engineering students were expected to work with first-year medical students todevelop innovative solutions for clinical problems. Faculty members from both institutes servedas mentors for student projects. The education objectives are twofold: (1) to develop the criticalthinking skills and independent research ability by solving engineering problems throughauthentic projects, and (2) to increase students’ non-cognitive learning outcomes such ascommitment and engagement with engineering, communication (writing and presentation skills),self-efficacy, and teamwork in a multidisciplinary environment. The first class of this biomedical innovation course started in the fall of 2021. The completeteaching plan comprises two consecutive courses in fall and
Tagliatela College of Engineering and is the PI of the grant entitled Developing Entrepreneurial Thinking in Engineering Students by Utilizing Integrated Online Modules and a Leadership Cohort. Through this grant entrepreneurial thinking will be integrated into courses spanning all four years in seven ABET accredited engineering and computer science BS programs.Dr. Maria-Isabel Carnasciali, University of New Haven Maria-Isabel Carnasciali is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the Tagliatela College of Engineering, University of New Haven, CT. She obtained her Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Georgia Tech in 2008. She received her Bachelors of Engineering from MIT in 2000. Her research focuses on the
engineering is vital to the effective, efficient operation of anyorganization. This is provided to the community via two sources - students and faculty.1. The primary product of the INSE Program is the student. In this regard, INSEgraduates will: o Be highly competent in mathematical understanding o Develop a systems-oriented approach to problem analysis o Be aware of process design, as well as product design o Possess and be able to apply problem-solving skills o Be effective in all segments of society o Possess decision-making skills o Be able to solve new problems, in unfamiliar areas, as well as solve old, familiar ones o Be able to apply their INSE skills in a wide variety of areas: engineering, management
engaged inarticulating their current understanding and reflecting on the implications of their observationsappeared to develop a greater conceptual understanding than students in a traditional collegechemistry course. Alonso-Tapia et al16 provided self-assessment prompts to higher schoolstudents for landscape analysis, and illustrated that students using these prompts had showedbetter knowledge than students working without them. Nonetheless, SRL has just started to draw attention among the technology and engineeringeducation community. Based on the SRL theories, Blank et al17 implemented the SRLassessment through the self-assessment-for-learning approach in a two-year technology course.In their program, a series of self-assessment
homework on math,science, English and history test scores for eighth grade students in the United States and foundfind that math homework has a large and statistically meaningful effect on math test scores.PytlikZillig et al.25 examined two frequently-used discussion protocols that were as part of aprogram to implement teaching cases in undergraduate that involved synchronous face-to-face(FTF) and asynchronous computer-mediated (CM) discussion taking place outside of class. Theyfound both CM and FTF discussion related to higher cognitive-affective engagement with thecases than the control condition and the CM discussion condition was associated with highercognitive-affective engagement than FTF discussion. In contrast, FTF discussion, but not
heuristics.Dr. Justin L. Hess, Indiana University-Purdue University of Indianapolis Dr. Justin L Hess is the Assistant Director of the STEM Education Innovation and Research Institute at IUPUI. His research interests include ethics, design, and sustainability. Dr. Hess received each of his degrees from Purdue University, including a PhD in Engineering Education, a Master of Science in Civil Engineering, and a Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering. He is currently the Vice Chair of the American Society of Civil Engineers’ Committee on Sustainability subcommittee on Formal Engineering Education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Critical Incidents in Engineering Students
to surface-level learning, where the focus is not on developingmetacognitive connections but rather on achieving a specific score relative to peers [6]. Thevalence of approach refers to a student’s willingness to engage in a particular learning behavior.Approach-oriented goals are associated with higher learning outcomes and higher self-efficacybecause students set goals to achieve academic challenges [7]. Avoidance goals refer to studentsstriving to meet expectations primarily to avoid failure or negative consequences. Paired, this model creates four distinct orientations: mastery approach, performanceapproach, mastery avoidance, and performance avoidance. If students report high masteryapproach, it suggests that the student seeks
Variable = Points Earned)[23] Braddock and Dawkins[3] found in their study that “high school grades are statisticallysignificant determinants of college grade performance in three (two-year TWI; four-year TBI;four-year TWI) of the four comparisons made while aptitude test scores were found to bestatistically significant contributors in only one (two-year TBI) of the four subgroups.Gosman[17], et al, found that “not only are black students more likely than white students towithdraw from college, but they also engage in proportionately more part-time and interruptedschooling, resulting in significantly lower four-year completion rates for blacks.”[17
of engineering doctorates awarded by U.S. universities to U.S. citizens dropped by 23% in the past decade.*The first of these statistics fails to support the point that engineering enrollments are “going inthe wrong direction,” because it describes only the proportion of degrees awarded. A decline inthe proportion of degrees awarded does not necessarily indicate a decline in the number ofdegrees awarded. The second item obfuscates the point by aggregating engineering withmathematics, physical sciences, and geosciences. The third is simply irrelevant, as the numberof doctorates awarded has little relationship to the number of engineering students in four-yearcolleges and has no impact on engineering licensure.Figure 1, produced by the
instructions. Instructors also reported more frequenttroubleshooting experience while using blended formats of instruction. Several other socio-cultural barriers of effective teaching were also noted. While individuals with children struggledto cope up due to school and daycare closures, individuals living alone struggled with depressionand anxiety due to limited in-person interactions amid widespread stay-at-home order. Thestruggle was exacerbated for students who were tested coronavirus positive or caregivers forimmediate family members. The pandemic also had a major psychosocial impact on individualsin academia who lost their loved ones or became unemployed. In a nutshell, both students andinstructors were not able to perform their academic
NCEES annual meetings. These presentations allowed for ASCE to communicate its position and disseminate information related to the upcoming votes. Actions and discussions at the spring NCEES zone meetings were monitored. This information provided a preview of the debates that would occur at the annual meeting and allowed ASCE to properly prepare for the meetings. The votes by licensure boards on each education-related issue were evaluated. This improved the understanding of where the various licensure boards stood on the issues and provided an indication of how their position may have been changing over time. Representatives of ASCE attended the NCEES annual meetings and engaged in informal
career path. Blazer proposes that pupils with a “fixed mindset” generally haveset beliefs about their abilities and engage in tasks they know they can perform well in, whileavoiding challenges.10 On the other hand, students with a “growth mindset” are not afraid totake risks in expanding their ability, embrace challenges presented to them, work harder whenfaced with a setback, and view criticism and advice as valuable to personal development.10Although individuals may not identify with one of the two mindsets all of the time,approximately 40% of people have a growth mindset, 40% have a fixed mindset, and 20% do notidentify with either mindset.10In a study relating mindset to academic achievement in math and science, Dweck found thatstudents with
” structure, community service and structured reflection. Many papers havebeen written that summarize the benefits of service-learning in engineering .4, 5, 8, 11-18 Some ofthe key benefits that have been identified in these papers include helping students to developtechnical and non-technical skills, enhancing the students’ problem solving skills, creativity andability to adapt to difficult situations, helping students to make connections between classes andto develop racial and cultural sensitivity, enhancing the students’ commitment to civicresponsibility and increasing their ethical awareness and awareness of the impact of professionaldecisions on society and the environment. When service-learning is combined with internationalexperience
strive to make thisintroduction class a fun and engaging experience and to keep students engagedwhile taking other general subjects such as math, chemistry, and physics courses.The team-experience gained through the final course project also helps studentsdevelop essential teamwork skills.As indicated by student survey results, the guest talks have been wellacknowledged by students and have been valuable assets of the Intro to EEcourse. The hands-on lab curriculum of this course has shown to be a successfulendeavor as well. Some of these hands-on activities can be adopted as tools toengage K-12 students to inspire them to study STEM majors. We will furtherelaborate such possibilities in Section III. Our experience of offering the Intro toEE
and innovation is too broad to be included in ABET student learningoutcomes. It is curious how some of these areas may be present in addition to technical content.Mindful Design Education EffortsIncreasingly, design-focused coursework is including novel and (relatively) new approaches suchas more emphasis on human-centered design and design thinking. Dym et. al. [5] captured manyapproaches for design to be used as pedagogical innovation itself. This can now be extended toencapsulate also what Making and makerspaces provide in support of such educational activities[2, 6, 7] There is wider adoption of digital and rapid fabrication tools such as 3D printers, as wellas additional models for community engagement such as community-based design and
. Higher Education, 79(6), 1023-1037.[20]. Cook-Sather, A., Bovill, C., & Felten, P. (2014). Engaging students as partners in learning and teaching: A guide for faculty. John Wiley & Sons. 11[21]. Mercer-Mapstone, L., Dvorakova, S. L., Matthews, K. E., Abbot, S., Cheng, B., Felten, P., ... & Swaim, K. (2017). A systematic literature review of students as partners in higher education. International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(1).[22]. Harrington, C., Erete, S., & Piper, A. M. (2019). Deconstructing community-based collaborative design: Towards more equitable participatory design engagements. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 3(CSCW), 1-25.[23
a video camera. The final exam grades of the students werecompared before and after the hands-on active learning module was implemented. The resultsshow significant enhancement of students’ grades as well as teaching and learning effectiveness.Feedback about the hands-on shake table testing module was also collected and analyzed, andstudents’ feedback shows the active learning module advances their understanding of the coursematerials and enhances their interest in Dynamics.Keywords: active learning, dynamics, hands-on, t-test1. Introduction:Active learning is a process which engages students in various activities that help advance theirunderstanding and knowledge of a particular subject. Over the years, this process has becomemore
student. TheIowa State evaluation process as reported by Mickelson, et al 5,6,7 recognizes this Page 12.528.3difficulty, and it avoids the problem by mapping the assessment of a specific successfuloutcome onto the achievement of specific competencies associated with that outcome.The fifteen ISU general competencies are: Analysis and Judgment, Communication,Continuous Learning, Cultural Adaptability, Customer Focus, Engineering Knowledge,General Knowledge, Initiative, Innovation, Integrity, Planning, Professional Impact,Quality Orientation, Safety Orientation, and Teamwork. Competencies are deemed tohave been achieved when students perform very specific
AC 2012-3048: THE RAISE THE BAR INITIATIVE: CHARTING THEFUTURE BY UNDERSTANDING THE PATH TO THE PRESENT - ANOVERVIEWDr. Jeffrey S. Russell, University of Wisconsin, Madison Jeffrey S. Russell, Ph.D., P.E., is Vice Provost for Lifelong Learning and Dean of Continuing Studies at the University of Wisconsin, Madison (UW). In this role, Russell is responsible for leading the university’s programs and services for lifelong learners and nontraditional students. Prior to assuming his current po- sition, Russell served as professor and Chair in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering (CEE) at the UW. In addition to his position as Vice Provost, Russell serves as a professor in the CEE Department, focusing on
their advisers are less likely toreport stress-related issues [33].To promote a more inclusive and effective advising approach for graduate internationalstudents, it is important to shift from an ethnocentric to an intercultural approach [38]. Thisapproach recognizes and values the differences between cultures and draws on the strengths ofboth to support student development [38]. To achieve this, it is crucial to increase faculty'sunderstanding and appreciation of both their own and their advisees' cultures. As such, furtherresearch should investigate the experiences of faculty in advising graduate internationalstudents [40] and explore how intercultural communication competence can impact theadviser-advise relationship. Acknowledging and
ways of approaching or interpreting information within a subject,and their mastery is often necessary before the learner can effectively continue on to moreadvanced topics in the field 2. Threshold concepts are distinguished from “core concepts” in thatthey are not simply important or fundamental concepts for the student; they also act as tools forintegrating multiple types of knowledge and ways of thinking into one new and unified view ofthe relevant concepts. Threshold concepts have been described as having five primary qualities,in that they are likely to be: Transformative: Once understood, threshold concepts have a significant impact on the student’s overall understanding of the concepts, and often result in a shift in
lines on the foam to get a visualization on angle of twist.” • “It is much easier using the elements in the kit to make the twists/rotations and actually see what the deformations are.” • “It showed how bending moments can cause compression or tension on one side of the specimen.” • “The kit was helpful in visualizing bending and other stresses.” • “It helped me understand the concepts of bending and torsion perfectly” • “This kit is a real life model which eliminates the risk of my own misconceptions.”9Activity 6: Continuous Engagement with Instructors During Adoption ProcessTwo undergraduate students communicated with 2015
. She draws on these experiences as well as her MS and PhD in Cognitive Science from the University of Louisville to construct meaningful activities in her first-year engineering course. She aims to improve the number of engineering graduates as well as the quality and diversity of the engineering workforce using evidence-based practices and applied theory in the classroom.Jeffrey Lloyd HiebJody Zhong (Graduate Assistant) Jody is a doctoral student in the Counseling Psychology department at the University of Louisville College of Education & Human Development. Jody's interests include studying how students from underserved communities navigate academic and professional environments, and the formation of
Paper ID #38762Career Outcomes Tracking New York City Louis Stokes Alliance forMinority Participation Research Scholars from 1993 to 2022Dr. Claude Brathwaite, City University of New York, City College Dr. Claude Brathwaite currently serves as the Director of Student Resources and Services at the City Col- lege Grove School of Engineering, utilizing a model of High Impact Practices and Engagement (HIPE). Dr. Brathwaite previously served as the Project Administrator and later Executive Director of the NYC Louis Stokes Alliance. He has also served as the Deputy Director of the City College Black Studies Pro- gram, the
Page 15.309.2solutions such as defensive routines, refusal to deal with emotions or “scapegoating” 9.Taken together, these research findings indicate that team conflict is an importantmechanism influencing the integration of emotion and intellect. Therefore, it needs moreattention in the context of teaching engineering design and innovation. Therefore, thisresearch will show common conflict patterns and conflict-management strategies,including productive forms of conflict that are present in student engineering design andinnovation.MethodologyTo explore the nature of team conflict and its impact on team performance our currentwork is investigating the following research questions: ≠ What is the nature of team conflict in student design
to choose from (based on the ideasand opportunities that they uncovered from their visits to rural Nicaraguan communities). Theywere asked to fill out a decision matrix where the components of the matrix and weighting ofeach field were: 1. Project alignment with electrical/computer engineering fields (weighting – 1) 2. Interest in the technology (weighting – 1) 3. Skill set to work on the project (weighting – 1) 4. Social impact (weighting – 0.5) 5. Business opportunity (weighting – 0.7)Six projects were selected as follows and were assigned students from Villanova University andUNI as follows: 1. Solar charge controller design (one Villanova student, one UNI student) 2. Design of a tele-health and remote education
displaced due to conflict, poverty, or other factors. TheLocalized Engineering in Displacement (LED) program was created to address this issue bydelivering engineering learning opportunities to learners in displaced settings. Multiple iterationsof the LED program have been implemented in Kenya, Jordan, Zimbabwe, Senegal, and the U.S.Previous research has shown that students in displaced settings often face unique challenges,such as limited access to resources and support, and may have limited prior exposure toengineering concepts. These factors can impact students' motivation and self-efficacy and maylimit their ability to successfully engage with engineering coursework. While assessing theimpact of a STEM program on students, it is important to
Paper ID #37213Why STEM? The External Factors Influencing International STEMPostdoctoral Scholars’ Career DecisionDr. Sylvia L. Mendez, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs Dr. Sylvia Mendez is a Professor of Leadership, Research, and Foundations at the University of Col- orado Colorado Springs. She earned a PhD in Educational Leadership and Policy Studies from the University of Kansas, a MS in Student Affairs in Higher Education from Colorado State University, and a BA in Economics from Washington State University. She is engaged in several National Science Foundation-sponsored collaborative research projects focused on
participants related to their roles as education leaders, curriculum developers, andassessment designers; (c) establishing academic year follow-up mechanisms includingInstructional Coaching, Quarterly Team Meetings to meet program requirements on a timelybasis, and Cross Classroom Collaboration to ensure implementation of newly developedcurriculum modules; (d) disseminating findings to other regional educators through the annualCMU High-Impact Teaching Symposium, as well as publications in conferences and journals;(e) the annual CMU STEM Day outreach event to engage secondary school students in STEMdisciplines.2. Program Orientation and ScheduleParticipant recruitment and program efforts started right after receipt of the RET site awardnotification
results remain stagnant. In the College ofEngineering and Applied Science at the University of Colorado Boulder, an NSF-sponsoredresearch project is creating a system-based model with elements and practices that could beapplied to begin to alleviate the shortfall of diverse students in U.S. engineering schools.“Inclusive excellence” refers to creating pathways to and through engineering that promotesuccess for a highly diverse student body through learning communities, engaging academicsand innovative policies. The Inclusive Excellence Research Project aims to investigate anddefine a system of varied pathways to and through engineering composed of three integratedsub-models: Access, Performance and Retention. The Access sub-model investigates how