relate to the outcomes of their work7. Inparticular, they recommend using perspective-taking as users to discover the complexity of theunderlying socio-technical system of use6. This attention to empathic communication isunderutilized in engineering education as a way of building core professional communication Page 26.871.2competencies. While the construct of empathy is complex, Levenson and Ruef’s9 definition(quoted in Walther et al.6) includes three essential qualities: 1) the cognitive knowing of whatanother person is feeling, 2) the emotional feeling what another individual is feeling, and 3) theact of responding to another’s experience with
Paper ID #38032GR in VR: Using Immersive Virtual Reality as a Learning Tool for GeneralRelativityKristen Schumacher, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Kristen Schumacher is currently a graduate student in physics with a research focus on modified theories of gravity. She founded the POINT project (Physics Outreach and Instruction through New Technologies) at UIUC to bring these abstract concepts to a wider audience through virtual reality.Sonali Joshi, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Sonali Joshi is a graduate student in physics with a research focus on effective models for condensed matter systems. She is
to be academicallyoriented, lacking alignment with the industry's demands. In response, a few higher educationinstitutions have introduced programs allowing or encouraging doctoral students to engage withthe industry during their academic training [3-5].Evaluation of these initiatives has shown that students benefit significantly from practicalindustry involvement, gaining skills through internships that enhance their understanding ofindustry operations and, consequently, improve their employability. Our study showedoverwhelming interest from graduate applicants for pursuing the Pasteur Partners PhD (P3)model, which explicitly requires the student to be trained comprehensively in partnership withindustry [6]. In this model, a student designs
Paper ID #7891Robotics: Enhancing Pre-College Mathematics Learning with Real-worldExamplesDr. Ravi T. Shankar, Florida Atlantic University Dr. Ravi Shankar is a professor in the computer and electrical engineering and computer science (CEECS) department in the college of engineering and computer science (COECS) at Florida Atlantic University (FAU) at Boca Raton, Fla. He is the director of a college-wide center on systems integration. He has a Ph.D. from the University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisc., and an M.B.A. from FAU. He is a registered Professional Engineer in the State of FL, a Senior member of IEEE, and a fellow of
(UW-Madison), Dr. Kevin Kirtley (General Electric Waterand Power), and Professor Robert Lucht (Purdue University). The co-principal investigators onthe project, Dr. Jeffrey Froyd and Professor K. Rajagopal, are acknowledged for theircontributions and assistance to the concept inventory. Faculty colleagues at Texas A&MUniversity Department of Mechanical Engineering are acknowledged for their assistance inadministering the concept inventory to their respective courses; these colleagues includeProfessor Michael Pate, Professor David Staack, Professor Andrea Strzelec, Mr. Joshua Bittle, Page 24.174.12and Dr. Jacob McFarland. Finally, the data
development, and the application of both in local communities. She also serves as Chair of her department and in this capacity prioritizes strategic planning, consensus building, curricular innovation, extracurricular student development, and stakeholder engagement.Dr. Alison Conway, City University of New York, City College Alison Conway is an Associate Professor of Civil Engineering at the City College of New York. At CCNY, Dr. Conway teaches an introductory course in civil engineering, as well as courses is transportation planning, transportation systems engineering, urban freight and city logistics, and urban street design. Dr. Conway conducts research primarily in the areas of urban freight and city logistics, freight
expressed and opinions shared are her own and do not necessarily represent those of the organizations she is part of. Learn more about her work at - www.ThatStatsGirl.comLilianny Virguez (Lecturer) Biography Lilianny Virguez is an Instructional Assistant Professor at the Engineering Education Department at University of Florida. She holds a Masters' degree in Management Systems Engineering and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. She has work experience in telecommunications engineering and teaches undergraduate engineering courses such as engineering design and elements of electrical engineering. Her research interests include the intersection of core non-cognitive skills and engineering students
attributes such as structure, moisture content, and electrical charge. Thosecan be dealt with at a later time when the students are better able to cope with abstractions. Aspiral curriculum describes an approach to the design of the curriculum that is built on thisidea. Thus, in this example the students meet the concept on several occasions during theschooling and on each occasion more material is added to the understanding of the concept.Graduate student teachers including scientists and engineers find it difficult to defineattributes and values but the evidence is that when they are forced to think about thedominant features of a concept they find it to be an aid in the planning and implementation ofa lesson. It is also evident that part of the
) funded FORTE (Fostering Opportunities for Tomorrow’s Engineers) program at UWM. Jablonski is focusing her dissertation on sustainable oxidation of textile waste water and is working to create small-scale waste wa- ter treatment units for cottage textile industries. She trained at the National Environmental Engineering Research Institute (NEERI) in Nagpur, India where she worked on bio-degradation of azo dye interme- diates. Jablonski served as co-chair of UWM’s student chapter of Engineers Without Borders for two years after its inception in 2007. She continues to help design and implement water distribution projects in Guatemala. Jablonski was a 2012 recipient of NSF’s EAPSI fellowship in China; a 2008 recipient
AC 2011-826: REALISTIC OPEN-ENDED ENGINEERING PROBLEM SOLV-ING AS SITES FOR POSTDOCTORAL RESEARCHER TRAINING INCOURSE INSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENTAmani Salim, Purdue University, West Lafayette Amani Salim is a postdoctoral researcher in the Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering (ABE) at Purdue University, and was previously a postdoctoral researcher in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She receives her B.Sc. and M.Sc. in Electrical Engineering from Uni- versity of Minnesota Twin Cities, and her Ph.D. in BioMEMS and Microelectronics from Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering at Purdue University. Her engineering education research focuses on prob- lem formulation within Model
diachronic view and a synchronicview of the process of innovation adoption and diffusion. Diachronically, the model allows us tovisualize the stages an individual will go through in making decisions about innovation adoption.Synchronically, the model demonstrates the complexity at a given time in the diffusion process interms of individual differences in perceptions, attitudes, and decisions about an innovation, and interms of the influences of external factors (e.g. innovation characteristics, communication channels,and innovation decision types) on individual decisions and on overall adoption rate. Based on awide application of this model in a variety of academic disciplines (e.g., geography, political science,anthropology, marketing, and public
M.S. in Industrial Engineering, and a Ph.D. in Engineering from the University of Arkansas. His research interest includes decision quality, resilient design, set-based design, engineering and project management, and engineering education. During his time at the University of Arkansas, Eric has served as Principal Investigator, Co-Principal Investigator, or Senior Personnel on over 40 research projects totaling over $6.6 Million, which produced over 50 publications (journal articles, book chapters, conference proceedings, newsletters, and technical reports). He is an active member of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) and International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE) where he has served in
focus on what prevents students from being able to integrate and extend the knowledge developed in specific courses in the core curriculum to the more complex, authentic problems and projects they face as professionals. Dr. Koretsky is one of the founding members of the Center for Lifelong STEM Education Research at OSU. Page 24.426.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Development of Interactive Virtual Laboratories to Help Students Learn Difficult Concepts in ThermodynamicsAbstractIn this project, we explore the use of threshold concept theory as a
registered professional mechan- ical engineer with 15 years experience as a practicing engineer. She earned a BSME degree from the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, a MSME degree from the Georgia Institute of Technology, and is currently pursuing a PhD in Engineering Education at USU. She is Principal Investigator for Online Learning Forums for Improved Engineering Student Outcomes in Calculus, a research project funded by the NSF TUES program. Her research interests include engineering student learning, distance engineering education, and alternative pathways to engineering education.Dr. Joshua Marquit, Pennsylvania State University, Brandywine Joshua Marquit is an Instructor in the Psychology Department at Penn State
AC 2008-1698: PREPARING GRADUATE STUDENTS TO BE SUCCESSFUL ASTEACHING MENTORS AND AS FUTURE PROFESSIONALSTershia Pinder-Grover, University of Michigan Tershia Pinder-Grover (tpinder@umich.edu) is the Coordinator of Engineering Graduate Student Instructor (GSI) Initiatives at the Center for Research on Learning in Teaching at the University of Michigan. She oversees the Engineering GSI Mentor (EGSM) Program, plans teacher training for new engineering GSIs, develops workshops and seminars, and consults with faculty and GSIs on pedagogy and engineering education research projects. Dr. Tershia Pinder-Grover earned her B.S. degree in Fire Protection Engineering from the University of Maryland and
of Strategic Planning 1 Female Former and Assessment Director of Assessment for the 2 Female Former Office of the Provost Associate Professor of Electrical 3 Male and Computer Engineering/ Former Undergraduate Coordinator Associate Head and Professor of 4 Male Aeronautics and Astronautics/ Former ABET Coordinator Associate Dean of Engineering
when thestudent has passed a satisfactory examination on these fundamental principles and their variousnon-technical applications is he permitted to work on engineering projects.” (p. 58). Howeverthe report questions this approach, defining the value of practical work early in the curriculum:“Practical engineering work is essential for the freshman not only because it appeals to hisprofessional ambition, arouses his enthusiasm, and gives him training in practice, but alsobecause it helps him to master the theoretical work more fully and more quickly.” (p. 88).Despite the emphasis on practice, engineering programs are distinguished from the moreapprentice-based model of medicine and law by their academic character: “In engineering, onthe other
skills traditionally have been more applicable. Furthermore,students’ course-taking patterns and the intensity and quality of their high school curricula arerelated to their successes in college, as well as the likelihood they will choose and complete adegree in science or engineering21,27. Page 24.926.4 3In summary, the pre-college student characteristics related to persistence in engineering aregenerally academic in nature. Certain demographic characteristics are highly correlated toacademic achievement, but assumptions of potential success
Paper ID #37854Victims of Outcomes: Towards an Enactivist Model ofTechnological LiteracyAlan Cheville (T. Jefferson Miers Chair in Electrical Engineering, ProfessorDepartment Chair) Alan Cheville studied optoelectronics and ultrafast optics at Rice University before joining Oklahoma State University working on terahertz frequencies and engineering education. While at Oklahoma State he developed courses in photonics and engineering design. After serving for two and a half years as a program director in engineering education at the National Science Foundation, he became chair of the ECE Department at Bucknell
engineering and education, capstone design, and introductory materials engineering. His research interests are evaluating conceptual knowledge, miscon- ceptions and their repair, and conceptual change. He has co-developed a Materials Concept Inventory for assessing conceptual knowledge of students in introductory materials engineering classes. He is cur- rently conducting research with NSF sponsored projects in the areas of: Modules to Promote Conceptual Change in an Introductory Materials Course, Tracking Student Learning Trajectories of Atomic Structure and Macroscopic Property Relationships, and Assessing the Effect of Learning Modes on Conceptual Change.Michelene T.H. Chi, Arizona State University Micki Chi is a
–particularly Latinos/as/xs – have been perceived as disruptive elements of theAmericanization project [1]. Latinos/as/xs have been framed as individuals that are unable tosucceed in academic spaces because of inherent deficits and thus unable to accommodate tothe demands of American exceptionalism [2]. Engineering is no exception to this deficitframing of Latinos/as/xs. In fact, engineering has a long history of discrimination towardminoritized groups that is still present today in engineering programs [3]. For instance,Latino/a/x engineering students still contend with the enduring repercussions of deficitideologies, racialization, and a process of assimilation through subtractive schooling [4, 5].Engineering has, too, embraced an educational
available and taken by those who hold Engineering degrees. ≠ What metrics should be developed to identify “star” faculty? For both undergraduate and graduate programs, we can do much more to identify best practices regarding education, research and the integration of research and education? Page 14.1377.107 M. Ohland et al., 2008, “Persistence, Engagement and Migration in Engineering Programs,” Journal ofEngineering Education. Panel 1b: Graduate studentsModerator Delcie Durham, Associate Provost and Dean of the Graduate School at University ofSouth Florida, Deidre Meldrum, Dean of Engineering at Arizona State
Paper ID #11855The Impact of Teaming and Cognitive Style on Student Perceptions of DesignIdeation OutcomesDr. Kathryn W. Jablokow, Pennsylvania State University, Great Valley Dr. Kathryn Jablokow is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Engineering Design at Penn State University. A graduate of Ohio State University (Ph.D., Electrical Engineering), Dr. Jablokow’s teaching and research interests include problem solving, invention, and creativity in science and engineer- ing, as well as robotics and computational dynamics. In addition to her membership in ASEE, she is a Senior Member of IEEE and a Fellow of
succeed in their selected field of study16. When faculty adhereto traditional grading practices (such as the imposition of curves), they have a differential impacton women students. Faculty differ in their views of, strategies for, and success at creating an atmosphere thatfosters learning.12 The subject matter of projects and problems, the fit between pedagogical andlearning styles, and classroom "climate" have each been discussed as influences that affectretention, particularly the retention of students of color and women students. Faculty practicesfrequently mentioned in the retention literature include: the use of study and project groups,exam construction, time pressure on tests (and tactics for neutralizing it); incorporation
Paper ID #36500Women Students Learning a STEM Subject: An Analysis ofNote-Taking Practices in a Civil Engineering Course and theAssociation with Self-Efficacy, Cognitive Engagement, TestAnxiety, and Course AchievementMonica Palomo (Professor) (California State Polytechnic University,Pomona) Dr. Mónica Palomo is a professor in the Department of Civil Engineering at California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, where she teaches senior projects, and environmental and water resources engineering undergraduate and graduate courses. She is the CWEA-AWWA student chapter advisor. Dr. Palomo holds a Civil Engineering degree