, 2022, vol. 2022-October: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., in Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE, doi: 10.1109/FIE56618.2022.9962613. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/FIE56618.2022.9962613[10] Gonzalez, V., O. Perez and R. Romero (2023). Cybersecurity in ECE Curriculum, an[11] Expanded Collaboration Program to Disseminate Real Security Experiences in Cyberphysical Systems. 53rd IEEE ASEE Frontiers in Education International Conference, FIE 2023, October 18, 2023 - October 21, 2023, College Station, TX, United States, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.[12] V. Gonzalez, O. Perez, R. Romero, P. Gonzalez, and H. Erives
established by the Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN),this paper describes the development of an assessment instrument to measure the entrepreneurialmindset of engineering students. An assessment instrument consisting of 37 questions wasinitially developed. An exploratory factor analysis of this pilot instrument resulted in a 29-itemsolution. Additional reliability analysis based on Cronbach’s α suggested further reduction ofitems with low internal consistency. Finally, a preliminary instrument with 27 items loaded on 9or 10 factors measuring the entrepreneurial mindset was established.IntroductionThe need for engineering entrepreneurship education has been well reported in the past twodecades. However, very few comprehensive
Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, Canada, 2011. 3. L. Mejias. “Effects of Introducing an Interactive Teaching and Learning Activity (TLA) in the Engineering Classroom.” Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computer Science & Education (ICCSE), 2012, pp. 1520-1525. 4. M. Borrego and J. Bernhard. “The Emergence of Engineering Education Research as an Internationally Connected Field of Inquiry.” Engineering Education, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 14-47, 2011. 5. G.J. Kim, E.E. Patrick, R. Srivastava, and M.E. Law. “Perspective on Flipping Circuits I.” IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 188-192, 2014. 6. M. Prince. “Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research.” Journal
development of a codebook for analysis of the ethnographic interview data. Dr. Loshbaugh taught in CSM's EPICS program, for which she developed extensive course and faculty-support materials, and designed and implemented a leadership course and overseas summer field session. She has recently been appointed to develop a diversity plan for CSM, and has experience in international education, corporate training and coaching, and academic editing.Brittany Claar, Regis University Brittany A. Claar is an undergraduate student at Regis University, studying sociology; she has recently transferred from Colorado School of Mines, where she was a Chemical Engineering student and worked as a Research
. 1, pp. 36-46, 2006, doi: 0361-6843/06.[17] C. K. Greene and W. L. Stitt-Gohdes, "Factors that influence women's choices to work in the trades," Journal of Career Development, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 265-278, 1997, doi: 10.1177/089484539702300402.[18] S. L. Rodriguez, C. Lu, and M. Bartlett, "Engineering Identity Development: A Review of Higher Education Literature," International journal of education in mathematics, science and technology, vol. 6, no. 3, p. 254, 2018, doi: 10.18404/ijemst.428182.[19] C. Beauchamp and L. Thomas, "Understanding teacher identity: an overview of issues in the literature and implications for teacher education," Cambridge Journal of Education, vol. 39, no. 2, pp
governments around the world with Postal Automation Systems, C4ISR and Tactical Communications Systems, Air Traffic Management, International Infrastructure and Air Defense, and Homeland Defense. Mrs. Jenniches is very active in the support of engineering and education. She is past president of the national Society of Women Engineers and was awarded the Achievement Award, in June, 2000. Since 1997, she chairs the National Academy of Engineering (NAE) “EngineerGirl!” website.Annette Gildea, Gildea Media Group Annette Gildea is the Founder and CEO of Ollie Interactive, an award-winning Internet design and marketing communications studio based in Northern Virginia. Her professional interests
Session We Came, We Saw, We Changed Some Things: Engineering Educators Talk About Extending Oklahoma University’s "Sooner City" Program to their Own Institutions Norman Dennis, Jon Fricker, Paul Palazolo, Anna Phillips The University of Arkansas/Purdue University/The University of MemphisAbstractIn August of 1999, Oklahoma University hosted an NSF-sponsored workshop for 29 engineeringeducators to present initial findings from their interdisciplinary “Sooner City Project” and collectfeedback and ideas from the participants. The authors of this presentation represent
AC 2010-57: IMMERSIVE LEARNING USING LEAN SIX SIGMAMETHODOLOGY IN THE MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGYCAPSTONE COURSEAlan Leduc, Ball State University Alan Leduc is an Associate Professor at Ball State University where he has taught in the TAC/ABET accredited Manufacturing Engineering Technology program since 1990. He also coordinates the Minor in Process Improvement (MIPI) which provides students with Lean Six Sigma Black Belt body of knowledge education and the opportunity to engage in professional level projects. Alan worked closely with Dr. Mikel Harry, Ball State University alumnus and co-creator of Six Sigma in developing the MIPI. Prior to his teaching career, Alan spent 20 years
connected.1 There are many books and paperswritten on creating PBLs, their effectiveness, the pros and cons, etc. In fact there is even ajournal dedicated to PBL: The International Journal of Problem-based Learning.Many engineering colleges use PBL in Introduction to Engineering courses, but not necessarilyformally (i.e., do not use all the PBL elements listed above). The typical learning objectives ofan Intro to Engineering course, such as team-work, problem solving, and design, cater well to themethod. Also because PBL is an interactive and engaging educational experience, its use iscrucial in the first year of an engineering curriculum that is otherwise filled with non-engineering-specific courses (i.e., PBL aids in retention). Lawrence
Affairs in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at ASU from 1993-2004. Anderson-Rowland was named a top 5% teacher in the Fulton Schools of Engineering for 2009-2010. She received WEPAN’s Betty Vetter Research Award 2015, the WEPAN President’s Award 2014, WEPAN’s Engineering Educator Award 2009, ASEE Minorities Award 2006, the SHPE Educator of the Year 2005, and the National Engineering Award in 2003, the highest honor given by AAES. In 2002 she was named the Distinguished Engineering Educator by the Society of Women Engineers. She has over 190 publications primarily in the areas of recruitment and retention of women and underrepresented minority engineering and computer science students. Her awards are based
. Sheppard, Ph.D., P.E., is professor of Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. Besides teaching both undergraduate and graduate design and education related classes at Stanford University, she conducts research on engineering education and work-practices, and applied finite element analysis. From 1999-2008 she served as a Senior Scholar at the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, leading the Foundation’s engineering study (as reported in Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field). In addition, in 2011 Dr. Sheppard was named as co-PI of a national NSF innovation center (Epicenter), and leads an NSF program at Stanford on summer research experiences for high school teachers. Her
) for students, which on some level can beat least partly obtained by the traditional approach of learning by clicking through a program.While that is certainly a part of this course, the use of integrated projects to learn GIS whilereinforcing core civil engineering concepts has shown to be an impactful model, providingstudents context and connections to enhance their learning in multiple areas beyond the software.References[1] V. Bernhäuserová, L. Havelková, K. Hátlová, and M. Hanus, “The limits of GISimplementation in education: A systematic review,” ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, vol. 11, no. 12, p. 592, 2022.[2] S. Lafia, R. Zhu, B. Regalia, and W. Kuhn, “Reimagining GIS instruction through concept-based learning,” AGILE
10.1216.1 “Proceedings of the 2005 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Copyright © American Society for Engineering Education”The Bicycle FrameFor the purpose of this paper several simplifying assumptions are made as follows: 1. The bicycle fork is selected as a representative member of the frame. 2. The fork is made from tubing of uniform cross section along its length and is treated as a beam subjected to bending. 3. The curvature in the fork is neglected. 4. The material and the cross sectional area used for fork are variable but its length and thickness are fixed. 5. The constraint for material selection depends on the
engineering, and design and development functions for automotive parts manufacturers in North Carolina and Germany.Heidi Blackburn, Kansas State University, Salina Heidi Blackburn is the Undergraduate Services Librarian for Kansas State University, Salina. She received her M.L.S. from Emporia State University’s School of Library and Information Management in 2008. She is a member of the Kansas Library Association (KLA), American College and Research Libraries (ACRL), and American Library and Information Science Education (ALISE). She is published in Library Hi Tech, Academic Exchange Quarterly, Journal of Aviation/Aerospace Education and Research, Journal of Library Administration, and International Federation of Library
Paper ID #29854Exploring how innovation self-efficacy measures relate to engineeringinternship motivations and outcomesAmy Huynh, University of California, Irvine Amy Huynh is a mechanical and aerospace engineering undergraduate student at the University of Cal- ifornia, Irvine. She is interested in better understanding and supporting the experiences of female and underrepresented engineers in the classroom and in industry. She is a Brooke Owens Fellow and has interned at NASA Goddard, Made In Space, and NASA Ames.Dr. Helen L. Chen, Stanford University Helen L. Chen is a research scientist in the Designing Education Lab
Education Annual Conference, Portland, OR.10. Sobek, D. K. (2002). “Use of Journals to Evaluate Student Design Processes.” American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Montreal, Canada.11. Sobek, D. K. I. and V. Jain (2004). “Two Instruments for Assessing Design Outcomes of Capstone Projects.” Annual Conference of American Society for Engineering Education, Salt Lake City, UT.12. Brackin, M. P. and J. Williams (2001). “Teaching and Assessing Team Skills in a Senior Level Design Course.” Annual Conference of American Society for Engineering Education, Albuquerque, NM.13. Stiggins, R. J. (1997). Student-Centered Classroom Assessment. Upper Saddle River, NJ, Prentice-Hall.14. Davis, D. C., S. W. Beyerlein, and I
Paper ID #14457Redesigning Computer Engineering Gateway Courses Using a Novel Reme-diation HierarchyProf. Ronald F. DeMara, University of Central Florida Ronald F. DeMara is a Professor in the College of Engineering and Computer Science (CECS) with 23 years of university-level faculty experience in Electrical and Computer Engineering disciplines. He has completed 180+ technical and educational publications, 34 funded projects as PI/Co-I, and established two research laboratories. He serves as the Computer Engineering Program Coordinator, the founding Director of the Evaluation and Proficiency Center (EPC) in CECS, and
Paper ID #16169Work in Progress: Developing a Quantitative Instrument for Measuring Un-dergraduate Engineering Students’ Future Time PerspectivesCatherine McGough, Clemson University Catherine McGough is currently a graduate research assistant in Engineering and Science Education at Clemson University. She obtained her B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Clemson University in 2014. Her research interests are in undergraduate engineering student motivations and undergraduate engineer- ing problem solving skill development and strategies.Adam Kirn, University of Nevada, Reno Adam Kirn is an Assistant Professor of
engineering education,” Journal of Online Engineering Education, vol. 4, no. 1, 2013.[7] ABET, Inc., “Online programs accredited by ABET,” https://amspub.abet.org/aps/online- search, 2020 (Accessed January 2020).[8] J. Frydenberg, “Persistence in university continuing education online classes,” The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 1-15. 2007.[9] American Society for Engineering Education, “American Society for Engineering Education Databytes,” http://www.asee-prism.org/databytes-mar-apr/, 2016 (Accessed January 2020).[10] A. Wigfield, & J. S. Eccles, “Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation,” Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 68-81, 2000.[11
curriculum in two ways:One is to reduce the number of existing courses by merging two or three related courses intoone and renaming them somewhat more interesting to young people. The other one is tointroduce IT and IT-related courses. Through the innovation, we hope the number of newcomers to the department of NAOE at SNU will increase largelyReferences1. Introduction of Engineering College, Seoul National University (http://www.snu.ac.kr/engsnu/)2. ABET (2000) Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs.3. Choi, H.S, et al. (2001) “Global Information Society and Engineering Education”, Proc. of International Workshop on Engineer Professional Accreditation and Engineering Education, Oct. 24-25, Chongqing/China
Session 2525 Teamwork for a Quality Education:1 Low-Cost, E ective Educational Reform through a Department-Wide Competition of Teams David E. Goldberg, W. Brenton Hall, Lindsay Krussow, Eunice Lee, & Aaron Walker University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign1 IntroductionCurriculum reform is all around us. The NSF Coalitions Coleman, 1996 are the most visibleof the e orts, but reform is occurring both nationally and internationally, the direct result ofa combination of higher demand for fully assembled" engineers, the
Paper ID #42461Designing Good Practices for Recruitment, Admissions, and Program Structureof Engineering Outreach Programs to Increase Access for Marginalized andNon-Traditional Higher Education StudentsDr. Sonia Travaglini, Stanford University Dr. Sonia Travaglini specializes in the intersection of engineering and learning, and is an educator passionate about new technologies and collaboration. Sonia also enjoys supporting engineering outreach with local community colleges and schools.Aya Mouallem, Stanford University Aya Mouallem (she/her) is a PhD candidate in Electrical Engineering at Stanford University. She received
Mary and an M.A. in Education and Human Development with a concentration in Educational Technology Leadership from The George Washington University.Dr. Norma J. Mattei P.E., University of New Orleans Norma Jean Mattei, PhD, PE, currently is Professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engi- neering, after recently serving as Dept Chair and Interim Dean of Engineering at the University of New Orleans. She now serves as one of two civilian civil engineer Commissioners on the Mississippi River Commission (MRC), nominated by President Obama. She just completed her year as 2017 President of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). Locally she is still active on the Executive Committee of the ASCE New
Paper ID #37064Outreach Program Evaluation through the Lens ofEngineering Identity Development (Evaluation)Jorge Ivan Rodriguez-DevoraTyler George Harvey Tyler Harvey holds a PhD in Bioengineering and a graduate certificate in Engineering and Science Education, both from Clemson University, and is currently a Lecturer in the department of Bioengineering at Clemson. His teaching focus is on undergraduate capstone design, bioethics, entrepreneurship, and sports engineering. His current research interests include integrating empathy education into the engineering curriculum and increasing access to the discipline
AStudent Education Outcomes from ABET Criteria 2000(a) Ability to Apply Knowledge of Mathematics, Science, and Engineering(b) Ability to Design and Conduct Experiments, as well as to Analyze and Interpret Data(c) Ability to Design a System, Component, or Process to Meet Desired Needs(d) Ability to Function on Multi-Disciplinary Teams(e) Ability to Identify, Formulate, and Solve Construction Problems(f) Understanding of Professional and Ethical Responsibility(g) Ability to Communicate Effectively(h) Broad Education Necessary to Understand the Impact of Construction Solutions in a Global/Societal Context(i) Recognition of the Need For, and an Ability to Engage in Life-Long Learning(j) Knowledge of Contemporary Issues(k) Ability to Use the Techniques
AC 2012-3127: EEE (ELEMENTARY ENGINEERING EDUCATION) ADOP-TION AND EXPERTISE DEVELOPMENT MODEL: CONCEPTUALIZ-ING, ASSESSING, AND TRACKING ELEMENTARY TEACHERS’ EEEADOPTION AND EEE EXPERTISE DEVELOPMENTMs. Yan Sun, Purdue University Yan Sun is a Graduate Research Assistant of INSPIRE (Institute for P-12 Engineering Research and Learning) at Purdue University, and a Ph.D. student of learning, design, and technology at Purdue Uni- versity.Nikki Boots, Purdue UniversityDr. Johannes Strobel, Purdue University, West Lafayette Johannes Strobel is Director of INSPIRE, Institute for P-12 Engineering Research and Learning, and As- sistant Professor of engineering education and learning design and technology at Purdue University
localdevelopment: the contribution of engineers without borders from Italy and Colombia: towardsthe improvement of water quality in vulnerable communities. Systemic Practice and ActionResearch, 24(1), 45-66.Richards, L. G., & Gorman, M. E. (2004). Using case studies to teach engineering design andethics. In CD) Proceedings, 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Conference (Vol.52).Richards, J., Elby, A., Gupta, A. (2014) Characterizing a New Dimension of Change inAttending and Responding to the Substance of Student Thinking. In Polman, J. L., Kyza, E. A.,O’Neill, D. K., Tabak, I., Penuel, W. R., Jurow, A. S., O’Connor, K., Lee, T., and D’Amico, L.(Eds.). (2014). Learning and becoming in practice: The International Conference of the
AC 2009-2: TEACHING ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS: UP AND DOWN THETAXONOMYEdmond Saliklis, California Polytechnic State UniversityRobert Arens, California Polytechnic State UniversityJoseph Hanus, United States Military Academy Page 14.1126.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 TEACHING ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS – UP AND DOWN THE TAXONOMYAbstractEngineering faculty and Architecture faculty both address student learning through the prism ofBloom’s taxonomy of the cognitive domain, but do so in diametrically opposite manners.Engineering faculty tend to assess student learning starting at the lowest taxonomy level,Acquisition of
AC 2007-1901: INTEGRATION OF ELEMENTARY ENGINEERING ELEMENTSIN THE LANGUAGE ARTS PROGRAMPat Van Driessche, Douglas L. Jamerson, Jr. Elementary School PAT VAN DRIESSCHE is a fourth grade teacher at Douglas L. Jamerson, Jr. Elementary School Center for Mathematics and Engineering. She earned a B.S. in Elementary Education from the University of Wisconsin-Superior and her M.S. in Specific Learning and Behavior Problems from the College of St. Thomas, St. Paul, MN. Her teaching experiences include over 30 years teaching first through sixth grade and seven years in exceptional student education. Pat has presented various district trainings and is currently involved in the development of the
, and the opportunity to co-op with fluid power industry and subsequent employment.• The faculty by providing an opportunity to engage in cutting edge industrial research• The programs by providing a strong foundation to develop a successful grant research program, and to participate in the cross-disciplinary research project.• The College by contributing to the enrollment growth and enhancing the prestige. Page 9.428.1 “Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Education”I. Background