institutions. One reason for implementing a journal was to personalize the course for this25%, including older students who often feel disinterested or out of place in a 100-level course.Reflective journaling was constructed on three core principles. Students should (1) considertheir own expectations for personal learning in courses; (2) practice establishing and monitoringacademic, personal, and/or professional goals; and (3) engage in honest self-reflection that isshared with their instructor. The journal tool in Blackboard provides a private communicationspace between student and instructor. Having appropriate and meaningful prompts is critical forguiding students on what to write about. Prompts are designed to accommodate students atvarious points
Engineering Education, vol. 99, no. 4, pp. 319–336,2010.[29] A. Dutt, M. Ismail, and T. Herawan, “A systematic review on educational data mining,”IEEE Access, vol. 5, pp. 15991–16005, 2017.[30] R. Asif, A. Merceron, S. Abbas Ali, and N. Ghani Haider, “Analyzing undergraduatestudents' performance using educational data mining,” Computers & Education, vol. 113, pp.177–194, 2017.[31] A. I. Adekitan and O. Salau, “The impact of engineering students’ performance in thefirst three years on their graduation result using educational data mining,” Heliyon, vol. 5, no. 2,2019.[32] A. Charitopoulos, M. Rangoussi, and D. Koulouriotis, “Educational data mining and dataanalysis for optimal learning content management: Applied in Moodle for
contemporary perspectives, culture, human and organizational behavior, aesthetics and ecology and their impacts on society including the history and heritage of the civil engineering profession.9. a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in, life-long learning. (ABET i) Commentary: Life-long learning mechanisms available for personal and professional development include additional formal education, continuing education, professional practice experience, active involvement in professional societies, community service, coaching, mentoring, and other learning and growth activities. Personal and professional development can include developing
strain and they need to have an ability to use and interpret data graphs. Further, Iseem to jump from stress and strain to the connection between the graph and material behavior.Dr. Middendorf predicts this sort of realization: “we have found that everyone who takes thiswork seriously starts with a bottleneck and then finds that within that bottleneck lie many morebottlenecks…. Think of the layers of the onion metaphor” (personal communication, August 6,2012). One expert move that I seem to make, therefore, is the use and interpretation of datagraphs, something that may be a bottleneck for my students. The conversation continues,exploring how we, as scientists and engineers, use graphs and we muse about where students gethung up. We agree that
based on the analysis of quantitative (surveydata, data on participation to workshops) and qualitative (observations and interviews) data. Theanalysis supports the need for student champions to develop a community of practice andmentorship and structure for peer teaching topics and content in an extracurricular setting. Futurework suggests a more structured series of design workshops.BackgroundExtracurricular Design LearningResearch has shown the positive effect of extracurricular activities and projects on designlearning. Dukart indicated strong findings that extracurricular project-based experiential learning(EPBEL) experiences can have a positive impact on satisfaction in undergraduate engineeringstudents, enhance their experience, and give
to which thesestudents participate, and the impact of this participation on their development and academicperformance12. Amenkhienan and Kogan also state that student involvement pertains to one‟spersonal initiative and commitment to his/her academics12. It involves going beyond therequirements of a course and engaging in non-required activities such as reading self-assignedmaterial, attending tutorials, and seeking academically-related contact with peers and faculty. Areview of the literature recommends including the use of instructional approaches (e.g.orientations, workshops, or credit-no credit classes) to serve first-year students, high-riskstudents, and or under-represented students; suggested topics include orientation to policies
Paper ID #39301In/authenticity in STEM Social Networks: How ”Out” are LGBTQ Studentswith their Peers in STEM?Dr. Bryce E. Hughes, Montana State University - Bozeman Bryce E. Hughes is an Associate Professor in Adult and Higher Education at Montana State University. His research interests encompass diversity and equity in engineering education, with a focus on LGBTQ students. He was recently awarded an NSF CAREER grant to study the experiences of LGBTQ under- graduates in STEM fields. He holds a Ph.D. in education from the University of California, Los Angeles, an M.A. in student development administration from Seattle
during the COVID-19 pandemic.” 2020.[9] C. Woolston. “Signs of depression and anxiety soar among US graduate students during pandemic.” Nature, pp. 147-148. 2020.[10] S. D. Molock, & B. Parchem. “The impact of COVID-19 on college students from communities of color.” Journal of American College Health, pp. 1-7. 2020.[11] A. M. Lederer, M. T. Hoban, S. K. Lipson, S. Zhou, & D. Eisenberg. “More than inconvenienced: The unique needs of US college students during the COVID-19 pandemic.” Health Education & Behavior, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 14-19. 2021.[12] S. Rudenstine, K. McNeal, T. Schulder, C. K. Ettman. M. Hernandez, K. Gvozdieva, & S. Galea. “Depression and anxiety during the covid‐19 pandemic
teamwork dimensions is equally important to team success and acritical element in the peer evaluations [8].Peer evaluations facilitate better learning outcomes in upper level education, encouragingstudents to continue their engagement with constructive team behavior in future teamactivities[13]. A peer evaluation is an assessment of an individual’s contribution to a workactivity by their peers, either as students, or as professionals in industry. Peer evaluationshelp to teach individuals and teams how to act and how to assess one another’s performance.Peer evaluations, as facilitated by CATME and its behavior anchored rating system, provide astrong model for facilitating the learning of teamwork behavior [14, 15].Research MethodsI. CATME Peer
engineeringidentity contributes to the internal and external environments of BSTiE. Figure 3: Framework for students’ engineering identity adapted from Hazari et al. [15] and expanded by Godwin [12] Fleming et al. [11] found that Black students felt a strong sense of community culturalcommitment as they took on engineering. Students felt like their degrees were greater than them andthus felt motivated to enter and persist in engineering. Students noted how a shared identity with peerspositively influenced their identity development. Even further, students viewed their roles as engineersin tandem with their racial identity. When asked to identify characteristics of engineers, they includedpossessive markers like “we” and “our.” While some may
. Her research has focused on the sources and effects of personal efficacy beliefs. She is the director of the P20 Motivation and Learning Lab.Dr. Joseph H. Hammer, University of Kentucky Associate Professor of Counseling PsychologyDr. Sarah A. Wilson, University of Kentucky Sarah Wilson is a lecturer in the Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering at the University of Kentucky. She completed her bachelor’s degree at Rowan University in New Jersey before attending graduate school for her PhD at the University of Massachusetts in Amherst, MA. Her research interests in- clude engineering communication, process safety, and undergraduate student mental health. Recently, she was awarded an NSF RIEF grant to
Description2.1 Objective and Outcomes Page 23.827.4The course focuses on enhancing student's understanding of major issues that impact theengineering profession, and on improving their non-technical skills and ability to formjudgments based on literature analysis and available data. The course formal objectives were todevelop the engineering student as a professional able to better engage and address the ethical,global, political and social issues of engineering using logical and informed judgment.The course design was guided by input from the engineering employers in the industry throughthe department of mechanical engineering’s Industry Advisory Board
, knowledge sharing, and camaraderie.The impact of building such a community extends beyond mere social interaction. It plays acrucial role in enhancing academic performance, as students are more likely to thrive in anenvironment where they feel supported and engaged. By fostering relationships among peers,students can access a wealth of knowledge and resources that contribute to their growth anddevelopment as aspiring engineers [1]. Furthermore, the formation of a robust engineeringcommunity provides students with opportunities to engage in extracurricular activities thatcomplement their academic pursuits. Trips, projects, and competitions organized by the SMEchapter offer students practical, hands-on experiences that supplement classroom learning
learning styles (our specific choice of techniques being based upon our experienceand the limited time in the course), several of these techniques proved to be valuable to manystudents.The next four sections discuss the set of choices we made and the practices we implemented inthe course. They include background on each of these, as well as our assessments of how wellthey worked, and results from the student feedback we gathered.3. Designing the Course around ReflectionFor students to learn and for their learning to last, they must be engaged in the material. Weexpected some resistance to learning “soft skills” because most engineering students had gonethrough their academic lives largely by working on their own and so had become accustomed tothis
to whole. A flexible problem-based learning environment develops fromthe perspective of the student, is coherent and relevant for learners and puts the teacher ina role as facilitator helping learners develop understanding from the whole concepts totheir native parts ( adapted from Center for Problem Based Learning website).The value of a team: Research notes that solo status (i.e. working alone) has moredetrimental impact on women and under-represented minorities than on white males (Thompson and Sekaquaptewa, 2002). A team is more than the sum of the parts. Aslearners engage more complex problems, they need to draw on a multitude of expertise.Carl Larson and Frank LaFasto (LaFasto, 2000) in their landmark study of excellentteams, drawn
study groups. 3. Active learning methods engage students in the learning process by encouraging them to discover, process, and apply information. Empirical support for the positive impact of active learning on student achievement is extensive. Examples:The instructor... • Challenges or engages student assumptions • Demonstrates active listening • Models thinking and problem-solving; works through problems, scenarios, arguments with students • Assigns student activities that involve one or more of the following1: o active use of writing, speaking, and other forms of self-expression o opportunity for information gathering, synthesis, and analysis in solving problems
that non-ECP students exhibit a significantly higher proportion of C grades,approximately 40%, compared to ECP students, who have a mere 10%. This implies that non-ECP students encounter greater challenges in comprehending the course material and facedifficulties in attaining higher grades.DiscussionThe results of this study provide insight into the significant impact of hands-on pedagogy onenhancing peer learning, collaboration, and curiosity among undergraduate chemistry students.By integrating active learning techniques, laboratory experiments, and interactive teachingmethodologies, students exhibited significant enhancements in their engagement, capacity forcollaboration, and curiosity.One of the key aspects illuminated by this study is
of Corroding Materials, III. The Impact of Anode/CathodeSizes. Our objectives in developing this module were to address the need for clear bridgesbetween math, science and technology in the engineering curriculum and to provide a means offaculty development primarily at community colleges. As a result, it was designed to allow theengineering student to experience the synergy of science, math and engineering technology in alaboratory setting. Recent findings in learning theory research were used in the design of themodule to reach students of diverse learning styles. Our targeted audience is sophomoreengineering majors at community colleges and institutions without Materials Science andEngineering programs. In this paper we will present the
Emerging Ethnic Engineers (E3) Program. She teaches Calculus 1 during the Summer Bridge program and instructs Cooperative Calculus 1 during the school year. Continuing with her commitment to community involvement, Whitney has previously served on the Na- tional Executive Board for the National Society of Black Engineers, a student-managed organization with more than 30,000 members. She served as the Planning Chairperson for the 2013 Annual Convention and is currently an advisor for the Great Lakes Region. Dr. Gaskins the President of the Sigma Omega graduate chapter of Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Inc. She is also a member of the Society of Women Engineers, the Women’s Alliance, the National Technical Association
for graduate school. Some of these activitieswere sponsored by Texas A&M University’s Office of Undergraduate Research and involvedparticipants from other REU and undergraduate research programs. Others providedopportunities for participants and their mentors to come together and exchange ideas andexperiences and to begin to establish a research community on themes related to imaging.Career DevelopmentStudents were introduced to research conventions and opportunities through a weekly CareerDevelopment series. The program provided lunch to encourage an informal atmosphere withplenty of student-faculty and student-student engagement. The Career Development seriesincluded a Career Day in which TAMU alumni were invited to discuss their own
mistakes may have contributed to the mishap. We cannot improve on whatwe regard as a masterful contribution to the literature describing high technology organizations.No, it is instead the Paul model which is under examination. Our question was solely whether thePaul model was adequate to the purpose of opening the CAIB report and its complexities to ourundergraduate students in ways that they could retain and apply.A Critical Thinking Model For Engineering Engineers and scientists are quite comfortable working within the context of conceptual Page 13.1244.2models. We employ thermodynamic models, electrical models, mathematical models
of metacognitive knowledge has been shown to negatively impacts students’affect as well as harm the behaviors that impact their learning [5]. Yet instructors do nothabitually refer to metacognitive skills to ensure that students develop them and researchershave been calling for more to be done to make students aware of these skills[5].Recently, researchers found that it is possible to encourage improvements in student metacog-nition [9]. They measured students’ metacognition using the Metacognitive Awareness In-ventory (MAI), an instrument which was originally developed by Schraw and Dennison[11].They found that students’ scores on the instrument improved from the beginning of thesemester to the end. These were students in their Junior year
comprising four differentiated campuses that positively impact the economic,social, cultural and environmental health of the communities it serves. Its research is inspired byreal world application, blurring the boundaries that traditionally separate academic disciplines.ASU serves more than 63,000 students in metropolitan Phoenix, Arizona, the nation’s fifthlargest city. ASU champions intellectual and cultural diversity, and welcomes students from allfifty states and more than one hundred nations.Enrollment at ASU in Fall 2007 reached a record 64,394 students, growing by nearly 9,000students since 2002 according to another part of that website (http://asunews.asu.edu/20070925).All four ASU locations experienced increases, with the greatest gains at
citizens of the world—but who is going to address them and on whatterms?The recent outcome-based criteria developed by the Accreditation Board for Engineering andTechnology (ABET) stipulate that graduates develop: e) An ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems; and h) The broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context (ABET 2003).Nowhere in the eleven ABET outcomes criteria, however, is there reference to creativity or theneed to teach creativity to students. What kind of engineering problems are future engineersgoing to solve? If they are to solve the critical issues surrounding the infrastructure, economicdevelopment, and the natural environment
our current courses throughparticipation in a RHIT-sponsored Sustainability Teaching Network (STN). This community ofpractice (CoP) created time and space for faculty across departments and programs to developcourse updates and provided modest financial compensation for our development work. Ignitedby this CoP, our course updates benefited from a transdisciplinary approach, as Dugan is inmechanical engineering and Chenette is in chemical engineering. This CoP also let us betteralign what we do in the classroom with industry expectations and with our institutions’ newstrategic plan, which has a theme around infusing sustainability into education [7].We embarked on this study to understand students’ learning, interest, and reception of
follow through with their agreed-upon roles and responsibilities PI_4_2 Understand vision of where the team is going and agreed-upon and understood goals PI_4_3 Understand impact of programs delivered to clientele PI_4_4 Established process for communication among team members that allows for efficient and open information sharing in a timely manner SO9: Recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning PI_9_1 Demonstrate self-managing ability to articulate student's own learning goals PI_9_2 Demonstrate self-monitoring ability to assess student's own achievements PI_9_3 Demonstrate self-modifying ability to make mid-course
engineering tools necessary for engineering practice. The system design result wassomewhat unexpected, but students often designed laboratory experimental apparatus and/orwere cognizant of how their research results could improve the design of existing systems tominimize negative environmental and/or human health impacts. Design ability was also thelowest rated item on the pre-survey at 1.91. The ability to engage in life-long learning was thehighest rated item on the post survey, averaging 3.8. Written and oral communication did notshow gains (difference 0.1). This indicates that the single formal oral presentation at the end ofthe program and the two significant written deliverables (proposal and final report) were notperceived by the students to
]. ii. Methodological innovations are difficult to adopt by a large percentage of teachers [2], [6]. iii. An institutional training program needs a convergence of conditions to sustain effectiveness: institutional support, economic and human resources, collaborative culture, and basic agreements and decisions on the characteristics of the educational system to be achieved [7]. iv. Knowledge is situated in the day-to-day lived experiences of teachers and best understood through critical reflection with others who share the same experience [8]. v. Learning communities actively engage teachers in professional learning courses, increase their professional knowledge and enhance student learning [8], [9]. vi. Mastering teachers
Paper ID #41888Case Study: Civil Engineering Student Mental Health and Watching Football?Dr. Angela R Bielefeldt, University of Colorado Boulder Angela Bielefeldt is a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder in the Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE) and Director of the Integrated Design Engineering (IDE) program. IDE offers a BS degrees accredited under the general criteria of the ABET EAC and a new PhD degree in Engineering Education. Her research interests include sustainability, social responsibility, ethics, and community engagement. Bielefeldt is a licensed P.E. in
there are differences in the skills or attributes of innovativeness within thosesubgroups. These interviews will add to the weight of evidence that establishes the core set ofinnovative skills and help determine whether those skills vary in any significant way across thesubgroups or across engineering disciplines. We plan to create and validate a new instrument based on community-derived factors toassess the development of these factors within engineering students and practicing engineers. Itis our premise that there is no single “ideal” profile of innovativeness that leads to success.Instead, we expect to find diverse profiles (i.e., different combinations and degrees of the keyinnovativeness factors) that vary by individual, by context