Collection

2022 ASEE - North Central Section Conference

Authors

Holly Maribeth Plank, University of Pittsburgh

Tagged Topics

Diversity

own context and evolving understanding of a liberatoryengineering education.IntroductionEducational scholar Dr. Bettina Love relentlessly advocates for the urgent need for abolitionistteachers who can design curriculum and educational experiences for our students that areliberatory in nature.1 A liberatory engineering education has the potential to empower ourhistorically underrepresented and racially minoritized students to be the kind of engineers whowill collaboratively strive for a just world and solve humanity’s most pressing problems.2Technology integration in engineering curriculum can either aid or hinder students’ ability tothrive as humans as well as potential future engineers. After years of seeing the ways technologycan be

Conference Session

Topics in Computing and Information Technologies II

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael Tamir; Ronald S Harichandran P.E., University of New Haven; Lueny Morell, InnovaHiEd

Tagged Divisions

Computing & Information Technology

learning resources and modes), employer-relevant and practical (project- based learning) than traditional engineering programs at a lower price point. 7. Employing faculty who are a smart blend of engineers + educators, who explore innovative teaching, and are mentors.The GalvanizeU/UNH Academic Model and Pedagogy GalvanizeU/UNH’s program places hands-on, collaborative, project-based learning at thecenter of education. Emphasizing real world experience, communication, leadership andentrepreneurship, it offers a diverse body of students the opportunity to experience data scienceas an engaging and collaborative profession, pairing technical training with 21st centuryprofessional skills. A priority goal of GalvanizeU/UNH is to

Conference Session

History, Program Design, and even a Journal Club

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Susan Blanchard, Florida Gulf Coast University; Robert O'Neill, Florida Gulf Coast University; James Sweeney, Florida Gulf Coast University; Lisa Zidek, Florida Gulf Coast University; Simeon Komisar, Florida Gulf Coast University; Diana Stoppiello, Florida Gulf Coast University

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering

attended ProjectKaleidoscope’s 2006 Planning Facilities for Undergraduate Science & Mathematics7 and wasused as a guide for planning the building.Holmes Hall was designed to: o Provide a learner-centered environment that engages students and faculty in innovative, integrated, interactive, and interdisciplinary engineering education; o Promote interdisciplinary collaborations among students, staff, and faculty as well as members of the greater community; o Be connected to the natural environment through views to the sky and landscape and the incorporation of sustainability principles; o Have flexible and adaptable space to meet current and future needs for engineering education and research; o Be a beautiful

Conference Session

TELPhE Division Technical Session 2: The Broadening Face of Engineering Education

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Mousumi Roy P.E., University of Connecticut

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

Paper ID #33987The Growth of Interdisciplinarity in Engineering Education in the 21stCenturyDr. Mousumi Roy P.E., University of Connecticut Dr. Roy earned her Doctoral degree from Columbia University, NY, MS from The Cooper Union, NY, and BS from Jadavpur University, India. She has a joint appointment in Civil and Environmental Engineering Department and Management & Engineering for Manufacturing Program (a collaboration between School of Engineering and Business) as an Assistant Professor in Residence in University of Connecticut. Her research interests include interdisciplinarity in Automation, Industry 4.0

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session I

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mary E. Besterfield-Sacre, University of Pittsburgh; Larry J. Shuman, University of Pittsburgh; Cheryl Matherly; Gisele Ragusa, University of Southern California; Lisa Benson, Clemson University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

Bioengineering from the University of Vermont, and M.S. and Ph.D. in Bioengineering from Clemson University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Assessing the Spectrum of International Undergraduate Engineering Educational Experiences: Three StudiesAbstractInternational experiences are viewed as important components of undergraduate engineeringeducation. Yet little has been done to define global preparedness, specify alternatives forachieving it, or determine to what degree being globally prepared is the result of personalattributes, prior experiences (including pre-college), or specific educational experiences.A collaboration of investigators from four universities

Conference Session

Raise the Bar – Visions for the Future, Bodies of Knowledge, and Accreditation Vicissitudes.

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mark William Killgore PE, F.ASCE, D.WRE, American Society of Civil Engineers

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

scholarly paper will delve into a series of questions about the future of engineeringeducation including:  What do various visions for the future of engineering education have in common?  How are the various visions distinct from each other?  How might the various engineering societies collaborate to realize their visions of engineering education in the future (perhaps through the AAES Working Group on Engineering Education)?  Since 2020 is only six years away, is it time to take another look at the future of engineering education?In characterizing one aspect of a future state of civil engineering practice, ASCE’s roadmap toachieving Vision 2025 declares, “Civil engineering is universally recognized as a

Conference Session

Environmental Engineering Pedagogy and Innovation

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Johanna Lönngren, Chalmers University of Technology; Magdalena Svanström, Chalmers University of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Environmental Engineering

an ongoing collaborative action research project that aims to develop a tool for assessingengineering students’ development of WSP literacy. Specifically, we provide a matrix of 22concrete ILOs for WSP literacy, as well as two different approaches to assessing (some of) themin engineering education. We expect that engineering educators will find these ILOs andassessment strategies valuable for adopting a constructive alignment approach for WSP literacyin their teaching.Study overviewThe study reported on in this paper is a collaborative action research project in which theresearchers have worked together with different groups of interested engineering educators tomake sense of previous empirical research about engineering students

Conference Session

Curricular Change Issues

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Linda Katehi; Leah Jamieson; Katherine Banks; Kamyar Haghighi; John Gaunt; Heidi Diefes-Dux; Robert Montgomery; William Oakes; P.K. Imbrie; Deborah Follman; Phillip Wankat

agreement about what that means.• Confounding factors make cause-and-effect relationship between a treatment and an outcome difficult to prove and replicate.Wankat et al. goes on to cites a number of other professional issues including the low relativeimportance of the scholarship of teaching in promotion, past lack of funding for engineeringeducation research, and the necessity for multidisciplinary collaboration with non-engineers1. Page 9.79.3 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for EngineeringEngineering

Conference Session

Reception & Poster Session

Collection

2013 ASEE International Forum

Authors

Mary E. Besterfield-Sacre, University of Pittsburgh; Gisele Ragusa, University of Southern California; Cheryl Matherly, The University of Tulsa; Sarah R. Phillips, Rice University ; Larry J. Shuman, University of Pittsburgh; Lucia Howard

Tagged Topics

ASEE International Forum

- rience for Undergraduates Program. Since 2006, this program has sent 106 young U.S. engineering and physics students to Japan for research, language, and cultural study. She also manages the reciprocal NanoREIS: Research Experiences for International Students at Rice University which provides oppor- Page 21.15.1 tunities for students from the laboratories of our Japanese collaborators to come to Rice for short-term research internships. Since 2008, 60 Japanese students have come to Rice for research through this pro- gram. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013

Conference Session

Aerospace Division (AERO) Technical Session 2

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Waterloo Tsutsui, Purdue University ; Vladimir Zeltsman, Purdue University ; Tyler Scott Adams, Purdue University ; Jitesh H. Panchal, Purdue University ; Daniel Delaurentis, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Aerospace Division (AERO)

, previously reported to enhance aerospace structural education [20], [21], could beleveraged alongside SoS-inspired approaches. To this end, these virtual labs could serve astangible reinforcement for the SoS-inspired ontology, fostering better comprehension, semanticconsistency, and interoperability in engineering education. Integrating game-based learning andSoS-inspired ontology into virtual labs could amplify student understanding of the subjectmatter.2.2 Ontology in Collaborative EnvironmentWithin a collaborative environment, ontologies are essential in ensuring a streamlined processthat fosters alignment and seamless data sharing among diverse contributors [22]. This alignmentencompasses shared terminology researchers employ across disciplines

Collection

2019 PPC

Authors

Lewis Burke

Advancing Engineering Education and Research Outlook and Strategy for 2019 Miriam Quintal and Otto Katt Lewis-Burke Associates, LLC February 5, 2019Lewis-Burke and ASEE• Lewis-Burke began representing ASEE in October 2017 – 27 policy experts with range of expertise/backgrounds allow multi-layered issue teams with deep expertise in agencies and scientific/education areas – 38 clients exclusively composed of non-profit entities: universities, scientific societies, managers of large federal facilities• Goals of ASEE Advocacy – Conducting outreach to Congress to support funding and sound policy for engineering research and education – Supporting ASEE Councils to enhance advocacy goals of deans and

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Arlene Russell, University of California, Los Angeles; Patricia Carlson, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Warren Waggenspack, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge; Warren Hull, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge; william Monroe, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge; Chester Wilmot, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge

AC 2009-405: ENGINEERING EDUCATION: ORAL AND VISUALCOMMUNICATION USING ENHANCED CALIBRATED PEER REVIEWArlene Russell, University of California, Los Angeles Arlene Russell is a Senior Lecturer at UCLA in both the Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry and in the Department of Education. She was a co-PI on the Molecular Science Project under which the Calibrated Peer ReviewTM (CPR) program was developed. Her work in science education has been recognized by awards from the New York Film and Television Association for excellence in science videotape production; the Smithsonian Institution for her educational innovation using technology, the Chemistry Manufacturing Association for her

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Effects on Student Learning

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jennifer Harper Ogle, Clemson University; Jeffery M Plumblee II, Clemson University; David E Vaughn, Clemson University; Aaron S. Gordon, Clemson University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering

in an engineering education setting,provides a framework for its use, and discusses the benefits to students, faculty, and society. Thepaper provides highlights of an application of the translational research model at ClemsonUniversity in which students in multidisciplinary teams research novel and adapted solutions tosocietal problems, work through multiple funding sources, and collaborate with communitystakeholders to implement infrastructure solutions. The facets of translational research will bedefined, as well as differentiated from problem-based learning and service-learning. Initial datasupporting the educational outcomes gained from this learning style will be discussed. Overall,the case is made for the expansion of translational

Conference Session

Trends in ME Education Poster Session

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Yakov Cherner

that such dynamic linkingis an important feature in many effective educational software designs. The framework enablesdiverse components to co-exist while sharing resources on a computer.Simulations, virtual experiments, dynamic graphs, tables, streaming video, students’ notebooks,journals, e-mail and collaboration tools can be "plugged" together in desired configurations toallow them to collaborate thereby attaining added functionality. Page 9.792.1Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & ExpositionCopyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering EducationFig. 1 The module “Plumbing

Conference Session

International Division Technical Session 8

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bill Williams, ESTBarreiro, Setubal Polytechnic Institute; Phillip C. Wankat, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Pedro Neto P.E., Polytechnic Institute of Setubal ; Carlos Alexandre Tiago, ESTBarreiro, IPS

Tagged Divisions

International

of 24,172 papers in engineering education research journals and conference proceedings overthe period 2000-2011 (Xian and Madhavan, 2014) has found that in-state collaboration within the US issignificantly more frequent than between-state collaboration which suggests that geographical locationcan strongly influence how scholars form collaborations.The three empirical studies above focused on the most published authors and those with whom they co- Page 24.828.2authored but do not provide information on what sources these scholars consulted when carrying outtheir work. Even if published research in the principal journals and conferences

Conference Session

Nanomaterials for Learners of All Ages!

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Placid Ferreira; Martha Atwater; Kenneth Roberts; Jagannathan Sankar; Deborah Bartz; Dhananjay Kumar; Devdas Pai; Cindy Waters

at both the undergraduate and graduate level. Many ofthe doctoral engineering students at A&T have focused on advanced materials for their research.The collaboration between UIUC and A&T grew out of common research interests in the areasof nanoparticulate filled polymers and sensors and the desire to go beyond research into theundergraduate and graduate classroom. The following sections outline the curricular componentsand outreach activities that address nanoscience and engineering education. In addition, studentsfrom A&T will participate in UIUC’s REU programs and graduate students work inNanoCEMMS labs on UIUC’s campus.Undergraduate curriculumMaterials Science (MEEN 260)At the undergraduate level, broadest impact is being

Conference Session

Special Topics

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Moshe Hartman; Harriet Hartman

; Page 7.256.1 Exposition Copyright 2002, American Society for Engineering Education”course atmosphere (including competitiveness, time spent on course, the pace and workload)8; pedagogyused all too often in engineering schools, emphasizing competition, weeding outindividual achievement,and autonomous (as opposed to collaborative) work have been seen as contributing to a “chilly climate”for women in particular7, 9, 10,11, 12, leading to women’s dissatisfaction with the course of study,alienation, and beliefs that they cannot succeed or do not have the ability or knowledge to succeed in thescience, mathematics & engineering disciplines13,14,15. Satisfaction with their major is negativelyaffected by students’ feelings of social

Collection

2000 Annual Conference

Authors

Hamid Y. Eydgahi; Saeid Y. Eidgahy

Global Engineering Education: Benefits and Limitations of Distance Education By Hamid Y. Eydgahi Dean/Associate Professor Engineering and Industrial Technologies Lima Technical College 4240 Campus Drive, Lima, Ohio 45804-3597 Phone: (419) 995-8230 Fax: (419) 995-8095 Eydgahih@ltc.tec.oh.us And Saeid Y. Eidgahy, Ph.D. Dean/Professor

Collection

1998 Annual Conference

Authors

Thomas R. Williams; Judith Ramey

column addresses the secondmajor failing of many curriculum proposals written by engineering educators: an apparentunfamiliarity with the literature of instructional theory, as evidenced by a paucity of citations tothat literature. For instance, assuming that it indeed is the case that traditional approaches toteaching physics are "too abstract," that they are "ineffective," and that they adversely affectstudent recruitment to the sciences and engineering, what evidence exists that would suggest that"hands-on" or collaborative versions of freshman physics would ameliorate the problem? Or, inthe absence of such evidence, what can at least be inferred from the similar work of others? Ifthere is no research directly related to the teaching of

Conference Session

LEES Session 8: Care and Commitments

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Marie Stettler Kleine, Colorado School of Mines; Elizabeth Reddy, Colorado School of Mines; Jessica Smith, Colorado School of Mines

about ethical practice and facilitate collaboration [1]. While engineering codes of ethicsdo not necessarily mobilize care, as Warford [2] notes, that does not make care unimportant:“The absence of care from the most visible normative value statements in the profession... isproblematic.” Indeed, care is increasingly visible in engineering education scholarship. Even as itemerges as an important mode of discussion and action, care is an unstable category andmobilized to mean different things in different contexts.Though care may not be present in many statements about the profession, engineering educationscholars are writing about it. For many scholars, care for students can guide faculty to enhanceindividual relationships through various

Conference Session

Ethics, Mindfulness, and Reform During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Thomas A. De Pree, University of New Mexico; Sarah Appelhans, University at Albany-SUNY; Alan Cheville, Bucknell University; Atsushi Akera, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Melissa Shuey, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

, participant observation, and digital archivingfrom March 2019 to August 2019, during the initial impacts of COVID-19 in the United States.The collaborative research that undergirds this paper is ongoing, and what is presented here is arough and early articulation of ideas and research findings that have begun to emerge throughour engagement with engineering educators for change.This paper begins by introducing an image concept that will guide our analysis of how, in thishistorical moment, forms of social and racial justice are finding their way into the practices ofengineering educators through slight changes in pedagogical techniques in response thedebilitating impacts of the pandemic. Conceptually, we are interested in how small and subtlechanges

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics II

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Richard Theis, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Prescott; patricia watkins, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Library; Mary Angela Beck, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

AC 2008-968: PATHWAYS TO LEARNING: ORCHESTRATING THE ROLE OFSUSTAINABILITY IN ENGINEERING EDUCATIONRichard Theis, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Prescottpatricia watkins, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Library MLIS, Research and Reference Instruction LibrarianMary Angela Beck, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Assistant Professor of Humanities and Communications Page 13.966.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Pathways to Learning: Orchestrating the Role of Sustainability in Engineering EducationAbstractThe 2001 Action Plan put forth by the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) articulatesthe

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hamid Vakilzadian, University of Nebraska, Lincoln; Dietmar Moeller, University of Hamburg

Engineering. His current research interests include computational modelling and simulation, e-Learning, transportation, air-transport systems, aeronautical engineering, robotics, and embedded systems. Page 14.999.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Qualification and Assessment Requirements for Simulation-Based Electrical Engineering EducationAbstractModeling and Simulation (M&S) is a discipline for developing an understanding of theinteraction of the parts or of a whole system. The level of understanding developed usingM&S is rarely achievable using other disciplines. However

Conference Session

Classroom Engagement

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Keith Holbert, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

(EPAR),” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 86, no. 2, April 1997, pp. 183-187.11. S.K. Starrett, M.M. Morcos, “Hands-on, minds-on electric power education,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 90, no. 1, Jan. 2001, pp. 93-99.12. C.J. Finelli, A. Klinger, D.D. Budny, “Strategies for improving the classroom environment,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 90, no. 4, Oct. 2001, pp. 491-497.13. S. Shooter, M. McNeill, “Interdisciplinary collaborative learning in mechatronics at Bucknell University,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 91, no. 3, July 2002, pp. 339-344.14. T. W. Simpson, H. J. Thevenot, “Using product dissection to integrate product family design research into the classroom and improve

Conference Session

Curricula of the Past, Present, and Future

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Thomas Litzinger, Pennsylvania State University; Robert Pangborn, Pennsylvania State University; David Wormley, Pennsylvania State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Engineering Design Course,” in “Shaping Our World,Century II,” Proceedings of 1993 ASEE Conference, pp. 883-888, Urbana-Champaign, IL, June, 1993.4 Sathianathan, D., R. Devon, N. Kallas, and R. Engel, “First-Year Design Curriculum at Penn State” InternationalConference on Engineering Education, Proceedings Volume II, p. 597-610, 1997.5 Sathianathan, D., “Faculty Collaboration and Course Coordination in Geographically Dispersed Campuses,”Frontiers in Education, CD-publication, Session TID, 1997.6 Sathianathan, D., “Curriculum Coordination and Faculty Collaboration among Multiple Campuses,” ASEE –Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration Proceedings. pp. 53-56, 1997.7 Maughmer, M.D., and D. W. Jensen, “Enhancing the Aerospace Education

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Prateek Shekhar, University of Michigan; Aileen Huang-Saad, University of Michigan

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

intended outcomes of engineering education reforms. Inaddition, although the engineering entrepreneurship community (e.g. ASEE and KEEN)has provided a platform for researchers to interact and collaborate on improving variousassessment-related areas, a lack of communication of desired learning outcomes and theirconceptions can lead to further promulgation of terminologies such as EM in the 6community without any concrete description of what they entail in the broader realm ofengineering entrepreneurship education.Table 2: Summary of articles Reference Entrepreneurial Defining Guiding Sources Mindset – skills or

Conference Session

Methodological & Theoretical Contributions to Engineering Education 1

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lauren D. Thomas, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

, individual ability, and personal responsibilities are also a part ofthe intellectual strand. The institutional strand focuses on identity based on affiliation and rolewithin the university and field. There are also institutional structures, resources, andresponsibilities that have an important influence on the identity of an early academic. Thenetwork strand includes professional relationships, organizations, and collaborations thatcontribute to professional identity. The three strands allow for a rich analysis of the complexnature of identity and how it evolves through time.This framework was used in an engineering education doctoral dissertation9 to explore theexperience of graduate students in optics and photonics. The findings of the study

Conference Session

NSF Grantees' Poster Session

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mary E. Sunderland, University of California, Berkeley; Joonhong Ahn, University of California, Berkeley; Cathryn Carson, University of California, Berkeley; William E. Kastenberg, University of California, Berkeley

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Paper ID #6372Making Ethics Explicit: Relocating Ethics to the Core of Engineering Educa-tionDr. Mary E. Sunderland, University of California, Berkeley Dr. Mary Sunderland is a historian of science and technology. She studies the history and philosophy of engineering education as a way to better understand the changing societal role of the engineer. Her work on engineering ethics has appeared in Science and Engineering Ethics. She developed and teaches the course, Ethics, Engineering, and Society at the University of California Berkeley’s College of Engineering and is an instructor in UC Berkeley’s Minner Program in

Collection

ASEE 2021 Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference

Authors

Ronald E. Barr P.E., University of Texas at Austin

should be presented, in both computer and freehand sketching modes. 4. The course should lend itself to design analysis and digital prototyping. 5. The classroom space for the course should be arranged to facilitate collaboration among the instructor and the students, and among the student members within each team. Proceedings of the 2021 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference Baylor University, Waco, TX Copyright © 2021, American Society for Engineering Education 3 The Collaboratory SpaceThe word “collaboratory” is used to describe a creative space where a group of people

Conference Session

Capstone Design & Project Courses

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

P. Ruby Mawasha, Wright State University; Kumar Yelamarthi, Wright State University; J. Mitch Wolff, Wright State University; Joseph Slater, Wright State University; Zhiqiang Wu, Wright State University

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering

Education, 2007 An Integrated Interdisciplinary Technology Project in Undergraduate Engineering EducationAbstractThe ever changing engineering curriculum mandates an emphasis on interdisciplinary projects.Through interdisciplinary projects, students will be exposed to a curriculum that allows them towork in teams of multi-disciplinary members with focus geared towards integrated technologies.This effort requires collaboration of students and faculty from multiple disciplines, and providesstudents an opportunity to learn from several other engineering systems. In addition, theseprojects will also help students to learn and deal with the societal aspects of engineering.The main focus of the paper is the