Paper ID #42656Student-Tool Interactions from a Conceptually Challenging Adaptive LearningModule for Materials ScienceNutnicha Nigon, Oregon State University Nutnicha (Kate) Nigon recently graduated with a Ph.D. in Materials Science in the School of Mechanical, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering and a minor in Education at Oregon State University, USA. She received B.Eng. and M.Eng. in Metallurgical and Materials Engineering from Chulalongkorn University, Thailand.Prof. Julie Tucker, Oregon State University Dr. Tucker earned her Ph.D. in Nuclear Engineering at the University of Wisconsin – Madison. After
participants related to their roles as education leaders, curriculum developers, andassessment designers; (c) establishing academic year follow-up mechanisms includingInstructional Coaching, Quarterly Team Meetings to meet program requirements on a timelybasis, and Cross Classroom Collaboration to ensure implementation of newly developedcurriculum modules; (d) disseminating findings to other regional educators through the annualCMU High-Impact Teaching Symposium, as well as publications in conferences and journals;(e) the annual CMU STEM Day outreach event to engage secondary school students in STEMdisciplines.2. Program Orientation and ScheduleParticipant recruitment and program efforts started right after receipt of the RET site awardnotification
STEM education, 21st century skills, and design and evaluation of learning environments informed by the How People Learn framework. His research has being supported by NSF, IES, and NIH.Dr. Mathew Kuttolamadom, Texas A&M University Dr. Mathew Kuttolamadom is an associate professor in the Department of Engineering Technology & In- dustrial Distribution and the Department of Materials Science & Engineering at Texas A&M University. He received his Ph.D. in Materials Science & Engineering from Clemson University’s Int’l Center for Au- tomotive Research. His professional experience is in the automotive industry including at the Ford Motor Company. At TAMU, he teaches Mechanics, Manufacturing and
alsodeveloped. Overall, the systems developed were shown to be successful in exposing students toethics and improving their knowledge on ethical decision making. To integrate ethics modulesmore thoroughly across the engineering curriculum a systematic approach is required with properaccounting of teaching load for ethics/philosophy faculty who lecture in multiple courses. Forefficiency, an ethics case-study database with assignment/discussion questions should bemaintained, and an online module could be explored with in-class facilitated discussion.References1. Zandvoort, H., van de Poel, I., Brumsen, M., Ethics in the engineering curricula: Topics, trends and challenges for the future. European Journal of Engineering Education, 2000. 25(4): p. 291
faculty development, developing integrated course sequences, and methods for involving students in curriculum development and teaching through Peer Designed Instruction. Dr. Kendall's scholarship emphasizes the professional formation of engineers, specifically through the development and application of the Contextual Engineering Leadership Development framework. Bringing together her work in engineering leadership development, curriculum design, and collaborative design, her current focus is on developing engineering instructional faculty as leaders of educational change at Hispanic-Serving Institutions. Dr. Kendall is the Division Chair of the Engineering Leadership Development (LEAD) Division of the American Society of
seven Information Technology textbooks, over 100 peer reviewed journal articles and conference papers, and she gave numerous presen- tations at national and international professional events in USA, Canada, England, France, Italy, Portugal, Spain, Germany and Romania. She is the founder director of the Auburn University Educational and Assistive Technology Laboratory (LEAT), Co-PI of NSF EEC ”RFE Design and Development: Framing Engineering as Community Activism for Values-Driven Engineeringan”, Co-PI of NSF CISE ”EAGER: An Accessible Coding Curriculum for Engaging Underserved Students with Special Needs in Afterschool Programs”, institutional partner of AccessComputing (http://www.washington.edu/accesscomputing/), Ac
fundamentals.References1. Materials Science and Engineering for the 1990’s: Maintaining Competitiveness in the Age of Materials,National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, D. C., 1989, p. 3.2. Report on the National Science Foundation Undergraduate Curriculum Workshop in Materials, Divisionof Materials Research, National Science Foundation, October 11-13, 1989.3. Materials Science and Engineering for the 1990’s: Maintaining Competitiveness in the Age of Materials,National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, D. C., 1989, p. 11.4 . Ercolano, V . , “Seeing is Achieving,” ASEE Prism, American Society for Engineering Education,December, 1995, pp. 29-31.5. Hawkins, S., Coney, M. B., Bystrom, K. E., “Incidental Writing in the
Society for Engineering Education, 2024 An Independent Study Course for a Multi-Rotor Design and an Endurance RecordThis paper presents a student-led initiative to extend the flight endurance of multi-rotoraircraft, guided by a team of instructors. This venture stands distinctly as it targets surpassingthe existing world record for flight time in small multi-rotor autonomous aircraft. Theinvestigative approach involved an analysis of the current record-holder's design, focusing onpotential improvements in battery technology, motor efficiency, structural design, and rotorblade aerodynamics. Amidst a rapidly evolving drone technology landscape, this endeavor holdspromise. The narrative highlights
from 2008-2009, President-Elect 2010-11, and President for 2012-2013. Dr. Schulz is a member of Eta Kappa Nu (Electrical Engineering Honorary Society), Tau Beta Pi (Engineering Honor Society), the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), the Society of Women Engineers and the National Society of Black Engineers.Mrs. Blythe A Vogt PE, Kansas State University Blythe Vogt is a senior industry advisor and Ph.D. researcher on this project. She received her B.S. in Architectural Engineering from Kansas State University in 2001 and completed her M.S. in Architectural Engineering from Kansas State University in 2010 related to Curriculum Development in Architectural Engineering and Construction. Mrs. Vogt is
Session 1368 Combining Laboratory Innovation and a Design Experience into Tools for Mechanics Jennifer Kadlowec, Frank Brown, Aditya Chaubal, Joe Plitz, Michael Resciniti, Paris von Lockette, Eric Constans, Beena Sukumaran, Douglas Cleary Rowan University, Glassboro, NJ 08028AbstractHands-on laboratories and the engineering design process are valuable experiences by which toenhance undergraduate engineering education. This paper discusses the integration of an NSFsponsored Course, Curriculum and Laboratory Innovation project, the
land to the State of Arizona. Currently the ASU East Campusconsists of three colleges. The College Technology and Applied Science has programs inAeronautical Management Technology, Information and Management Technology,Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering Technology, Electronics and ComputerEngineering Technology, and Computing Studies. The College of Agribusiness hasprograms in Professional Golf Mgmt, Pre-vet, Food Management, and Food Science.The East College has programs in Applied Psychology, Applied Biological Science,Business Administration, Elementary Education, Exercise and Wellness, Human Health,and Nutrition. ASU East has joined with Chandler-Gilbert Community College in aninnovative New Partnership in Baccalaureate Education to
-learning, communication, collaboration and ethics education. With aclear motivation for increasing engineering student empathic thinking and a multitude ofcontexts where its inclusion in the curriculum would be appropriate it is a wonder that the topicis not identified more broadly as something undergraduate programs might advocate.This paper presents the details from a small empathy lesson and assignment that was delivered tofirst-year students and senior students in an undergraduate engineering program. The lesson wasfocused on the need for mode-switching and practicing empathic responses in an engineeringcontext. The impact of the lesson and assignment were assessed using a survey and analysis ofstudent responses in the assignment.Study
great deal more than I expected to. The things I learned will be very helpful in the future. • …It (the class) changed the way I see things and the way I should do things…ConclusionsOverall the course was a success. The advanced-level ethical skills helped students approachproblems from various viewpoints and develop arguments to “defend” an ethical stance. TheTAs will now work on incorporation of ethical modules into senior-level coursework to buildupon these skills. Page 9.550.10 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright
, asengineering educators, teaching our students how to fish, to use the knowledgewe give them? Do we provide our students with a framework to guide how theyorganize and utilize the knowledge they acquire in their undergraduateeducation? I would argue that the true hallmark of a professional is that he orshe possesses intellectual autonomy; while a professional may work with others,he or she must be able to decide for themselves exactly how to apply theory andinformation to solving problems. In engineering education, we need to be surethat our students learn to fish, to think for themselves. Hence, a key task for humanities and social sciences in engineeringeducation is to give students insight into the ways in which knowledge abouttechnology is
-person it’s easy to seewho is clumped together. That’s how I will choose who to work with on the collaborativeproject.”In engineering education, most universities shifted in a matter of weeks toward digital tools andremote working. Some adjusted to a digital learning requirement by making and sending “kits”for study in technical courses to students in multiple time zones. In many cases, internationalstudents didn’t leave the country, fearing they would have difficulty returning. Students in oneclass informed with a narrative on the international student Covid 19 experience suggesting“disincentivized collaboration made it trickier because working together became something thathad to be actively planned rather than meetups at office hours or in
development and delivery of manufacturing curriculum, conducting applied research, and engagement with Indiana industry. While at Purdue University, Dr. Tomovic served as W. C. Furnas Professor of Enterprise Excellence, University Faculty Scholar, Director of Digital Enterprise Center, and Special As- sistant to Dean for Advanced Manufacturing. He has co-authored three books on hydraulic systems, product lifecycle management, and manufacturing processes. In addition, he has authored or co-authored over 140 papers in journals and conference proceedings, focused on applied research related to design and manufacturability issues, as well as issues related to mechanical engineering technology education. Dr. Tomovic made over
writing at the University of New Mexico in the Departments of Chemical & Biological Engineering (CBE) and Biology.Dr. Ruben D. Lopez-Parra, University of New Mexico Ruben D. Lopez-Parra is a Post-doctoral fellow in the Department of Chemical & Biological Engineering at University of New Mexico. His Ph.D. is in Engineering Education from Purdue University and he has worked as a K-16 instructor and curriculum designer using various evidence-based active and passive learning strategies. In 2015, Ruben earned an M.S. in Chemical Engineering at Universidad de los An- des in Colombia where he also received the title of Chemical Engineer in 2012. His research interests are grounded in the learning sciences and
occurred 3 months after the PD, however, in order to measure long-term adoption rates more data must be collected. Finally, 75% (6/8) of PD experts were accustomed to educational outreach, which may be atypical in other technically focused PDs.Analysis & FindingsQualitative - Two Case Studies (Through Teacher Created Presentations)I. A High School Teacher’s Self-Guided Learning: One of the K12 instructors that implemented CS in their existing curriculum was an early career physics teacher with less than 2 years of teaching experience. One of her post-implementation interview responses exemplifies an overarching theme amongst the teachers’ willingness to self-learn the Python programming language through web-based tools such as Jupyter
and interpret data(c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realisticconstraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety,manufacturability, and sustainability(d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams(e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems(f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility(g) an ability to communicate effectively(h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global,economic, environmental, and societal context(i) a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning(j) a knowledge of contemporary issues(k) an ability to use the
, processes, and cultures,” presented at the Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE, 2019. doi: 10.1109/FIE.2018.8659099.[5] B. Chang, “Education for social change: Highlander education in the Appalachian Mountains and study circles in Sweden,” Int. J. Lifelong Educ., vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 705– 723, Nov. 2013, doi: 10.1080/02601370.2013.773571.[6] A. I. Horton, The Highlander Folk School: A History of Its Major Programs, 1932-1961, vol. 13. in Martin Luther King, Jr. and the Civil Rights Movement, vol. 13. New York: Carlson Publishing Inc, 1989.[7] A. Comeaux, Change (the) Management: Why We as Leaders Must Change for the Change to Last. Lioncrest Publishing, 2020.[8] J. P. Kotter, Leading Change, 1R ed. Boston: Harvard
. There were challenges in delivering course materials with the new approach as well.The challenges at different stages of implementation of the project on allocating time, budget, andpersonnel as well as the curriculum development and delivery will be shared in this paper. Lessonslearned from the first year implementation of this project can be used by the Principle Investigatoras a formative assessment to improve the process for the second year of implementation. Thispaper can also inform engineering education researchers of the challenges and potential strategiesto overcome these challenges and help them be more strategic during proposal writing andimplementation of similar projects.IntroductionAlthough the “chalk and talk” style of teaching
Section 3657 Active and Cooperative Learning of Markov Processes in a Half-Term Course Joyce Yen, Tava Lennon Olsen Department of Industrial and Operations Engineering University Of Michigan, Ann ArborAbstractThis paper discusses the design of a new half-term undergraduate course on Markovprocesses that has weekly lab exercises. The motivation for designing this course wastwo-fold. First, the Curriculum 2000 initiative in the University of Michigan College ofEngineering has resulted in major curriculum redesign and in the introduction of half-semester courses. Second
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Education"consider a transfer from and stop taking any other subjects offered by the department ofarchitectural facilities(3) Students from department of electric engineering, refrigeration or environment when havingfound their aptitude and competence appropriate for them to take up the course of architecturalfacilities may take up all the subjects offered in the course of architectural facilities witharchitecture as the second major.Bibliography:Chang, T. (2001). Knowledge Economy and Higher Education Development. Journal of Teacher Education. 409(7). pp11-16.Chen, I-Ling. (2003). Integration of cross disciplines curriculum. http://www.ss.qesosa.edu.hk/susdev/curriculum
need to reimagine and update traditionalautomotive engineering education to equip students with the necessary knowledge, skills, andperspectives to thrive in this dynamic environment. This paper proposes a novel approach to anAutomotive Engineering course, seamlessly integrating EV technologies with AI whilemaintaining a strong foundation in core automotive principles.This reimagined course aims to address the following key objectives:First, to bridge the gap between traditional automotive engineering principles and cutting-edgeEV technologies: By infusing each subject area with the latest advancements in AI technology, itis necessary to provide students with a holistic understanding of the evolving automotivelandscape. The course curriculum
Page 24.1029.12 Educativa en Enseñanzas Técnicas. Vilanova i la Geltrú, Spain. 6. Baylon, A.M. (2004). Assessment result into a PBL project opportunity: A quality assurance in action. Philippine Journal of Maritime Education and Training 2(2), 46-58. 7. Woods, D.R., Hrymak, A.N., Marshall, R.R., Wood, P.E., Crowe, C.M., Hoffman, T.W., & Bouchard, C.G. (1997). Developing problem solving skills: The McMaster problem solving program. Journal of Engineering Education,86(2), 75-91. 8. Catalano, G.D., & Catalano, K.C. (1997). Transformation: from teacher-centered to student-centered engineering education. In Frontiers in Education (pp. 95-100). IEEE. 9. Mills, J.E., Treagust, D.F
) an ability to identify, formulate, and solveprocess to meet desired needs within realistic Gray cells indicate conceptual alignment.f) an understanding of professional and ethicaleconomic, environmental, and societal contextc) an ability to design a system, component, or(i) a recognition of the need for, and an ability to(a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, Table 2: Mapping of expiring SOs to new SOs.h) the broad education necessary to
, and Society” or “Education and Awareness for Sustainability”. Whenintegration into mainstream courses begins, the other model described by Arasat emerges andtakes a wider view of sustainability education. In this Integrated model, sustainability isincorporated into the current curriculum across all levels of a particular engineering program.Examples of curricula which follow the Integrated model include the Applied Sustainability andPublic Health in Civil Engineering program at Queens University Canada.12, 13 But, regardless ofwhether sustainability is taught in a Stand-Alone or Integrated model, courses which endeavor tohighlight sustainability should do so across the three pillars of sustainable practice (economic,social, environmental
Paper ID #23100Developing an Understanding of Civil Engineering Practitioner Problem-solvingRationale Using Multiple Contextual RepresentationsMr. Sean Lyle Gestson, Oregon State University Sean Gestson is a recent graduate from the University of Portland where he studied Civil Engineering with a focus in Water Resources and Environmental Engineering. He is currently conducting Engineering Education research while pursuing a doctoral degree in Civil Engineering at Oregon State University. His research interests include situated cognition, problem-solving research, and engineering curriculum development.Mr. Benjamin David
example of how the EWB model can be incorporated into the curriculum has beendeveloped by Worcester Polytechnic Institute (WPI). In the early 1970s, WPI transitioned to aproject-based curriculum, from which their Global Perspective Program (GPP) was established[2]. This program allows students to travel abroad and work on open-ended projects whilesatisfying general educational and engineering requirements. The program is designed to meetmany of the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) requirements, andself-evaluation in students’ final reports indicate that off-campus projects are consistently higherquality than those completed on campus [2].The WPI program is specifically geared toward engineering, and while it has been
represents the spine of the curriculum for the Department of Engineering. The research and teaching interests of Dr. Nagel tend to revolve around engineering design and engineering design education, and in particular, the design conceptualization phase of the design process. He has performed research with the US Army Chemical Corps, General Motors Research and Development Center, and the US Air Force Academy, and he has received grants from the NSF, the EPA, and General Motors Corporation.Dr. Jacquelyn Kay Nagel, James Madison University Dr. Jacquelyn K. Nagel is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering at James Madison Uni- versity. She has eight years of diversified engineering design experience, both in