among the fourdifferent entrepreneurship interest-intention groups. Page 24.580.11In the PEARS dataset, we operationalized frequency of undergraduate interactions withprofessors as follows. Each of these items was measured on a 5-point scale ranging from Neverto Very Often.While an undergraduate engineering student, how often did you discuss each of thefollowing with your engineering professors: • Course material and assignments outside of class • Your professional options with an engineering degree • How skills you learned in class apply to “real-life” engineering practicesTable 6. Frequencies of Topics Discussed by
useful interaction Not enjoyable Not as efficient Need interesting as other discovery and present peers behaviors Need instructors Did not realize to encourage benefits collaborationObserving Not reflective or Lack ability to Unstructured – Not emphasized attentive to associate from benefits not in many classes everyday
studentsparticipate at every stage. In addition, the majority of financial assistance that the Incubatorprovides to a small company is in the form of employment of graduate and undergraduatestudents to work on development of prototypes to meet the company’s needs.In addition to other early indicators of success, two companies formed around graduate studentsthat had completed a management course in Intra/Entrepreneurship of Technology have hadrecent success in obtaining SBIR and follow-on funding.This paper is a continuation of the paper delivered at ASEE 2002 conference entitled “Launchingan Innovation Incubator in a University Setting” by Vickers, Salamo, Loewer and Ahlen. In the2004 conference, we will discuss early progress indicators and recommendations
challenging to design a companion entrepreneurial thinking course that could be appliedacross all eight of our current engineering programs: Biomedical, Chemical, Civil, Computer,Electrical, Environmental, Mechanical, and Naval Engineering, as well as the EngineeringManagement program. Only about half of our projects fall into the category of product designwith a prototype. The product projects, whether hardware, software, or a combination, work wellas examples in traditional entrepreneurship or business planning classes. Many of our biomedicalengineering students develop medical devices, and mechanical engineering students developrobots and gadgets, all of which are ideal examples for identifying customers, value propositions,and fundraising
of 2014. The project comprises two major phases: (1) education ininnovation, entrepreneurship, and commercialization, and (2) identification and funding ofpromising and competitive technologies.The project’s education initiatives include: A comprehensive assessment of entrepreneurial orientation, perceptions and activity Page 24.1254.3 • across UT System campuses. • An Entrepreneurs Academy™, an online program designed to help faculty learn the fundamental concepts of starting a business and commercializing their innovations. The modules provided in the Academy combine a selection of best-in-class videos and
Performance Standards Areas that Need Work Areas that are Weak or Standards Missing Context: The proposal describes an application that is fundamental to the lesson plan either as an extension or as in-class material. FIGURE 1. EXAMPLE OF A SINGLE POINT RUBRIC CRITERION.The single point rubric is not a passive document where one merely looks for a box to circle – itsolicits responses. Leaving the non-proficiency cells of the performance level areas blank invitesconversation; if
the problem given to them. Students oftengain confidence from these projects and provide statements such as “made me more excitedabout the major”, “made me want to take more classes to learn all that I still don’t know”, “whatI had been waiting for”, “what we are here for”, and “one of the few times where you actuallyapply, hands on, the theory that you learn all through school.” 10 These ‘capstone’ projectsusually take place during the student’s senior year.In the conventional senior-level ‘capstone’ project-centered learning project, the student has norole in the problem’s conceptual development. The problem along with all of its parameters isgiven to the student, and the student’s sole responsibility is generating the solution.Conversely
Percent Through affiliation with Spark Boulder 25% From co-workers, e.g. CEO, mentor 25% Electrical engineering capstone class email 13% Campus pitch competition 13% Entrepreneurship Center at business school 13%In order to reach more potential companies, a suggestion for improvement is reaching out toother capstone programs. Inviting other capstone courses to apply to the program would allowCatalyze CU to draw from a greater pool and have access to more students who are alreadyinvolved in idea and technology development. The post assessment revealed that 85% ofparticipants said they would
Paper ID #18246Cultivating the Entrepreneurial Mindset through Design: Insights from The-matic Analysis of First-year Engineering Students’ ReflectionsMr. Mark Vincent Huerta, Arizona State University Mark Huerta is a PhD student in the Engineering Education Systems and Design program at Arizona State University. He earned a B.S. and M.S. in Biomedical Engineering at Arizona State University. Mark possesses a diverse background that includes experiences in engineering design, social entrepreneurship, consulting, and project management.Dr. Jeremi S. London, Arizona State University Dr. Jeremi London is an Assistant
Paper ID #13052Fostering Innovative Skills within the Classroom: A Qualitative Analysisfrom Interviews with 60 InnovatorsLaura Atkins, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Laura Atkins is a doctoral candidate in the Department of Sociology at the University of Illinois. Recent research includes projects aimed toward improving the lives of students. Her other research interests relate to health disparities along class, gender, and racial lines.Mr. Julian Ernesto Martinez-Moreno, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Julian currently works as a researcher at Applied Technologies for Learning in the Arts & Sciences
Paper ID #25207A Scaffold and Competency-Based Learning Approach to Innovation-RelatedThinking FrameworksDr. Lisa Bosman, Purdue University Dr. Bosman is an Assistant Professor in Technology Leadership and Innovation and the Program Co- ordinator for Transdisciplinary Studies in Technology. Her STEM education research interests include entrepreneurial mindset, renewable energy, competency-based learning, self-regulated learning, transdis- ciplinary education, civic engagement, and faculty professional development. She spent the first part of her career working as a manufacturing engineer for world-class companies including
Paper ID #22077Early-career Engineers at the Workplace: Meaningful Highs, Lows, and In-novative Work EffortsMr. Mathias J. Klenk, Technical University of Munich Mathias graduated from Technical University of Munich (TUM) with a B.Sc. ’15 and M.Sc ’17 in Man- agement and Technology. His majors were Computer Science, Innovation and Entrepreneurship. He was also a participant in the entrepreneurial qualification program ”Manage&More”. This is a program of the center for innovation and business creation at the Technical University Munich (”UnternehmerTUM”) which supports innovation and startup projects. While at
cohort of Honors Scholars in the InnovationLeadership Honors Program in the Fall 2008 Semester. The program overlays the existing curriculaand provides a select group of students an enhanced background and training in innovation,entrepreneurship, leadership, and communication. The status of the program is reported here. Page 14.1141.2 The paper concludes with some additional suggestions for implementing and assessing the skills andactivities. 1 Teaching Innovative Thinking: Future DirectionsIntroduction For engineers of the future, technical capability alone will
feasible complete design that could actually befabricated.The College of Business at this University offers an Entrepreneurship minor that has 9 credithours of core courses and 9 credit hours of electives. This year, the two phases of the IdeationChallenge roughly correspond with the first two of those core courses: Entrepreneurship Ideationand Innovation and Entrepreneurship Feasibility Analysis. The third Entrepreneurship corecourse, Small Business and Entrepreneurship, was not addressed in this iteration of the IdeationChallenge.Entrepreneurial thinking begins with ideation…thinking outside of the box. An entrepreneurmust develop a vision for a new product or service, or a new way of delivering an existingproduct or service, to distinguish
because each team would need to create professional quality CAD models and basicsimulations. Having at least one person with strong CAD skills on each team is essential. Genderwas factored in because the class was mostly male and the instructor wanted to avoid, if possible,having multiple teams with only one female on the team. TeamBuilder enabled the instructor toobjectively form teams by subjectively choosing which factors were most important to hiscourse.Likewise, TeamBuilder can also be leveraged in entrepreneurship. In particular, byorganizations that support team formation, like on-campus accelerators. Often times there arestudents (or people in the community) who want to be a part of a startup, but don’t have an ideafor a product or
AC 2012-4303: OPEN PROCESS FOR ENTREPRENEURING TEAM COL-LABORATION: PARALLELS FROM AN ACADEMIC RESEARCH TEAMTO THE START UP THEY STUDIEDProf. Barbara A. Karanian, Stanford University Barbara A. Karanian, Ph.D. teaches graduate design methods and a new REVS class on the car experi- ence in the College of Engineering at Stanford University, using applied psychology and art for story- telling to facilitate student progress from the idea and prototyping phases to delivery. With a focus on entrepreneurial leadership, Karanian makes productive partnerships with industry and forms collaborative teams from the areas of engineering, design, psychology, and communication. She was the Michael T. Anthony Professor at Wentworth
]. Studentsare directed to identify challenges posted by world groups, such as The National Institute of Health(NIH) and The National Science Foundation (NSF), directing their intrinsic motivation to gathernew knowledge and apply it towards creating solutions to global problems [5]. Students in IBLcourses use a tokenized system to track their learning of concepts, skills, and tools that they believeaid them in pursuit of innovations. Bi-weekly learning reports are presented during class and real-time feedback is given by peers on both presentations and token submissions. Simultaneously, theCynefin framework provides a guide to show how students work through developing and creatinginnovations [6]. By challenging students to work between the line of the
participants mentioned that students in thejunior sequence and the innovation course saw these as “just a class.” One participant said thathis team never discussed pursuing their project as a startup because the team members were “justthere for the class.” Similarly, another participant said that their efforts in both the juniorsequence and the innovation course were more of “just a project for a class rather than doingsomething for real.” The junior-level sequence is required for majors, and thus students may seethis more as a hurdle than as an opportunity. The courses are about entrepreneurship andentrepreneurial skills, but they do not necessarily convert students immediately intoentrepreneurs.A second factor involves the composition of teams
currently exists and the plans that have been derived from therecommendations that resulted from the study. This paper will also discuss recent events that areredefining the effort and the application of experience gained to entrepreneurial education inengineering.Introduction Traditionally, entrepreneurship in higher education has been associated with research-intensive efforts1. Entrepreneurship in higher education has also been linked with innovation andeconomic development exemplified by the Massachusetts route 128 corridor, the North CarolinaResearch Triangle, and the Silicon Valley in California2. More recently, entrepreneurship hasbeen linked with efforts to create social value resulting in what is commonly referred to as
students participated in this research. One group were those actually enrolled inthe BR450 Capstone Design Class (Table 1) as a requirement to get the BmE or BS&T minor(Biomedical Engineering or Biomedical Science and Technology). The numbers in BR450 aresmaller than those who actually got the BmE minor as some capstone design projects in Mechan-ical Engineering (and to a far lesser extent in Chemical Engineering in 2013/ 2014) focused on aBmE problem and hence could be counted as satisfying the BmE design requirement. BR450 had64% (44) as engineering students, 25% (17) as either biology or biomolecular science students,7% (5) as students from other disciplines, and 4% as either exchange (2) or high school (1) stu-dents. Table 1 also lists the
services. CATI and its relationship to regional economic development are describedin more detail elsewhere3.Industry and Academic PartnershipsCATI has partnered with Carthage College’s ScienceWorks Entrepreneurial Studies in NaturalScience Program so as to develop and share resources for entrepreneurship education and todevelop new products, services, and companies. This collaboration has generated effectiveprojects for over twenty senior business plan students, supported in-class exercises that haveresulted in market analyses for new products, and provided the grist for the launch of severalnew companies, contributing to the regional economy. A major advantage of this approach is thatsmaller academic institutions, without engineering programs, an
of management or business, the entrepreneurialprograms at the University originated in the College of Engineering. In the College ofEngineering, the belief was that engineering graduates play many roles in industry, all ofwhich require business and entrepreneurial skills. In response to this situation, the collegedeveloped the entrepreneurial certificate program. Separately, the College of Arts andSciences, through the Undergraduate Management Program, also developed a certificateprogram and concentration in entrepreneurship. However, these two programs operatedseparately and only impacted a small percentage of the entire student population. Inaddition, a majority of the entrepreneurial focus, especially in the College of Engineering,has
solution.What actually happens in a Rube machine? Brainstorming stepsIn parallel with selecting a theme and writing a storyboard, early meetings were devoted tobrainstorming innovative ideas for steps. Many of these ideas came from classes, museums,cartoons and television, interesting objects from the real world, and even late-night shoppingexperiences. Thinking of how different kinds of energy, such as mechanical, chemical, orelectrical, could be transformed sometimes resulted in new ideas being generated. Some stepsstemmed from the development of a particular technology over time. For instance, the author’smachines often featured two-rail roller coasters for billiard balls. Each year, the roller coastertechnology would be pushed to further exploit
of Maryland, College Park. He received his B.S. and M.S. from West Virginia University and the Ph.D. from The Johns Hopkins University in Electrical Engineering. He is a Fellow of the IEEE. His publications focus on electronics technology and technology entrepreneurship. Dr. Barbe received the ASEE Entrepreneurship Division Outstanding Entrepreneurship Education Award in June 2003.James Green, University of Maryland-College Park Mr. Green is the Associate Director of the Hinman CEOs Program at the University of Maryland, College Park. He manages the Program's operations, coaches students in new venture creation, and instructs classes in technology entrepreneurship at the undergraduate and
(TUM) Johann is currently finishing his Masters in Management & Technology at Technical University of Munich (TUM). During his studies he focused on Finance, Entrepreneurship and Mechanical Engineering. In 2018, Johann researched at the Designing Engineering Education (DEL) lab at Stanford University.Dr. Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University Sheri D. Sheppard, Ph.D., P.E., is professor of Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. Besides teaching both undergraduate and graduate design and education related classes at Stanford University, she conducts research on engineering education and work-practices, and applied finite element analysis. From 1999-2008 she served as a Senior Scholar at the Carnegie
experience in leadership development for all students, staff and faculty. Recognize student commitment to leadership development with credentials (e.g., a Certificate in Leadership, a Leadership Minor).From its inception, LAP was designed by a multi-disciplinary team representing many differentfunctional units of Rose-Hulman: administrators, faculty, student affairs staff, and staff drawnfrom other areas. The purpose of this cross-functional approach is two-fold. First, unlike otherundergraduate leadership development programs that are sponsored by student affairs staff onlyor are taught within the context of an academic class, the Rose-Hulman approach integratesleadership development into both a student’s academic and
satisfaction inthe attainment of a certain class of incentives.” Page 26.970.7 6Expectancy – “A cognitive anticipation, usually aroused by cues in a situation, that performanceof some act will be followed by a particular consequence.”Incentive – “relative attractiveness of a specific goal that is offered in a situation (or the relativeunattractiveness of an event that might occur as a consequence of some act.” (Atkinson, 1957,pp. 359 - 372)Each of these has strong relationships to innovation and engineering education. Motive could be adrive
core competencies of creativity through in-class activities and games, as well as assignedwork. In addition, the students study and implement various methodologies of creative problemsolving through various problems and product development assignments. Teamwork isemphasized and each student is given at least two opportunities to act as a team leader during aproblem solving or product development project. All students’ leadership skills are both self-assessed and assessed by each team member.On the first day of the course, the students were surveyed on their general perceptions ofcreativity, problem solving, teamwork , leadership, the role of creativity in engineering, and theirpersonal view on their own creativity. After the course, the same
Paper ID #18063Exploring Ways to Measure Entrepreneurial Mindset: The development of aStudent-Focused Effectual Logic Assessment InstrumentMr. Todd Mathew Fernandez, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Todd is a PhD Candidate in Engineering Education at Purdue University who’s research is focused on entrepreneurship education and entrepreneurship education as a component of modern engineering edu- cation efforts.Dr. Nathalie Duval-Couetil, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Nathalie Duval-Couetil is the Director of the Certificate in Entrepreneurship and Innovation Program
globe.11Programs that not only incorporate liberal arts, but require students to take classes on culturalawareness and participate in international exposure, thru study abroad and/or foreign language,produce engineers that are ready to work in the global engineering economy. One of the majorstrengths of the dual degree program is the students’ ability to receive an excellent liberal artseducation that not only includes foreign language but also includes culture, history, and othertraditional liberal education topics.11 This research continues by claiming that the program isintended to explicitly prepare graduates to work in the international engineering environment bysupplementing language skills with cultural, political, and economic knowledge