was the primary person in charge of the assessment of the NSF and DoD funded Automotive Research and Industrial Mentorship REU program.© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Page 12.780.2© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Generating Enthusiasm for Research through Automotive Projects andIndustrial Mentors: Lessons Learned from the First Year of an REU ProgramIntroductionThe department of Mechanical Engineering at Oakland University (OU) received funding forthree years through the National Science Foundation REU program and the Department ofDefense ASSURE program to organize a summer research experience for undergraduates (REU)program that focuses
appeared in the San Jose Mercury News, CBS Market Watch, CNN.com, Information Week, PC Magazine, Fast 2008 Company, and Enterprise Linux. He is an active participant in government-industry-university partnerships through such groups as the US National Academies Government-University-Industry Research Roundtable. He Page 15.389.1 has participated on many scientific program committees, is on the board of advisors for four major universities including the University of Illinois and the University of California San Diego, published extensively (his top five publications have been cited 580+ times
Leadership Education in Engineering (ILead) (2010- 2018) at the University of Toronto. After a lengthy career as a consulting engineer he made development of personal capability central to his work with engineering students, undergraduate and graduate. In 2002 he established Leaders of Tomorrow, a student leadership development program that led to the establishment of ILead in 2010. In 2017, he was part of the team that developed the OPTIONS Program (Opportunities for PhDs: Transitions, Industry Options, Networking and Skills) for engineering PhD students interested in careers outside the academy. He is a Professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry.Prof. Julie Audet P.Eng., University of
Thinking. He has team taught 10 courses including Agricultural Systems Thinking, Human Values in Agriculture, World Food Systems, Agricultural Biotechnology, Earth Systems, Global Environment and Fertigation. He has conducted fertilizer training programs for industry throughout California and Arizona plus South Africa and Brazil. He emphasizes multidisciplinary approaches to holistic problem solving. Soil microbiology, biochemistry, fertilizers, plant nutrition, and fertigation (as a coauthor) are major subjects. Page 12.946.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Interdisciplinary
tothink well requires intentional changes: changes in thinking processes, and changes in everydayhabits and routines. One does not employ new thinking skills in isolation; rather, it requiresdeveloping a lifestyle, behaviors, and attitudes that inspire and support the process of thinkingand effective design problem solving. Design instruction in our six course undergraduate design sequence spans sophomorethrough senior years and focuses on sustainability in four contexts: environmental, socio-cultural, economic, and technical. Students learn to design (and re-design) for sustainability inall contexts and are required to build their designs. Throughout the program, students arerequired to design or re-design products and processes that are
Undergraduate Education at the National Science Foundation, and a Fellow of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). Dr. Pearson currently chairs ASCE’s Formal Engineering Education Committee, and is Vice Chair of ASCE’s Committee on Diversity and Inclusion.Dr. Canek Moises Luna Phillips, Rice University Canek Phillips (P’urepecha) is a postdoctoral research associate at Rice University in the Brown School of Engineering. Canek’s research interests broadly relate to efforts to broaden participation in engineering. Currently, he is working on a project to improve mathematics education for visually impaired students.Dr. Margaret E. Beier, Rice University Margaret Beier is an Associate Professor of Psychology at Rice
Paper ID #34273Engaging Women Engineering Undergraduates as Peer Facilitators inParticipatory Action Research Focus GroupsDr. Susan Thomson Tripathy, University of Massachusetts Lowell Dr. Susan Thomson Tripathy received a Ph.D. in Anthropology from Harvard University in 1989. Her doctoral research was funded by a Fulbright-Hays Doctoral Dissertation grant, and utilized ethnographic fieldwork in rural Bihar, India, to analyze the politics and artistic development of a local dance form. From 1995-2007, Tripathy taught behavioral sciences at Middlesex Community College (MCC), where she was an active participant and
served the nation well in theeducation of future academic researchers, it is now recognized that an alternative model ofgraduate professional education is required for the majority of the nation’s graduate engineers inindustry and government service who are pursuing non-research professional career paths.Based on this new understanding, it has become evident that the nation’s primary “wellspring”for the generation, creation, and innovation of technology is its human resource base of creativegraduate engineers in industry. Graduate professional education programs that are specificallydesigned to further the leadership growth and creative development of this vital national assetwill directly and immediately stimulate effective innovation for
creative and leadership potential because creative practitioners must conceiveand implement creative solutions to real-world industrial problems and societal needs thatfrequently go beyond conventional thinking. These solutions demand sound technicalcompetence and the application of the intrinsic human potential of creativity, imagination,vision, judgement, responsible leadership, and original systems thinking.As the findings of the national study indicate, “Faculty and program administrators who took adialogical approach to teaching and learning centered their program’s primary learningexperiences within the context of a tacit “learning community.”3 In this setting, faculty andstudents participated in a variety of activities, including
Paper ID #42079Artificial Intelligence in the Construction Industry: A Competency-BasedExamination Through Expert LensProf. Hector Buyones-Gonzalez, Universidad Andres Bello, Chile Hector Buyones Gonzalez is a professor in the School of Engineering’s Construction Engineering program at Universidad Andres Bello and Universidad Autonoma de Chile in Santiago, Chile. He earned his degree in Civil Engineering and Civil Construction, as well as a Master’s degree in Construction Management. With extensive experience coordinating and executing construction projects across diverse sectors—including the oil industry (refineries
Paper ID #11157WHY DO UNDERGRADUATE WOMEN PERSIST AS STEM MAJORS?A STUDY AT TWO TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITIESDr. Ronald Brandt, Seton Hall University Ronald Brandt teaches physical science at the high school level, emphasizing Project Based Learning and inquiry based lab activities. Brandt seeks to inspire his students, especially young women, to develop a passion for STEM studies and consider a career in science and technology. Prior to entering the education profession, Ronald Brandt was an executive in the chemical industry serving as senior vice president at two multinational firms as well as President & CEO of an
productiveengineering careers in industry. As reflected by the National Society of Professional Engineers(NSPE), there are “nine levels” of progressive professional responsibility and leadership abilitiesrequired in creative engineering practice. Undergraduate engineering education prepares the engineerfor entry into the profession at Level I Engineer. But, it does not prepare the engineer for creativepractice at all levels of engineering. Further professional studies, experience, and actual creativeperformance are required beyond entry-level for further professional development in engineering.Finding # 5: Revitalizing the U.S. Engineering Workforce for leadership of technologicaldevelopment & innovation in industry is one of the nation’s primary engines
needsBecause the engineering program at this institution is fairly new, undergraduate only andsmaller (200 students), the number of faculty and staff with the ability to run this program issmall. In the 2022-23 academic year, graduate assistants were used (due to the pandemic,several student athletes who were undergraduate engineering majors had an extra year ofNCAA eligibility, so they stayed at the institution a fifth year and participated in a 5th year MBAprogram). Given that this is a unique situation which will not reoccur, in Spring Semester wetransitioned to using undergraduate volunteers to assist with the program, with the goal ofhiring upper-level undergraduate student workers to run the wellness program next year. Thedean has funds to
of an industry-sponsored construction management capstone course. Proceedings of the 2012 Annual Conference & Exposition, American Society for Engineering Education. Retrieved from http://www.asee.org/search/proceedings13. Heybruck, B., & Thurman, L. (2011). Increasing broader industrial participation in engineering & technical Page 24.914.8 undergraduate programs. Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Conference & Exposition, American Society for Engineering Education. Retrieved from http://www.asee.org/search/proceedings14. Halverson, T., Todd, R. H., Mattson, C. A., & Warnick, G. M. (2011
self-authorship in their undergraduate years.In this paper, we share an educational framework built on the theories of adult development self-authorship and self-determination, as well as our curriculum which is designed to build capacityfor self-authorship in our students. We outline the innovations that this has introduced to ourprogram including creating an honors program that does not use GPA or standardized test scoresfor admission or retention, but rather emphasizes immersive experiences and reflective practicethat challenge students to develop their own internal voice and interpersonal relationships. Weshare our rubric for assessment of self-authorship using reflection assignments and offer casestudies of engineering students who reveal
to foster real-world relevance,motivation, and goals for students beginning as early as possible in their undergraduate study.This entrepreneurial foundation helps provide context and relevance to foundational material,and fosters independence and personally relevant vantage points on coursework and the whole ofthe major. Here we report on our work-in-progress and initial formative assessment ofperformance and motivation of students in the entrepreneurial modules.2. Introduction and JustificationOur nation needs engineers that will drive innovation and leadership. Colleges and universitieshave outstanding undergraduate programs to train these rising engineers. Students receive criticalelements of integration, real-world connection
% Asian American Asian American 5% 10% 0% 0% Pre-Calc Calculus Chem Physics B/C/P (US Dept. of Education) (US Dept. of Education)It is precisely because of the challenges highlighted earlier in this paper that the NortheasternUniversity Program In Multicultural Engineering (NUPRIME), in partnership with RaytheonIntegrated Defense Systems (IDS), launched an engineering education diversity initiative in aneffort to stimulate broader industrial participation in undergraduate programs. In an effort toaddress the
directly relevant to the progressive growth needs of the participatingengineering leaders in regional industry. The intent of this reform is to offer courses that meet the engineeringleader’s professional growth needs. In this manner, the participants, industry, and the regional university wouldcontinually grow together. The curriculum of professionally oriented graduate studies would include both thetheoretical work and the practical engineering work necessary to enhance the participant’s field of needs-drivencreative technological innovation. This high quality professionally oriented graduate studies program would beinitially designed, implemented, and continually improved at universities in strong partnership with regionalindustry to protect
update and upgrade programs in powerand energy in light of new technologies and requirements for the electric power grid includingissues associated with policy and regulations. The workshop described in this paper is the first ina series conceived to develop, implement and evaluate responses to this need. These workshopsbring together diverse sets of academic and industry participants from Canada and the UnitedStates to address a range of issues including curriculum changes, faculty development andstudent recruitment.The goal of the workshop is to identify actions that will create a strong academic foundation foreducating the next generation of power engineering professionals and supporting the industrythrough fundamental research in relevant
programs atNorth Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University (NCA&TSU). The purpose of theworkshop was to significantly enhance and stimulate undergraduate learning in the areas ofscience, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) by utilizing the relevant STEMcontent of NASA sponsored research and education programs in conjunction with NCA&TSUfaculty expertise. The faculties were presented with several educational modules developed atNCA&TSU. These modules included Atmospheric module, Biology module, Chemistry module,Mathematics module, Materials module. In addition several external speakers were invited fromprivate industries and educational and government institutions. Workshop receivedoverwhelming response and
AC 2012-3392: DEVELOPMENT AND GROWTH OF AN UNDERGRAD-UATE MICRO/NANO ENGINEERING LABORATORY COURSEDr. Benita M. Comeau, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Benita Comeau is a Technical Instructor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the Mas- sachusetts Institute of Technology, where she teaches a laboratory course on nano/micro engineering. She is a Chemical Engineer and received her B.S.E. from the University of Michigan and her Ph.D. from the Georgia Institute of Technology. She was an NSF Research Fellow and a member of the Georgia Tech Student and Teacher Enhancement Partnership (STEP) GK-12 program. Before graduate school, she worked as a Product Engineer for Procter & Gamble and Agere Systems
include elementary schools and change theproduction to poetry writing and novel production. Also included in our future plans are morevisitations to schools to talk about engineering as a stimulus to excite K-12 students in the creativeefforts that can include engineering in the arts. Added in the scope of future activities would bevisits by undergraduate and graduate engineering students who could take the project from theportrayal of energy in relation to an engine to a much broader scope involving many aspects ofengineering and the ways that these engineering topics could be expressed in art. The current projectwas limited to flat portraits in acrylics to sculpture and beyond.References1. U.S. Department of Transportation, Aesthetics in
orientation because students wouldsoon be dispersed to different locations and interacting primarily through teleconferencing.During the orientation students also participated in laboratory and industrial field trips so thatthey were exposed to the variety of career choices available in bioengineering and related fields.At the end of the orientation, students went to their different sites to begin their research projects.2.2 Coordination across sites Coordination across sites was vital to the success of the program. Overall coordinationwas done at Vanderbilt with one administrator who handled the orientation program, publicity ofthe program, recruitment of students, financial management, and overall record-keeping. Eachsite also had a
, students who desire to earn a bachelor’s degree in an engineering discipline at acollege or university will declare a major upon matriculation or at the end of a first-yearengineering program. Whether or not the student is aware of it, their decision is generally guidedand informed by many beliefs [6] and values [7].Among the values often considered is the future value of being an engineer and/or having anengineering degree. Students studying engineering at a public research university located in thewestern mountain region of the United States, that specializes in undergraduate engineeringeducation, had very different reasons as to why their career and/or degree will be valuable – forsome, a financially rewarding career or benefits to society was
non-traditional, second- career, engineering students.Dr. Konstantin Cigularov, Old Dominion University Dr. Konstantin Cigularov is an Associate Professor of Industrial and Organizational Psychology in the College of Sciences at Old Dominion University. He holds a Ph.D. from Colorado State University in Industrial-Organizational Psychology and a B.S. in Banking and Finance from the University of Eco- nomics in Bulgaria. As the Director of the Leadership and Employee Assessment and Development Re- search Lab, Dr. Cigularov has investigated various organizational issues related to leadership and culture, employee burnout and stress, as well as training programs and interventions. Dr. Cigularov has extensive
Improvement and Lean Philosophy into Innovation Program for Undergraduate StudentsAbstractThis paper provides a novel program to create the seeds of innovation. Innovation is one of themost crucial elements of a successful startup, and it is important to move quickly. At the sametime, many startups fail because they build the wrong product. The longevity of any businessand/or industry relies on the effectiveness and rationale of the service providers. The paradigm andbusiness methodology applied in lean six sigma is aimed at having the long-term effectiveness ofthe employees. Hence the lean and continuous improvement application has originally proved tobe a quality process that provides and generates a high percentage of
(STEM) field. Involvingundergraduate students in research will make them take more interest in studies and motivate them topursue graduate degrees. The undergraduate students at Pennsylvania State University where I teach getinvolved in research usually conducted in the summer period for an 8-week or 10-week duration. Thename of the program is “Multi-campus Research Experience for Undergraduates” (MC-REU) and it isadministered by the College of Engineering at Penn State.Similarly, there are many academic institutions in the United States that got involved with researchundertaken by undergraduate students. The goals of the undergraduate research programs are (1) topromote undergraduate students participating in research early in their academic
confidence, development of an understanding to connecttheory with practice, inculcating an ability to work independently, etc.1,7,8 The existing literaturealso points out that undergraduate research seems to stimulate student interest in the subject-matter, resulting in an enhancement of critical thinking skills, improvement of career awareness,and development of an active learning attitude.7Students participating in this study have been involved with undergraduate research over the lastthree semesters. Before selecting their research topics, students were introduced to differenttopics of study (in the first semester of their involvement) by inviting multiple faculty membersto present their current research and explain possible opportunities for
. Students who learn aboutsocial entrepreneurship through different programs grow to engage themselves more deeply insocial and civic matters while developing a broader global perspective.Innovation competitions and programs may impact aspects of a student’s academic, business,and personal development. Some students develop their program experiences to formulate abusiness venture. Other students participate in these programs to join a team, learn about moderntechnologies, or for pure enjoyment. These experiences for students play an influential role informing an entrepreneurial ecosystem as students develop complex business ideas and createtheir own network of critical thinkers, problem-solvers, and entrepreneurial minds.Providing student teams with
education.Dr. Barbara B. Kawulich, University of West Georgia Dr. Barbara Kawulich is Interim Director of the Evaluation Center and Associate Professor of Research in the Educational Technology and Foundations Department at the University of West Georgia. She teaches qualitative and action research, ethics, leadership, and diversity to graduate and undergraduate students. Her research focuses on research methods, research pedagogy, and issues related to indigenous women. She has authored numerous publications on these topics and has co-authored two books on research methods.Prof. P.K. Raju, Mechanical Engineering Dept, Auburn University,Al Dr. Raju is the Thomas Walter Distinguished Professor of Mechanical Engineering at