requires constant communication between for example decisionmakers, engineers and the users. Narrating, communicating and receiving the positiveresponse - the key elements of change - can be achieved through only by including theseagents in the natural cycle of innovation processes. While technical achievements typicallyrely on engineers, engineering education curricula typically offers rather limited support tocultivating students’ understanding of societal impact and can provide a limited perspectiveto innovation outside of dominant economic interests [17]. While there have been calls forresponsible innovation [18], we have limited understanding of what engineering students’understanding of responsible innovation entails, and the impact of
itself.STEM Faculty Learning Community at One Midsize Research Institution Our midsize research institution runs a QEP faculty workshop every semester, aimed atimproving disciplinary writing across the institution. Faculty enroll in the program for the purposesof professional development. Within one semester, faculty participants engage in five workshopsthat last for eight hours each. The mission of this initiative is to focus on the improvement of upper-division undergraduate students' disciplinary writing by exploring the ways writing, as a process,should start with research and reflection about the given topic or problem. The main goal of thisworkshop is for faculty to master the skills related to good assignment design. The idea is to
home. He speculated that students, for whom English was a second language,may fear being placed into what they may have perceived to be undesirably ESL streams. Nochanges were made to our survey, but this was noted as a possible source of error.Education Graduate StudentsAn early study model was brought to a survey research graduate class for discussion. Based ontheir suggestions, we acknowledged that exposure should be considered as a modifier andsubsequently added the third research question to our survey.Engineering Undergraduate StudentsTwo senior undergraduate students were asked to give feedback on the survey. Their majorcomment was to shorten the survey in order to improve the sustained engagement of participants.Cognitive
Design effective presentation slides o Organize a clear presentation o Select tools to help mitigate nervousness during presentations o Clearly describe a technical process o Identify common mistakes in technical communications o Recognize how to personally improve your technical verbal communication- Ethics and University Values o Describe opportunities for becoming engaged in student activities on campus and in the School of Engineering o Discuss how the value of openness is valuable to your future career and life success o Demonstrate excellence in applying the engineering design process to three group projects o Demonstrate integrity by creating reports that are
and Interpretation. Four themes emerged from our analysis of teacherinterviews. We found evidence of teachers noticing how students 1) framed (or interpreted) theproject, 2) engaged in the engineering design process, 3) exhibited informed designer patterns,and 4) communicated with each other in ways that supported their engineering. In this section westep through each of these themes in turn, providing evidence from the interview transcripts.To provide continuity across all four themes, we focus primarily on the interview with Molly.Molly was the pilot teacher for Novel Engineering, and had the most experience with theprogram. She also displayed evidence of all four of these themes in her interview. To reinforcethat these themes were
AC 2012-3321: ADULT UNDERGRADUATE ENGINEERING STUDENTEXPERIENCEDr. Shannon Ciston, University of California, Berkeley Shannon Ciston is a lecturer of chemical and biomolecular engineering at the University of California, Berkeley. She has experience teaching chemical, environmental, and multidisciplinary engineering funda- mentals as well as technical communications. Ciston’s research interests include affective and experiential aspects of student learning, and impacts of nanomaterials on aquatic biofilms.Dr. Maria-Isabel Carnasciali, University of New Haven Maria-Isabel Carnasciali is Assistant Professor of mechanical engineering at the Tagliatela School of Engineering, University of New Haven, Conn. She obtained
their mistakes. The current homework grading system does not provide sufficient interaction between professors and students. Though the professors have office hours available to answer the students’ questions, but the students may not be utilizing these hours because of their full-time or part-time work schedules or other engagements. Failure to maintain an open communication activities, the students repeats the similar mistakes in the examinations as they did in the homework. Such failures in exams and homework drive struggling students to drop the class before completion. Literature review Page
Paper ID #21479Engineers’ Imaginaries of ’The Public’: Dominant Themes from Interviewswith Engineering Students, Faculty, and ProfessionalsDr. Nathan E. Canney, CYS Structural Engineers Inc. Dr. Canney’s research focuses on engineering education, specifically the development of social responsi- bility in engineering students. Other areas of interest include ethics, service learning, and sustainability education. Dr. Canney received bachelors degrees in Civil Engineering and Mathematics from Seat- tle University, a masters in Civil Engineering from Stanford University with an emphasis on structural engineering, and a PhD
provideinstructors with the tools needed to help change the way students view and approachinfrastructure topics.The CIT-E model course contains complete lesson materials for an entire one-semester course.The course introduces first or second year civil and environmental engineering students toinfrastructure and helps students see infrastructure as the system that it truly is. Consequently, itprovides students with the knowledge, skills, and attitudes needed to effectively design, build,manage, and maintain our public works by considering social, economic, environmental, andpolitical impacts in addition to the technical considerations.The course developers (that is, the members of the CIT-E community of practice) recognize thatmany first- or second-year
willexist [16]. Using a funds of knowledge theoretical grounding, summer enrichment programfacilitators can then reflect on how to provide engaging strengths-based educational experiencesfor students [24]. A FoK approach is beneficial for underrepresented students since it serves as acounter-discourse to harmful deficit-based models by validating the existing knowledge that hasbeen previously invalidated or neglected [23,24].It is important to note that the concept of funds of knowledge is not prior knowledge. FoKincludes the practices that inform the everyday lives and ways that communities operate, thecultural and social capital of communities that were previously considered to be resourceless,and the recognition of vast historical knowledge that
journals, commentary, and reflections.WTL strategies also allow students to assert more control over the way they learn. Emig8 ex-plains this benefit: “One writes best as one learns best, at one’s own pace.” Butler and Winne9assert that individualized learning is critical to individual success: “the most effective learnersand self-regulating.” They define self-regulation as “a suite of powerful skills: setting goals forupgrading knowledge; deliberating about strategies to select those that balance progress towardgoals against unwanted tasks; and, as steps are taken and the task evolves, monitoring the accu-mulating effects of their engagement.” If students are to be active participants in their learning,writing assignments must prompt self
intention was to measure the impact that the robotic workshop had onthe students perceptions in these four areas.The main hypothesis of this work is that Problem Based Learning (PBL) can influence studentsto be interested in STEM disciplines. PBL assumes that in the learning process the student takesan active role. In PBL the focus is centered on challenging students to be participants of theirlearning process by solving a problem that is generally open ended9. In the particular casepresented in this work, the students were presented with a robotic arm with missing connections,In it, the students had to collaboratively find a solution to the presented problem to make therobot work.Several researchers have studied the motivational effect of robotics
university community. Finally, students were thanked for theirtime and participation, then given specifics on how compensation would be distributed.G. Data AnalysisAfter the individual interviews, audio files from the Zoom recordings were transcribed using theRev.com transcription service. The photovoice component of this study was used to facilitatediscussions about the participants’ experiences. However, the images participants captured are notincluded in this work as this study focuses on the reflections derived from the photographs. Theresulting transcripts were analyzed using a reflexive thematic analysis to identify common themesamong the participants. Thematic analysis is a detailed method for identifying, analyzing,organizing, describing
fact the mission at the universitystates; Cal Poly fosters teaching, scholarship, and service in a learn-by-doing environment in which students, staff, and faculty are partners in discovery. As a polytechnic, Cal Poly promotes the application of theory to practice. As a comprehensive institution, Cal Poly provides a balanced education in the arts, sciences, and technology, while encouraging cross-disciplinary and co-curricular experiences. As an academic community, Cal Poly values free inquiry, cultural and intellectual diversity, mutual respect, civic engagement, and social and environmental responsibility.[1]The aspirations of the institute promote technical or depth of knowledge in a field
-world embedded system design issues. They are well familiar withmodern consumer products, which continue to get smaller, faster and consume less power. Thisexperiment aims to illustrate that gains in speed, size or power often come at a cost to the othertwo factors. The quantitative investigation emphasizes, through a cost benefit analysis of a realworld hands-on experience, the use of hardware versus software in an embedded system.This lab is an effective teaching tool which is engaging and interesting to the students. They areenthusiastic about analyzing and solving a real-world design issue. Displaying and manipulatingimages on the VGA further peaks their interest as they are able to visibly see the differencebetween the two
threesubmissions), student submissions were collected as uploads to a folder on the course’s learningmanagement system (LMS). During the latter portion of the semester (final four submissions),Twitter (http://www.twitter.com) was utilized as a means to both collect and promote discussionsaround student submissions. On Twitter, students were asked to include a hashtag (#mech293)with each of their posts (tweets) to provide a means of quickly sorting and organizing relevantposts. The transition from collecting submissions on the LMS to Twitter was made in order tofoster easier out-of-class discussion and communication surrounding a given student submission.Similar work has suggested that the use of Twitter helps facilitate student engagement outside ofclass
qualitative survey data andstudents’ feedback indicates that the combination of the structured labs and group projectsucceeded in engaging students’ interest. In the future, we plan to run more detailed surveys tocollect students’ feedback on the lab components and whether the course has impacted theircareer in the embedded DSP area.References [1] Arizona State University. Eee 404/591 real-time digital signal processing. http://lina.faculty.asu.edu/realdsp/. [2] The University of Texas at Austin. Ee 445s real-time digital signal processing laboratory. http://users.ece.utexas.edu/ bevans/courses/realtime/. [3] University of London. Real-time digital signal processing with tms320c6000. http://www.ee.ic.ac.uk/pcheung/teaching/ee3 Study Project
nearly 75% of students enjoyed their project with 6 students neutral ontheir project and one student who had a low level of enjoyment. In Table 3, the next fourquestions inquire about the students’ ability to connect the course material with the project.Hopefully the students saw the relevance to teamwork/leadership, communication, engineeringdesign and engineering problem solving. These topics are covered in the reading and classdiscussion then also applied through the project. All four had average scores above 4.2 on a 5-point scale for the alignment of the project and course topic. It is encouraging that the project-based approach is complimenting the course material and reinforcing it through practicalapplication. Figure
engineering,while the lowest, 14 %, in computer-science in 2014 [4]. Some prior studies indicatedthat the low representation of females in engineering program was closely associatedwith gender differences observed in students’ learning experience, self-efficacy andlearning outcomes [5][6][7]. Others, moreover, observed that gender differences in termsof students’ self-efficacy, engagement level and performance presented significantchallenges to the teaching and learning process in engineering education [7].Particular challenges for female students have been observed in the team-workingenvironment of a project-based learning process [8]. Project-based Teaching, as one ofthe core teaching methods, has been widely adopted in engineering education
. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Design Curriculum in Introductory Circuits Laboratory Assignments and the Influence on Innovation Self-EfficacyAbstractThis paper examines the impact of integrated design elements in a second-year introductorycircuits course on students’ innovation self-efficacy (ISE). Building upon a pilot study fromSpring 2024, this research focuses on the implementation of updated laboratory assignments inone section of the course while maintaining the original curriculum in a parallel section. Theupdated curriculum emphasizes experiential learning through active learning engagement,simulation exercises, open-ended design challenges, and reflection. This allows students tonavigate the full
. Kathleen Quardokus Fisher, Oregon State University Dr. Kathleen Quardokus Fisher is a postdoctoral scholar at Oregon State University. She is currently participating in a project that supports the use of evidence-based instructional practices in undergraduate STEM courses through developing communities of practice. Her research interests focus on understanding how organizational change occurs in higher education with respect to teaching and learning in STEM courses.Ms. Christina Smith, Oregon State University Christina Smith is a graduate student in the School of Chemical, Biological, and Environmental Engineer- ing at Oregon State University. She received her B.S. from the University of Utah in chemical engineering
basic concepts of management andSpeaking effectively. The assessment of these specific ABET student outcomes include directand indirect embedded indicators. Additionally, the impact on both the cognitive and affectivedevelopmental domains is considered with respect to educating and inspiring our future civilengineers. 1 IntroductionThe mission of the United States Military Academy (USMA) has evolved since the institution’sinception in 18021:To educate, train, and inspire the Corps of Cadets so that each graduate is a commissionedleader of character committed to the values of Duty, Honor, Country, and prepared for a careerof professional excellence and service to the Nation as an officer in the
students’ perceptions within their teams (measuring Autonomy,Psychological Needs Scale1 to measure motivation (Fall 2019). The recent classroom-based study in Relatedness and Competence). The survey was administered first in week 3, at the • Measure and visualize the level of awareness of class instructor on cognitivethe Spring 2021 semester utilized an industry tool formerly owned by fable+ and administered by beginning of the semester, after students had just started working in their teams but diversity and psychological safety and how this impact the learning dynamicsICQ Global Australia. The author from Pertamina University used the same tool in the senior
, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE). She has served as the Associate Chair for Under- graduate Education in the CEAE Department, as well as the ABET assessment coordinator. She was also the faculty director of the Sustainable By Design Residential Academic Program at CU, a living-learning community where interdisciplinary students learn about and practice sustainability. Bielefeldt is currently the chair of ASEE’s Community Engagement Division and a member of the AAAS Committee on Sci- entific Freedom and Responsibility.She is also a licensed P.E. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in engineering education include service-learning, sustainable engineering, social responsibility, ethics, and
, Representation and Reasoning, and Learning.Some articles [12-14] demonstrate high engagement with these concepts, incorporating detailedcurriculum development and practical ML applications to enhance students' AI literacy.However, the focus on Natural Interaction and Societal Impact is less prevalent, indicating apotential gap in the literature. While some articles [17, 26] begin to broach these topics, oftenthrough the lens of diversity and ethical considerations, there is an evident need for a morecomprehensive integration of these concepts. Furthermore, a small portion of the research [22,24] does not extensively address these AI4K12 concepts, suggesting room for growth in coveringthe full breadth of AI literacy within educational research.4.3
rituals andvisitations, where extended family, friends, or community members provided support during timesof scarcity [17]. Prior work on FofK has demonstrated its positive effects on students’ academicperformance. For example, Volman’s [18] intervention consisted of teachers implementing severalactivities and ways to show and build students’ funds of knowledge and identity through the courseof a school year, which revealed positive results on attitudes, involvement, teamwork, confidence,and overall well-being. Another study unveiled that students from the lowest income groups weremore engaged and maintained an interest in science when they could use their own experiencesand knowledge to make science more relevant [19]. Verdin et al. [20
of a recentlycompleted student Capstone project “Smart Phone Book Search”, ii) analyzes how the studentsmet the program goals and gained practical experience dealing with real life problems, and iii)demonstrates how the project provides a viable solution.In the current busy Internet world, we are all actively engaged in a great variety of differentpursuits and heavily dependent on our mobile phones to maintain immediate contact with family,friends, and colleagues. We often store information in our mobile phones and later randomlyretrieve such information as needed. Contact information stored in our mobile phone is used fora variety of purposes beyond making a phone call, and serves as an important general purposedata source. The “Smart Phone
not change significantly for almost twodecades. Starting in Fall 2014, a new curriculum was implemented that exposes students to theArduino microcontroller, robot building, sensors, DC motors, C programming, CAD modeling,and 3D printing. The primary objective of the redesigned course was to excite incoming students,provide them with an engaging, hands-on experience, and help them acquire useful andtransferable skills. From this perspective, the redesign has been a great success as prior surveysindicated that students enjoy the new course. A detailed analysis of the redesign and surveyresults were presented at the 2016 ASEE Annual Conference.Since the redesign was implemented only two years ago, our department still contains manystudents who
was thebiggest success factor in academic and professional success (Virkki [3]). Herbert et al. found thatimproving student engagement early can also signi�icantly impact both retention and studentperformance [4]. As noted in the next section, 30% of scanned programs now accept CS 0 as a prerequisite forbeginning the CS 1 course. The impact of the CS 0 course on CS 1 has been studied quite extensively[1], [5], [6] and it is not a surprise that taking a CS 0 course, in college or in high school improvesstudent performance in the CS 1 course. Our concern is whether the CS 0 course is a necessaryprerequisite, and whether, as in our case, the removal of the CS 0 prerequisite enables studentsmore �lexibility in taking upper division courses
. Dr. AbdelGawad’s interests are centered around materials and manufacturing, with a strong focus on corrosion of advanced materials, and the study of statics and mechanics. With an extensive teaching background, she has developed a keen interest in advancing innovation in engineering education. At present, she actively explores various methods to enhance student engagement and optimize their learning experiences through curriculum and course design. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 WIP: The Use of Animated Visual Aids in the Education of Undergraduate Engineering StudentsIntroductionA common issue in many classes, particularly in materials