Paper ID #16159Further Examination of the Engineering Students’ Motivational Beliefs ScaleMiss Casey Marie Williamson, James Madison University Casey Williamson is a Psychological Sciences master’s student in the concentration of Experimental Psy- chology, and a Graduate Research Assistant in the Department of Engineering at James Madison Univer- sity. She received a Bachelors of Science degree in Psychology at James Madison University, and will receive a Master’s of Arts in Experimental Psychology this coming May. As a graduate assistant, she is currently working closely with the engineering department performing
Paper ID #18597How Do Engineering Students’ Achievement Goals Relate to their ReflectionBehaviors and Learning Outcomes?Miss Damji Heo, Purdue University Damji Heo received B. A. degrees in Educational Technology and Psychology from Ewha Womans Uni- versity in 2012 and M. Ed. degree in Educational Psychology from the University of Texas at Austin in 2014 respectively. Currently, she is doing her Ph. D. in Learning, Design, and Technology program at Purdue University since 2015 and a graduate research assistant in School of Engineering Education at the same university. Her main areas of research interest are learning
studentassistant. The student assistant is responsible for grading homework assignments, helping tofacilitate / answer questions during class, and staff evening office hours. Student assistants for Page 25.1026.3the course are engineering students that are sophomores, juniors, and seniors who complete anapplication and interview process to be considered for the position. They are hired for the entireschool year and are typically asked to return for subsequent years. There is some attrition,student assistants may not return for another year due to graduation, study abroad programs,research opportunities, or other time conflicts. On average there are six
for Engineering Education, 2015 Engineering Identity Development of Latina and Latino Members of the Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers Despite the efforts made in at least the last forty years, Latinas and Latinos continue to beunderrepresented in engineering. Research has shown that engineering college students whoidentify as engineers are more likely to persist in engineering than those who do not identify asengineers1,2. One way to study identification with engineering is through a study of engineeringidentity development. However, much of the literature on engineering identity has focused on anaggregated population of engineering students, doing so often leaves the experiences of studentsof color
students to develop their knowledge of engineering andbecome familiar with a variety of advanced components that are used. This knowledgecan benefit students in fields such as Mechanical, Electrical, Industrial, and Bio-Engineering. Providing students with a hands-on approach when teaching robotics classesenables students to become aware of how mechatronic design, rapid prototyping, andcomputer control can drastically influence the downstream design and manufacturingprocesses. This is especially helpful for students in the mechanical, electrical, andindustrial concentrations, since they have a high probability of designing parts that willrequire machining processes during their manufacture. A research case study on bionicrobotics is presented here
AC 2012-5155: DEVELOPING INQUIRY-BASED LABORATORY EXER-CISES FOR A MECHANICAL ENGINEERING CURRICULUMProf. Sriram Sundararajan, Iowa State University Sriram Sundararajan is an Associate professor of mechanical engineering at Iowa State University. He is currently the Associate Chair for Undergraduate Programs and oversees curricular and program matters including assessment and continuous improvement efforts. His research areas encompass scanning probe microscopy, multiscale tribology (friction, lubrication and wear), and surface engineering. More recently, he has focused on atom scale mapping of thin film material systems using 3D-atom probe microscopy. He has authored over 50 articles in peer-reviewed journals and
fiber optic network coexist withdata, voice and video traffic. Our preliminary study indicates that our students show much moreinterest in working in such a lab environment. No matter what individual course they are taking,the students can always see a big picture of the network, which shows great resemblance of thereal world Internet and applications. In the meanwhile, more research work, such as the topicsrequire a mixed type network and traffic, can be conducted conveniently.1. IntroductionThe Telecommunications and Computer Networking (TCN) program at Southeast Missouri StateUniversity aims to provide students a balanced education between theory and technical expertise,considering that standard engineering courses focus on the technical
AC 2012-4514: LOW-SES FIRST-GENERATION STUDENTS’ DECISIONTO PURSUE ENGINEERINGMs. Michele L. Strutz, Purdue University, West Lafayette Michele L. Strutz is a 2009 NSF Graduate Research Fellow and will graduate this summer with her Ph.D. in engineering education and a secondary doctoral focus in gifted and talented education from Purdue University. Strutz’s research interests include stEm talent development and identification. Prior to completing her master’s degrees in gifted and talented education and in curriculum and instruction, Strutz worked as an engineer for 13 years in Laser Jet Printer product development and marketing at Hewlett Packard Co., computer systems design at Arthur Andersen & Co., sulfuric
-regulated learning strategies, whereas negativeemotions correlate with external regulation strategies. This study aims to objectify the emotionalexperiences of students in an upper-level engineering course that is considered a bottleneckcourse for students primarily because of its high level of mathematical rigor and abstractconcepts. It is not uncommon for students to repeat this course two or three times beforematriculating to subsequent courses, which ultimately delays their graduation. As a result,students typically delay registration in this course until their senior year. Understanding theemotional state of students throughout the semester may provide insight to designinginstructional interventions that seek to enhance positive emotions
syntheses of highereducation research have arrived at similar conclusions concerning what factors make a differencein student learning.10,11,12 Overall, this research indicates that curricula and pedagogy structuredto encourage student engagement improves the learning experiences of students.Quality of Experience and Student Attrition in Science, Math, and Engineering ProgramsAlthough this study did not address the issue of student attrition in engineering programsdirectly, several previous studies have tried to find reasons and answers to the causes of attritionas an initial step towards finding ways to increase retention.1,2,3,14,15 The discussion about highrates of attrition in engineering studies is important and has been ongoing for a long
2006-531: CALIFORNIA REGIONAL CONSORTIUM FOR ENGINEERINGADVANCES IN TECHNOLOGICAL EDUCATIONSharlene Katz, California State University-Northridge Sharlene Katz is Professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at California State University, Northridge (CSUN) where she has been for over 25 years. She graduated from the University of California, Los Angeles with B.S. (1975), M.S. (1976), and Ph.D. (1986) degrees in Electrical Engineering. Recently, her areas of research interest have been in engineering education techniques and neural networks. Dr. Katz is a licensed professional engineer in the state of California.Kathleen Alfano, College of the Canyons Kathleen
AC 2012-3722: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT-STYLED SHORT COURSESFOR A HIGHLY EFFECTIVE BIOPROCESS ENGINEERING LABORA-TORY EXPERIENCEDr. Rick Williams, East Carolina UniversityDr. Loren Limberis, East Carolina University Loren Limberis joined the engineering faculty at ECU in Aug. 2006. He earned his B.S. in electrical engineering and Ph.D. in bioengineering from the University of Utah. Limberis taught for several years as an Assistant Professor at the College of New Jersey and was a research analyst with Southwest Research Institute prior to his academic career. His research interests focus on designing techniques to utilize nature’s highly complex and sophisticated biological systems to develop biohybrid devices for use in
an umbrella term that is generally defined as any instructional method that requiresstudents to actively participate in the learning process activities besides passively listening to theinstructor [1]. As the name suggests, active learning requires students to actually do things (e.g. write,read, discuss, solve) either individually or as a group and reflect on what they do. Active learning can takemany different forms from simply pausing a lecture and asking students to write a summary of what hasbeen covered in the lecture to asking them to collaboratively work on real-world problems and projects.Active learning strategies chosen for this study were based on a previous study conducted by Borrego, etal., [5] on research-based strategies, and
University Calumet Rahul Singhal is pursuing a Master’s of Science in Electrical Engineering at Purdue University Calumet and intends on continuing studies at the University of Wisconsin – Madison. His research interests include high performance microprocessors and energy-efficient digital systems. Rahul has held two internships, one with Freescale Semiconductor and the other with Intel Corporation. Rahul graduated with highest distinction from Purdue University Calumet with a Bachelor’s of Science in Electrical Engineering in December 2006. Contact him at r.singhal17@gmail.com.Eduardo Garcia, Purdue University Calumet Eduardo Garcia is employed as controls and automation engineer for
through graduated experimentation,” 2007 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition.[5] Krishnan, M., et.al., “Advanced mechatronics: development of a course on sensors & actuators for mechatronic systems,” 2006 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition.[6] Surgenor, B., Firth, K., Wild, P., “Lessons Learned from a Mobile Robot Based Mechatronics Course,” 2005 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition.[7] Brennan, S. “Mechatronics and systems instruction across graduate, undergraduate, and research applications using rapidly reconfigurable hardware,” 2007 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. Page 24.933.14
, ASMR, and several other professional societies. She is a certified distance education specialist and also practices and studies active learning techniques in engineering classrooms as well as the impact of climate on hydrology, water resources and related infrastructure.Dr. Joanita M. Kant, South Dakota State University Dr. Joanita Kant is a Research Scientist in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering in the Jerome J. Lohr College of Engineering at South Dakota State University (SDSU). She holds gradu- ate degrees from SDSU in geography and biological sciences with plant science specialization (M.S. and Ph.D., respectively). She has conducted research into heavy metals concentrations in plants and soils
: CAREER: Engineering Design Across Navajo Culture, Community, and Society (EEC 1351728), Might Young Makers be the Engineers of the Future?(EEC 1329321), and Broadening the Reach of Engineering through Community Engagement (BRECE)(DUE 1259356). He is also Co-PI on one NSF-funded project: Should Makers be the Engineers of the Fu- ture?(EEC 1232772), and is senior personnel on an NSF-funded grant entitled Workshop: I-Corps for Learning (i-Corps-L). He received his Ph.D. in Engineering Education (2010)and M.S./B.S. in Electrical and Computer Engineeringfrom Purdue University,and as a qualitative researcher studies both STEM and informal engineering education. As an educator, he foundedandled a team to two collegiate
workplace, engineering educators must betterunderstand the current work and values of professional engineers. However, formal research inthis area is limited. In this portion of our study we interviewed practicing engineers (n=45),surveyed engineers, engineering managers and individuals with engineering backgrounds(n=280), and conducted a case study of one engineering firm. In order to better understand theepistemic frame of engineering, or what makes an engineer an engineer, this study used agrounded theory approach. This approach used the viewpoint of engineers to uncoverimplications for engineering education. We gained insights on (1) what engineers see as notableand as exemplifying engineering in their work, (2) what aspects of their work they
College of Engineering at the Univer- sity of Notre Dame. She received her PhD in Engineering Education from Purdue University in 2009. She also has a B.S. and M.S. in Mechanical Engineering. She has several years of industry design experience, but has since shifted her focus to engineering education with the first-year engineering program. Contact information: phone (574) 631-0972, fax (574) 631-8007, or email kmeyers1@nd.edu.Rachel Louis, Virginia Tech Rachel is a PhD student studying engineering education at Virginia Tech. She has her B.S. and M.S. degrees from The Ohio State University in civil engineering where she specialized in construction. Cur- rently, Rachel is working on research related to the identity of
studies.In addition, our review shows that the primary use of CIs in engineering education is to gaugestudents' understanding and to uncover any prevailing misconceptions. It also revealed that thepredominant use of CIs is in undergraduate education, accounting for 90% of the studiesexamined. However, there is need for studies that examine the use of CIs to examine studentconceptual understanding at graduate level as researchers have shown that students still havemisconceptions even after graduation. For example, Maries and Li [30, 31] emphasize the criticalneed to examine the impact of misconceptions at the graduate level, recognizing thatmisconceptions persist at all educational levels. Furthermore, our review highlights a significantresearch gap
pathways for adult, nontraditional, and veteran undergraduates in engineering.Mr. Muhammad Asghar P.E., Utah State University Muhammad Asghar is a graduate research assistant and a PHD student at Engineering Education Depart- ment, Utah State University. He has a master’s in clinical psychology, a master’s in educational psychol- ogy and a bachelor’s in computer information systems engineering. His research interests consist of using different technical and non-technical methods to enhance learning processes of engineering students.Ebenezer Ewumi, Washington State University Ebenezer Ewumi is a Computer Engineering master’s student at Washington State University. His research is in engineering education and software
(SES) is a measure of anindividual or family’s relative economic and social ranking6.While SES research relative to education is abundant, SES research relative to students’experiences in higher education is not3. That which does exist is often inconsistent3, no doubt inpart because of the difficulties in defining student SES. Walpole3 investigated high and low SESstudents at American universities in a longitudinal study focusing on their collegiate experiencesand their “outcomes of college”: income and graduate school aspirations and fulfillment. Shefound differences in grade point averages, types of activities the students engaged in – and theirpost-undergraduate incomes and educational attainment. Ethington and Smart7 similarly foundthat
AC 2012-3087: DEVELOPMENT OF A POWER ELECTRONICS LAB COURSEWITH RENEWABLE ENERGY APPLICATIONSMr. David S. Ochs, Kansas State University David S. Ochs received his bachelor’s of science in electrical engineering from Kansas State University in 2010. He is currently pursuing a master’s of science at Kansas State University. His research interests include power electronics and maximum power capture in wind energy systems.Dr. Ruth Douglas Miller, Kansas State University Ruth Douglas Miller earned a B.S.E.E. from Lafayette College and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees, both in electrical engineering, from the University of Rochester. She has taught at Kanssa State University for 21 years and is presently Associate Professor. She
interest include thinking and problem-solving, transformation from novice to expert, learning, memory, creativity and Theory of Inventive Problem Solving (TRIZ). Iouri is a recipient of 2009 Australian Award for Teaching Excellence. In 2016 the Australian Government Awarded him with the National Senior Teaching Fellowship.Prof. Margaret Hamilton, RMIT University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Development of creativity of engineering students: a cause for concern?AbstractThis research paper describes the study of how instruction in the use of an idea generationheuristic may differently influence the creativity performance of first year, third year, andpostgraduate students from the same
World as We Know It, and I Need a Job: A Qualitative Exploration of Mid-Year Engineering Students' Future Possible CareersAbstractThis research paper on students’ future possible careers is situated in a larger mixed methodsstudy exploring mid-year engineering students’ motivations related to their future possiblecareers. Previous work has demonstrated the importance of motivation in engineering forimproved academic performance and retention. Our work is situated in the future-orientedmotivation frameworks of future time perspectives (FTP) and future possible selves (FPS). Inthis study we further qualitatively explore the perception of a group of students who have beenquantitatively identified as having
Paper ID #22252A Combined Model for Predicting Engineering Identity in UndergraduateStudentsAnita D. Patrick, University of Texas, Austin Anita Patrick is a STEM Education doctoral student and Graduate Research Assistant in the Department of Mechanical Engineering and College of Liberal Arts at UT Austin’s Population Research Center. She received her BS in Bioengineering from Clemson University where she tutored undergraduate mathemat- ics and science courses, and mentored undergraduate engineering majors. Prior to coming to UT, she independently tutored K12 and undergraduate mathematics and science. Her research interests
, Teaching and Learning with the Division of Engineering Science at the University of Toronto. In this position, Lisa plays a central role in the evaluation, design and delivery of a dynamic and complex curriculum, while facilitating the development and implementation of various teaching learning and assessment initiatives. Lisa teaches undergraduate courses in engineering & society, and graduate courses in engineering edu- cation. Her research interests include teaching and assessment practices in engineering. Lisa also serves as Associate Director for the Institute for Studies in Transdisciplinary Engineering Education & Prac- tice (ISTEP) in the Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering, which serves as a hub
AC 2008-2117: A SIMPLE EDUCATIONAL WIND TUNNEL SETUP FORVISUALIZATION OF DUCT FLOW STREAMLINES AND NOZZLE/DIFFUSERBOUNDARY LAYER SEPARATIONB. Terry Beck, Kansas State University Terry Beck is a Professor of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering at Kansas State University (KSU) and teaches courses in the fluid and thermal sciences. He conducts research in the development and application of optical measurement techniques, including laser velocimetry and laser-based diagnostic testing for industrial applications. Dr. Beck received his B.S. (1971), M.S. (1974), and Ph.D. (1978) degrees in mechanical engineering from Oakland University.Brian Anderson, Kansas State University Brian Anderson is a recent
2006-1739: DEVELOPMENT AND ASSESSMENT OF INTERACTIVESPREADSHEET SOFTWARE FOR THE TEACHING OF SEMICONDUCTORDEVICE THEORYRamachandran Venkatasubramanian, Arizona State University RAMACHANDRAN VENKATASUBRAMANIAN recently graduated with an M.S. degree in Electrical Engineering from Arizona State University. He received his B.E. (Hons.) in Electrical and Electronics Engineering from Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani, India. His research interests are in mixed-signal circuit design, computer architecture, semiconductor devices and software development for interactive semiconductor education.Guillermo G. Mendez, Arizona State University GUILLERMO G. MENDEZ is a M.S. student in the Mathematics
Paper ID #8813Online Homework: Does it help or hurt in the long run?Dr. Julian Ly Davis, University of Southern Indiana Dr. Julian L. Davis is an Assistant Professor of Engineering at the University of Southern Indiana (USI) and holds his Ph.D from Virginia Tech in Engineering Mechanics. He began teaching mechanics courses in 2007 and has continued every year since his appointment at USI in 2010. His area of research is biomechanics and before his appointment at USI he served as a post-doctoral researcher at University of Massachusetts where he taught System Dynamics.Dr. Thomas McDonald, University of Southern Indiana