drafted this into an internal technical report as part of ourdata audit,47 which helped us look for particular themes that individuals repeatedly brought upwithin their series of interviews. In addition, we also have looked across cases for cross-cuttingthemes that multiple individuals raised. Some of these themes have been presented at theFrontiers in Education conference.50Discussion of analysisWe report here on the data collected as part of the initial “pre” interview, where the participantsbrought their pictures that represented engineering to them and discussed them with theinterviewer. As a result, these data represent themes seen across cases
of the Fourth International Conference on Learning Analytics And Knowledge, pages 103–112. ACM, 2014.18. B. M. Capobianco, J. H. Yu, B. F. French, “Effects of Engineering Design-Based Science on Elementary School Science Students’ Engineering Identity Development across Gender and Grade,” in Research in Science Education, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 275- 292, 2015.19. J. Trent, “Teacher education as identity construction: insights from action research,” in Journal of Education for Teaching, vol. 36, no. 2, 2010.20. P. J. Burke, J. E. Stets, “Identity Theory,” New York: Oxford Press, 2009.21. P. T. Knight, “Summative Assessment in Higher Education: Practices in disarray,” in Studies in Higher Education, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 275-286
their groups. For the Fall 2021, the faculty intend to keep shared learning objectives,workshops, assignments throughout the course so that students have similar first-yearexperiences regardless of the section they are in or the project they work on.AcknowledgmentsThe authors would like to thank the Olin Summer Institute and specifically their coaching teamfor their guidance in the reimagining of the engineering design course.References1. Smith, K. A., Sheppard, S. D., Johnson, D. W. & Johnson, R. T. Pedagogies of Engagement: Classroom-Based Practices. J. Eng. Educ. 94, 87–101 (2005).2. Sheppard, S. et al. Examples of Freshman Design Education. International Journal of Engineering Education (1997).3. Redish, E. F. & Smith, K. A
Zealand Journal of Law and Education, vol. 13, no.2, 2008, pp. 21-32.[14] A. O. Madan, “Cyber aggression/cyber bullying and the dark triad: effect on workplace behavior/performance,” International Journal of Social, Education, Economics and Management Engineering, vol. 8, no.6, 2014.[15] Q. Li., “Cyberbullying in schools: A research of gender differences,” School Psychology International, vol. 27 no.2, 2006, pp. 157-170.[16] E. M. Lund and S. W. Ross, “Bullying perpetration, victimization, and demographic differences in college students: A review of the literature,” Trauma, Violence and Abuse, vol. 18, no. 3, 2017, pp. 348-360.[17] L. K. Watts, J. Wagner, B. Velasquez, and P. I. Behrens
The peer-to-peer understanding was used to code for instances when participants woulddiscuss how to build a deeper understanding amongst their students. Some educators discussedhow they would provide opportunities for connection in the classroom. For example, participantEE2 stated that she connected her students with “alumni to tell them, hey, I still don't reallyalways know what I'm doing. That it's OK to not feel like you're perfect, to not feel like youknow everything.” Providing an environment to allow students to be empathetic towards oneanother helps them to develop better social networks and develop professional skills which willlead to a more successful career.B. Diversity Engineering educators should promote diverse principles
years. Prof. Chowdhury earned her MS in Civil engineering from Clarkson University, New York, USA and B.S. in Civil Engineering from Bangladesh University of Engineering & Technology. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Integrating Evidence-Based Learning in Engineering and Computer Science Gateway CoursesAbstractGateway Courses generally refers to the courses that are crucial for students to progress throughtheir chosen majors. The successful completion of the gateway courses are necessary becausethese courses are mostly the prerequisites of other courses in the majors. However, many typesof attritions in the STEM gateway courses lead to high failure
firms. Page 12.506.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Development of a Capstone Design Program for Undergraduate Mechanical EngineeringAbstractIn September 2004, the University of California, Santa Barbara, Department of MechanicalEngineering initiated a Capstone Design course requirement for Senior Mechanical Engineeringstudents. The course has transitioned from a three unit course typically taken in the final Springquarter of the curriculum to a two unit course taken each quarter of the academic year for a totalof six units. Students work in teams under the direction of a faculty
) MET4390 Internal Combustion Engines (3 credits) MET4900 Alternative Energy Systems (3 credits) o Typical elective credits for materials science and engineering students MY3100 Materials Processing I (4 credits) MY3110 Materials Processing II (4 credits) MY4140 Science of Ceramic Materials (3 credits) MY4990 Materials Science and Engineering Undergraduate Research (1-6 credits) MY5410 Materials for Energy Applications (3 credits) o In addition, the following elective courses are related to societal impacts of hydrogen technology EC4620 Energy Economics (3
case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom: Putting a Learning-by-Designcurriculum into practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(4), 495-548.7. Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., Beaton, A. E., Gonzalez, E. J., Smith, T. A., & Kelly, D. L. (1997). Scienceachievement in the primary school years: IEA’s third international mathematics and science study. Chestnut Hill,MA: Center for the Study of Testing, Evaluation, and Educational Policy, Boston College.8. Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., Gonzalez, E. J., Gregory, K. D., Smith, T. A., Chrostowski, S. J., et al. (2000).TIMSS 1999 international science report: Findings from IEA’s repeat of the third international mathematics andscience study at the eighth grade. Chestnut
AC 2010-1033: SUCCESSFUL STUDENTS: SMART OR TOUGH?Beverly Jaeger, Northeastern University Beverly, Rich, and Sue are core members of the Gateway Team of full-time faculty in the College of Engineering at Northeastern University in Boston, MA. While they concentrate on first-year engineering courses teaching across all engineering disciplines, they also teach specialty courses in the Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering at NU. Each of the NU team has published and presented papers on approaches and techniques in engineering education. Combined, Sue, Rich, and Beverly have earned several teaching awards and are proponents of active, engaging, and effective learning
. s.l. :Educational Technology Publications, 1982. pp. 179-181.5. Different Methods of Multiple-Choice Test: Implications and Design for Further Research. Ng, Annie W.Y andChan, Alan H.S. Hong Kong : IMECS, 2009. International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists.pp. 1958-1963. Vol II.6. A Taxonomy of Multiple-Choice Item-Writing Rules. Haladyna, Thomas M. and Downing, Steven M. 1, s.l. :Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, 1989, Applied Measurement in Education, Vol. 2, pp. 37-50.7. Some Modifications of the Multiple-Choice Item. Dressel, Paul L and Schmid, John. 4, Durham : Educationaland Psychological Measurement, December 1953, Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 13, pp. 574-595.8. Brown, Thomas A. and Shuford, Emir
. Robinson, “Diagnostic Testing in Mathematics: Paired Questions.” Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications, vol.24, no.4, pp. 154–66, 2005.[20] J. Vanderoost, R. Callens, J.P.L. Vandewalle, T. De Laet, “Engineering Positioning Test in Flanders : A Powerful Predictor for Study Success ?”, Proceedings of the 42nd annual SEFI conference, Birmingham, UK, 15-19 September, 2014.[21] J.L. Hieb, K.B. Lyle, P.A.S. Ralston, and J. Chariker,“Predicting Performance in a First Engineering Calculus Course : Implications for Interventions.” International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, vol.46, no.1, pp. 40–55, 2015.[22] M. Pinxten, T. De Laet, C. Van Soom, C. Peeters, C. Kautz, P. Hockicko, P. Pacher, K
://investigate.afsc.org. [Online]. Available: https://investigate.afsc.org/company/lockheed-martin. [Accessed: Jan. 21, 2025].[6] Investigate, “General Dynamics Corp,” https://investigate.afsc.org. [Online]. Available: https://investigate.afsc.org/company/general-dynamics. [Accessed: Jan. 21, 2025].[7] A. W. Johnson, C. L. Bowen, C. C. Cruz, and R. B. Rodriguez, “Ethical Issues In Mechanical And Aerospace Engineering,” in The Routledge International Handbook of Engineering Ethics Education (1st ed.). Routledge, 2024, pp. 269–284. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003464259-19.[8] ABET, “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2022-2023,” https://www.abet.org/. [Online]. Available
commotion:” Re-imagining Urban Elementary Students’ Participation in Engineering Design Practices. International Journal of Education in Mathematics Science and Technology, 6(3), 285-301.Appendix A: Interview QuestionsThe following questions were asked in Phase 1 of the individual student interviews. ● Can you please tell me about your design? ● How did you come up with this design? ● Have you ever seen or done anything before that made you think of your solution? ● What do you consider to be good about your design? Why? ○ Follow-up: What things do you like about your design? Why? ● Can you explain how your design solves the problem? ow was your design supposed to
). ACM.Blikstein, P. (2013). Digital fabrication and ‘making’ in education: The democratization of invention. FabLabs: Of machines, makers and inventors, 1-21.Blikstein, P., Abrahamson, D., & Wilensky, U. (2005, June). Netlogo: Where we are, where we’re going. In Proceedings of the annual meeting of Interaction Design and Children, Press.Blikstein, P., & Wilensky, U. (2005). Less is more: Agent-based simulation as a powerful learning tool in materials science. In IV International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2005), Utrecht, Holland.Blikstein, P., & Wilensky, U. (2010). MaterialSim: A constructionist agent-based modeling approach to engineering education. In Designs for learning
Measurement inEducation guidelines 15. Reliability relates to “the consistency of the scores across instances ofthe testing procedure” (p. 33). Cronbach’s alpha was used as a measure of internal consistencyfor the items within each construct. “Validity refers to the degree to which evidence and theorysupports the interpretations of the test scores for the proposed uses of tests…” (p. 11). Theintention of this instrument is to measure environmental factors which may contribute toeffective ethics education in engineering. Evidence of validity presented in this paper includesevidence based on test content and evidence based on internal structure. Evidence based on testcontent focuses on the relationship between the content of the test (the questions
,” Procedia Engineering, 2017. 196, 1088–1097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.08.066[9] I. Choudhury, "The Effect of Watching Video Clips on Student Performance in a Construction Science Course at an Undergraduate Level," In 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2011. pp. 22-1450.[10] J. M. Burgett, “Can ‘Flipping the Classroom’ Improve the Educational Experience in Construction Management Courses: A Case Study in Teaching,” HVAC Psychrometrics, 2014. 8. http://ascpro0.ascweb.org/archives/cd/2014/paper/CEUE127002014.pdf[11] N. Lee, T. Salama, and S. J. Kim, “Using the Flipped Classroom Model to Improve Construction Engineering and Management Education,” 2016 ASEE Annual Conference &
, international engineering education research, education policy making, teamwork and leadership, and management of production systems. He has worked as a production control engineer in Taiwan, and taught industrial, manufacturing, and first-year engineering at Purdue University. He also participated in NSF funded projects on student success in engineering, and international engineering education. His passion is to develop world-class engineers that can collaborate and compete with the best engineers in the world.Dr. Kenneth Reid, Ohio Northern University Ken Reid is the Director of Engineering Education, Director of First-Year Engineering and Professor in Electrical and Computer Engineering at Ohio Northern University. He was
created qualitative and quantitative instruments for outcome assessment in enginering education. She has also evaluated policy efforts towards engineering diversity and undergraduate research.Dr. Sergio Celis, Universidad de Chile Sergio Celis is an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering and Sciences at the Universidad de Chile. He conducts research on higher education, with a focus on teaching and learning in STEM fields. His primary research interest is in how multiple forces, internal and external to the institution, influence what and how we teach in colleges and universities. Sergio received his professional degree in industrial engineering at the University of Chile and his Ph.D. in higher
Paper ID #31731Engineering Resilience through Research Mentorship: ManufacturingPathways to CareersDr. Lara Cristina Perez-Felkner, Florida State University Dr. Lara Perez-Felkner is an Associate Professor of Higher Education and Sociology in the Higher Edu- cation Program within the College of Education at Florida State University. She is affiliated with FSU’s Center for Postsecondary Success, Temple University’s Center for College, Community, and Justice, and the international VHTO Network Gender + STEM. Her research uses developmental and sociological perspectives to examine how young people’s social contexts
AC 2010-490: MUSEINK: SEEING AND HEARING A FRESHMAN ENGINEERINGSTUDENT INK AND THINKDavid Bowman, Clemson University David R. Bowman is a Lecturer in the General Engineering Program within the Department of Engineering and Science Education at Clemson University. He is also a Computer Science Ph.D student in the School of Computing at Clemson University. His educational background includes a B.S. and M.S. in Computer Engineering from Clemson University.Lisa Benson, Clemson University Lisa Benson is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering and Science Education at Clemson University, with a joint appointment in the Department of Bioengineering. Dr. Benson teaches first year
inEducation Conference (FIE), pp. 1-5. IEEE, 2015[5] C., Vieira, Y.Y., Seah, and A.J., Magana. "Students' experimentation strategies in design: Isprocess data enough?" Computer Applications in Engineering Education 26, no. 5 (2018): 1903-1914.[6] X., Charles, C. Schimpf, J. Chao, S. Nourian, and J. Massicotte. "Learning and teachingengineering design through modeling and simulation on a CAD platform." ComputerApplications in Engineering Education 26, no. 4 (2018): 824-840.[7] X., Charles, Z., Zhang, S., Nourian, A., Pallant, and E., Hazzard. "A time series analysismethod for assessing engineering design processes using a CAD tool." International Journal ofEngineering Education 30, no. 1 (2014): 218-230.[8] J., Riitta. "Think-aloud protocol studies
the educational purpose of the presentation. Since this study wasperformed with a limited amount of data, it will be repeated and a more complete assessment isplanned for future classes.Bibliography1. Job Outlook 2011. National Association of Colleges and Employers, Bethlehem, PA, November 2010.2. Ford, J.D. and Riley, L.A., “Integrating Communication and Engineering: A look at curricula, courses and support systems”, Journal of Engineering Education, October 2003.3. Williams, J.M., “Transformations in Technical Communication Pedagogy: engineering, writing, and the ABET Engineering Criteria 2000”, Proceedings of 2000 Joint IEEE International and 18th Annual Conference on Computer Documentation, Cambridge, MA, Sept. 2000.4
successfulimplementation, the VLE will be made available to the global engineering community.AcknowledgementsThis work was funded by the Armstrong Teaching and Learning Grant 2011-2012 and the NASAGeorgia Space Grant Consortium, P.I. Coates, C. The authors would also like to acknowledgethe undergraduate student research assistants for their work with the creation of the multimediatutorials.References1. Campbell, C., “On-Line Video-Based Training for MATLAB, MATHCAD and MAPLE”, American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Austin, TX, June 2009.2. Kaw, A., Besterfield, G. and Eison, J., “Assessment of a Web-Enhanced Course in Numerical Methods”, International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 712-722, 2005.3
Paper ID #286203D Design in Art and Engineering: An Interdisciplinary ExperimentDr. Robert T. Bailey P.E., Loyola University Maryland Dr. Robert T. Bailey is currently a Professor of Mechanical Engineering in the Department of Engineering at Loyola University Maryland. He received his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Florida, the latter in 1991. He worked in industry for Westinghouse and Science Applications International Corporation, served as a senior program officer at the National Research Coun- cil, and taught previously at the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga. His
the United States Military Academy." Ph.D. diss., Purdue University, 2016.[17] Clark, John Cripps, Russell Tytler, and David Symington. "School-community collaborations: Bringing authentic science into schools." Teaching Science 60, no. 3 (2014): 28.[18] Dunn, Patrick F. Measurement and data analysis for engineering and science. CRC press, 2014.[19] Kong, Xiaoqing, Katherine P. Dabney, and Robert H. Tai. "The association between science summer camps and career interest in science and engineering." International Journal of Science Education, Part B 4, no. 1 (2014): 54-65.[20] Lawton, B., T. Schwerin, and R. Low. "Using Authentic Science in the Classroom: NASA's Coordinated Efforts to Enhance STEM Education." In
Page 23.1249.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Three Approaches to Flipping CE Courses: Faculty Perspectives and SuggestionsAbstractClassroom inversion or “flipping” is one of the latest models designed to actively engagestudents during class times. The model involves moving traditional lecture material outside theclassroom and practical application of newly learned ideas into the class meeting times. In theinverted model, the course concepts, theory, or equations are presented in various media –videos, readings, notes – prior to the class contact time. Application of those new ideas iscultivated during the class time through faculty-directed problem solving
, “ Industrial Sponsor Perspective on Leveraging Capstone Design Projects to Enhance Their Business,” Am. J. Eng. Educ, vol. ED-8, pp. 13-22, Jun. 2017.[15] C. Pezeshki, S. Beyerlein. “Improving Capstone Design Outcomes and Student Development by Coaching the Client.”, International Journal of Engineering Education , vol. 31, no. 6(B), pp. 1760-1772, 2015.[16] H. I. Abu-Mulaweh, N. A. Abu-Mulaweh. “Case study: Industry-sponsored mechanical engineering capstone senior design program.”, International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 371-381, 2019. 12
Association, Nashville, TN. (1995)[11] C. Temple, M. L. Rodero, Active learning in a democratic classroom: The "pedagogical invariants" ofcelestin freinet (reading around the world). Reading Teacher, (49)2, pp. 164-167. (1995)[12] P. Chetankumar, M. Ramachandran, Agile Maturity Model (AMM): A Software Process Improvementframework for Agile Software Development Practices International Journal of Software Engineering 2.1 (2009):pp. 3-28.[13] B. Schatz, I. Abdelshafi. The agile marathon. Agile Conference, 2006. IEEE, (2006) Page 23.738.12
through undergraduate education. This frame is visually represented inFigure 2. Figure 2 Visual Representation of Relationships between Local Standards, National Directives, Higher Education Outcomes and Literature Synthesized for Engineering Epistemic Frame The epistemic frame elements are skills(S), knowledge(K), identity(I), values(V), andepistemology(E), and have been coded as such for analysis. Each parent code (S,K,I,V,E) has aset of sub-codes that allow for macro and micro analysis. The nomenclature for each code isparentcode.subcode, for example k.localknowledge represents the sub-code localknowledgeunder the parent code K. (but indicated in lowercase). Figure 2 shows how sub-codes