manufacturing environments.Dr. Jeff Hung, Farmingdale State College Dr. Jeff Hung holds degrees in engineering and technology disciplines (Ph.D. in Materials Science and Engineering, M.S in Mechanical Engineering, and B.S in Manufacturing Engineering Technology). His areas of expertise are in Computer-Aided Design (CAD), Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAM), Com- puter Number Control (CNC), new product development, fuel cell technology, and thermal spray tech- nology. He is currently an assistant professor of the Mechanical Engineering Technology Department at Farmingdale State College. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Design and Development of Online Applied Thermo-Fluid
the concepts of public service andsustainability into engineering education?Many universities have available courses mainly focused on sustainability, with 64civil/architectural/environmental engineering courses identified in a recent benchmarking surveyby Allen et al.1. These courses are most often electives targeted to upper-division students, suchas the Green Engineering and Sustainability course at Michigan Technological University andYale University referenced by Zhang et al.2 and the seminar course at Lamar Universitymentioned by Koehn et al.3. An alternative approach to teaching sustainability in upper-levelelective courses is to introduce sustainability at the beginning of the curriculum, during the firstand second-year courses. The
blocks of Fig.5, corresponding to the block diagram in Fig. 4 are: Y[i]=Clip{X[i]}.vi that performs thefunction of the limiter, Derivative x(t).vi which performs differentiation andENV_DET.vi which performs envelope detection. The first two blocks are part of the fulldevelopment version of LabVIEW 5.1 and the last block, the envelope detector, is part of thecommunication systems toolkit described in [14].Figure 5: A graphical program that simulates FM detection in LabVIEW.We note that the program in Fig. 5 suggests the process depicted in Fig. 4 while the suggestion givenby the following MATLAB (pseudo)code to Fig. 4 is not as clear: Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education North Midwest Section Annual Conference
– Ethics 4 4 or 5 g – Communications 4 3 h – Broad education 2 or 3 3 or 4 i – Lifelong Learning 1, 2 or 3 1, 2 or 3 j – Contemporary Issues 3, 5 or 6 4, 5 or 6 k – Engineering Tools 6 or 7 3, 4 or 5Other categorization of questions may also be helpful to evaluate content validity. For instancethe curriculum could be examined to make sure that each skill or subject area is tested.Criterion Validity. In order to evaluate the test on the basis of criterion validity the correlationbetween
Paper ID #6448Pre-Service Teachers’ Engineering Design Practices in an Integrated Engi-neering and Literacy ExperienceDr. Kristen Bethke Wendell, University of Massachusetts Boston Dr. Wendell is an assistant professor in the Department of Curriculum and Instruction Center of Science and Mathematics in Context. Page 23.973.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Pre-Service Teachers’ Engineering Design Practices in an Integrated Engineering and Literacy
maintenance a practical approach to maintaining rotating equipment. Previouslythe responsibility of consultants who analyzed the condition of a handful of critical machines,monitoring programs were expanded to include necessary supporting equipment (pumps, motors,compressors) and duties were shifted to a combination of skilled trades personnel, maintenanceengineers, and technicians in-house1. This shift from consultants to maintenance professionalscreated an educational void, where graduate engineers and engineering technologists lacked theknowledge needed to successfully manage predictive maintenance programs2.An initial pilot version of MET 317 Machine Diagnostics was offered in the fall of 1990 to sixsenior Purdue University MET students to begin
Distribution, College of Engineering, Texas A&M University. Education: M.B.A., Texas A&M University, 2002 B.S., Engineering Tech., Texas A&M University, 1997 Philanthropic and Endowment Experience: • Strategically developed a new funding model for the ETID department to endow and develop labs to support strategic education curriculum, 2004. • Leveraged pro- fessional relationships with Mr. Robert ”Bob” Womack, of Womack Machine Supply, Dallas Tx and helped negotiate a $1.0M donation for an endowment to support a ”hands on” Fluid Power Laboratory, 2007. • Obtained a second gift of $500k, from personal and professional relationships with DXP Enter- prises, to develop the DXP Pump Laboratory to support
. Krishna Kumar Nedunuri, Central State University Dr. Nedunuri holds appointment as a Professor at Central State University (CSU) in the International Center for Water Resources Management (ICWRM). He teaches Fluid Mechanics and Hydraulics, Soil and Water Pollution, Water Chemistry, Water Supply, Groundwater, Wastewater Engineering, Streams and Lakes. He is an active member in the area of Faculty Development promoting distance education through video-conferencing and web-based learning. He is one of the fore-runners in adapting inquiry methods into traditional classroom environments at CSU. He earned his Ph.D. in Environmental and Hydraulic Engineering area of the School of Civil Engineering from Purdue University (1999
. Thompson, P. W. (1994). Students, functions, and the undergraduate curriculum, Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences Issues in Mathematics Education, 4, 21-44.27. Trigueros. M., & Martínez–Planell. R. (2009). Geometrical Representations in the lLearning of Two-variable Functions. Educ Stud Math, Published online, 24 June.28. Arnon, I, Cottrill, J, Dubinsky, E., Oktac, A., Fuentes, S.R., Trigueros, M., & Weller, K. (2014). APOS Theory: A Framework for Research and Curriculum Development in Mathematics Education, Springer.29. Piaget, J. (1971). Psychology and epistemology (A. Rosin, Trans.). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. (Original Work Published 1970
AC 2007-1556: ASSESSING ABET OUTCOMES USING CAPSTONE DESIGNCOURSESPaul Biney, Prairie View A&M University Page 12.261.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Assessing ABET Outcomes Using Capstone Design CoursesAbstractThis paper presents a methodology fo r using capstone design project courses for assessing anumber of ABET outcomes. In the advent of EC 2000, Engineering programs have grappledwith methods for assessing some of the ABET outcomes, especially those skills which are nottaught in the traditional engineering programs.Senior Design and Professionalism I and II are two capstone design courses taken by seniors inthe College of Engineering over a
is also significantly involved in the Department of Residence Life on campus.Jenna Laleman, University of St. Thomas Jenna is in her third year of studies at the University of St. Thomas, majoring in Elementary Education and STEM Education with a minor in Psychology. She works at her university’s Playful Learning Lab which focuses on engaging students of all ages in hands-on, innovative engineering education, especially focusing on reaching the underrepresented within the STEM fields. Jenna is working on a variety of STEM student outreach programs including leading the University’s STEPS (Science, Technology, and Engineering Preview Summer) Camp, developing the curriculum, leading the staff, and working as the
Department at Weber State University. She is a member of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE). She has more than five years of experience working in automotive industry as a Design Engineer.Prof. Kelly A. Harward, Weber State University Kelly A. Harward has a M.S. degree in manufacturing engineering technology, 1991, and a B.S. degree in design engineering technology, 1976. She has experience at Weber State University as an instruc- tor, 1979-1982 and 1987-1891, Assistant Professor, 1991-1998, and Associate Professor, 1998-present (tenured March 1995). As a Course Instructor, she developed and taught several CAD/CAM courses us- ing AutoCAD, Mechanical Desktop, Inventor, Ideas, SolidWorks, and ProE CAD/CAE
Paper ID #18177Learning Sustainability through the Design ProcessDr. Jennifer Mueller Price PE P.E., Rose-Hulman Institute of TechnologyDr. Mark H. Minster, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Associate Professor of English c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Learning Sustainability through the Design ProcessAbstractFirst-year engineering students across disciplines who have joined the HERE: Living and LearningToday for Tomorrow program (formerly the Home for Environmentally Responsible Engineering)participate in a three-course sequence: Introduction to Sustainability, Rhetoric and Composition
Education. ASEE Proceedings 2012[C]. IEEE,2012:25.612.1-25.612.13.[4] Birdi K, Leach D, Magadley W. Evaluating the impact of TRIZ creativity training: an organizational field study[J]. R & D Management, 2012, 42(4):315-326.[5] Haines-Gadd L. Does TRIZ Change People? Evaluating the Impact of TRIZ Training within an Organization: Implications for Theory and Practice[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2015, 131:259-269.[6] Harlim J, Belski I. On the effectiveness of TRIZ tools for problem finding[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2015, 131:892-898.[7] Harlim J, Belski I. Learning TRIZ: Impact on Confidence when Facing Problems[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2015, (131):95-103.[8] Ogot M
systems in Fall 2018, but has also unofficially been involved in helping the team with rapid prototyping for several years.Michael Colella, The Cooper Union I am a current senior Mechanical Engineering student at The Cooper Union for the Advancement of Science and Art. Throughout my four years as an undergraduate student, I have been an avid member of the Formula SAE team, working on various vehicle subsystems. For the past two years, I have been in charge of the frame subsystem.Dr. George J. Delagrammatikas, The Cooper Union George J. Delagrammatikas is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at The Cooper Union for the Ad- vancement of Science and Art in New York City. He is the Director of STEM Outreach which is com
rhetorical knowledge, critical thinking, and reading for first-year compositioncourses, composing, writing processes, and knowledge of conventions. The first-year 1composition curriculum emphasizes the rhetorical situation (writer, audience, purpose, andcontext), rhetorical appeals (logical, ethical, and emotional), and genre awareness in the writingprocess [1]. Most first-year composition courses are taught and/or administrated by English orCommunication departments.Although engineering undergraduates learn academic writing in first-year composition or othergeneral education writing courses, they often struggle to transfer the writing knowledge fromthose courses to engineering courses [2]. This is
related to achievement, problem-solving, task persistence, and student attitudes.Bioliography1. Bloom, B. S., ed. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. New York:David McKay Company.2. Bloom, B. S. (1971). Mastery Learning. In J. H. Block (Ed.), Mastery learning: Theory and practice. New York:Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, Inc.3. Carroll, J. B. (1963). A model of school learning. Teachers college record, 64, 723-733.4. Carroll, J. B. (1971). Problems of measurement related to the concept of learning for mastery. In J. H. Block(Ed.), Mastery learning: Theory and practice. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, Inc.5. Horton, L. (1981). Mastery Learning. Bloomington, IN: The Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.6
temperature,light, and vibration.Educational excellence requires exposing students to the current edge of research. To ensure thatstudent projects are along the same trajectory that the industry is moving, educators mustcontinually introduce emerging techniques, practices, and applications into the curriculum. Thefield of wireless sensor networks is growing rapidly, and there is increasing interest in providingundergraduate students with a foundation in the area. It is crucial that the emerging field ofwireless sensor networks be integrated into the undergraduate computer science and engineeringcurricula. This paper presents the details of two WSN projects that our undergraduate computerengineering students have done in their senior capstone
sponsored by National Science Foundation Page 24.621.2(DUE-0942932). As the robotics curriculum and its educational structure as well as effectivenesswere previously covered16,17, this study presents the NSF-sponsored robotics curriculum impactas well as linkage on the engineering design process and describes an open-ended autonomousforestry robot design and construction perspective to retrieve simulated soil samples during theIEEE 2013 Region-5 robotics competition that simulated a forest fire region filled with differenttypes of obstacles and required autonomous robot navigation and effective path planning. Therobotics curriculum focuses on
and Administrative Sciences at the Hashemite University, in Zarqa, Jordan, in 2007. His research interest are focused on Engineering management and systems engineering applica- tions in healthcare, manufacturing, operations management, business, and other industries; modeling and Page 26.1398.1 simulation of complex systems; distributed networked operations; Engineering Education c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 STEM Workshops for Transfer and Retention Program at a Hispanic Serving Institution
Vehicles). Third, is the integration of hybrid vehicle education into theMS Graduate Specialization in Automotive Systems Engineering.I. IntroductionOSU researchers have been involved in research related to control system and drivetrain designaspects of electric hybrid-electric vehicles for the past six years1,2,3,4,5,6. The graduate educationprogram described in this paper represents the culmination of these activities into a formalprogram, and builds on previous educational activities in mechatronics design7,8,9,10. One of theprincipal objectives of the OSU GATE program is to incorporate the latest developments in HEVtechnologies into a novel curriculum emphasizing creative interdisciplinary thinking, mechatronicdesign techniques, and the latest
attention in theundergraduate curriculum, with the coverage in Computer Science (CS) and SoftwareEngineering (SE) courses assessed as insufficient1,2. Technology is rapidly changing and thisimplies that instructors must instill in CS and SE students the testing skills, methodologies, andknowledge required to meet the challenges of this dynamic industry.While an understanding of verification has been deemed essential for software engineers, therehave been few materials available to educators for assessing software verification at theundergraduate level. The SEI published an “Introduction to Software Verification andValidation”3, in 1988 which provides some guidance on the curricular coverage required insoftware verification. The SEEK4 and SWEBOK5
Educational Partnerships, Old Dominion University Joe Brobst holds a BS in Biological Sciences, MA in Curriculum & Instruction, and Ed.D. in Educational Leadership, all from the University of Delaware. Formerly a high school biology teacher, he is now an ed- ucational research and program evaluation specialist with experience working on a wide range of projects sponsored by organizations including the National Science Foundation, National Institutes of Health, Of- fice of Naval Research, U.S. Department of Education, and Corporation for National and Community Service. His areas of interest and expertise include broadening participation in STEM higher education, K-12 STEM teacher professional development, and preservice
investigating the use of Oral Discourse Method for con- ceptual development in engineering, the impact of a four-year hands-on design curriculum in engineering, the effects of service learning in engineering education, and informal learning in engineering.Derek T Reamon, University of Colorado, Boulder DEREK REAMON is Co-Director of the Integrated Teaching and Learning Program, and a Senior In- structor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Colorado Boulder. He received his PhD in Educational Interface Design from Stanford University and has won numerous outstanding teaching awards. Dr. Reamon’s research interests encompass the foundations of educational theory, the practical issues involved in
activities is the use of properlydeveloped (and continuously improved) templates and standard procedures. I encourage you touse them in your program and give the faculty the task of developing creative learning activitiesrather than trying to develop new assessment procedures. Page 8.1027.5 Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Education Table 1: Outcomes Assessment Plan Faculty Responsibility Flowchart Each quarter check the action items list in the most recent Faculty Program
degree program in engineeringstudies. While the requirements for senior design differ somewhat across degreeprograms, all programs strive to provide the students with a solid capstone designexperience.As the curriculum is currently structured, ECE students are required to take a two-course design sequence during their senior year. During the first of these courses,senior design I, the students work on a structured design project that has been pre-packaged for them by the faculty teaching the course. Recently, this project hasbeen writing Verilog code to implement a wireless LAN using pre-designedFPGA and RF hardware that is supplied to them. The students are taught inlectures about formal design process, but their design freedom in the project
degree program in engineeringstudies. While the requirements for senior design differ somewhat across degreeprograms, all programs strive to provide the students with a solid capstone designexperience.As the curriculum is currently structured, ECE students are required to take a two-course design sequence during their senior year. During the first of these courses,senior design I, the students work on a structured design project that has been pre-packaged for them by the faculty teaching the course. Recently, this project hasbeen writing Verilog code to implement a wireless LAN using pre-designedFPGA and RF hardware that is supplied to them. The students are taught inlectures about formal design process, but their design freedom in the project
industrial problems typical of those in which engineers would dependupon mathematics for solutions. This approach is based upon WPI's project-based style ofeducation, one that employs the engineering approach to problem solving broadly across thesciences and mathematics.This project oriented curriculum, introduced over 30 years ago at WPI, has facilitated a majorchange in mathematics education. In the past ten years WPI faculty have developed a successfulmodel that introduces real-world, industrial, projects in mathematics education, at all levels frommiddle school to the Ph.D. program and faculty research. The faculty and students affiliated withthe Center for Industrial Mathematics and Statistics have developed project collaborations withover 30
engineering and is a licensed engineer in the state of Kansas.Dr. Jia G. Liang, Kansas State University Jia Grace Liang is a faculty in the Department of Educational Leadership at Kansas State University (USA). Her research interests focus on school leadership, professional development and learning in STEM, equity for women and racial minorities, and leadership for community engagement. She holds a PhD from the University of Georgia in Educational Administration and Policy.Dr. Eric J. Fitzsimmons, Kansas State University Dr. Eric Fitzsimmons, P.E. is an assistant professor in the civil engineering department at Kansas State University. He received his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees in Civil Engineering with a specialization
science education reform at the national, state and local levels, developingan understanding of how children learn science, identifying, researching and discussingcurrent trends and issues of curriculum and methodology in science education, planningand implementing inquiry-based science lessons/units, developing an understandingabout the development of children’s scientific literacy, and learning and utilizing varioustypes of assessment strategies in the science classroom.The Gizmo project is one way in which students demonstrate their competencies inrelation to the above goals. Specifically, the goal of the project is to connect the world ofscience to the world of science teaching. As a result, this project is completed incollaboration with