., students, faculty, users),engaging in purposeful and constant communication within and across user groups, and fosteringa collaborative spirit, thus seeking opportunities for users to act as co-designers.Literature Review: The Evolution of a Model of Empathy in Engineering DesignIn this section, we focus on several key models and frameworks that focus on or are extensible tohow engineering students empathize or how empathy operates within engineering design. Thissection serves as both (1) a literature review, highlighting relevant scholarship and situating thisstudy within that scholarship, and (2) argumentation for a preliminary model of empathy forusers among engineering student designers, which serves as the basis for the rest of the study.For
same applies to issues of gender equity; our understanding of the current state of gender equityin engineering education directly impacts the solutions engineered to create more equitable andinclusive environments for students.Our research questions aim to better understand how male students in engineering perceive genderequity, which is the first step in creating a shift in the engineering cultural climate. If we understandhow male students perceive gender equity, educational efforts can be made to reframe harmfulideologies on gender equity for women and other minority groups. If dominant groups canunderstand the experiences of marginalized groups, differentiate between equality and equity, andspread awareness of social issues, the future of
addition to the acquisition of technical skills, professional skills suchas creativity, global readiness, leadership, and entrepreneurship are increasingly being emphasizedin the engineering curricula. One of ABET’s required student outcomes is that graduates are ableto “understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, andsocietal context” (p.3).5Engineering colleges take varied approaches in helping to promote students’ global readinessskills. Study and work abroad programs have been in place for many years. However, Parkinson,who collected information on the variety of different types of programs available in engineeringcolleges, estimated that only 7.5% of engineering graduates engage in some sort of study
. Thisprovided the researchers in the present study a unique opportunity into the domain of creating acourse structure that can help STEM instructors to teach effectively in all modes of coursedelivery, including the traditional face-to-face, hybrid, and online classes.The present study designed and implemented an effective course delivery structure at TexasA&M University and Saint Ambrose University. To obtain comprehensive results, the studydesign utilized multiple modes of instruction, multiple instructors at two higher educationinstitutions with varied student demographics. It requires high-level student engagement for thestudent learning and success. On part of faculty and instructors, it requires a lot of effort, hardwork and innovation to
are better equipped to make informed decisions on project alternatives. This ability to understand the subtle nuances of complex technical problems makes EGRS majors the intermediary between traditionally trained engineers and society.” • “The impact of EGRS’ tailored experience isn’t derived from each individual class. Rather, the EGRS curriculum as a whole served to change the way I worked and communicated. The sum total of my engineering studies experience didn’t simply teach me facts. It changed the way I think.”Further, the capstone instructor has observed students’ explicit incorporation of tools andmethods learned in the two prerequisite courses into their work. An exemplary quote from onestudent essay
Engineering CoreCourses, Engineering Design Courses, and Engineering Track Core Courses as important inpreparing them for senior design. In addition, relationships between the courses mentioned andthe skills students considered important for design or were confident in demonstrated influentialcomponents of the curriculum. These skills included: written communication, programming,hands-on building, teamwork, project management, using machine shop tools, and oralcommunication. However, there were very few statistically significant relationships to note. Thisresult may indicate that the courses are not directly impacting these skills, are negativelyimpacting these skills, or are not emphasizing the skills within the courses. Therefore, moreresearch is
competition that incorporates robotics, design, and project-based learning based often times on a socially-relevant theme. The theme varies annually butalways focuses on a complex issue of interest to society. For instance, recent themes haveinvolved biomedical engineering (2010) and food production and distribution (2011). The clubsdesign build, and program robots to successfully navigate an obstacle course based onautomation and control. They also research and present unique projects about an area ofimportance and interest related to the theme that impacts their local community. In addition tolearning about and presenting research projects and robotics, students work on 21st century skilldevelopment because, embedded throughout the FLL experience
through Action, immerses HSI STEM Educators inactivities that introduce CRI practices in their technician training and collect evidence aboutimpacts and outcomes for students. Participants will also learn about and be encouraged to seekNSF ATE grant funding to expand the impact of their work. Tier 3, Engaging Community, buildsCR STEM faculty leaders and disseminates lessons learned and contributions of those whocompleted Tiers 1 and 2 to achieve broader impacts in the ATE Community via synergy sessionsand spotlight presentations at conferences or similar virtual events that attract technicianeducators.Each tier in CR-ATE has four modules. Each module is focused on a particular topic based onneeds, findings, and practices identified in the
engineering design course that is intended to deepen and enrich students’understanding of these terms by asking them to categorize various artifacts as works ofengineering design. Starting with a simple binary question - yes or no - they move to a planarassessment - and finally to a comparative exercise as complications are introduced into theartifact set. Analyzing their pre and post-activity definitions and student reflections on theactivity allows us to explore the impact of the exercise on the students’ understanding of andengagement with the concept of “engineering design.”1. Background and IntroductionFreshman engineering students often begin their studies with limited, imprecise, and minimallyinformed conceptions of engineering, design, and
people do not trust these products, they willnot invest in them.” Studies that have explored engineers’ imaginaries of the public 49 show oneof the most common constructions of the public as in need of advances in engineering. On theother hand, constructions of the public as engaged in technological development are lesscommon 42,50. Our study follows a similar pattern, except when students reduced the role of thepublic to consumers having an impact on AV development. Technological neutrality thesis is the idea that technology is neutral and its unethical useis a matter of human behavior. A secondary component of this thesis is that problems that arisewith technology can often be traced to human error. The argument against this thesis is
better understand how developing your story influenced your view ofyourself.o Do you think it had any impact on how you think of yourself, in general?o Do you think it had any impact on how you think of yourself, as a grad student?o Do you think it had any impact on how you think of yourself, as a future STEMprofessional?4. We want to better understand the impacts of performing (telling) your story to others.o What was the experience like, for you? What did you like about it? What aspects did you find challenging?o What impact, if any, do you think telling the story to others had on you? In terms of how you see yourself? In terms of how you think others see you? In terms of your communication skills?5. Would you
technology, mechanical engineering technology, and flighttechnology. Among these were three former active-duty or national guard veterans.The literature already documents the attributes of student veterans in terms of their potentialwithin the engineering community. This paper describes the design competition and documentsthe actions of the team through the student design process. It then describes the veterans’ rolesand integration in the project, specifically how their veteran experiences directly influenced theteam’s success. Finally, it describes these veterans’ impact on model rocketry at the institutionas a whole and their legacy in subsequent competition teams.IntroductionUniversities have experienced significant growth of student-veteran
that students'experiences—such as their confidence and sense of community—impact their commitment to anengineering degree, highlighting the important role a supportive educational environment playsin students’ success. At the graduate level, Bahnson et al. [16] used an intersectional approach toexplore engineering graduate students' identities and academic advisor relationships, furtherrevealing that social factors play a critical role in shaping students' professional identities.Building on Oyserman's [17] Identity-Based Motivation (IBM) theory, which is comprised ofthree components—Action Readiness, Dynamic Construction, and Interpretation of Difficulty[17], utilizing updated literature by Oyserman and Destin [18]—this study investigates how
detection (Drones), IOT, and big data analysis. He has more than 10 technical papers published in conferences and journals. He is also a member of IEEE. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Design and Development of Cybersecurity Concentration Courses and Laboratory Experiences for Undergraduate Students AbstractInformation and Communication Technologies (ICT) have become increasingly important for UScitizens, who are becoming dependent on the use of information networks and services in their dailylives. Yet, while uptake of new technology among citizens is high, a large portion of the populationremains unaware of their exposure to
the very personal journey of developing transversal skills. Participants in this study are 29 students enrolled in an undergraduate course onEngineering Leadership at a Tier 1 University. The course has an intentional focus on theawareness of both the technical and transversal or non-technical skills needed to be competitiveas leaders in the engineering field. As part of the leadership development, students engage inself-assessment, learning modules, coaching, reflection and experiential learning adventures thatare designed to build their self-awareness and the transversal skills related to being an effectiveleader. Lessons learned from the self-assessment (EQ-I 2.0) and course material are immediatelyapplied in their personal and
ofcollege experience, and reduced faculty interaction can impact learning outcomes anddepartmental goals[2, 3, 5-10]. Recently, our university implemented pedagogical changes inBiomedical Engineering classes to address these challenges[6, 11]. During one-on-onediscussions about course changes, the faculty team recognized a significant gap in understandingour students[12-15].In this ongoing research, motivated to address this issue, we employ Maslow's Hierarchy ofNeeds as a framework to explore the experiences of senior BME students.[16-19]. Maslow'sHierarchy of Needs offers a human-centered approach to engaging with and understandingfundamental motivations, ranging from basic needs to higher aspirations. We surveyed seniorstudents graduating in
impacts ofextreme weather events and changing climate conditions. The National Oceanic and AtmosphericAdministration reports that in 2021 alone, there were 20 weather disaster events causing lossesexceeding $1 billion each [1]. Such disasters lead to damaged structures and infrastructuresystems disrupting social services and resulting in massive financial losses. Therefore,communities ought to consider resilience actions ahead of disasters, including preparingresources, response, and recovery activities [2]. Moreover, extreme weather events and othernatural disasters can have a disproportionately negative impact on low-income communities,Indigenous populations, and communities of color due to decades of discriminatory policies andpractices. For
. Students consider SO 4. …which must consider the impact of engineeringimpacts of solutions on solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societalrelevant contexts. contexts. (second part of Student Outcome 4)EPSA 3. Students consider SO 4. …which must consider the impact of engineeringcontemporary issues. solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societal contexts. (second part of Student Outcome 4)EPSA 4. Students acquire, SO 7. an ability to acquire and apply new knowledge asinterpret, evaluate and apply needed, using appropriate learning strategies.information.EPSA 5. Students SO 3. Communicate effectively with a range of
Student to Scholar: A Professional Skills Focused Library and Student Affairs CollaborationABSTRACTThe Student2Scholar initiative began as a collaboration between library and engineering facultyin the Spring of 2017. The primary focus of Student2Scholar (S2S) was to develop focusedprogramming to reinforce professional skill development among engineering students. Duringthe Summer of 2020 the S2S initiative partnered with New York University’s Tandon School ofEngineering Summer Undergraduate Research (SUR) Program to develop an 8 week longworkshop series focusing on opportunities in areas such as scientific communication,visualization, ethics and research, information literacy, and mentorship. A
studiesdiffers from that of their direct pathway peers—those students who have spent less than fiveyears in industry before attending graduate school. Returners bring with them the notion ofcommunity of practice, which denotes a group of people engaged in “a process of collectivelearning” for a specific purpose [2]. Much of the learning from communities of practice isimplicit, that is, learned episodically and enroute to solving the problem at hand, and situated—within a social and contextual environment. Our participants discuss the differences they seebetween workplace and classroom learning that involve the notions of implicit knowledge andsituated learning that benefit all students. We make recommendations for professors ofengineering to leverage
discussion and therefore is not the sole source of information or learning. Thecourse management program, Blackboard, is used to post and receive assignments, link studentsto sources of information, facilitate online discussion forums between class meetings, viewstreamed video content, and conduct online surveys and quizzes. Using this format, students’learn about and form their own opinions on ethics and contemporary issues. In addition, studentsare required to participate in professional development activities by attending ASCE meetings,engaging in continuing education programs, and getting involved in community service events.Specifically, the published course objectives are that by the end of this course, a student shouldbe able to: 1. Develop
feedback.IntroductionOral exams are commonly used as a component of Ph.D. qualifying exams and have manyrecognized benefits over written exams. Oral exams allow for real-time feedback and probing toprovide for a more authentic assessment of students’ conceptual knowledge. Preparation for oralexams also can improve communication skills. However, oral exams are not commonly used inundergraduate engineering courses in the U.S. [10, 33]. One reason for the hesitancy of faculty tointroduce oral exams in undergraduate courses is the workload associated with administeringthese exams, and the lack of certainty of the benefits that the exams would provide even if thecapacity to administer them is available. Another source of hesitancy is uncertainty about howoral exams
knowledge, skills, and values totackle real-world issues, while fostering a sense of civic duty, empathy, and self-improvement[1].Examples of service learning projects include designing and building a toy for a disabled kid,fabricating laboratory equipment for a science teacher, developing a playground for an under-served community, and participating in an environmental clean-up initiative. Service learningcan be integrated into various academic fields, including but not limited to, education,psychology, sociology, public health, and environmental studies.Service learning offers numerous benefits to students, including developing leadership skills,promoting civic engagement, and gaining hands-on experience in their field of study. It alsopositively
begin working in teams during the PFE course series to identify ideas for SeniorDesign/Capstone projects, engage with community members and potential stakeholders, andobtain feedback to refine their ideas. Other student groups are encouraged to participate in on-going Senior Design/Capstone projects or multidisciplinary engineering projects defined byCollege of Engineering industry partners.A critical aspect of the course is that faculty members serve as the primary instructor and teacheach class session live. Although on-line lectures and using graduate assistants to teach coursesdo have many benefits, the primary purpose of this course series is for faculty, universityadministration, and engineering industry partners to directly engage
Engineers (ASCE) student leadersadminister a department wide civil engineering freshman mentoring program. Theprogram mission is to develop first year students who are: 1.) confident in their careerdecision, 2.) engaged in their engineering education, and 3.) active members of ourengineering community. This initiative focuses on establishing supportive one-on-onecontact between freshmen and upper-class students within civil engineering. Additionally,since ExCEL-SC students are assigned to a pre-designated residential dormitory, an on-campus leadership structure is in place to provide student mentoring along with oversightfrom an assigned college staff position, who observes and supports the student leadershipstructure, and provides supplemental
studentsultimately have the free will to choose to attend class (Credé et al., 2010; Macfarlane, 2013;Pintrich, 2004), and students may miss class for various reasons (Macfarlane, 2013; Supiano, 2022;Zhu et al., 2019). Missing class negatively impacts students as they miss out on critical aspects ofthe learning experience and may indicate challenges students are experiencing in their personallives. Students’ attitudes towards course policies, including attendance policies, are complicated.In one of the few studies examining students’ perceptions of and reactions to attendance policies,Bailey et al. (2016) found that the research participants preferred being exempt from the coursepolicy when it was not in their favor (e.g., requesting an extension). However
BIM and SD education. By incorporating interactive BIM softwaresuch as Revit Architecture, Revit MEP, and Autodesk Ecotect, students can engage in simulationexercises to conduct “what-if” sustainability analyses during building design and constructionscenarios [1]. This approach to learning engages students by showing them how design andconstruction choices can impact the sustainability of a building, leading to a better understandingof SD principles.Moreover, [8] focuses on providing students with practical experience using BIM software forsustainable building design and energy analysis, preparing them for challenges in construction.BIM software packages also enable students to gain practical experience conductingsustainability analyses
biotechnology over a one-year period. This paper describes how our assessment of theclasses evolved over the year to build on lessons learned from previous classes.IntroductionAs part of the VaNTH ERC Northwestern faculty have revised various courses to enhance thelearning experience of students. The VaNTH engineering faculty recognize that courses shouldembed the subject matter in a practical context, foster the development of practical skills such asoral and written communication and teamwork, as well as teach the underlying scientificprinciples. The reason for embedding learning in context is based on a theoretical as well aspractical stance. Learning and instructional theories explain that providing real-life contextsincreases students’ interest
marginalization in the form of social disadvantage which may bein terms of income, services, and/or participation. If engineers are to work effectively with andfor marginalized communities both locally and abroad, they should be sensitized to social justiceissues and have sophisticated ethical reasoning skills. This research explored the perspectivesand practices related to social justice issues among engineering educators who integrate ethicsand societal impact issues (ESI) into their courses. A survey found that among 1268 instructorswho embed ESI in their courses, 27% include social justice and/or poverty topics. The majorityof individuals who taught social justice and/or poverty believed that the ESI education ofundergraduate and graduate students in
their intentions for social impact in CS. We use these findings to suggest that CSsupport programs encourage their participants to form student-led, virtual communities forprofessional development, and engage socially-oriented individuals, respectively. Above all, weencourage facilitators of CS support programs and educational settings to remain strategic in thedesign of curriculums and environments. With an emphasis on changes in systems over students[26], [73], we believe that the field can resourcefully nurture the persistence of students ofdiverse identities, ultimately encouraging a future of equitable innovation in CS.References[1] T. Highfill and C. Surfield, “New and Revised Statistics of the U.S. Digital Economy, 2005–2020”, [Online