delivery to include such content. The approach engages students and student teams in innovative activities using both traditionaland authentic assessment strategies, including portfolio development. The second approach,however, seems to have several advantages over the first one. It builds students knowledge andskills on project management, teaming, and design over time, and they develop individualportfolios. Students also work with an interdisciplinary faculty team throughout the three-courseproject management sequence and then again in the senior design capstone course. Not only willthey work with students from other disciplines, but multi-tasking will be required as well. TheIT feels that this is one of their next steps to continuous
, we suggest offering fieldtrips to local companies to community college students to help them achieve a similar broadeneddefinition of engineering. Overall, we highlight a need to expand access to study abroad programs and a need forprogram administrators to integrate potential transfer students into programs like RSAP carefullyand purposefully, especially when those students are older than their peers. This paper also callsfor more research into the experiences of potential transfer students, including longitudinalstudies, which assess the long-term impacts of participating in an experiential global learningprograms on success at a 4-year institution. Ultimately, additional research into the experiencesof potential transfer students
and tutors in that theyreceive additional pedagogical training based on constructivist models of teaching and learning(e.g., sociocultural theory [1]). Their role in the classroom is to facilitate and guide, often throughquestioning, in ways that will help students reach understanding on their own. Studies on theLearning Assistant model have demonstrated numerous benefits, such as increased conceptualunderstanding; an increase in positive affective dimensions such as belonging; and an increase inwell-trained and enthusiastic future STEM teachers. While existing education research hasillustrated positive impacts on students in STEM classrooms, less work has focused on thepersonal and epistemological development of the LAs themselves.In this
considerations by promoting sustainability andresponsible resource use [4]. Social responsibility involves engaging with communities tounderstand their needs and concerns. Engineers should actively involve local communities in thedesign and implementation of projects, ensuring that solutions meet their requirements andrespect their cultural values. Engineers should prioritize environmentally sustainable practices,considering the long-term impacts of their projects on ecosystems and natural resources.Global competencies and social responsibility are particularly important for chemicalengineering undergraduate students to understand for several reasons. Chemical engineers oftenwork on projects and processes that have a significant impact on society and
technological advancements, driving innovative research, and ensuring thatacademic programs remain aligned with industry demands [6].The field of biological engineering has the potential to make a significant global impact, yet itremains less widely recognized compared to more traditional engineering disciplines. Itsrelevance is steadily increasing as it addresses pressing global challenges related to renewableenergy which is driving innovation and economic growth [7]. Students who have a balance oftechnical skills as well as professional skills (e.g., problem solving, strong communication,teamwork and interpersonal skills) are often better equipped to navigate the competitive joblandscape and find fulfilling roles after graduation [8].One of the key
supporting one or more SELECT use photographs or videos of theirteams in recruiting brochures, websites, and fund-raising newsletters. The team photos are usedto depict students engaged in authentic, hands-on, collaborative, and enjoyable learning at theirinstitution. Our review of these media portraits shows that team membership is almostexclusively white male. This high visibility coupled with the lack of diversity on theundergraduate engineering design competition teams very loudly counters messages of inclusionand opportunity prominent in national conversations regarding engineering.Furthermore, SELECT programs are resource intensive endeavors. From budgets of many tens ofthousands of dollars, access to faculty time, faculty mentoring, and space
Technology to pitch their inventions to judges and audience members in astatewide competition.The goal of this research is to understand the experiences of teachers and students within theprogram and the ways they benefit from participating. Initial research efforts have focusedprimarily on teachers’ experiences implementing the program. Through survey, focus group,and interview data collected over the past several years, teachers have also provided theirperspectives about how the program has impacted their students. Across several academic years,teachers’ survey data reflects a high level of agreement that participation has had a positiveimpact on their students’ communication and teamwork skills, enthusiasm for learning aboutengineering and
Theory states that students are more motivated to pursue a career when theybelieve the profession affords the values that they personally endorse. Goal-Congruity furthercategorizes value into two forms, agency (wealth, prestige, power), and prosocial (working withand helping others, benefitting society). In our study, we focus on the often-overlookedprosocial value. This type of value system is important for two reasons. First, with theubiquitous nature of technology in the modern world, the consequence of engineering decisionscan have a devastating impact on society, often in the aggregate over time. Considering thesocietal impact within the engineering decision making process can benefit the sustainability andaccessibility of new technologies
understanding of these students’ experiences. Todate, the research team has recruited and conducted Zoom interviews with 22 undergraduateengineering students from over 11 universities. The interviews consist of three major parts: 1)Students’ identity and impact on lives, 2) Engineering-related experiences, and 3) Reflection andGiving Back to the community. The details of the bigger project are described elsewhere [17]. 4We adopted narrative and discourse analysis techniques [18], [19] to construct narratives fromthe transcribed interviews. Constructed narratives centered around the final question of ourinterview protocol (i.e., “If you could tell
bridges and roads in the community. This could have been a result of theawareness E-LEAD students raised about the different types of fields of engineering not onlyduring one of the specific workshops, but over the entire week. The E-LEAD student 1mentioned that his leadership confidence increased after learning the impact he had as a leader.He admitted that, prior to this experience, he thought leadership skills were gained only whenplaced in authoritative positions but now he had a better understanding that a leader is one whocan guide others to lead. Then, he acknowledged that leadership skills are gained throughteamwork, while having an impact on others, and learning to work with other’s capabilities andcharacter. He also said “I used to
opportunitieswith different aspects of the study abroad experience. We use qualitative analysis techniques toexplore this ill-explored space and address the following research question RQ: How do students describe their learning experiences across different types of visits during a short-term international trip?Background on the Rising Sophomore Abroad Program (RSAP)RSAP consists of a semester-long preparatory course during the spring semester followed by atwo-week international module. The course prepares students for their international experienceby engaging them in discussion on topics such as: 1) defining what it means to be a globallycompetent engineer; 2) communication and culture; 3) understanding international engineeringwork; 4
balance conflict with safety. Too much or the wrongtype of conflict can be detrimental to learning. The techniques we used, some of them borrowedfrom professional leadership training programs, had a positive impact on the students, asrevealed by their weekly reflective essays and by individual communication with them duringand after the course. Students, perhaps subconsciously, created conflicts that enabled them tolearn lessons they needed to learn.One aspect of safety is how to limit the damage of mistakes while encouraging learning frommistakes. To that end, we chose not to have a real-world customer whose dependence on theproject success would have increased the damage from a potential project failure. Our focus wason the learning – in the
major, and they typically enroll as sophomore undergraduates. It is also often a requiredcourse for students pursuing other engineering majors. As an introduction to EE, its primaryobjective is to introduce fundamental concepts. However, the course could also expose studentsto engineers’ potential impact on society, thereby introducing sociotechnical concepts forengineers to consider beyond the classroom. Researchers have suggested ways to introducesociotechnical concepts specifically in EE related courses [1], [14], [15], [16]. Lord, Przestrzelski and Reddy [1] describe a course module for circuits that addresses theimpact of conflict minerals used in electrical components. Their module resulted in greaterstudent engagement with the
modules. 2. Instructional Strategies: Investigate the effectiveness of various teaching methods, such as flipped classrooms or project-based learning, in enhancing student engagement and comprehension across different institutional types. 3. Institutional Contexts: Conduct comparative studies across a broader range of institutions, including community colleges and international universities, to better understand how institutional resources and student demographics influence learning outcomes. 4. Focus on Equity: Explore how EOP-aligned modules can be designed to address equity and inclusion, particularly in contexts where access to resources and prior exposure to environmental concepts
form comments). Mid-semester feedback included the following: 1. What aspects of class are working well? What are the strengths of the class? What aspects of the class are having a positive impact on your learning? 2. What aspects of the class are working poorly? What are the weaknesses of the class? What aspects of the class are having a negative impact on your learning? 3. What aspects of the class do you believe should be changed? How should these aspects be changed? (Please be as specific as possible.)Discussion: Data on student perceptions and feedback of the course has been collected and beinganalyzed. Based on preliminary examination, modifications are being incorporated for the Spring 2020semester course including
does this identity influence their academic success and resilience in the first two years post-transfer? • Considering institutional initiatives like the scholarships in STEM program, how do such institutional supports impact the engineering identity development of financially constrained transfer students, and how do these impacts manifest in their academic engagement and performance over their tenure at a 4-year institution?To fully grasp transfer students’ journeys, it is essential to use a blend of methodologies. Alongitudinal approach could trace students’ GPA and retention over the first post-transfer years,offering a quantitative snapshot of their academic trajectory. On the qualitative side, semi-structured interviews and
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019Relationship between Personality Types and Topical Interests of Engineering Students, if Any: A Work in ProgressIntroductionThis paper is a work in progress on a study linking personality types to topics of interest ofengineering students.It is a common perception that engineering students are introverted, like mathematics and science,do not like communication, and so on. We are studying if these assumptions are still true with thecurrent generation of students attending our university. We also would like to determine whethermore current topics like sustainability and entrepreneurship appeal to students who may not fit thebill of a “traditional engineer.” When complete, the
undergraduate education is summarized best by Dr. Edgerton,who says,“Learning ‘about’ things does not enable students to acquire the abilities and understandingthey will need for the twenty-first century. We need new pedagogies of engagement that will turnout the kinds of resourceful, engaged workers and citizens that America now requires”8The “pedagogies of engagement” to which Dr. Edgerton refers are the type of active, hands onteaching methods to which this paper and research is devoted. This shift from traditional lecturebased classes to more active, hands on teaching is especially impactful in classes where conceptsare particularly abstract and thus difficult to visualize or relate to everyday life9. This adequatelydescribes the material being
of the Student SuccessInitiative within the School of Engineering at GVSU. The motivation for the Student SuccessInitiative and the development of the learning skills modules is the improved retention of thefirst-year students in the engineering program. The retention of students from the Introduction toEngineering Design I course to the Introduction to Engineering Design II course has historicallybeen in the range of approximately 33% – 36%. A multi-pronged approach has been taken tohelp provide students with the skills and resources to be successful, access to academic support,creating a sense of engagement and community among students and within the School ofEngineering.The learning skills modules were developed to be incorporated into a
their learning environment to identifywhat is expected of them and what is valued. Typically, individuals are most sensitive tosituational cues that are communicated by people in positions of power [6]. In learningenvironments, that it typically the instructor. Instructors can communicate cues aboutexpectations for student success and the value of the learning material for students lives in theform of instructional practices and classroom policies. By observing their instructor’s practicesand experiencing their policies, students will form perceptions of their instructor’s abilityexpectations and values for the course, which will in turn directly impact students’ own beliefsand values [2].Existing research has highlighted the impact of students
development in teaching. “Champions” from within these departments,however, support students’ introduction to the program and their overall experience. Finally, theparticipants discussed the role of the program’s learning communities in facilitating thedevelopment of their instructional practices while in the program and after. Results of this studysupport the continued improvement of career preparation programs by taking into account theeffect of institutional climate on doctoral student preparation for diverse career pathways. Inaddition, these results complement existing literature about the graduate engineering studentexperience and the development of future faculty.IntroductionTo support doctoral students’ preparation for academic careers, many
assignments. Thispaper presents the results of the surveys, analyzing students' initial perceptions, expectations, andexperiences with AI tools, as well as the strategies they employed to enhance their interactionswith ChatGPT during a structured assignment 2. MethodsThis study utilized a survey-based approach to examine the understanding, expectations, andperceived applications of artificial intelligence (AI) among first-year engineering and computingstudents. The survey was designed to capture the students’ initial perceptions prior to any formallecture on AI tools and their perspectives after engaging with the lecture content.The study included participants enrolled in an "Introduction to Engineering and Computing"course at xxxxxx University
veterans follow non-traditional education pathwaysand bring with them a wealth of diverse life experiences. Correspondingly, the growing numberof veterans pursuing STEM degrees, and the diversity of this underserved group of studentscontinues to gain the attention of faculty, administrators, and national organizations. To bolsterASEE’s support for many diverse groups to include student veterans in ETETE pathways, theASEE president commissioned a series of leadership roundtables during the 2018 ASEENational Conference and Exposition. There, roundtables were tasked with makingrecommendations regarding how ASEE can support engineering education, relevant diversityresearch, and engagement of these diverse communities in society activities.The purpose
group projects a norm in STEM education [1]. FromKindergarten to College (K2C), experiential learning and collaborative work are highlyrecommended in education to help students develop relevant team dynamics skills, bothinterpersonal and social skills[2]. Several studies show that collaborative learning increasesstudents’ motivation and engagement. However, other works denote that teamwork can oftenintroduce limitations or even negate the benefits due to team members’ social loafing, mistrust,and conflicts [3]. The definition of social loafing has been revised over the years. However, theauthors adopt Gilovich et al. definition that social loafing is a phenomenon or tendency for ateam member to exert less effort when working on a group task in
their collaborative horizons, ultimately guiding them towards informed decision-makingfor the project's future directions.3. On personal growthTwo major themes have emerged from the students’ reflections in terms of personal growth andleadership development. Firstly, 50% of participants noted improvements in their confidence,presentation skills, and communication abilities. “I gained valuable experience in public speakingand audience engagement. During the social events and poster sessions, I met people from diversebackgrounds…” and “Presenting my work at such a prestigious event significantly boosted myconfidence, as I had the chance to effectively communicate my research and its broader implicationsto an engaged audience. This opportunity
toAttend Academic Summer Camps? A Mixed Methods Study Exploring the Impact of a NASAAcademic Summer Pre-engineering Camp on Middle School Students in a Latino Community,”Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, vol. 8, pp. 22-30, 2018.[8] A. Bandura, Self-efficacy: The exercise of control, Freeman, New York, NY, USA, 1997. 14[9] N. A. Mamaril, E. L. Usher, C. R. Li, D. R. Economy, and M. S. Kennedy, “MeasuringUndergraduate Students’ Engineering Self-efficacy: a Validation Study,” Journal of EngineeringEducation, vol. 105, pp. 366-395, 2016.[10] D. H. Schunk, P. R. Pintrich, and J. L. Meece, Motivation in Education: Theory,Research and Applications (3rd ed.), Pearson Education, Upper
nonconvex programming, distributed optimization, and their applications in signal processing and communication. Additionally, Dr. Alvarado is actively engaged in engineering education, focusing on mathematics teaching and curriculum development.Sr. Jose Roberto Portillo, Universidad Galileo Roberto Portillo heads the Teaching Assistants Department of Universidad Galileo in Guatemala and is a mathematics instructor in engineering courses. He holds a Bs. in Electronics and Computer Science (from Galileo University, Guatemala) and an MSc. in Operations Research (from Galileo University, Guatemala). He is currently a Ph.D. candidate in information technologies applied to education. He also has a vast teaching experience in
; andwhich attitudes and behaviors they perceive are necessary for success after graduation. Theresults of this study reveal that students seamlessly weave together thoughts on actionsperformed during the design process with facets of an EM throughout their reflections. Itincludes evidence of how engineering design and EM can inform and influence one anotherwhile engineers engage in their work. The findings of this study help make the case for the needto co-facilitate the development of an EM as part of teaching engineering design inundergraduate engineering education.Motivation It takes time for new norms to be established in the engineering education community,but given enough time and a little reflection, changes become more apparent
troubling mental health concerns. Forexample, one stated, “There’s a joke among some of us that being told to stay at home and sociallydistance just validated our existing lifestyles. There was a lot of truth to that in my case, though thedegree of isolation eventually worsened my depression” (Senior, CS, SBCOMP=2.5). Another broughtup how lack of social interaction and mental health issues have affected their academic performance,“My little amount of campus engagement was slashed. Online programs were pretty awful. Mymental health sharply declined and the lasting effects of that are interfering with my current studies”(Senior, CS, SBCOMP=2.4).Increased AccessibilityOne positive impact of remote learning is that some students felt that class
in hopes of laying the foundation for securingan engineering internship following their first year of study.STEM-Persistence Seminar: The STEM-Persistence Seminar (SPS) is a one credit coursedesigned as an extension of FYS and was developed exclusively for the students who are part ofthe Engineering Ahead cohort. In addition to continued building of mathematics andmetacognition skills, the purpose of the SPS is to help students continue to build their resumes inhopes of securing a high engagement opportunity (i.e., internship, undergraduate research,mentoring) following their first year of college. Therefore, the focus of this class is communityengagement and undergraduate research. One of the community engagement events includes theLION