withengineering and technology. The end goal of this partnership is to provide a teacher with theknowledge, tools, and confidence to implement an engineering and technology curriculum intheir classroom.In this paper we examine teachers’ reactions on their participation in STOMP. We specificallylook at teacher perceptions of STOMP, experience and comfort level in teaching STEM content,and their shear interest in the STOMP program. We also examine a need and rationale behind athree-phase model in which STOMP has a sustainable impact on a teacher’s ability to implementSTEM curricula.Results of this study show that STOMP has raised teachers’ confidence in teaching andknowledge of engineering and technology content. These results support the use of a three
Paper ID #48458From Bachelor’s to Master’s: Growing Student Engagement in AcceleratedECE PathwaysDr. Pelin Kurtay, George Mason University Pelin Kurtay is Professor and Senior Associate Chair of the Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) Department at George Mason University. She currently heads the ECE Department’s undergraduate curriculum development efforts and other initiatives related to the development of new programs, recruitment, retention, and planning efforts.Smriti Patwardhan, George Mason University Smriti K Patwardhan is an award-winning academic advisor with over 15 years of experience in higher
math and one science teachers) and engage them to work on their first lesson in the following sequence. Select a topic from the middle school curriculum that is aligned with the NGSS. Build a lesson plan using the NGSS plus 5E template. Design activities using LEGO robots (classroom activity sheets, EV3 programs, etc.). Present the lesson plan, demonstrate the LEGO activity, and gather feedback from peers. Review and integrate feedback from peer teachers and facilitators. Revise the newly developed lessons. Week 3 Design another lesson plan in groups with the sequence of activities being same as in Week 2.The PD
engineering and technology into the structure of scienceeducation” at all grade levels, including elementary school (Volume 2, Appendix A, p. 3). Thisshift requires not only new thinking about elementary curriculum and pedagogy, but also atransformation in the preparation of new elementary teachers so that they develop the knowledgeand skills necessary to include the discipline of engineering in their classrooms.A number of science education researchers have documented strategies for improving noviceelementary teachers’ competence in inquiry-based science teaching 2, 3, but there is only limitedresearch in the U.S. on how elementary teachers learn to teach engineering design 4, 5, 6. There isa need for new strategies to prepare novice elementary
students can meet the new standards, it isof paramount importance that their teachers leverage the SEPs in instructional planning andimplementation. Use of technology in the context of science teaching and learning can also helpteachers perform inquiry-based teaching so that students can have meaningful learning experiences[4—6]. In a recent effort, we developed and conducted professional development (PD) workshopsfocused on using robotics technology to provide a supportive opportunity and environment toteachers to experience the use of robotics in classroom teaching and to lower their perceivedapprehension about its classroom integration. The projected outcome through the PD is to improvethe teachers’ curriculum knowledge and standard aligned
actively engaged in teaching, research and curricula development since joining the faculty in 1988.Roger Seals, Louisiana State UniversityVaneshette Henderson, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge Vaneshette Henderson is the Pre-College Programs Coordinator for the Office for Diversity Programs with the Louisiana State University College of Engineering. She received her bachelor’s degree in physics from Xavier University of Louisiana; master’s degree in biomedical engineering from the University of Michigan; she will receive her doctorate in curriculum and instruction from LSU in May of 2010. Her research interests and areas of specializations include pre-college science and engineering
be used to expand theseefforts more broadly in the future.2. FLC formation and activitiesFLCs are a transformative practice in which faculty participate in groups of usually between sixand 15 members, to generate an actionable goal or product [10],[11],[12]. They are based on thepremise that universities are places of learning for all, including faculty, and can be a way tofoster collaboration [12]. FLCs have been demonstrated as valuable for cross-campuscollaborations [12],[13], faculty development [14], curriculum development [15], generatingteaching resources [16], and scholarship of teaching and learning [14],[17],[18]. Additionally,FLCs have been shown to reduce the isolation among faculty [12],[19].FLCs are generally either “topic” or
Paper ID #37486The Impact of Faculty’s Use of Pedagogical CommunicationPlatforms on Professor-Student RapportTina Zecher (Evaluation Associate) Tina Zecher is an evaluator and education researcher in the Center for Science Teaching and Learning at Northern Arizona University in Flagstaff, Arizona. She holds a B.S. in Economics/Finance from the University of Texas at Dallas and an M.Ed. in Educational Leadership from Northern Arizona University. She is currently pursuing her Ph.D. in Curriculum & Instruction. Ms. Zecher serves as an evaluator and educational researcher on federally and privately funded grants
development and manufacturing process optimization, especially for solidification processes such as metalcasting and welding.Dr. Paul C. Lynch, Pennsylvania State University Erie, The Behrend College Paul C. Lynch received his Ph.D., M.S., and B.S. degrees in Industrial Engineering from the Pennsylvania State University. Dr. Lynch is a member of AFS, AIST, SME, IISE, and ASEE. Dr. Lynch’s primary research interests are in metal casting, manufacturing systems, engineering economy and engineering ed- ucation. Dr. Lynch has been recognized by Alpha Pi Mu, IISE, and the Pennsylvania State University for his scholarship, teaching, and advising. He was awarded the Penn State Behrend School of Engi- neering Distinguished Awards
leads the development of the MSP course Connecting Physics, Chemistry, and Mathematics. Prof. Culbertson is also actively involved in the Master of Natural Science (MNS) program for in-service science teachers, and he has developed and taught two courses in this program over the past five summers. He also teaches introductory physics for majors and other courses in the physics curriculum. His research interests include Physics Education Research (PER) as well as fundamental experimental research in materials physics specializing in ion beam analysis of surfaces and thin films.Marilyn Carlson, Arizona State University Marilyn Carlson Marilyn Carlson is a Professor in the Mathematics
skills for our first-year engineering students. Although this skill can betaught and assessed, the results of past surveys show that engineering students are inadequatelyequipped to meet this need.This need is addressed by teaching and assessing the three pillars of engineering communication:written, oral and graphical through a series of lectures, activities and group assignments. Forinstance, a series of biweekly group assignments, designed to assess and improve the three pillarsof engineering communication are woven into the project-based curriculum, culminating with afinal project exhibition and written reflection. These assignments, not only assess thepresentation, graphical communication and writing skills of the teams but also their
the experience acquired inthis early career course. The novelty of the initiative presented in this paper has beendeveloping and implementing CBI with hands-on activities for the second time in a newIntroduction to STEM course which is expected to be sustainable and adaptable. Thisresearch addresses the need of curriculum development that helps minority students tosee the relevance of their studies to the real world since this is one of the importantfactors that influences minority students’ decision to drop-out or transfer out of STEMundergraduate careers.7. AcknowledgmentsThis work has been developed as part of a College Cost Reduction Access Act (CCRAA)grant from the US Department of Education to UTPA in collaboration with STC. Wewould
students’ abilities to acquire, process, and apply data affect their self-perception as engineers is vital for curriculum development. The interplay between theoreticalknowledge and practical application in data proficiency is also a critical area of investigation.Preliminary evidence suggests that how students engage with data may be as important as the dataskills themselves [9]. This aligns with broader research on experiential learning in engineeringeducation, which emphasizes the value of hands-on, contextual learning experiences [10], [11]. 1This paper, representing the second phase of a larger study, investigates how different aspects ofdata proficiency influence engineering identity among
students take ownership of their own learning," 2015 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), El Paso, TX, USA, 2015, pp. 1-5, Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2015.7344080[15] R. M. Marra, D. J. Hacker, and C. Plumb, "Metacognition and the development of self-directed learning in a problem-based engineering curriculum," J. Eng. Educ., vol. 111, no. 1, pp. 137–161, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1002/JEE.20437[16] P. N. V. Meter, C. M. Firetto, S. R. Turns, T. A. Litzinger, C. E. Cameron, and C. W. Shaw, "Improving Students’ Conceptual Reasoning by Prompting Cognitive Operations," J. Eng. Educ., vol. 105, no. 2, pp. 245–277, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1002/JEE.20120
Paper ID #46622Validating Future Engineering Competencies: An Innovation System Approachin Competency Modeling through Delphi MethodMr. Alexa Ray Ronsairo Fernando, National University, Philippines Alexa Ray R. Fernando is the Senior Research Management and Publication Director and an Associate Professor I at the College of Engineering, National University, Philippines. Previously, he served as Dean of the College of Engineering at the same institution. As a PhD candidate in Engineering Education at Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, his research focuses on competency modeling, curriculum development, competency-based learning
Sherer. Moving Beyond Active Learning to EngineeringLearning: An Approach to Course Design and Enactment. 2018. ASEE Zone IVconference, Boulder, CO. March 25-27, 2018.GP Wiggins & J McTighe. Understanding by design. (2007) Princeton, NJ: Association forSupervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).SE Zappe, S Cutler, SA Spiegel, D Jordan, & M Sanders (submitted 2022). Lessons Learned -Conducting an External Evaluation of a STEM Teaching and Learning Center (Lessons LearnedPaper #1 of 2). Paper submitted to the annual meeting of the American Society for EngineeringEducation, Minneapolis, MN. Lessons learned: Findings from an External Evaluation of a STEM Teaching and Learning Center 6
Paper ID #37733WIP: Perceptions of Effective Engineering Faculty-to-FacultyMentorship PracticesJennifer Hadley Perkins (student) Hadley Perkins is a second-year Ph.D. Student in the Engineering Education Systems & Design Program at Arizona State University. Ms. Perkins is an Assistant Engineering Educator in the Engineering Technology Department of Wichita State University and is currently teaching there as an adjunct instructor. She has also taught Secondary Mathematics courses in both public and private school settings. Her research interests include Curriculum Design, Virtual instruction & Distance
Paper ID #36772Neuromorphic VLSI design courseAnu Aggarwal (Dr) Hello © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Neuromorphic VLSI design courseThis paper describes a novel Neuromorphic VLSI design course that was added to theElectrical and Computer Engineering curriculum at our university. 1. SignificanceNeuromorphic VLSI design has been a research area for over 3 decades. It started withattempts at building silicon chips that could emulate functions of various brain regions likeeye and cochlea [1]. With Moore’s law hitting physical limits, the industry is
Association for the Advancement of Science mentoring award, the IEEE International Undergraduate Teaching Medal, the American Society for Engineering Education Lifetime Achievement Award, and numerous faculty awards at Texas A&M University. She has served as President of the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) and the President of the Education Society of IEEE.Arun R Srinivasa (Assistant Professor) Dr Srinivasa is the Holdredge Paul professor and Associate Head of the Department for the UG progam at the Mike Walker '77 Department of Mechanical Engineering at Texas A&M University. He obtained his Phd in Mechanics from UC Berkeley and has been active in pedagogical research and faculty development
Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1998.[36] Brown, Peter C., Roediger, Henry L., and McDaniel, Mark A., Make it Stick, Harvard University Press, 2014.[37] Nilson, Linda B., and Ludwika A. Goodson. Online teaching at its best: Merging instructional design with teaching and learning research. John Wiley & Sons, 2021.[38] Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P., “Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415, 2014.[39] Nilson, Linda B., Specifications Grading, Stylus Publishing, Sterling, Virginia, 2015.
retention and graduation rates within NCE. Clearly, engineering.if more students perform better on the Placement Test,then higher the retention and graduation rates will be.This work-in-progress paper takes a look at variousreasons due to which students do not do well on thePlacement Test. For each of these reasons identified,NJIT has implemented various initiatives to helpstudents start on track in their first semester. Some ofthese initiatives include 1) developing sample placementtests for students to practice under the sameenvironment as the original test, 2) making a placementcalculator for students to input the scores from thepractice placement tests to determine their likelymathematics placement, 3) establishing a strongoutreach to
years old and knowledge flowed at a pedestrian pace, compared with today’s “4th Ageof Information(5)”. While the legacy science and engineering curriculum model has produced the talentbasefor tremendous technological advances through the 20th century, many engineering education leaders haverecently amplified calls for a transformation of engineering education to embrace complex systemsthinking, transdisciplinary collaboration, communication, and social impact(6), producing “a whole newengineer”(7). Addressing global grand challenges demands a broader reimagining of university experienceto meet the needs of the 21st century, just as they did to meet the needs of the industrial age(3). Universitiesaround the world should be the places to bring
Research Scientist at Aggie STEM, Department of Teaching, Learning, & Culture and Senior Lecturer in Department of Mathematics at Texas A&M University, where she has taught 10 different courses in mathematics and mathematics education. She has served on several committees in the mathematics department, including course development for teacher education in mathematics. Her research agenda includes engineering calculus success, including high school preparation for college. Previously, she taught 8 additional courses at the college level and 13 different high school courses in mathematics and science. She has worked with teacher professional development for over 20 years, and served as mathematics curriculum
AC 2007-598: PROJECT GUISE: CURRICULAR INTRODUCTION ANDRESOURCES FOR TEACHING INSTRUMENTATIONDavid Beams, University of Texas-Tyler Page 12.1201.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Project GUISE: Curricular Introduction and Resources for Teaching InstrumentationAbstractProject GUISE (General-purpose, Universal Instrumentation System for Education) is acomputer-based laboratory instrument combining LabVIEW virtual-instrumentationsoftware and custom external hardware developed with support of the National ScienceFoundation under grant DUE 9952292. Descriptions of its development have beenpreviously published. However, an opportunity to
State, the Department of Education, and the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) fostering collaborations, between these organizations which promote science, technology, engineering, and math educational activities in developing countries. Address: 601 West Main Street, PO Box 843068, Richmond, VA 23284-3068; e-mail: rhobson@vcu.edu. Page 14.1097.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Summer Transition Program: A model for impacting first year retention rates for underrepresented
augmented by a clear connection to the student’s academiccurriculum. As Baber and Fortenberry5 state, “The use of the classroom must be re-examined in educating future engineers, broadening the curriculum focus to includecompetency development.” Similarly, for researchers at the Cambridge-MIT Institute6,experiential learning, like co-op, is most valuable pedagogically if it allows students touse in the experiential setting what they have learned in the classroom. Clearly, theresearch is now suggesting that, in order to increase the efficacy of the academic andexperiential components of the students’ education, classroom learning must be clearlyand methodically connected with experiential learning in the co-op setting.The need for a pilot
involved in machinery monitoring, mechanical testing, curriculum and assessment. Her professional affiliations include ASEE, ASME, and the Vibration Institute. Page 14.605.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Experiences of Engineering Technology Faculty in Professional Certification ProgramsAbstractProfessional certification is a widely accepted method for establishing credentials in one’s field.Certification is an industry driven process to establish a level of competency for employers andemployees. Becoming certified generally consists of a minimum length of practice in the field
commitment by providing an annual GAP (Generating AcademicPerformance) Summer Bridge Program. The GAP Bridge Program seeks to provide a first stepon the road to success for historically under-represented students who have qualified foradmission and who will be attending the College of Engineering (COE) in the upcoming FallSemester. Participants interact with University faculty, staff and students in a variety ofacademic, mentoring, social and leadership development activities. The GAP componentincludes workshops that provide a preview of calculus, physics, and chemistry as well as hands-on engineering demonstrations to set the students up for a head start to success in a demandingengineering curriculum and then provides dedicated academic support
primary instrument used in this first phase of the study was Schraw, Dunkle, andBendixen’s (2002) Epistemic Belief Inventory (EBI) [3]. The instrument is in the form of aquestionnaire and it was administered to 39 female students in their freshman and sophomoreyears in an engineering college in the Arabian Gulf. The results showed that there was very littlevariation between the two levels of students, indicating that the issue of developing students’epistemic beliefs needs to be addressed more thoroughly. This could be done possibly in theintroductory engineering courses or as curriculum infused in other Science, Technology,Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) courses.Keywords—epitemic beliefs; inventory; engineering students; female; Arabian
promote integration of robotics in middle school science and math education. For her doctoral research, she conducts mechatronics and robotics research in the Mechatronics, Controls, and Robotics Laboratory at NYU.Dr. Sheila Borges Rajguru, NYU Tandon School of Engineering Dr. Sheila Borges Rajguru is the Assistant Director of the Center for K-12 STEM Education, NYU Tan- don School of Engineering. As the Center’s STEAM educator and researcher she works with engineers and faculty to provide professional development to K-12 STEM teachers with a focus on social justice. She is currently Co-Principal Investigator on two NSF-grants that provide robotics/mechatronics PD to science, math, and technology teachers. In addition