above and beyond their course and career work. Page 13.1290.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Tipping the Scales: Finding the Most Effective Balance between Lecture and Active Learning across Academic Levels in Engineering I hear and I forget, I see and I remember, I do and I understand. -ConfuciusAbstractAs seen in the quote above, the concept of active learning can be traced back to the time of Confucius(551-479 BC). Of late, much work and research has been done on the effectiveness and engagement valueof experiential education1,2,5,6. Research indicates that in the proper measure and
AC 2012-2959: PREPARING THE ENGINEER OF 2020: ANALYSIS OFALUMNI DATAIrene B. Mena, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Irene B. Mena has a B.S. and M.S. in industrial engineering, and a Ph.D. in engineering education. Her research interests include first-year engineering and graduate student professional development.Dr. Sarah E. Zappe, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Sarah Zappe is the Director of Assessment and Instructional Support in the College of Engineering at Penn State University. In this role, she provides support to faculty in trying innovative ideas in the classroom. Her background is in educational psychology with an emphasis in applied testing and measurement. Her current
AC 2012-4659: CHALLENGES TO ENSURING QUALITY IN QUALITA-TIVE RESEARCH: A PROCEDURAL VIEWDr. Joachim Walther, University of Georgia Joachim Walther is an Assistant Professor of engineering education research at the University of Geor- gia (UGA). He is Co-director of the Collaborative Lounge for Understanding Society and Technology through Educational Research (CLUSTER), an interdisciplinary research group with members from en- gineering, art, educational psychology, and social work. His research interests span the formation of students’ professional identity, the role of reflection in engineering learning, and interpretive research methods in engineering education. He was the first international recipient of the ASEE
/default/files/2018-04/AMS-MAN- 10_Accreditation_Criteria_User_Guide_Higher_Education_v1.0.pdf[2] C. Bilsland, H. Nagy, and P. Smith, "Virtual internships and work-integrated learning in hospitality and tourism in a post-COVID-19 world," International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 425-437, 2020.[3] M. Seifan, D. Dada, and A. Berenjian, "The effect of virtual field trip as an introductory tool for an engineering real field trip," Education for Chemical Engineers, vol. 27, pp. 6-11, 2019/04/01/ 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.ece.2018.11.005.[4] S. Male and R. King, "Enhancing learning outcomes from industry engagement in Australian engineering education," pp. 101-117, 05/03 2019, doi
AC 2007-399: ASSESSMENT RESULTS OF A SENIOR DESIGN CAPSTONECOURSEMysore Narayanan, Miami University DR. MYSORE NARAYANAN obtained his Ph.D. from the University of Liverpool, England in the area of Electrical and Electronic Engineering. He joined Miami University in 1980 and teaches a wide variety of electrical, electronic and mechanical engineering courses. He has been invited to contribute articles to several encyclopedias and has published and presented dozens of papers at local, regional , national and international conferences. He has also designed, developed, organized and chaired several conferences for Miami University and conference sessions for a variety of organizations. He is a
-friendlydocumentation aimed at an audience with low-to-intermediate technological proficiency, andworking as members of a cross-disciplinary team. EPICS students gained experiencecommunicating with both technical and non-technical audiences, experience defining the scope oftheir projects, and a greater awareness of the needs and requirements of their customers. Page 8.72.1 Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering EducationI. IntroductionPurdue University’s Professional Writing Program offers a one-semester course
involvement in the trainingand assigning of visitors to engineering and engineering technology programs that do not havetraditional lead society sponsors. This paper describes the on-going developments as well as theopportunities these evolving new relationships may offer to ASEE members to provide valuableprofessional service to engineering and engineering technology education as program evaluators.ASEE & ABET Interactions and InvolvementASEE was almost 40 years old when it and six other professional societies established ABET’spredecessor, the Engineers Council for Professional Development (ECPD) in 1932 [1]. ASEEhas actively interacted with ABET ever since. ABET and ASEE are vitally interested in thequality of educational programs in
Paper ID #31697Writing Good Reflection Questions: Testing Brookfield’s criticalincident questionnaires effectiveness in improving student learningDr. Elizabeth Payne Tofte, South Dakota State University Education: PhD, University of Edinburgh, Scotland. I am currently an Assistant Professor of Landscape Architecture for the School of Design at South Dakota State University, specializing in Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in interdisciplinary learning environments.Dr. Albena Yuliyanova Yordanova, South Dakota State University Education: University of Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls, Iowa; Doctor of Technology with emphasis in
AC 2009-1599: LEADERSHIP 106: THE VALUE OF TIMEJerry Samples, University of Pittsburgh, Johnstown DR. JERRY SAMPLES holds a BS Ch.E. from Clarkson College, MS and Ph.D. in ME from Oklahoma State University. Dr. Samples served at the United States Military Academy twelve years before assuming the position of Director of the Engineering Technology Division at the University of Pittsburgh at Johnstown in 1996. After a five year period as the Vice President for Academic and Student Affairs he returned to the Engineering Technology Division. He is a Fellow of the International Society for Teaching and Learning receiving that honor in 2007. In 2008, he received the American Society for
assessment: arevision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. White Plains, NY: Longman.23. University of Saskatchewan (2014). College of engineering communication rubric.24. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. New York: CambridgeUniversity Press, 1998.25. Sullivan, K. R. and Kedrowicz, A. A. (2012). Gendered tensions: engineering student’s [sic] resistanceto communication instruction. Equality, Diversity, and Inclusion: An International Journal 31(7): 596-611.26. Owen, C. and Rolfes. D. (2014). Situated Professional Communication: A Rhetorical Approach. CanadianEngineering Educators Association Conference Proceedings, 359-361. http://ceea2014.wordpress.com27. Riley, D. M. (2014). What’s wrong with
Foundation Advanced Technology Education Evaluation Community of Practice. Ms. Mann is a Senior Research Manager with the Social and Economic Sciences Research Center at Washington State University, where she has spent the past 10 years. Page 22.648.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Evaluating the Impact of an Underwater Robotics Competition: Questions, Methodologies and FindingsThe Marine Advanced Technology Education (MATE) Center has been sponsoring regional andinternational underwater robotics competitions for 10 years. In that period
, Tampa, FL, 2019.L. M. S. Almeida, K. H. Becker, and I. Villanueva, “Engineering communication in industry and cross-generational challenges: an exploratory study”, European Journal of Engineering Education, 46:3, 389-401, 2021.P. Alves-Oliveira, P. Arriaga, A. Paiva, and G. Hoffman, “Children as robot designers," In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 399-408. 2021.M. U. Bers and M. Portsmore, “Teaching partnerships: Early childhood and engineering students teaching math and science through robotics,” Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(1), 59–73, 2005.C. M. Burton, C. Mayhall, J. Cross, P. Patterson, “Critical elements for multigenerational
Paper ID #19079Engagement in Practice: Not Just Technical Education; An AnthropologicalPerspective on a Community-Based Engineering Internship ProgramKenzell Huggins, University of ChicagoMs. Asha Barnes Currently a student of the University of Notre Dame, my long term goals are to become a citizen of the world, a metropolitan learner. As Anthropology is my passion, I hope to continue to better my skills in ethnographic research.Dr. Susan D. Blum, The University of Notre DameDr. Jay B. Brockman, University of Notre Dame Dr. Jay Brockman is the Associate Dean of Engineering for Experiential Learning and Community En
at SUNY-Binghamton offered its owndiscipline- specific capstone design course. (Figure 1) At the direction of the dean inSeptember 2000, a committee consisting of all department chairs, undergraduate programdirectors, and the associate dean for administration was established. This committee metregularly over the course of the academic year and recommended that a pilot multi-disciplinary capstone project sequence be developed and offered beginning in fall 2001. Page 9.932.1The Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE), and the Department of Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education
implications, is a strong liberal arts curriculum.An effective liberal arts education helps engineering students to uncover and expose the inherentvalues that are built into technology as it is developed and deployed. It also helps studentsidentify the multitude of ways those values built into a technology affect our society. Recognizingthe feedback between technology and society is essential in evaluating technology effectively froman ethical and moral standpoint.2 Non-neutrality in the literatureThe non-neutrality of technology is well established in the philosophy of technology literature, butthis is not so in our society at large. More importantly, it is not well established within the typicalengineering student population, perhaps because most
Food to Achieve 100% Student Retention in an Intro CS Course,” J.Comput.Sci.Coll., vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 127–134, dec 2016.[27] Y. A. Rankin, J. O. Thomas, and I. Irish, “Food for Thought: Supporting African American Women’s Computational Algorithmic Thinking in an Intro CS Course,” in Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, ser. SIGCSE ’19. Minneapolis, MN, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2019, pp. 641–646. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3287324.3287484[28] L. Williams, L. Layman, K. M. Slaten, S. B. Berenson, and C. Seaman, “On the Impact of a Collaborative Pedagogy on African American Millennial Students in Software Engineering,” in Proceedings of the
Of CollaborationAbstractCollaborations between engineering faculty and skilled experts outside of engineering properbuild strong undergraduate engineering curricula that clearly emphasize professional skills andABET program outcomes (Criteria 3 d, f, g, h, i,). With shared goals of providing undergraduateswith a rich educational experience in which research, communication and critical thinking arecentral to achievement and to the development of integrity in engineering, such collaborationsproduce an instructional program that readies students for the requirements of continuouslearning and complex analysis essential to a successful, principled engineering career.This paper will describe the contributions to undergraduate engineering education
. Conferences, April 2024. [8] P. K. Konakalla and G. Simuni, “Security and privacy concerns in generative ai,” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2024. [9] Northern Illinois University. (2024) Class policies for ai tools. [Online]. Available: https://www.niu.edu/citl/resources/guides/class-policies-for- ai-tools.shtml[10] I. A. Olohunfunmi and A. Z. Khairuddin, “Exploring ethical dilemmas of ai generative tools among higher education students: A systematic review,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Innovation & Entrepreneurship in Computing, Engineering & Science Education (InvENT 2024). Atlantis Press, 2024, pp. 255–275.[11] Vanderbilt University. (2024) Ai and syllabus policies. [Online]. Available
through a collaborative process thefinal four themes were identified. For example, participant‟s responses concerning the challengesassociated with curriculum development were coded for curriculum development as well as morespecific types of challenges (i.e. language, uncertainty, frustration, institutional policy, etc.). Thispaper identifies and describes the themes raised in the focus groups as well as specific examplesdirectly from the transcripts to illustrate the participant experiences.ResultsFindings from focus groups revealed a variety of internal factors that influence engineeringfaculty concerns, frustrations and confidence in engineering education curriculum reform. Fourreoccurring themes related to participant change in approaching
Paper ID #10910Capturing evidence of metacognitive awareness of pre-service STEM educa-tors’ using ’codifying’ of thinking through eportfolios (Research-to-Practice)– Strand: OtherMr. Patrick Rowsome, University of LimerickDr. Diarmaid Lane, University of Limerick Diarmaid is a Lecturer in Technology Teacher Education at the University of Limerick. His research interests are in the areas of freehand sketching, cognition and spatial visualization. He is currently Director of Membership of the Engineering Design Graphics Division (EDGD).Dr. Seamus Gordon, University of Limerick Head of Department Design and Manufacturing
] de Grazia, Janet L.; Falconer, John L.; Nicodemus, Garret; Medlin, Will “Incorporating Screencasts Intochemical Engineering Courses” 2012 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings.[5] Dollar, Anna and Steif, Paul “Web-based statics course used in an inverted classroom” 2009 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings.[6] Felder, Richard M.; Brent, Rebecca; Prince, Michael J. “Engineering Instructional Development: Programs, Best Practices, and Recommendations” Journal of Engineering Education January 2011, Vol. 100, No. 1, pp. 89–122.[7] Gannod, Gerald C.; Burge, Janet E.; Helmick, Michael T. “Using the inverted classroom to teach software engineering” Proceedings - International Conference on Software Engineering, p 777-786, 2008.[8] Green
, pp. 5-22.[13] Ieta, A., G. Silberberg, Z. Kucerovsky, and W. D. Greason, “On scales and decision-making based on arithmetic mean,” Quality & Quantity, Vol. 38, No. 5, 2005, pp. 559–575.[14] Scaling grades et al, http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/college-life/325006-scaling-grades-et-al.html[15] Richeson, D. “How to curve an exam and assign grades”, http://divisbyzero.com/2008/12/22/how-to-curve-an-exam-and-assign-grades/[16] Ieta, A., Doyle, T. E., Kucerovsky, Z., and Greason, W. D. “Challenges and Options Related to Scaling RawScores in Engineering Education,” The International Network for Engineering Education and Research. Innovations2009: World Innovations in Engineering Education and Research, iNEER, Arlington (July 2009
Thinking in Parallel: Multicore Parallel Programming for STEM Education 1,* A. Asaduzzaman, 2 R. Asmatulu, and 1 R. Pendse 1 Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science and 2Department ofMechanical Engineering, Wichita State University, 1845 Fairmount St, Wichita, KS 67260 *E-mail: Abu.Asaduzzaman@wichita.edu; Tel: +1-316-978-5261AbstractAcademic research and engineering challenges both have increasing demands for highperformance computing (HPC), which can be achieved through multicore parallel programming.The existing curricula of most universities do not properly address the major transition fromsingle-core to multicore systems and sequential to parallel
Paper ID #41046The Forgotten Horseman: Digital Implementation of Arithmetic Division andResources to Learn and Teach Its ComplexitiesDr. Peter Jamieson, Miami University Dr. Jamieson is an associate professor in the Electrical and Computer Engineering department at Miami University. His research focuses on Education, Games, and FPGAs.Nathaniel David Martin, Miami University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 The Forgotten Horseman - Digital Implementation of Arithmetic Division and Resources to Learn and Teach Its ComplexitiesAbstractOf the four arithmetic functions, Division is the
AC 2008-960: BEING AND BECOMING: GENDER AND IDENTITY FORMATIONOF ENGINEERING STUDENTSDebbie Chachra, Franklin W. Olin College of EngineeringDeborah Kilgore, University of WashingtonHeidi Loshbaugh, Colorado School of MinesJanice McCain, Howard UniversityHelen Chen, Stanford University Page 13.250.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Being and Becoming: Gender and Identity Formation of Engineering StudentsBackground:For undergraduate engineering students, development of an engineering identity is an importantoutcome of their education, as they progress towards their professional selves. This process isreflected
AC 2009-1254: ON-LINE DISTANCE EDUCATION AND STUDENT LEARNING:DO THEY MEASURE UP?Carole Goodson, University of Houston Carole Goodson is a Professor of Technology at the University of Houston. As an active member of ASEE, she is a member of the Academy of Fellows, a past Editor of the Journal of Engineering Technology, a past Chair of PIC IV and the ERM Division, and a past Chair of the Gulf Southwest Section of ASEE.Susan Miertschin, University of Houston Susan L. Miertschin is an Associate Professor in the Information Systems Technology program at University of Houston. She is a member of the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE), active in the Engineering Technology
- Maynor-Graham-up.pdf.18. Barry M. Lunt, J.J.E., Sandra Gorka, Gregory Hislop, Reza Kamali, Eydie Lawson, Richard LeBlanc, Jacob Miller, Han Reichgelt. Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate Degree Programs in Information Technology. 2008 [cited 2012 March 10]; Available from: http://www.acm.org/education/education/curricula/IT2008%20Curriculum.pdf.19. Guillermo A. Francia, I., Critical infrastructure security curriculum modules, in Proceedings of the 2011 Information Security Curriculum Development Conference2011, ACM: Kennesaw, Georgia. p. 54-58.20. M.K. Abuzalata, M.A.K.A., Shebel Asad and Mazouz Salahat, Design of a Virtual PLC Using Lab View. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology
published a book and more than fifty articles in various areas of industrial engineering including K-12 research. He is actively involved with professional society activities including IIE and ASEE. He is the editor in chief of the International Journal of Logistics & Transportation Research and serving in the editorial board for several other journals. Page 24.719.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Improving Student Engagement in Online CoursesAbstractDistance education is a learning model in which students and instructors are separated bylocation and/or
Promoting quality STEM Education in the time of Social Distancing (Other)AbstractThe pandemic produced by COVID-19 has forced a radical change in the strategies andmethodologies used to share and transmit knowledge. With the closure of the Schools /Universities, the educational process has been radically transformed from one day to the next.STEM education is based on collaborative work, inquiry, experimentation, problem-solving, andproject generation. This type of education encounters many obstacles in the present situation:students do not have access to laboratories, materials, and other essential supplies to implementan educational process of quality.The Institution has developed alternative ways to promote quality STEM education for
learning.AcknowledgmentsThis program is partially funded by the US Department of Education Grant #P031C110050.References[1] Morales, J.C. Implementing a Robust, yet Straightforward, Direct Assessment Process that Engages 100% of theFaculty and Student Populations, Proceedings of the ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress andExposition, Florida, 2009.[2] Litzinger, T.A., Lattuca, L.R., Hadgraft, R.G., Newstetter, W.C., Engineering Education and the Development ofExpertise. Journal of Engineering Education. Vol. 100, No. 1, January 2011. Pp. 123-150.[3] E.A. Patterson, P.B. Campbell, I. Busch-Vishniac & D.W. Guillaume (2011). The Effect of Context on StudentEngagement in Engineering. European Journal of Engineering Education. Volume 36, Issue 3, 2011.[4