number and preparedness of transfer students. Thiseducational research aims to enhance inclusion and participation in engineering and thedevelopment of a more innovative and inclusive technical workforce. This project aims to broaden participation by improving access to engineering educationand baccalaureate degree programs for underrepresented minority, low-income, first-generation,and nontraditional students. Increased transfer pathways and educational innovations specificallydesigned for marginalized communities can improve transfer outcomes and positively impactcollege affordability for students from communities not previously well served. This research isdistinct from other transfer student research in its combined focus on
office, the project team hasidentified the set of available institutional data, developed an inventory of existing academic datasets and dashboards, and explored similar tools developed at other universities (e.g., IndianaUniversity Bloomington, University of California Davis, University of Kansas).During Year 1, over 80 Questions and “I Wonders” (QWs) were developed through the DataTools Co-Design and Inquiry in STEM Success Faculty Communities sessions (prompted byreading papers and national reports on student success and retention in STEM) and visit to ameeting of the STEM department chairs. Members of the Data Tools Co-Design FC categorizedthe generated Q&Ws according to data category, when faculty would use the information, andwhy a
population qualifies for Pell Grants andapproximately 35% of students have been identified as first-generation college students. Thesediversity statistics are in addition to above average engineering enrollments of students self-identifying as Hispanic (14%) and multiethnic (5%). Figure 1. Figure depicting the multiple phases of our research study over the last two years.Data Collection ProceduresPhase IWe recruited 2,576 participants across both institutions. A pre- and post-semester surveyinstrument were deployed in Fall 2015 at the first institution and Fall 2016 at the secondinstitution to understand student’s shifts in their multicultural openness, teaming effectivenessand diversity sensitivity. Both institutions also used CATME Team-Maker to
students also went on planned (andimpromptu) weekend outings and activities, including hiking excursions, travel to nearbyWashington, D.C., a trip to an amusement park, free concerts in the community, and a wide arrayof other options available in the greater Charlottesville, VA area.Student REU participants met as a group with all of the available faculty mentors and othergraduate students three times each summer: after three and six weeks, respectively, to presenttheir progress to date in a gallery-style poster session, and at the conclusion of the ten-weekprogram to present in a formal symposium. The two group “check-in” meetings served threepurposes: 1) The group meetings gave the students invaluable communication experience indiscussing
Engineering at The University of Texas. Her research area is design cognition including systematic methods and tools for innovative design with a particular focus on concept generation and design-by-analogy. Her research seeks to understand designers’ cognitive processes with the goal of creating better tools and approaches to enhance engineering design. She has authored over 150 technical publications including over forty journal papers, and ten book chapters.Dr. Astrid Layton, Texas A&M University Astrid Layton is an assistant professor at Texas A&M University in the Mechanical Engineering depart- ment and received her Ph.D. from Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta, Georgia. She is interested in bio
seminars, an industrial internship, and participation in entrepreneurship programs.We will discuss observations and outcomes for each of these areas. The following discourseanalysis methods were used.Open coding (Blair, 2015; Hennessey et al., 2020; Huber and Froehlich, 2020) was conducted tocomb through the thank you notes and the mentoring reports. Each text was read multiple times,and themes were generated across each grouping of reports or thank you notes. For example, allthe mentoring reports from Cohort 1 in Spring, 2020, were read as a group, coded, and thenthemes were generated using that grouping of texts, and that grouping alone. Thus, there weredifferent themes that were developed in the thank you notes from Cohort 1 versus the
theresearch culture and increased acknowledgement of the value of diversity are designed toenhance students’ STEM identity, which is important for retention in the major and career.The UofM VIP program includes the following: • A sequence of 1-hour VIP courses open to all engineering students from first-year (Honors students only) to seniors (all engineering students); a three-semester enrollment yields credit for a technical elective (see Figure 1); • Students apply to join a specific research team led by a UofM faculty member; while not encouraged, students are allowed to switch teams after the first semester, but must sit out of the program for a semester if they desire to change teams a second time; • A
c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Paper ID #19802 Technical Staff and as Systems Analyst at Bell Communications Research (Bellcore, now Ericsson, 1989- 1996), as Senior Technical Staff Member at AT&T (1996-2000), and as Senior Information Technology Specialist at IBM (2000-2002). He has been a Full Professor at William Paterson University, Wayne, New Jersey, USA since 2014 (Assis- tant Professor: 2002-2009, Department Chair: 2007-2013, Associate Professor: 2009-2014). He received an Excellence Award for Faculty Service in 2009. His research interests include software engineering, databases, data
Race1 Major2 Gener F M ation H A A AI W BioE ChE CME ECE CS IE ME ANumber Cohort I3 6 10 7 6 2 3 2 3 1 2 3 0 4 2 4of Cohort II 5 8 3 0 1 5 0 7 1 1 1 1 7 0 2Scholars Cohort III3 5 11 10 6 2 4 1 3 2 0 1 2 8 1 1 Total 16 29 20 12 5
existing curriculum constraints. In particular, teachers found that the NextGeneration Science Standards [1] practice of “computational thinking” was the best lens fordeveloping their aligned big data instruction. After exploring a taxonomy of computationalthinking in mathematics and science [2], the teachers collectively eventually settled on a core setof four computational thinking skills [3] most likely to be productive for their teaching focus;algorithmic thinking, decomposition, abstraction, and pattern recognition. This paper reports onthe variety of connections teachers developed with the practice of computational thinking, fromdata clustering as an active practice for simulating early generation of the periodic table in achemistry class
categories are providedas well. Table 1: Emergent Coding Scheme for Positive Aspects of Classroom Surroundings Peers help one another to learn; Peers Fellow students are focused or motivated and promote these qualities in others; Peers generate or ask questions in class; Instructor is supportive; Instructor is engaging or interesting; Instructor Instructor is easy to follow or understand; Instructor answers questions in class; Discussions with instructor during class; In Person
dedicate at least oneworkshop to exploring anti-racism practice in ECE. The sessions described below are the first ina sequence of four two day sessions focused on this topic.Mini-Workshop SeriesEach of the workshops was limited to 60-90 minutes to minimize the impact on the participants’ability to deal with challenges of teaching during COVID. Recordings of the workshops and prepinformation can be found on the IEC website.Session 1: RAPID Grant on Online Teaching and Collaboration and Sharing Spring TeachingExperiences (May 2020) Funding was obtained from NSF to collect data on the transition toremote teaching necessitated by COVID-19. This project was introduced to the IEC communityduring this first workshop session to both prepare them to
University. Dr Zhang’s research interest is Applied Mathematics including generalized Wentzel boundary value problems, analytical analysis and computer simulations of various climate models, anal- ysis of mathematical models of malaria transmission, analysis of derivative securities.Dr. HuiRu Shih P.E., Jackson State University Dr. HuiRu Shih is a Professor of Technology at Jackson State University. He received his Ph.D. degree in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Missouri. Dr. Shih is a registered professional engineer in the state of Mississippi. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Exploring Effects of Online Collaborative Learning with Scaffolding in Multiple STEM
ideas to fit what ATE will supportDay 0 Evening Assignment: Each college should appoint a spokesperson and prepare aone minute introduction of your team and your project for tomorrow morning.Day 1Monday, July 15, 20196:30-8:00AM Breakfast at hotel8:15 -8:30AM Bus pickup at hotel9:00 – 9:10AM Welcome9:10 – 9:30AM Introduction of Colleges9:30-10:00 Session 1: ATE Basics (brief session 30 minutes including Q&A) Components of ATE proposal Head’s up about submission process, Fastlane, grants.gov, research.gov What PIs and grants offices will have to do between now and submission day10:00-10:45AM Session 2: Rationale (45 minutes) Brief presentation on importance of rationale (10
social andcommunicative skills in hand, under-represented youth can become leaders in their post-secondary programs, and critical contributors to establishing increasingly diverse, innovative andproductive communities in post-secondary and professional engineering communities.There has been little empirical work that has explored the specific practices and structures thateffectively invite diverse groups of young people to recognize, participate in, and mutuallyvalidate the social practices that establish and sustain inclusive work environments forengineering or for STEM learning more generally (Aschbacher, Li, & Roth, 2009). Focused, in-depth research in the context of such programs can identify practices and program features
: How can the original EMHHI be improvedto enhance validity for diverse students in different institutional contexts?Undergraduate Engineering Student Mental HealthWithin undergraduate engineering students, the prevalence of mental health distress can vary frominstitution to institution. In analysis of national data, engineering students report fewer symptomsof anxiety and depression when compared to students from many non-engineering majors [1]. Thatbeing said, a concerning trend is that students who are historically excluded from engineering areoften differentially impacted by symptoms of mental health distress. For instance, women [2, 3],first generation [2], gender expansive [4], LGBTQ+ [5], and Hispanic [6] students self-reporthigher rates
has initiated several successful programs with the purpose of engaging students at all academic stages in the excitement of engineering and research, with focus on underrepresented groups. She has authored and coauthored two book chapters and more than 185 journal papers and refereed conference articles. Bugallo is a senior member of the IEEE, serves on several of its technical committees and is the cur- rent vice chair of the IEEE Signal Processing Society Signal Processing Theory and Methods Technical Committee and the chair of the EURASIP Special Area Team on Theoretical and Methodological Trends in Signal Processing as well as an elected member of the IEEE Signal Processing Society Sensor Array and
research mentor. This two-semester design offloads some of the research training thatfaculty may have to do with undergraduate students new to their research lab.ERSP is structured using a cohort-model so that students work in teams wherein the support isprovided via class meetings, research meetings, and team meetings[1]. Aside from the faculty thatoversee ERSP, there is at least one graduate student designated to ERSP who assists with goal-setting and technical advice for each team of undergraduate student researchers [5].The implementation of ERSP at other institutions, including University of California SantaBarbara, Stanford University, and UIC was enabled by the NSF Grant (#1821501). The team haspublished results from this effort in [6], and
; and 48% were first generation college students. TheIOU-NA occurred in concert with the Undergraduate Research Opportunities Consortium(UROC) at the University of Arizona, which provided graduate school information, applicationguidance, and GRE training. Further, participants engaged in professional skills workshops, suchas, technical writing, oral communication skills, and presentations about industry options inoptical sciences. Participant deliverables included presentation of a research poster, oralpresentation of REU research, and an extended research abstract. Since the conclusion of theprogram, 61% of participants have presented at or attended professional conferences and onestudent was awarded a patent with his faculty mentor based on
NSF Faculty Fellow at GTE Laboratories in Waltham, MA, a visiting scientist at ABB Corporate Research in V¨aster˚as, Sweden and at the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) in Palo Alto, CA and a Visiting Professor at the Technical University of Denmark. His research interests span all aspects of electromag- netics issues in power transmission and has resulted in approximately 85 publications in refereed journals and approximately 150 conference publications/presentations. He is also one of the authors of the AC Transmission Line Reference Book – 200 kV and Above which is published by the Electric Power Re- search Institute (EPRI) and the author of the recently published two volume book, High Voltage Overhead
first-time students are supported for four years and 36 students transferring from community colleges are supported for two years. The goals of the project are to (1) increase the number and diversity of students pursuing degrees in engineering technology (first-generation, underrepresented students, women, and veterans); (2) add to the body of knowledge regarding best practices in Engineering Technology and promote employment; and (3) contribute to the literature on self-efficacy. The project brings together engineering technology academic programs that are offered through the School of Technology and programs in the Honors College, an inclusive and unique college designed around high-impact educational practices
in Industrial Engineering focused on Mechatronics, Robotics and Automation. She went through engineer- ing pathways herself, completing master electrician degree when completing Technical School in Uzice, Serbia, focusing on pre-engineering program on high power voltage systems and maintenance of electro- mechanical systems. Her research is focuses on engineering pathways, career and technical education, digital thread, cyber physical systems, mechatronics, digital manufacturing, broadening participation, and engineering education. She is a Director of Mechatronics and Digital Manufacturing Lab at ODU and a lead of Area of Specialization Mechatronics Systems Design. She worked as a Visiting Researcher at
taken hold in the UnitedStates. The authors suggest that youth, particularly ones belonging to under-represented groupssuch as students of color, young women, and low-income students are in particular need oflearning on computer science education as they often lack less access and support (Salmon,2023). The findings of work by Ryoo (2019) reveal that: “(1) demystifying CS by showing itsconnections to everyday life; (2) addressing social issues impacting both CS and students’communities; and (3) valuing students’ voices and perspectives” (p. 1) are useful in motivatingand engaging youth in CS education.Implementing culturally relevant professional development opportunities through research-practice partnerships seems a useful approach to gaining
] and others have suggested that heteronormativity and heterosexismmay be promoted through particular ideologies in engineering culture, especially“technical/social dualism” (devaluation of social, communicative and personnel-related aspects)[38-40] and “depoliticization” (relegation of questions of social justice and inclusion as“political,” and thus irrelevant to “real” engineering) [41, 42].This project used a mixed-methods research plan with surveys of engineering deans [43], facultyand students as well as ethnographic participant observations of a Virtual Community of Practicefor LGBTQ inclusion in STEM. The surveys and ethnographic research generated newknowledge and understanding of engineering cultures, which provided empirically
, have a much higher rate of financial need thanincoming freshmen to UTK. Institutional data shows a significant financial need for manystudents transferring to the four year institution that could be alleviated with scholarshipsupport after transfer. Apart from financial barriers, transfer students also face numerous academic barriers bothbefore and after transfer to a four year institution, especially those pursuing a technical sciencerelated degree, as this type of degree pursuit is cited as a challenge to four year student successafter transfer [1, 2]. Many students enter two year institutions because of issues in academicpreparation from high school, thus requiring them to take remedial courses to prepare for thecoursework associated
faculty in powerful and meaningful ways [23].4. ImplementationIn the spring of 2016, ASEE hosted two Safe Zone Level 1 workshops online. Adobe Connectwas used for synchronous communication during the webinars; this web conferencing toolprovides a broad range of capabilities for real time collaboration. ASEE staff provided technicalsupport for the communication platform.Four additional Safe Zone Level 1 workshops were conducted in a face-to-face format at theASEE Annual Conference in June. These were held during regular technical sessions throughoutthe conference.Workshops in both formats were 90 minutes in duration and were co-facilitated by members ofthe VCP.ASEE conducted surveys with the participants from all of the Safe Zone 1 & 2
had complementary components that involved: (1) matching participants with facultyand other undergraduates (peer-mentoring) or graduate student researchers under the supervisionof the faculty for direct hands-on training in relevant computational and experimental researchmethods, (2) participation in research-oriented field trips (e.g., various labs on campus, Ad AstraRocket Co., near the Johnson Space Center of the National Aeronautics and SpaceAdministration [NASA], etc.) (3) participation in professional-development seminars (GREpreparation, technical writing), and (4) presenting formal research papers at professionalconferences and submitting to refereed journals.The REU programs coordinated with the college’s own summer program and the
-STEM Program for First-Year Students: 3rd-Year Results1 IntroductionIn 2012, over four million freshmen were enrolled in U.S. four-year institutions of highereducation, and of those almost two million received Pell grants in their first year. Six years lateronly 43% of those students had obtained a bachelor’s degree, 10 percentage points behind non-Pell recipients [1]. The education disparity between privileged and low-income students hasslowly been widening over the years. The percentage of first-time students who obtained theirbachelor's degree within six years has increased from 57% (in 2001) to 69% (in 2017) forstudents from families in the fourth (highest) income quartile [2]. However, for students
, H. Rosenberg, A. Statham, and H. Rosing. 2015. “The Effect of Comm. Service Learning on Undergraduate Persistence in Three Institutional Contexts.” Mich. Jour. of Comm. Svc. Lrng., 21 (2), 22-36.[28] P. Conley and M. Hamlin. 2009. “Justice-learning: Exploring the efficacy with low- income, first-generation college students.” Mich. Jour. of Comm. Svc. Lrng., 16 (1), 47-58. DOI: http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.3239521.0016.104.[29] T. L. Yeh. 2010. “Service-Learning and Persistence of Low-Income, First-Generation College Students: An Exploratory Study.” Mich. Jour. of Comm. Svc. Lrng. 16 (2), 50-65.[30] J. Conner and J. Erickson. 2017. “When Does Service-Learning Work? Contact Theory and Service-Learning Courses in
-of-service enhanced networking protocols, pattern recognition, data mining, and their application in cyber security.Dr. Heidar Malki, University of Houston, College of Technology (CoE & CoT) Heidar A. Malki is currently a Professor and chair of Engineering Technology Department at the College of Technology. He also has a joint appointment with Electrical and Computer Engineering Department at UH. He holds a PhD. degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. He is a senior member of IEEE and was associate editor for the IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems. Dr. Malki was the general chair for the 1997 ASEE/GSW Conference and one of co-chairs of 1997 ICNN- IEEE International