Paper ID #15406Instigating a Revolution of Additive Innovation: An Educational Ecosystemof Making and Risk TakingDr. Ann F. McKenna, Arizona State University, Polytechnic Campus Ann F. McKenna is a Professor in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering and Director of The Poly- technic School at Arizona State University. Prior to joining ASU she served as a program director at the National Science Foundation in the Division of Undergraduate Education, and was on the faculty in the Department of Mechanical Engineering and Segal Design Institute at Northwestern University. Dr. McKenna received her B.S. and M.S. degrees in
engineering, drug delivery, and cancer treatment. With numerous exter- nal and internal funding sources, he is actively engaged in research involving undergraduate students in various areas, including engineered red blood cells for oxygen therapeutics development. Dr. Zhang has published more than 40 peer-reviewed journal articles, authored the book Nanotechnology for Bioengi- neers, and holds multiple patents. When it comes to engineering and chemical sciences education, he is especially interested in integrating the entrepreneurial mindset into a wide range of courses. Dr. Zhang has been recognized by the ASEE’s Prism magazine as one of 20 high-achieving researchers and educa- tors under 40 (2018), the Milwaukee Business
Department of Mechanical Engineering, BUET from 1988 to 1993. Dr. Mian’s research interests include advanced manufacturing; silicon micro-fabrication; micro- electromechanical Systems (MEMS); and electronic and MEMS Packaging. He has authored over 85 technical publications, book chapter, and is a member of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, American Society of Engineering Education, and Phi Kappa Phi. Dr. Mian is a recipient of MSU Presi- dent’s Pure Gold Award (2012), ASEE Multidisciplinary Engineering Division Best Paper Award (ASEE Conference 2011), IMAPS Conference Best Paper Award (1999), and Graduate Research Forum Award (1998).Mrs. Sandra M Preiss, Dayton Regional STEM Center Sandra Preiss, is the
: Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge 3 Task Committee. Civil engineering body ofknowledge. . 2019. https://ascelibrary.org/doi/epdf/10.1061/9780784415221.7. Martin MJ, Diem SJ, Karwat DM, et al. The climate is changing. engineering education needsto change as well. J Eng Educ. 2022;111(4). https://par.nsf.gov/servlets/purl/10444150.8. American Society of Civil Engineers. ASCE’s roadmap to sustainable development: Fourpriorities for change. https://www.asce.org/communities/institutes-and-technical-groups/sustainability/sustainability-roadmap.9. Mowreader A. Tackling climate anxiety with student participation. Inside Higher Ed. 2024.10. Mowreader A. ASU adds sustainability to gen ed curriculum. Inside Higher Ed. 2024.https://www.insidehighered.com
. Nehmar, “Processor-In-the-Loop Simulation of a Neuro-Fuzzy Controller on Raspberry Pi 3 board”, 19th International Multi-Conference on Systems, Signals & Devices (SSD), Sétif, Algeria, pp. 146-151, 2022.[8] I. Akli, H. Boukari Alidou, A. Chekir, and S. Ouazine, “Basic Mobile Robot Prototyping Using RFID”, 3rd International Conference on Embedded & Distributed Systems (EDiS), Oran, Algeria, pp. 102-107, 2022.[9] J. Walter, M. Fakih, and K. Grüttner, “Hardware-based Real-Time Simulation on the Raspberry Pi”, Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on High Performance and Real-time Embedded Systems, Vienna, Austria, vol. 20, 2014.[10] M. Shojaee and S. M. Azizi, “Decentralized Robust Controller Design for Strongly Interconnected
(engineering ed. and geosciences) and serves as senior personnel (evaluator) for a third NSF-sponsored grant (STEM education). He is active in the Association of Educational Communications and Technology (AECT) and has served as president of its International Division. He is also a member of the American Educa- tional Research Association (AERA). Perkins earned his Ph.D. at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.Dr. R. Casey Cline, Boise State University Dr. Casey Cline is an assistant professor in the Construction Management Department within the College of Engineering at Boise State University. Dr. Cline earned a B.S. in Business Administration from Oklahoma State University, an M.S. in Construction
Engineering Documents (journal articles, patents, standards, and technical reports) and Abstracts (executive, conference, and research). Key themes include structural conventions, the writing process, and best practices for specialized material. (Figure 2) 2. Literature Reviews and Citation Management Organized into three subcategories: Literature Reviews, Tips for Searching Literature (keyword generation, Boolean operators, database utilization), and Citation Management (styles, plagiarism, and tools such as Zotero, EndNote, and RefWorks). (Figure 3) 3. Data Visualization in Spreadsheet Software Covers Spreadsheet Software for Engineering, Datasets and Their Manipulation in Spreadsheet Software
self-reported design thinking ability The second research question of this study, “What differences exist in the technicaldesign thinking ability?” aimed to investigate the technical or observed difference in thestudents’ design thinking abilities. This question was analyzed through the thematic coding ofeach statement made in the Zoom transcripts. There were an average of 689 statements per groupsession, with each ranging from 1 hour and 22 minutes to 2 hours and 58 minutes. Figure 3 depicts a breakdown of the communication between group members per classstanding. It can be seen that Freshmen spoke the least frequently, with approximately 4.8statements per minute, and seniors spoke the most frequently, with approximately 5.6
how buildings are designed, constructed, and operated, as documentedextensively by Zheng and Yu [3], Constantinou et al. [4], and Zhou and Song [5]. This convergencecreates both an opportunity and an imperative to revolutionize how we educate the next generationof construction professionals.Traditional construction education programs, while comprehensive in technical fundamentals,often struggle to keep pace with the rapidly evolving technological landscape. According toMercier-Laurent [6] and Yigitcanlar et al. [7], there exists a significant gap between conventionaleducational approaches and the increasingly AI-driven realities of modern sustainableconstruction. This disconnect manifests in several critical areas of concern within the
ensuring alignment with project goals and safety standards.The process began with brainstorming sessions, where team members shared ideas and evaluatedpotential solutions to address workplace hazards through innovative PPE designs. This phaseencouraged open communication and creative problem-solving, allowing teams to refine theirconcepts collectively.As the collaboration progressed, teams developed detailed sketches of their designs, highlightingkey components and sensor placements within the PPE. Each team member contributed tocritical decisions, such as selecting suitable sensors, defining technical requirements, andidentifying software tools for data collection and analysis, as shown in Figure 2(a), (b) and (c).This collective effort extended
assessed using assignments andreflective writing. Results after three successive years of offering this course show that a tailoredprofessional development course helps students better understand their academic pathways,better understand career options, utilize opportunities for professional growth, develop effectivepeer cohorts, and express more satisfaction with their experiences as graduate students.IntroductionChallenges faced by first year graduate students and the support provided to them play asignificant role in their academic success [1], [2]. Professional development training forgraduate students that complements their development of expertise and disciplinary knowledgeleads to better future career success [3]. Professional development
, leadership, and assistive technology.Prof. Patrice Marie Buzzanell, Purdue University, West Lafayette Patrice M. Buzzanell is a Professor in the Brian Lamb School of Communication and the School of Engineering Education (courtesy) at Purdue University. Editor of three books and author of over 150 articles and chapters, her research centers on the intersections of career, gender communication, lead- ership, and resilience. Fellow and past president of the International Communication Association, she has received numerous awards for her research, teaching/mentoring, and engagement. She is working on Purdue-ADVANCE initiatives for institutional change, the Transforming Lives Building Global Commu- nities (TLBGC) team in
Paper ID #14118Recent Progress in Step-Based Tutoring for Linear Circuit Analysis CoursesDr. Brian J Skromme, Arizona State University Dr. Brian Skromme is a professor in the School of Electrical, Computer, and Energy Engineering and is assistant dean of the Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. He holds a Ph.D. in electrical engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and was a member of technical staff at Bellcore from 1985 to 1989.Paul Rayes, Arizona State UniversityMr. Brian McNamara, Arizona State UniversityMr. Xiaoxuan Wang, Arizona State University Master Student in
., Turns, J., “Engineering with Engineers:Revolutionizing Engineering Education through Industry Immersion and a Focus on Identity”,Proceedings of American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference. Salt Lake City,UT: ASEE 2018.[2] K. Deaux, “Reconstructing social identity,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, vol.19, pp. 4-12, 1993.[3] S. Stryker, and P. J. Burke, “The past, present, and future of an identity theory,” SocialPsychological Quarterly, vol. 63(4), pp. 284-297, 2000.[4] E. H. Erikson, Identity and the life cycle. New York: International Universities Press, 1959.[5] M. B. Brewer, “The social self: On being the same and different at the same time,”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, vol. 17, pp. 475-482, 1991
and prompting teamwork through guided worksheets requiring groupdiscussions. Additionally, emphasis was placed on developing expert-like epistemologiessurrounding BME, as research has indicated that there is a connection between students’ beliefsabout science and engineering and learning in STEM courses [6], [7], [8], [9]. To achieve this,we encouraged comfort with failure as well as an understanding of the importance of iterationthrough activities like the “desert island” scenario in Module 1 and the exploration of the bloodpressure datasets in Module 3.A major goal of this course transformation was to foster confidence in translating skills learnedto future careers. To achieve this, we dedicated one class session to reflecting on both
Paper ID #15657Understanding Engineering Students’ Professional Pathways: A Longitudi-nal Mixed-Methods StudyDr. Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus Samantha Brunhaver is an Assistant Professor of Engineering in the Fulton Schools of Engineering Poly- technic School. Dr. Brunhaver recently joined Arizona State after completing her M.S. and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. She also has a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Northeastern University. Dr. Brunhaver’s research examines the career decision-making and professional identity formation of engineering
Engineering and Computer Science 4 Department Industrial and Operations Engineering 2 Mechanical Engineering 5 Materials Science and Engineering 2 Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering 3 Nuclear Engineering and Radiologic Sciences 1 Technical Communication 2Data and ResultsThe focus group data were transcribed and imported into NVivo for qualitative analysis, and wecombined both inductive and deductive approaches for our analysis (an
Paper ID #25041Board 77: Visual Representations Guide Students’ Use of Conceptual Knowl-edge and Problem-solving StrategiesDr. Nicole Johnson-Glauch, California Polytechnic State University Dr. Nicole Johnson-Glauch is a lecturer in the Materials Engineering Department at California Poly- technic State University in San Luis Obiso, California. Her current research interests are in how visual representations help or hinder student learning and how the structure of outreach activities impact under- represented students’ interest and belonging in engineering.Dr. Geoffrey L Herman, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Dr
varying the steam heating pressure for thereboiler can reduce the CO2 emission by 20-30%, depending on the reflux or flash operating conditions.The scalability and future work section emphasizes the importance of incorporating Scope 3 emissions,including life cycle costing and creating a comprehensive teaching database.Future WorkFuture work involves expanding the study to include life cycle costing, creating a comprehensive databasefor LCA values and process pathways in teaching laboratories, and fostering international collaborations totest the robustness and scalability of common unit operations laboratory projects by extending similarpractices to different sizes of operation equipment in other institutions. This collaborative effort aims
industry. It focuses on the cross-disciplinary high- institution managers, tech research area of silicon and advanced researchers, students, and semiconductor materials and focuses on the corporate partners. Secondary development, production, technical services, and data comprised publicly application transformation of high-end products in available institutional reports the field of novel semiconductor materials. and internal policy documents.Research DesignThis study conducts a multi-case comparison and content analysis of six university-industrycollaboration centers from research universities. The selection of cases is based on two maincriteria
Paper ID #36474Walking Between Two Worlds: Creating a Framework for ConductingCulturally-Responsive Research with University Indigenous CommunitiesQualla Jo Ketchum, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Qualla Jo Ketchum (she/her/they) is a PhD Candidate in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech in Blacksburg, Virginia. She received her Bachelors of Science and Masters of Science in Biosystems En- gineering at Oklahoma State University. She is a citizen of the Cherokee Nation and her Indigeneity impacts all she does from her technical research in water resources to her pedagogical practices and edu
classroom. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 5(1), 1–21.22. Orr, R. B., Csikari, M. M., Freeman, S., & Rodriguez, M. C. (2022). Writing and Using Learning Objectives. CBE life sciences education, 21(3), fe3. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.22- 04-007323. Langworthy, S. (2017). Do you YouTube? The power of brief educational videos for extension. Journal of Extension, 55(2).24. Gielen, Matt [Little Monster Media Co.]. (2019, Jul 11). Cracking the YouTube algorithm 2020 | Little Monster [Video file]. Retrieved from https://youtu.be/IXXgwx3koNE25. Saurabh, S., & Gautam, S. (2019). Modeling and statistical analysis of YouTube’s educational videos: A channel owner’s perspective. Computers & Education
, and 3- designing a product to addressunique customer needs) and integrated technical knowledge that students were learning. While“Circuits, Signals, and Measurements” focused on building the biopotential amplifier from acircuit’s perspective, the PCB project in aimed at connecting students’ learning experience byasking them to manufacture a stand-alone biopotential amplifier device that would meet certainengineering requirements and customer needs (Appendix A).This work-in-progress briefly presents the project requirements, assessment, and organization,highlights some preliminary survey results, and summarizes some important “lessons learned”.The PCB project is not an improvement over prior methods.Project Requirements & AssessmentProject
aware of empathy definitions and implementation generally, were not aware of,or experienced with, the role of empathy within the engineering discipline [3]. Indeed, in asurvey of empathy perceptions of over 1,000 practicing engineers, respondents gave lowestmarks to the statement “I learned to be more empathetic and caring during my college years” [4].These findings are convicting. Engineering educators must not push training on the empatheticpractice of engineering to other, less technically driven disciplines. This deficit of training inengineering specific empathy is ultimately a problem in engineering formation that requires acombined effort from engineering educators and social scientists to address. As interventions are developed
Chat GPT.3. Debate:Regular sessions will be held to discuss progress, problems encountered, andproposed solutions to foster a collaborative work environment that reflects thedemands of today's professional environment in the construction industry.ResultsThe survey on the use of technologies for collaborative work of students in the aspectof interpersonal skills revealed a notable improvement in communication andconstant collaboration between disciplines, in addition to highlighting the efficiencyin the assignment of roles and promotion of collective responsibility, strengtheningcommunication and interpersonal relationships in the team. As for the relationshipwith BIM, it allows you to assign and visualize roles clearly in a shared model
align with thetopics covered in class. Lab activities include tests such as hardness, plastic deformation,annealing, nondestructive testing, and metallurgy. Lab activities are conducted in groups of 5-6students. The course aims to build a strong foundational understanding of engineering materialsand their applications.At the conclusion of this course, students should be able to:1. Expertise in selecting engineering materials.2. Expertise in selecting manufacturing processes.3. Select engineering materials for particular application.4. Ability of function effectively on teams.5. Identify, analyze, and solve technical problems related to the materials selection to satisfydesign specifications.6. Communicate effectively using appropriate designs
potential issues. Some of the barriers to competitionsinclude financial costs, space needs, and computing resources (in the case of modeling projects)[18]. Schuster et al. identified several student-related challenges including: 1. Education challenges such as design changes without good reasons, constraints on incremental improvements, and building and testing rather than designing. 2. Student challenges including potential safety issues, negative effects on other academic performance, and feelings of failure or embarrassment among losing teams. 3. Technical challenges including incomplete projects, poor designs, poor building, and inadequate presentation of the project.Other drawbacks could include that there are inherent
. Warren was a Principal Member of the Technical Staff at Sandia National Laboratories in Albuquerque, NM. He directs the KSU Medical Component Design Laboratory, a facility partially funded by the National Science Foundation that provides resources for the research and development of distributed medical monitoring technologies and learning tools that support biomedical contexts. His research focuses on (1) plug-and-play, point-of-care medical monitoring systems that utilize interoperability standards, (2) wearable sensors and signal processing techniques for the determination of human and animal physiological status, and (3) educational tools and techniques that maximize learning and student interest. Dr. Warren is a
.“Does active learning work? A review of the research” in Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3):223-231. 2004. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168- 9830.2004.tb00809.x.[10] M.J. León Guerrero & Crisol Moya, E. “Questionnaire design (OPPUMAUGR y OPEUMAUGR): The views and perceptions of teachers and students on the use of actives methodologies at the university” in Profesorado. Revista de Currículum y Formación de Profesorado, 15(2), 271-298. 2011. ISSN: 1138-414X. (in Spanish).[11] R. D. Jasso, F. J. García-Prieto & al.. “Active methodologies in the university: international bibliometric analysis (2003-2023)” in Formación universitaria, vol. 17, no 4, p. 151-162. 2024. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/s0718
agendas,” InternationalJournal of Engineering & Technology, vol. 7, no. 4, 2018.[6] M. Aoudia and D. A. Abu-Alqahsi, “Curriculum Redesign Process for an IndustrialEngineering Program Seeking ABET Accreditation,” International Journal of EngineeringPedagogy, vol. 5, issue 3, 2015, International Society of Engineering Education.[7] G. Wiggins and J. McTighe, Understanding by Design, Alexadria, VA: ASCD, 2005.[8] Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, ABET Standard, ABET, Baltimore, MD:2021.[9]Lattuca, Lisa, Terenzini, Patrick, and Volkwein, Fredricks, Engineering Change: A Study ofthe Impact of EC2000, Executive Summary, ABET: Baltimore, MD, 2006.Appendix A: Background and TerminologyTerminology used by the Curriculum Renewal