’[2]. This trend toward developing skills needed to fully operate in highlyglobalised and cross-cultural settings as a necessary top-up to ‘technical core competencies’[3]has become
content and tothe learning processes. These include ideas of using public shared videos, technical contents andstudent generated material that can be posted online. When these resources are integrated inclassroom sessions, the sessions become interactive and hence enriching. Universities needfaculty development model that assists professors in understanding technology as a tool forconnecting curriculum content to the learning processes.4.0 Educating Socially Competent and Responsible EngineersEngineering is not only a craft of using logical models to solve technical problems but engineersalso make use of their assumptions for what may or may not be of value within the social circlesin relation to which they contrive their solutions and carry out
number, such as the one on CulturalStereotypes and Generalizations or the one on Cross-Cultural Miscommunication, could be takenboth before and after the trip. These seminars, with the exception of a one-credit course duringtravel, are one-time, for two hours, but the office is planning to offer a full wrap-around coursewith 1-credit each before, during, and after travel. The course will conclude with a reflectivepaper integrating the seminars and their experience abroad. Related to the CORE seminars, theInternational Studies Office has created a returnee conference and global fête at which studentscan present a “creative expression of the meaning of cross-cultural experiences in their lives.”28Within the School of Engineering and Applied
interact with a projectmanager are important skills in many computing professions. The integration into the computerscience and software engineering curricula of opportunities for students to learn and exercisethese skills, however, could be challenging due to various logistical reasons. The work describedin this paper evaluates a newly established collaboration between an undergraduate softwareengineering course on software project management and an undergraduate computer sciencecourse on software development in terms of student learning and experience. The contributions ofthis work are a methodology for evaluating such collaborations and some lessons learned fromapplying this methodology for one semester.1 IntroductionThe ability to manage
extraordinary experience we now have a group of young leaders that can make an impactin the sustainability of our world.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to acknowledge the generous funding from the 100,000 Strong in theAmericas Innovation Fund under Competition #4, the US Department of Agriculture, UTEP’sStudy Abroad Office and College of Engineering, CETYS System and Ensenada Campus, all thestudents that participated in the Peru and Ensenada study abroad programs and the followingproject clients in Ensenada: Clos de 3 Cantos, Chateau Camou, Paralelo, and the San AntonioNecua Kumiai community.References 1. Rosales, V. (2013). New York Times article. “More Students Should Do It” by Violeta Rosales. October 17, 2013. 2. Berdan, S
undergraduate science research into our institute's curriculum issupported by a significant amount of research into the impact of such activities on scholarlyachievement in a number of fields. David Lopatto has published extensively on the positiveimpact of undergraduate research on academic programs. [1-5] Undergraduate research is shownin these publications to be key to producing engaged scientists for the future. Hinkel and Henke[6] show explicitly the positive impact participation in undergraduate programs has on futurestudent achievement and employment. In light of this information it is almost unforgivable not tooffer these opportunities to students who are willing to avail themselves of them.Science research courses give students the opportunity
groupsof three, they took pictures of their whiteboards, and all pictures were stored in a repository for all(students, instructors and researchers) to review. When students worked individually, instructorsassessed their learning based on their written solutions. The analysis of the whiteboards confirmedthat at the beginning of the semester students used few representations, whereas by the end of itthey were incorporating congruently more than ten different representations, making their modelsmore robust.1. IntroductionIn the past four years, a special course has been taught in a private university in northern Mexico.While this is not the first course that has attempted to integrate two different subjects, even withinthe same university where this
assessment and evaluation of engi- neering education research projects and initiatives. She has most recently worked for Walgreens as a Sr. Data Analyst and General Motors/Delphi Automotive as a Sr. Applications Programmer and Manufactur- ing Quality Engineer. She received her PhD in Industrial Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh and her MS in Mechanical Engineering from Case Western while working for Delphi. She completed her postdoctoral studies in engineering education at the University of Pittsburgh. Dr. Clark has published articles in the Journal of Engineering Education, Advances in Engineering Education, and Risk Analysis.Scott Streiner, University of Pittsburgh Scott C. Streiner is a full-time
given information, what is to be found orsolved, which equations to use, diagram the problem, and then determine the solution. In Frenchengineering, a problem is typically solved from first principles20.Following the German approach of methodological principle of design, the general requirementsfor the task are that it must be a challenging, complex, and an open-ended, real-life problem,which requires specialization and division of labor within the group. The task has to be within anengineering and technical subject with no standard solution, have multiple possible concepts andsolutions that conflict between time, available resources, and completion within the giventimeframe so that the team has to make decisions regarding which features to
country of Taiwan.Theme 1: culture shockEach of the 21 students discussed some aspect of culture shock in the reflection paper. The keyissues were differences in Taiwanese society and differences among students from differentcountries. Below are some excerpts from the reflection papers relating to culture shock. From my observations, I was generally impressed by how highly developed Taiwan is as a country. On our nighttime ride from the airport to CYCU, I noticed that the text on almost Page 26.820.6 each street sign not only had a perfect English translation but was also lit with individual LEDs, outlining the lettering on the signs. The
(U.S.) for the Nakatani RIES: Research & International Experience for Students Fellowship which connects undergraduates with the best of science & engineering research in the U.S. or Japan. The program serves as a catalyst for U.S. & Japanese students interested in future graduate study and research and contributes to the development of a generation of globally-engaged scientists & engineers who have the technical and culture skills to contribute to vibrant international re- search collaborations in the future. The Nakatani RIES Program is organized by the Nakatani Foundation and is implemented by the Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering at Rice University. She previously served as the
engineeringrealities. Building low cost robots that schools can afford would ensure access, availability andfoster mainstream instruction with robots that would prepare our next generation in math andengineering principles.This latest paper is focused on the final phase of engineering research, to build in precision inrobots so the distances traversed and angled turned are mathematically exact. Problem solvingcan be significantly supplemented with robotics, even if a robot is imprecise, goals that are wellappreciated by high school students who are in a pre-engineering program. However, it is alsoessential to make the robot a tool for teaching math to all students, so interest in math and
Shore graduating in Spring 2015. He enjoys the technical aspect of putting a system together to solve engineering problems. When he graduates he hopes to work for a research company as a systems engineer.Mr. Ayokunle Adeyemi Akangbe A, University of Maryland Eastern Shore I was born and raised in Nigeria, but came to the United States when I was twelve years old. I am currently a Sophomore at the University of Maryland Eastern Shore majoring in Mechanical Engineering. After obtaining my bachelor’s degree, I plan on getting my Master’s degree in Mechanical Engineering Page 26.720.1
explained: “I knew I wanted to do batteries. I know that’s what I want to pursue in grad school, that’s the goal I wanted to do for a very long time so getting that kind of experience here has been good because, I’ve learned a lot about the whole process in general and about how they work and all that stuff. Getting actual tactile experience and not just reading about it anymore was good.” Though their lab activities, participants developed laboratory skills that they found bothrewarding and valuable to their development as researchers. For Participant 1, this involved“Using really careful, cautious techniques, just improving fine motor skills in that sense.” Goingbeyond just the development of skills, many
is shown in Fig. 1-3 with the square-waveoutput of a function generator to drive the circuit.” This set-up had no relevance to the author.What is this circuit? When had he seen one in real life? Is he likely to be using a functiongenerator any time soon other than in lab experiments? If so, then how? If not, what in realitydoes it stand in for? Earlier in the manual, there was a clear presentation of the mathematicalmodel for the circuit, culminating (through the solution of a differential equation) in expressionsfor the voltage on the capacitor under different values of resistance. The description even startsto link to real systems, pointing out that the critically damped case “is frequently a desirableproperty, especially in mechanical
. The program includes sustainability emphasis that attempts toengage students with the awareness of how and why a diversity of values, viewpoints, andactions might assist them in developing into flexible, creative practitioners, with the capacity toenact sustainability in a diverse array of future professional contexts4. Additionally, the programincludes many opportunities for experiential education in the form of labs and hands-on projects.We consider a Madison Engineer to be alumni that successfully combine these attributes.ENGR 314: Materials and MechanicsMaterials & Mechanics is a four credit hour lecture/laboratory core (required) course within theMadison Engineering curriculum. ENGR 314 is generally taken in the junior year and
balanced; manual balancing valves must be set to flow more than is reallyrequired to offset the piping heat losses. This inevitably leads to oversizing the recirculation Page 26.972.2pumps which increase installation and operating costs. The flow velocities are then higher thannecessary, often leading to flow induced erosion of the piping which eventually results in waterleaks and high repair and replacement costs [1-6].Domestic hot water recirculation and keeping consistent hot water temperature at the sinks andbath tubs are important, especially in the buildings there is a colder climate. If the temperature ofthe hot water keeps dropping, the
between student and teaching assistantperceptions or between subgroups of students.MethodsA mixed methods survey was implemented with 12 Likert scale questions paired with a freeresponse portion (Appendix A). The study was designed using a concurrent triangulationstrategy (Fig. 1) as described in Creswell (2012)15 because it was anticipated that quantitativeresults would need to be corroborated and expanded by qualitative responses. Quantitative Qualitative Quantitative Qualitative Data Collection Data Collection Quantitative Qualitative Data Analysis
mentioned, since Materials is a required course, the objectives listed above had to bemet without compromising the learning outcomes already established for the Materials course.The Biomaterial focus section of the course was modified in several specific ways. One majorchange made to this section was the Course Schedule. The course schedule was adjusted toaccommodate some additional topics that are not generally covered in the traditional Materialscourse, but were highly relevant to the Biomaterial focused section. Among these includeEthical and Legal Issues, Wound Healing, Corrosion Basics, Failure Analysis and BiomedicalApplications of Materials as shown in Table 1. As a result of this, the laboratory activities didnot match up as well with what