fundamental constraintsand identify possible points needing further consideration. Team A received input from astructural, cost and architectural perspectives on the initial design presented by “A.”When the team reached its impasse, mentors played a key role in helping individuals toreconstruct their understanding of their roles in light of the requirements of the new,structurally focused design developed by the engineer. Mentors actively supporting thedevelopment of the team’s process through coaching. Individuals consulted with mentorsprivately, expressing feelings and concerns about roles and responsibilities in the designprocess and brainstorming alternatives. Mentors expressed empathy as members of theprofession, but also encouraged a more fluid
activities areimminent for the class is shown, see Figure 4. Page 7.449.4 “Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2002, American Society for Engineering Education” Session 1566Figure 3. Typical Monthly CalendarFigure 4. Student View of Initial Page after login to WebCT5.0 CommunicationVarious communication tools such as synchronous (live) chat, and asynchronous (time-delayed)email and discussion boards provide forums for faculty-student exchange extending thetraditional
mandatedregulations.INTRODUCTIONLocated in the Capital District of the State of New York State, Union College was founded in 1795, thefirst college chartered by the State’s Board of Regents. Union is an independent, liberal arts college withengineering.In its Vision Statement, Union College states “Our graduates will be people inspired to make a differencein the world, who know how to use academic methods of inquiry to bring about beneficial change. Theywill be equipped to address complex 21st-century societal and intellectual challenges that require theability to interact perceptively with people of many backgrounds and viewpoints. They will be able tothink critically and creatively, with an informed sensitivity to aesthetic and ethical concerns.”Furthermore, in its Mission
mandatedregulations.INTRODUCTIONLocated in the Capital District of the State of New York State, Union College was founded in 1795, thefirst college chartered by the State’s Board of Regents. Union is an independent, liberal arts college withengineering.In its Vision Statement, Union College states “Our graduates will be people inspired to make a differencein the world, who know how to use academic methods of inquiry to bring about beneficial change. Theywill be equipped to address complex 21st-century societal and intellectual challenges that require theability to interact perceptively with people of many backgrounds and viewpoints. They will be able tothink critically and creatively, with an informed sensitivity to aesthetic and ethical concerns.”Furthermore, in its Mission
), these will require approval at the college, Graduate Council, and Faculty Senate levels. One deviation from the standard programs may be the possibility that a limited number of hours taken for graduate credit can be applied to the Bachelor degree (not more than 9 hours).”This single paragraph allowed the IMSE Department to create the Concurrent B.S./M.S.I.E.degree, which allows students to count up to 9 hours of IMSE graduate courses toward theirundergraduate degree requirements. This new degree program provides sufficient benefit forstudents to stay at K-State and complete a graduate degree in the IMSE department.By allowing 9 hours of graduate credit to count toward the undergraduate degree, the concurrentB.S./M.S.I.E. can
465 Green Energy Conference Experience – Integration of Class Room Research Projects to IEEE Professional Presentation Hen-Geul Yeh, Duc Tran, and Paula Quintana California State University, Long BeachAbstractGreen Energy is a typical multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary topic for researchers,practitioners, faculty and students. In general, energy generated from the combustion of a limitedsupply of fossil fuels presents environmental concerns. Renewable energy, such as solar andwind, dramatically lowers CO2 pollution emissions, reduces environmental health risks
has focused on introducing new functionality and novel processing of glass, and making glass education available worldwide freely. For the last several years, he has been advocating for use-inspired research, and led the development of a new STEM doctoral workforce training model: Pasteur Partners PhD (P3) based on Industry-University partnerships. He is an author/editor of 12 patents, 10 books and over 400 research publications on glass science, technology and education.Volkmar Dierolf, Lehigh University Volkmar Dierolf is a Professor of Physics a Distinguished University Professor of Physics and Materials Science & Engineering at Lehigh University, where he has been a faculty member since 2000. He received
, instructors converse almost on a daily basis, if only for a few minutes, todiscuss particular issues that arise that could impact the success of that particular week’scurriculum. Example for PD-3: During Fall 2004, a weekly analysis meeting allowed instructors to put in place a plan to ensure the maximum effectiveness of a new redesign effort from the previous summer. PD-3 courses are offered on Tuesdays and Thursdays. To assess the effectiveness of any new content, sequencing of content and/or new instructional methods, the instructors that taught Tuesday sections would return and report on the success of student comprehension of material, the effectiveness of the sequence or flow of the content, and the overall evaluation of student
academicconsulting, conferences, exhibitions and workshops. Engaging in these formalized and non-formalized interaction channels create opportunity for organizational learning (Bruneel, d'Este,& Salter,2010), which are crucial to enhance the effectiveness of long-term interactions (Kogut,2000).At individual level, some studies have identified the role of university faculty and techniciansas primary agent for the dissemination and commercialization of new knowledge (Shane,2004;Hayter,2015). Recent studies have also put forward the important role of students, especiallygraduate students in knowledge-based activities and academic spin-off creation (Hayter, etal.,2017; Boh, et al.,2016). For example, Hayter et al. (2017) found that graduate studentsplay
feasibility of designing a 10-week course thataddressed all the concerns communicated by the interviewees. After having discussions withcampus stakeholders and other interested faculty members, a new scope was established tooptimize the course design while operating within the current resource constraints. Additionally,two major concerns were explicitly expressed: 1) Create a course that maintains the academicexcellence and rigor reflected in other Rose-Hulman STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering,and Mathematics) courses and 2) Integrate experiences to help students build the leadershipskills required of successful project leaders. Given these criteria and the original interviewfindings, the final scope read as follows: Design a 10-week
asked to generate a list of issues and answers that they think are relevant to the challenge; to share ideas with fellow students; and to appreciate which ideas are “new” and to revise their list. Learner and community centered. Multiple perspectives: The student is asked to elicit ideas and approaches concerning this Page 15.397.4 challenge from “experts.” Community and knowledge centered. Research and revise: Reference materials to help the student reach the goals of exploring the challenge and to revise their original ideas are introduced here. Knowledge and learner centered. Test your mettle
- otechnology for Health, Energy and the Environment and directs the Additive Manufacturing Materials, Prototyping and Applications Center (AMPAC) at Stony Brook University. In recognition of his academic activities, he received the 2012 SUNY Chancellor’s Award for Excellence in Teaching and has been se- lected a Leadership Fellow for the Science Education for New Civic Engagement and Responsibility (SENCER) program of the National Center for Science and Civic Engagement. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Integrating Humanitarian Values into First Year Engineering CourseworkAbstract:Humanitarian values and concerns can be seamlessly integrated into
. For summers 2005and 2006, six of the science students joined the WIMS Center and worked suitably onresearch projects related to their major and to their planned career interests.WIMS faculty and graduate students can mentor and provide research projects appropriatefor second year to fourth year students and for science majors. Students with sophomorestatus and science majors were concerns prior to and during the early stages of summer 2005.However, our concerns were significantly reduced because the LSAMP REU studentsworked tirelessly, had high personal achievement goals, and cherished the challenge to learnnew research fields and then conduct undergraduate research in the new fields.WIMS LSAMP REU Secondary ComponentsCommunication Skills
communities without such requirements. A policy of thisscope would require a massive amount of resources to identify, locate, and in many cases re-create critical data and information. The data and information would then need to be integrated,periodically updated, and made to be accessible even directly after a disaster. Although thefocus group determined an ordinance to be the best course of action, achieving this goal was notnecessarily perceived to be a reality.Educational ImplicationsUniversity faculty can address these issues not only directly in discussions with their students butalso, in their research and service roles, in their communities. During the Spring of 2008 astudent team enrolled in a upper level business-engineering crossover
]; and faculty membersturning their research into business ventures, enabled by the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 [15]. Whileeach of these examples individually might not embody the canary in the coal mine, together theydo support the hypothesis that a shift is occurring in higher education that treats education like amarket good. To be clear, this is not necessarily a new trend - Thorstein Veblen noted theincursion of businessmen into the operations of American higher education in the early 20thcentury; however, the trend may be accelerating in conjunction with the economic paradigmshift. Indeed, the rise of this market phenomenon spurred Slaughter and Leslie to invent the labelof “academic capitalism” [16], [17]. Academic capitalism is a term of art
the years that engineering graduates do notrefer to the ethics codes [9, 10]. Further, the faculty/administration and student perceptions ofengineering ethics education delivery are not aligned. In a study conducted over 18 campuses,110 faculty members and 123 students were interviewed in 90-minute focus groups; twoadministrators from each campus were also individually interviewed. While the faculty andadministrators believed that the engineering ethics curriculum provided a “nuanced treatment ofcomplex issues, their students reported “hearing simplistic, black-and-white messages aboutethics” [11]. Due to observations of faculty approving or participating in unethical behavior,students also did not perceive the faculty as ethical role models
the most direct impact in that they become more accountable for their lab work. This attitude promotes engaged learning and a professional view of how experimental work has to be planned, executed and reported. These are central concepts in many of the ABET outcomes. New opportunities for continuous improvement are welcomed by the accreditation bodies. Almost every student engaged in a practical project will make use of electronic instrumentation. The most likely area of trouble concerns analog signal processing between sensors and computers and this is a path to ‘just enough’ electronics training for non-specialists. Faculty who seek to integrate concepts with practical applications now
. Onecentral theme in this course is for the students to communicate often and effectively with theiradvisor. Thus students receive initial exposure to many subjects critical to future success in away that allows subsequent development by their faculty advisor. In this paper, the structure and content of this course will be presented. In addition,methods for incorporating multiple topics in a single assignment will be suggested. Commentsand feedback from both students and faculty advisors will also be discussed.Introduction In today’s university, there are fewer and fewer “typical graduate students.” Althoughsome students do enter graduate school directly after completing their undergraduate program inthe traditional manner, many do not
issues associated withnanotechnology. Particular emphasis is placed on understanding the implications ofnanotechnology for the environment and human health, in both local and global contexts.Contributions and concerns pertaining to nanotechnology’s impact on the economic,environmental, and social aspects of sustainability are also addressed. Students develop criticalanalysis and communication skills for approaching controversies pertaining tonanotechnology and society.The emergence of any new technology often raises the challenge of balancing risks andbenefits, and in this regard nanotechnology is no exception. Class subject matter and formatwill examine the implications of nanotechnology within a socioeconomic-environmentalcontext
and working in a team (FG) - The organization of the course: having faculty be in charge, and graduate mentors as the direct contacts, and having group meetings with faculty to get feedback (FG) - Having the first part of the course be in a traditional class format, learning about different lab techniques, and then going out and implementing what was learned (FG) - Having regular group meetings with the faculty (FG): The faculty were experienced and “good at managing the projects” and providing feedback. They were helpful in “giving us the background, telling us how the programs run, telling us some of the issues we were going to run into…just that personal communication.” - Being able to do
(hybrid, all-electric, and hydrogen-powered). It was evident thestudents were concerned about the future of the planet and gained an understanding of some ofthe international considerations involved in reducing greenhouse gas emissions.AssessmentCriterion “i” requires, “knowledge of contemporary societal and global issues,” and I believe thatin the process of completing the assignment and class, the students demonstrated achievement ofthe outcome. Assessment techniques include both direct and indirect methods. By utilizing thepre- and post-class survey, indirect evidence of student learning was obtained. In particular, withthe exception of question 7 (which scored very high on the pre-class survey) the students scoredtheir agreement or knowledge
artificial intelligence can be used in education in a creative and ethical way.Prof. Catalina Cortazar, Pontificia Universidad Cat´olica de Chile Catalina Cort´azar is a Faculty member in the engineering design area DILAB at the School of Engineering at Pontificia Universidad Cat´olica de Chile (PUC). Catalina holds a Ph.D. in Engineering Science with a focus on Engineering Education from PUC, an MFA in Design and Technology from Parsons The New School for Desing, an MA in Media Studies from The New School, and a bachelor’s degree in Civil Engineering, with a concentration in Structural Design.Dr. Jorge Baier, Pontificia Universidad Cat´olica de Chile He is an associate professor in the Computer Science Department
its on-site curriculum and through study-abroad opportunities. This commitment is so strong that USDis currently ranked second in the nation for undergraduate study-abroad participation7. In thepast, the USD Department of Engineering has been only a very minor participant in intersessionand study-abroad courses. The CIE courses are a new venture joining the advantages of each:short-term (three-week) engineering courses taught by USD faculty abroad. The coursesdescribed here are the first two intersession CIE courses at USD: one summer CIE course hastaken place and another is on the schedule for summer 2011.The technical content and the international experience are assessed using a four-prongedapproach. (1) Student evaluations as required by
with firms around theworld. The answer to this question can in part be provided by ASCE if and when a broadercontext is developed that more fully encompasses the future C.E. work place where both theprofessional engineers and the other allied-professional are accepted in an integrated approachthat can synergistically power the engine of the business of U.S. civil engineering.Bibliographic Information(1) ABET-TAC, Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Technology Programs, ABET, Inc., Baltimore, MD, 2005.(2) NCEES,”Council votes for more education,” Licensure Exchange, Volume 10, Issue 5, 2006, p.3.(3) ASCE, “Policy Statement 465”, adopted by Board of Direction, 19 Oct. 2004. { http://www.asce.org/pressroom/news/policy_details.cfm?hdlid=15
the core course syllabusthey taught. In addition, the graduate faculty members in both MCET and CEIT departmentswho were involved with IT and IT/ACA tracks were invited to discuss their opinion on thetopic(s) that they expect to be covered in the core courses that would better prepare students intheir classes (i.e., specific mathematical topics, technical issues pertaining to a technical electivecourse such as renewable energy, etc.).The feedback received from the graduate faculty members show slightly different expectationsdepending on whether a graduate course (such as advanced network security or manufacturingsimulation) belongs to IT/ACA or IT track. Both graduate faculty members in IT/ACA and ITemphasized on the importance of knowing how
. The project was conducted over the full academic year. At the start of theproject the team together with the faculty advisors (the authors of this paper) held a kick- Page 10.419.4off meeting at the Intrepid to discuss constraints, including the planned renovation of theProceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & ExpositionCopyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Educationpier which was anticipated to also include some widening that could be valuable to helpaccommodate the proposed structure. Regulation issues such as limits on the shadow thatcould be cast on the water (due to concern for
course. Over the years a series of incidents have happened in the classroom wheresome fundamental differences on how physics and math are taught have shown us that in somecases, the content in one course is not what the other one needs. Moreover, there are someextreme cases in which the way concepts are covered in one of the courses predispose students tomake mistakes in the other course.Over time we have reported some research on students’ use of models, and how we work in theclassroom [6]. It has become apparent that these discrepancies were a whole new area of researchand in this work we start looking for options on how to mediate the differences encountered,pointing out that most of the issues encountered become apparent only when both
’ website, which allowsparticipants to edit and upload information on the website and could serve as a new venue forcommunication among instructors, has been much less popular and served only a secondary role. For a variety of reasons, such as lack of time, TAs have been reluctant to contribute theircomments to the wiki. Lacking a richness of stored information, the wiki was not their firstchoice when the TAs were looking for information or advice. As a tool for fostering theirprofessional development, the wiki component of the website plays a secondary role comparedwith staff meetings and personal contacts with faculty, staff, and experienced TAs. The TAsrecognized the benefit of the wiki’s around-the-clock availability, but noted that it
an enduring, strong, and personal commitment to underrepresented engineering students and faculty; and the 2008 Hewlett-Packard/Harriett B. Rigas Award from the IEEE Education Society in recognition of her contribution to the profession. Dr. Schrader earned her B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Valparaiso University, and her M.S. in Electrical Engineering and Ph.D. in Systems and Control from the University of Notre Dame.Ms. Janelle BrownDr. Lynn Lubamersky, Boise State UniversityDr. Leslie Madsen-Brooks, Boise State University Leslie Madsen-Brooks’s work investigates the intersection of professional disciplinary knowledge with the public understanding of history and science. More specifically, she researches how
disciplineshave shown that it is possible for remote instruction to satisfy the required learning outcomes,while sustaining academic integrity [1]. Many issues affect how to realistically and efficientlyengage students while teaching remotely. This paper will look at some of these remote learningchallenges encountered at Engineering Technology program at Queensborough CommunityCollege [QCC] of the City University of New York [CUNY]. Presented here some of thetechniques and strategies employed to overcome the difficulties of remote learning at a minorityserving institution. Some of the challenges included how to engage learners with limited orinconsistent internet access, the strategies and decisions in using synchronous versusasynchronous delivery