Asee peer logo
Well-matched quotation marks can be used to demarcate phrases, and the + and - operators can be used to require or exclude words respectively
Displaying results 31 - 60 of 36804 in total
Conference Session
Innovations in Teaching and Research in Physics or Engineering Physics I
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Teresa L. Larkin, American University; Jessica Uscinski, American University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Physics & Physics
Paper ID #6739THE EVOLUTION OF CURRICULUM ASSESSMENT WITHIN THE PHYSICSPROGRAM AT AMERICAN UNIVERSITYDr. Teresa L. Larkin, American University Teresa L. Larkin is an Associate Professor of Physics Education and Faculty Liaison to the Pre-engineering Program at American University. She received her Ph.D. in Curriculum and Instruction with emphasis in Physics and Science Education from Kansas State University. Dr. Larkin is involved with Physics Education Research (PER) and has published widely on topics related to the assessment of student learn- ing in introductory physics and engineering courses. Noteworthy is her work
Conference Session
Innovations in Teaching and Research in Physics or Engineering Physics I
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Polin Yadak, Cañada College; Amelito G Enriquez, Canada College
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Physics & Physics
engineering and mathematics at Ca˜nada College. He received his PhD in Mechanical Engineering from the University of California, Irvine. His research interests include technology-enhanced instruction and increasing the representation of female, minority and other under- represented groups in mathematics, science and engineering. Page 23.978.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Preparing STEM Students for Success in Physics Through an Intensive Summer ProgramAbstract:Many community college students have low levels of preparation for college-level
Conference Session
Innovations in Teaching Physics or Engineering Physics
Collection
2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Teresa Larkin, American University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Physics & Physics
– 279. 12. Mullin, W. J. (1989). Writing in physics. The Physics Teacher, 27(5), 342 – 347. 13. Rice, R. E. (1998). ‘Scientific writing’ – A course to improve the writing of science students. Journal of College Science Teaching, 27(4), 267 – 272. 14. Sharp, J. E., Olds, B. M., Miller, R. L., & Dyrud, M. (1999). Four effective writing strategies for engineering classes. Journal of Engineering Education, 88(1), 53 – 57. 15. Kalman, C. S. (2007). Successful Science and Engineering Teaching in Colleges and Universities. Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing Company, Inc. 16. Larkin-Hein, T. (2001). Writing as a Teaching and Learning Tool in SMET Educaton. Journal of SMET Education: Innovations and Research, 2(1&2
Conference Session
Technological Literacy II
Collection
2004 Annual Conference
Authors
Kurt DeGoede
): 95-99. 4 Krupczak, J (2001) Private communication, Hope College.Author Biography:KURT DEGOEDE earned his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Michigan in 2000 and iscurrently an assistant professor of physics and engineering at Elizabethtown College. Previously, he spent 3 years asa project manager at Ford Motor Company. He teaches courses in mechanics and general physics in addition to thecourse described here. His current research interest is in the biomechanics of injury. Page 9.1145.17 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition
Conference Session
Innovations in Teaching and Research in Physics or Engineering Physics I
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Frank V. Kowalski, Colorado School of Mines; Susan E. Kowalski, Colorado School of Mines; Patrick B. Kohl, Department of Physics, Colorado School of Mines; Hsia-Po Vincent Kuo, Colorado School of Mines
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Physics & Physics
Paper ID #6371Technology-Enabled Nurturing of Creativity and Innovation: A Specific Il-lustration from an Undergraduate Engineering Physics CourseProf. Frank V. Kowalski, Colorado School of Mines Prof. Frank Kowalski has been teaching physics at Colorado School of Mines since 1980.Susan E. Kowalski, Colorado School of MinesDr. Patrick B. Kohl, Department of Physics, Colorado School of MinesDr. Hsia-Po Vincent Kuo, Colorado School of Mines Page 23.1161.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013
Conference Session
Innovations in Teaching and Research in Physics or Engineering Physics III
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Baha Jassemnejad, University of Central Oklahoma; Wei Siang Pee, University of Central Oklahoma; Kevin Rada, University of Central Oklahoma; Devon Kelley Keith, University of Central Oklahoma; Dylan Bradley Miller; Evan C. Lemley, University of Central Oklahoma; Adam Dorety, University of Central Oklahoma
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Physics & Physics
AC 2012-3896: A TRANSFORMATIVE LEARNING EXPERIENCE: UN-DERWATER ROBOTICS RESEARCHProf. Baha Jassemnejad, University of Central Oklahoma Baha Jassemnejad is Chair and professor of engineering and physics.Mr. Wei Siang Pee, University of Central OklahomaMr. Kevin Rada, University of Central Oklahoma Engineering & Physics Department, Edmond Okla.Mr. Devon Kelley Keith, University of Central Oklahoma Mechanical and Electrical SystemsMr. Dylan Bradley MillerDr. Evan C. Lemley, University of Central OklahomaAdam Dorety, University of Central Oklahoma Adam Dorety is currently a freshman at the University of Central Oklahoma (UCO). He is involved in UCO Robotics, and the UCO chapter of the American Society of Mechanical
Conference Session
Innovations in Teaching Physics or Engineering Physics
Collection
2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jian Peng, Southeast Missouri State University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Physics & Physics
AC 2010-1930: REVISING A MICRO-CONTROLLER COURSE FORENGINEERING PHYSICS STUDENTSJian Peng, Southeast Missouri State University Jian Peng received his B.E. degree from Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China in 1992, his M.S. degree from Hangzhou Institute of Electronic Engineering, Hangzhou, China in 1995, and his Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from Vanderbilt University, Nashville, in 2004. He is currently an Assistant Professor in the Department of Physics and Engineering Physics at Southeast Missouri State University. His research focuses on intelligent robotics and computer vision. He is a member of ASEE and IEEE
Conference Session
Engineering Physics Technical Session 3
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kanti Prasad, University of Massachusetts, Lowell
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Physics & Physics
stripinvolving advanced plasma techniques. Again the lead Engineer here is arenowned physicist. I would therefore suggest that engineering educationinnovations should also involve some interdisciplinary approaches.4. Conclusion:The technologies are bound to evolve with time based on better modelingtechniques. Intricate sound principles are sure to be explored. Therefore, wemust teach fundamentals of physics, chemistry and mathematics rigorouslyand demonstrate continually, how the state-of-art technologies are based onthese fundamentals. This is the cardinal philosophy of Innovation inEngineering Education including interdisciplinary approaches to somereasonable extent.I am convinced however, that innovations in engineering education must becarried out
Conference Session
Innovations in Teaching Physics or Engineering Phy
Collection
2008 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Matthew Kohlmyer, Georgia Institute of Technology; Michael Schatz, Georgia Institute of Technology; Richard Catrambone, Georgia Institute of Technology; Marcus Marr, Georgia Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Physics & Physics
ofinstructors who have taught or are currently teaching M&I has grown to five (four professors andone post-doc). To overcome barriers to faculty adoption, we have used variations on anapprenticeship model. We convinced two new faculty hires, both of whom would be teachingIntro Physics for the first time, to teach M&I courses (one in Spring 07, one in Fall 07). Onemember of the research team—an experienced M&I instructor—also taught an M&I course inthe same semester, and worked closely with the new faculty members on course content andlogistics. In summer 2007, another member of our research team co-taught an M&I-based IntroPhysics II (electromagnetism) course with a veteran professor who did not have M&I experience.Grant money
Conference Session
Engineering Physics & Physics Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Teresa L. Larkin, American University; Ben Hein
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Physics & Physics
Center for Teaching, Research and Learning at AU presented Dr. Larkin with the Milton and Sonia Greenberg Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Award 2013. In 2013 her paper entitled ”Breaking with Tradition: Using the Conference Paper as a Case for Alternative Assessment in Physics” received an award for best paper in a special session entitled Talking about Teaching (TaT’13), at the 42nd International Conference on Engineering Pedagogy (IGIP) held in Kazan, Russia. In 2000 – 2001 she served as a National Science Foundation ASEE Visiting Scholar. Dr. Larkin is the author of a book chapter published in 2010 entitled ”Women’s Leadership in Engineeringin K. O’Connor (Ed.) Gender and Women’s Leadership: A Reference
Conference Session
Innovations in Teaching Physics or Engineering Physics I
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kristi J. Shryock, Texas A&M University; Arun R. Srinivasa, Texas A&M University, Department of Mechanical Engineering; Jefferey E. Froyd, Texas A&M University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Physics & Physics
research does not provide explicitarticulation of what engineering faculty members who teach core engineering courses thatrequire physics mechanics as prerequisite knowledge think their students should know and beable to do at the beginning of one of these courses. Nor does the research shed light on how wellstudents satisfy expectations of their faculty members. Therefore, this gap motivates the researchdescribed in the following sections.MethodsTo determine expectations of engineering faculty for the knowledge of physics mechanics andskill in applying this knowledge that students in their course should have to be successful, theauthors identified a core, required, sophomore-level engineering science course in themechanical engineering curriculum
Conference Session
Innovations in Computing Education
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Alex Pantaleev, State University of New York, Oswego; Adrian Ieta, State University of New York, Oswego; Carolina C. Ilie, State University of New York, Oswego
Tagged Divisions
Computing & Information Technology
AC 2012-3348: JUST-IN-TIME TEACHING: COMPUTER SCIENCE MEETSPHYSICSDr. Alex Pantaleev, State University of New York, Oswego Alex Pantaleev received a B.A. degree in computer science from the American University in Bulgaria, Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria, in 2003, and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in computer science from the Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio in 2007 and 2008, respectively. He is currently an Assistant Professor in the Department of Computer Science at the State University of New York, Oswego.Dr. Adrian Ieta, State University of New York, Oswego Adrian Ieta received a B.Sc. degree in physics from the University of Timisoara, Timisoara, Romania, in 1984, a B.E.Sc. degree in electrical engineering from the
Conference Session
Innovations in Teaching and Research in Physics or Engineering Physics III
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Yumin Zhang, Southeast Missouri State University; David K. Probst, Southeast Missouri State University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Physics & Physics
arevery powerful full-wave 3D simulation software packages, such as ANSYS HFSSTM and CSTMicrowave StudioTM; on the other hand, there are also low cost 2D simulators, such asQuickFieldTM. However, we also noticed that there are side effects, and the CAD software canalso be a distraction to some students.5There are two different approaches in achieving proficiency in an area: The first is the externalapproach by getting familiar with various experimental results, and the second is the internalapproach by deriving theorems from the fundamental principles. The first approach was engagedin research and discovery, while the latter one is emphasized in teaching, as it is much moreefficient. The advancement in physics is accompanied by the progress of
Conference Session
Mechanical Engineering Poster Session
Collection
2008 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
X. Chang Li, Lamar University; Kendrick Aung, Lamar University; Jiang Zhou, Lamar University; Xuejun Fan, Lamar University
Tagged Divisions
Mechanical Engineering
AC 2008-2251: TEACHING ENHANCEMENT IN UNDERGRADUATETHERMODYNAMICS IIX. Chang Li, Lamar UniversityKendrick Aung, Lamar UniversityJiang Zhou, Lamar UniversityXuejun Fan, Lamar University Page 13.1164.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Teaching Enhancement in Undergraduate Thermodynamics IIAbstractOne of the core courses for most of the undergraduate students in Mechanical Engineering isThermodynamics II, which, as an extension of the basic knowledge in Thermodynamics I,generally covers the typical cycles and processes for power generation, refrigeration, and airconditioning. To enable the students understand the fundamental concepts more easily, thispaper
Conference Session
NSF Grantees: Entrepreneurship
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Crystal Bailey, American Physical Society
Tagged Topics
NSF Grantees Poster Session
, and maintaining resources on the APS Careers Website. As the principle investigator for the APS PIPELINE project, she also devotes significant amounts of time to promoting innovation and entrepreneurship education in physics. Before coming to the APS, Dr. Bailey did research in nuclear physics at Indiana University, Bloomington in the area of few-body systems. In 2008 she received the Konopinski Award for Outstanding Graduate Teaching from the IU Physics Department. She graduated with her PhD from IU in 2009. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Promoting Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education in Physics: The PIPELINE Network
Conference Session
Collaborative & New Efforts in Engineering Education
Collection
2006 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Joao Vinhas, Politecnico de Viseu; Joao Paiva, Politecnico de Viseu
Tagged Divisions
International
bring numerous gaps in their knowledge, particularly in physics and mathematics. Theinitial contact with this new reality in their lives is crucial to future success, revealing a greatimportance for personal and professional development and creating tight bonds with positiveinfluence on dropout rates. These challenges led to the decision to implement a new socio-pedagogical project called GOIS (from Damião de Góis, a prominent Portuguese andEuropean renaissance man). It introduced important innovations and new strategiesinvolving computer-student interaction during teaching-learning processes. Problem-solvingskills are fundamental tools for the future engineer; so, the goal is to improve those tools andcoach the student in a rational way. A
Conference Session
A Potpourri of Innovations in Physics
Collection
2003 Annual Conference
Authors
Guido Lopez
andcomputational burden that are typical of in-class, exam, or take-home problems in physics, cannow be effectively and quickly executed by computer software. This approach frees time forinstructors to emphasize concepts instead of procedures and helps students to master theunderlying science of their engineering disciplines with greater confidence and efficacy. Thispaper presents a comparative study between a traditional approach to teaching engineeringphysics, and an innovative approach that uses the computer software EES (acronym forEngineering Equation Solver), to convey concepts and principles of physics by minimizingmathematical manipulation and computational burden associated with the practice of problem-solving. This new approach and examples
Conference Session
Innovations in Teaching Physics or Engineering Physics I
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sudipa Mitra-Kirtley, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Rana Mitra, Southeastern Louisiana University; Maarij M Syed, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Physics & Physics
AC 2011-2293: UTILIZING PEN-BASED WIRELESS DEVICES IN PHYSICSCLASSROOMSSudipa Mitra-Kirtley, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology I am a professor in Physics and Optical Engineering depart at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. I have been teaching for the past 17 years, and am aRana Mitra, Southeastern Louisiana UniversityDr. Maarij M Syed, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Dr. Maarij Syed got his Ph.D. at University of Notre Dame in 1998. He joined the department of Physics & Optical Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology in 1998 and has been there since. His pedagogical interests include studio teaching and curricular development in the area of nano technology. His research interests are in the
Conference Session
Innovations in Teaching and Research in Physics or Engineering Physics I
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Harold T. Evensen, University of Wisconsin, Platteville; W. Doyle St.John, University of Wisconsin, Platteville
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Physics & Physics
Oklahoma State University (1988) respectively and a Ph.D. in Physics from Oklahoma State University (1993). He then held a postdoctoral research associate position at the Liquid Crystal Institute located on the campus of Kent State University working on flat-panel display metrology followed by a research scientist position at AlliedSignal (Madison, NJ) working on developing novel optical devices for new flat-panel display technologies. He then joined UWP (1996) assigned to develop from the ground floor a new Engineering Physics program. He continues in that role today teaching all areas of physics and engineering physics, currently serving as Department Chair as well, and pursues research in optical metrology
Conference Session
Innovations in Teaching Upper-Level Physics
Collection
2006 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Gerald Rothberg, Stevens Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Physics & Physics
. Knight, “Five Easy Lessons. Strategies for Successful Physics Teaching”, (Addison-Wesley, New York,2004), p.5.4. http://umperg.physics.umass.edu5. I. Beatty, Res. Bull. 2004 (3),1-13, Educause Center for Applied Research, Feb. 3, 2004. “Transforming StudentLearning with Classroom Communication Systems.” See ref.4.6. I.D. Beatty, W.J. Gerace, W.J. Leonard and R. J. Dufresne, Amer. J. Phys. preprint (2005). “Designing EffectiveQuestions for Classroom Response System Teaching.” See ref. 4.7. http://www.cs.washington.edu/education/presenter/papers.html8. R. Anderson, R. Anderson, L. McDowell and B. Simon, 35th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference,Oct. 19-22, 2005, Indianapolis, IN, pages T1A1-5. “Use of Classroom Presenter in Engineering
Conference Session
Innovations in Teaching Physics or Engineering Physics
Collection
2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Robert Ross, University of Detroit Mercy
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Physics & Physics
AC 2010-292: A NANOTECHNOLOGY APPLICATION FOR PHYSICSLABORATORY COURSESRobert Ross, University of Detroit Mercy Page 15.61.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 A Nanotechnology Application for Physics Laboratory CoursesAbstractIncluding current research topics into the curriculum is one strategy to engage students in physicscourses. We are piloting some innovative laboratory experiments that incorporate aspects ofnanotechnology into photovoltaic solar energy conversion devices.Students produce working devices using conjugated organic polymers. The fullerene, C60, isused as a nanoscale particle and is suspended in the
Conference Session
Innovations in Teaching Upper-Level Physics
Collection
2006 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Greg Mowry, University of St. Thomas-St. Paul
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Physics & Physics
2006-98: A MODULAR PEDAGOGY FOR TEACHING UNDERGRADUATEELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD THEORYGreg Mowry, University of St. Thomas-St. Paul Greg Mowry received his B.S. and M.S. degree in metallurgical engineering from Iowa State University in 1976 and 1978 respectively. He attended Stanford University from 1979 to 1981 for a non-thesis M.S.E.E. program. He received his Ph.D. in electrical engineering from the University of Minnesota in 1995. He joined the School of Engineering at the University of St. Thomas in 2003 with 24 years of industrial and entrepreneurial experience. His research interests include alternative energy research, thin-films, MEMs, optics and laser optics, and the pedagogy of teaching
Conference Session
Innovations in Teaching Physics or Engineering Phy
Collection
2008 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Teresa Larkin, American University; Dan Budny, University of Pittsburgh
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Physics & Physics
. E., Olds, B. M., Miller, R. L., & Dyrud, M. (1999). Four effective writing strategies for engineering classes. Journal of Engineering Education, 88(1), 53 – 57.[25] Walker, K. (2000). Integrating writing instruction into engineering courses: A writing center model. Journal of Engineering Education, 89(3), 369 - 374.[26] Hein, T. L. (1999). Using writing to confront student misconceptions in physics. European Journal of Physics, 20, 137 – 141.[27] Hein, T. L. (2000). Writing in physics: A valuable tool for other disciplines. The Teaching Professor, 14(10), 2 - 3.[28] Tobias, S. (1990). They’re not dumb, they’re different: Stalking the second tier. Tucson, AZ: Research Corporation.[29] Tobias, S. (1989). In Paul
Conference Session
Engineering Physics & Physics Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Teresa L. Larkin, American University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Physics & Physics
Series]. Beverly Hills, CA: Twentieth Century Fox.[23] Apsell, P. S. (Senior Executive Producer), & Ritsko, A. (Managing Director). (2012). Space, time, and the universe [Video Series]. United States: PBS Distribution.[24] Kalman, C. S. (2007). Successful Science and Engineering Teaching in Colleges and Universities. Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing Company, Inc.[25] Larkin-Hein, T. (2001). Writing as a Teaching and Learning Tool in SMET Education. Journal of SMET Education: Innovations and Research, 2(1&2), 25 – 35.[26] Hein, T. L. (1999). Using writing to confront student misconceptions in physics. European Journal of Physics, 20, 137 – 141.[27] Brown, S. & Knight, P. 1994. Assessing learners in higher
Conference Session
Innovations in Teaching and Research in Physics or Engineering Physics I
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Bala Maheswaran, Northeastern University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Physics & Physics
AC 2012-3390: HOW MUCH PHYSICS THE FIRST-YEAR ENGINEER-ING STUDENTS REALLY NEED: A STUDY AND SURVEYDr. Bala Maheswaran, Northeastern University Bala Maheswaran, College of Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115. Page 25.701.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 1 How much Physics the First Year Engineering Students really need: A Study and Survey AbstractFreshmen engineering courses are the eye opener for engineering students in
Conference Session
Innovations in Teaching and Research in Physics or Engineering Physics I
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Michael De Antonio, New Mexico State University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Physics & Physics
AC 2012-3501: CRITERION 2: A DISCUSSION OF ABET PROGRAM ED-UCATIONAL OBJECTIVESDr. Michael De Antonio, New Mexico State University Michael DeAntonio is a College Associate Professor at New Mexico State University. He is Past Chair of the Physics Division of ASEE, and he is currently a member of the Engineering Physics ABET committee at NMSU. Page 25.365.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Criterion 2: A Discussion of ABET Program Educational ObjectivesIntroductionABET has made a change in its definition of Criteria 2: Program Educational Objectives for the2011-2012
Conference Session
Innovations in Teaching and Research in Physics or Engineering Physics III
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Bert Pariser, Technical Career Institutes
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Physics & Physics
AC 2012-4139: PHOTON MASSDr. Bert Pariser, Technical Career Institutes Bert Pariser is a faculty member in the Electronic Engineering Technology and the Computer Science Technology departments at Technical Career Institutes. His primary responsibility is developing curricu- lum and teaching methodology for physics, thermodynamics, electromagnetic field theory, computers, and databases. Pariser has prepared grant proposals to the National Science Foundation, which produced the funding for a Fiber Optics Laboratory. He served as Faculty Advisor to the IEEE and Tau Alpha Pi National Honor Society. Pariser was instrumental in merging Tau Alpha Pi National Honor Society into the ASEE. In addition, Pariser co-founded
Conference Session
Innovations in Teaching and Research in Physics or Engineering Physics I
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Thomas Mark Scaife, University of Wisconsin-Platteville; Andrew F Heckler, Ohio State University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Physics & Physics
currently serving as the Interim Director of Digital Content for Physics, Engineering, and Computer Science at McGraw-Hill Higher Education.Andrew F Heckler, Ohio State University Andrew F. Heckler is an Associate Professor of Physics at Ohio State University. His original area of research was in Cosmology and Astrophysics. In the past nine years, he has focused on Physics Edu- cation Research, studying fundamental learning mechanisms involved in learning physics, the effects of representation on learning and problem solving, and the evolution of physics understanding during and after a physics course. As part of the education component of an NSF MRSEC center, he is also leading a project to identify and address student
Conference Session
Innovations in Teaching Physics or Engineering Phy
Collection
2008 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Adrian Ieta, Murray State University; Arthur Pallone
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Physics & Physics
member and a registered Professional Engineer of Ontario. He taught at the University of Western Ontario and is now Assistant Professor at Murray State University, Department of Engineering and Physics.Art Pallone, Murray State University Art Pallone holds a Ph.D in Applied Physics from the Colorado School of Mines (2000) in Golden, CO USA. He also holds an M.S. in Applied Physics from Indiana University of Pennsylvania (1995) and a B.S. in Aerospace Engineering from the University of Michigan (1991). From 2000 to 2003, he held a Davies Fellows Postdoctoral Teaching and Research appointment cosponsored by the United States Military Academy and the U.S. Army Research Laboratory. He
Conference Session
Engineering Physics and Physics Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Bala Maheswaran, Northeastern University; Cristian Scott Stransky, Northeastern University; Haridas Kumarakuru, Northeastern University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Physics and Physics
successfully proves theconcept of harnessing energy from the vertical motion of an elevator, for it to be a commerciallyprofitable product, it needs more work. We hope that the result from this educational modelproposed in this paper would serve as a milestone, and help future innovators to use this conceptand technology to produce a profitable “real-world” elevator to generate energy. The skillslearned from this project were invaluable, as research, design, trial and error, as well as technicalwriting are all important experiences within engineering and physics. 9AcknowledgementThe authors would like to express their sincere thanks to Dr. Donald