University of Saskatchewan, are not research institutes, degreefactories, or simply storehouses of knowledge. They acquire their distinctive character by theircapacity to unite scholarship with teaching. Scholarship involves the discovery of newknowledge, its integration and synthesis, and its application to new or persistent problems.Teaching requires not just the effective communication of this knowledge, but the creation of acapacity for criticism and self-examination. Given this University's strong commitment toresearch, and its equally strong commitment to a broad range of educational programs, it makessense to place a high value on research that has an impact on the learning experience of students,and a high value on teaching that is informed
hasthe strongest impact on students’ academic performance and their attitudes towards engineeringprofession 3. Despite of the fact that many students may have been academically prepared andmotivated to study engineering, 50% of students who enter engineering programs as freshman donot earn an engineering degree 1, 2. The gap between engineers needed annually and the numberof graduates available to fill positions is still wide 4, 5. Instructors are confronted by the task ofconveying a general knowledge base to non-majors while simultaneously laying the foundationfor continued study by majors. Teaching electrical engineering (EE) and electrical engineeringtechnology (EET) hands-on courses to non-majors has been recognized by a number
at the University of Illinois and served as the director of Curriculum and Service-Learning for the Social Entrepreneurship Institute in the College of Busi- ness. She has taught service-learning courses in various disciplines and has collaborated on, and traveled abroad with students participating in, international service-learning projects in engineering. Her profes- sional and research interests are in (international) service-learning, social entrepreneurship, humanitarian engineering, community-engaged scholarship, instructor training and professional development, and the scholarship of teaching and learning.Dr. Laura D Hahn, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Laura Hahn holds a Ph.D. in
. She received her Bachelors of Engineering from MIT. Her research focuses on the nontraditional engineering student – understanding their motivations, identity development, and impact of prior engineering-related experiences. Her work dwells into learning in informal settings such as summer camps, military experiences, and extra-curricular activities. Other research interests involve validation of CFD models for aerospace applications as well as optimizing efficiency of thermal-fluid systems.Dr. Cheryl Q. Li, University of New Haven Cheryl Qing Li joined University of New Haven in the fall of 2011, where she is a Senior Lecturer of the Industrial, System & Multidisciplinary Engineering Department. Li earned her
’ tinkering Page 26.1500.10practices are coupled with their local emotions, which could impact their engagement withdesign.DiscussionThough tinkering may not lead to generalizable content learning, we argue that it often has valueas an engineering disciplinary practice. This work sheds light on how tinkering emerges in thedesign process, the ways in which tinkering might be productive for design, and how tinkeringmight impact student engagement.In the case of Hazel and Silver, tinkering was a productive part of their process and helped themengage in more systematic unpacking of concepts. While tinkering, they utilized resourceswithout getting too
semester cateringmainly to the sophomore students in which the content from a traditional 15-week, 3-credit classis compressed into a shorter 7.5 week, 2-credit class. For the Fall 2015 semester a projectcomponent was added to study the impact of a hands-on activity towards learning effectivenessand team work among students. Four or five member student teams conducted an air-cannonexperiment based on projectile motion, energy and momentum conservation theory. Thecorresponding range and the time of flight was measured and compared with the theoreticalvalues obtained from standard equations of motion therefore isolating the drag effect on theprojectile flight characteristics. Each team was surveyed on how well they thought such anactivity fulfilled
seminars on preparing students for academia, and post-doctoralworkshops on grantsmanship. This paper summarizes these grantsmanship development eventsin the form of lessons that junior engineering faculty can apply when constructing an entireproposal.Each proposal contributes to a faculty member’s reputation and must be approached withthoughtful attention to this end. Common struggles in proposal development include: setting andmaintaining a timeline to the proposal deadline, creating goals and objectives and using them toorganize a proposal, writing a proposal to sell an idea to a funding agency and not as amanuscript for publication, and focusing text to address review criteria, especially the NSFbroader impacts review criterion. Carefully
Paper ID #11964Time Management Skills and Student Performance in Online CoursesProf. Susan L. Miertschin, University of Houston (CoT) Susan L. Miertschin, M.Ed., M.S.I.S., is an Associate Professor teaching in the Computer Information Systems program at University of Houston. Her teaching interests are in the areas of (1) information systems applications development and the complementary nature of back-end developer and front-end developer skill sets and (2) managing IT services. Her research interests are program and student as- sessment, the impact of instructional technology on student learning, and the improvement of e
with responsibilities for undergraduate student re- cruitment and engagement, K-12 programming, career services, residential-based learning communities, scholarships, and student government for the School of Engineering and Technology. She works very closely with current students. She is responsible for the Commitment to Engineering Excellence program which is a university funded program that provides scholarships and research funding for underrepre- sented students in engineering and engineering technology programs. Dr. Talbert-Hatch is also a Co-PI on a recently funded NSF STEM grant that provides scholarships, academic support, and career planning for 2nd year students with unmet financial need who are enrolled
literature, PDI deviates from current collaborativelearning approaches in one notable way: the authority in the classroom shifts from the facultymember(s) to Student Instructors (SI). These Student Instructors are students that previouslycompleted the course and returned to take on the responsibility for the design and delivery oflearning experiences in the classroom. Faculty, therefore, assume a coaching role with the SIsand no longer act as the source of knowledge, educational material, and content delivery for thecourse.This research paper delves into the impact that this learning experience has on studentmotivation. Using a survey developed based on the MUSIC Model of Academic MotivationInventory®, the authors asked students to report their
members; intercultural communication; effective virtual managementpractices, including work planning, meetings, and goal-setting; and the impacts of specifictechnological tools and choices on work outcomes, including for diverse global teams [40]–[42].Working remotely poses a number of challenges that apply directly to virtual internships.Gaining trust, engaging in effective communication, establishing shared interpretations oflanguage and expectations of technology, negotiating time zones and perception of time, andidentifying hierarchies and clear leadership roles are all challenges that interns and theirsupervisors face when working remotely [43]. As such, it is critical that efficient communicationand collaboration processes are carefully
. Urbana, Ill.: (ERIC Clearinghouse reading and Communication Skills.15. Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. Self-Explanations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Learning to Solve Problems. Cognitive Science, 13, 145-182 (1989).16. Chi, M. T. H., de Leeuw, N., Chiu, M. H., & LaVancher, C. Eliciting Self-Explanations Improves Understanding. Cognitive Science, 18, 439-477 (1994).17. Bielaczyc, K., Pirolli, P. L., Brown, A. L. (1995). Training in self-explanation and self-regulation strategies: Page 6.1158.7 Investigating the effects of knowledge acquisition activities on problem
idea or solution among alternatives Communication (COM) Communicate the design to others, write down a solution, or instructions Page 22.774.7Adopted from Atman 9Two graduate students were trained in the coding methodology using documents shared by theUniversity of Washington. While the coding scheme was consistent with previous literature, thetechnique was slightly different. Previous work used transcriptions, segmenting coding as threeseparate activities in the analysis process 9. Inter-rater reliability was calculated on the coding toensure reliability of the multiple coding analysts. The pilot phase of
between engineering profession andsocial responsibility (as reported by students based on their educational experience), Canney,Bielefeldt and their colleagues43 found that “... the ways in which students talk about theinteraction between engineering and society remained mostly at low level, bare minimumrelationships of public safety and providing infrastructure. Few students talked aboutcollaborative or co-creative relationships between engineering and society.”. They suggest that“In order to develop engineers with a broader understanding of the societal and cultural contextsin which they work, the students must first be guided to have broader views about how engineersand communities are to interact.”.43 In another study to explore which courses
opportunities that can improve FGS resilience and mediate the impact of stressors[4]. Researchers have explored the impact of SIP on student emotional intelligence, program satisfaction, andself-efficacy noting their impact on FGS retention [1-3]. This research seeks to expand the growing literature onSIP implementation through assessing FGS perceived stressors, use of academic supports, and perceived utilityof the support systems.The Molinaroli College of Engineering and Computing at the University of South Carolina serves approximately3,000 undergraduate students, representing close to 11% of the overall student body at the university. Inacademic year 2021-22, only 22.5% of the undergraduate students in the college were female. Black
Vanderbilt University focuses on teaching medical imaging at the high school level as a means of both covering physics and mathematics content and engaging students in real- world applications of engineering and biomedical imaging. This curriculum was tested in the summer of 2004 on seven high school students. The testing revealed that the curriculum had a very positive impact on student interest in biomedical imaging and resulted in several improvements and additions to the curriculum. The curriculum, testing, and future plans are described in this
and overestimation of the processing time of thesubmitted jobs in the system.1. IntroductionHigh performance computing offers an excellent vehicle to accelerate computational needs ofscientific and engineering applications. This platform currently can easily be configured withclusters of PCs connected through a high-speed switch on a high-speed network. Such a toolprovides exceptional opportunities to explore numerous projects for educational as well asresearch purposes. We have installed a Beowulf Cluster1 with 16 compute-nodes in ourcomputing lab, and have engaged our students with exciting projects in courses such asOperating Systems, Communication Networks, Parallel Programming, Distributed Simulation,Algorithms, Data Base Management, and
how their sense of identity is linked to daily actions in a school or workenvironment. In the wider STEM scholarship, scholars have demonstrated the impact of religious identityon students’ overall college experience, including the ability to see connections between religiousidentities and their STEM identities (e.g., Rodriguez et al., 2018).Within engineering, foundational research in this space found that college students use religion as a lensto understand their other identity dimensions (Cross, 2016). Religion has also been used as a copingmechanism and a way to connect with others within engineering (Cross, 2016). Overall, the relationshipbetween engineering identity and religious identity is complex and can vary depending on a wide
. He is nationally recognized for his work related to the safer design of makerspaces and collaborative STEM labs. Dr. Love is an Authorized OSHA Trainer for General Industry. He has also served on committees at state and national levels that developed P-12 engineering education standards. In recognition of his work, Dr. Love was awarded the 2022 ASEE mid-Atlantic section Best Paper Award, and has received numerous awards from the International Technology and Engineering Educators Association. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 An Evaluation of Prompt Engineering Strategies by College Students in Competitive Programming Tasks Sita V
not otherwise have the opportunity and those from underrepresented groups (female and ethnic minority), to cutting-edge STEM education research. Stimulate participating REU students to pursue graduate degrees and careers in teaching and STEM education research. Develop each REU student’s technical, communication, and teamwork skills by actively engaging them in all aspects of educational research – from literature review, research methods, data collection and analysis, to technical writing and oral presentations. Create a supportive educational community that involves REU students, graduate students, faculty mentors, and education professionals and administrators to promote STEM education. Evaluate
, pp. 70–81, 2014, doi: 10.1177/1354067X13515940.[27] M. S. Ross, J. L. Huff, and A. Godwin, “Resilient engineering identity development critical to prolonged engagement of Black women in engineering,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 92–113, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1002/jee.20374.[28] S. Secules et al., “Positionality practices and dimensions of impact on equity research: A collaborative inquiry and call to the community,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 19–43, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1002/jee.20377.[29] J. Saldaña, The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers, 3rd ed. 2016. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.[30] “NSBE Vision, Mission & Objectives - National Society
Construction. She has led diverse groups of student teams to Vietnam, Kenya,Belize, Guatemala and Haiti to complete construction projects and community engagement programs.Currently her work is focused in Belize and Africa. She also serves as a Faculty Fellow for the Sigma PhiEpsilon fraternity, is a Bridges to Prosperity Construction Mentor, serves on the Board of Directors andas a mentor for the ACE Mentoring program of Southeastern Pennsylvania and was elected as the firstAffiliate member of the Carpenters’ Company of the City and County of Philadelphia. In her spare timeshe enjoys working with non-profits such as Peacework and Habitat for Humanity, traveling, bee-keepingand scuba diving. c American Society for Engineering
; supporting diversity in STEM fields with an emphasis on lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and questioning (LGBTQ) students; and using the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) to improve students’ communication skills during group work.Mrs. Renata A Revelo Alonso, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Renata Revelo Alonso is a graduate student at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. She is in the Higher Education doctoral program in the department of Education Policy, Organization, and Leadership. She has Bachelor’s and Master’s degrees in Electrical Engineering from the same university. Her research interests include diversity, engagement, and identity.Katherine Earl Earl, University of Illinois at
fields since it promotes active andcollaborative learning while simultaneously promoting individual accountability, personalresponsibility, and communication skills [5].Addressing current challenges requires educators to increase their use of approaches that enhancelearning in the STEM classrooms. Experiential and active learning are two well-knownpedagogies that can benefit from a team-based approach. Experiential learning engages studentsin a real, rather than abstract, experience [6, 7]. Active learning enhances students’ ability toexercise lifelong learning by placing the learning responsibility on the learners themselves [8].Project-based learning, using a project to simulate student learning, is well-cited as an effectivepedagogy for
individualreflections to understand the process of ISE formation. Pre-post comparisons of the quantitativesurvey items will be conducted for individual students in the test and control courses. Team andindividual reflections from the test course will be analyzed after the course. Potentialdemographic differences in ISE will be explored. Potential team-level influences will also beevaluated to understand the impact of a team’s ISE score on enhancing an individual teammember’s ISE gain. Focus groups and individual interviews with students who participated in thetest course will take place in spring 2024. The ISE, INT, and IW of environmental engineeringstudents will be further assessed in spring 2024 through the ISE survey in the environmentalengineering
-authors[1] similarly developed a framework that details many opportunities to get involved on a singlecampus, linking the opportunities to a set of 20 student outcomes.Despite a wealth of knowledge on what outcomes students might gain from engagement in co-curricular activities, relatively few studies have explored what factors engineering studentsconsider when choosing to engage in these activities [14]–[16]. Furthermore, researchers exploringthe impact of engineering student engagement in co-curriculars have not yet looked at institutionalcontext in relation to students’ reasons for being engaged. As one example, literature has showndifferences in the experiences of residential and commuter students [17]. Holding a commuter orresidential status
learning styles and adaptive e-learning system: Current developments, problems and opportunities.”, Comp. in Hum. Behavior, vol 55, pp 1185 – 1193, 2016.[11] S. Zappe, R. Leicht, J. Messner, T. Litzinger, H.W. Lee, “’Flipping’ The Classroom To Explore Active Learning In A Large Undergraduate Course”, 2009 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference. Classroom Engagement in Educational Research and Methods. Austin, TX. June 2009. pp 14.1385.1 – 14.1385.21.[12] E. Alfonseca, R.M. Carro, E. Martin, A, Ortigosa, P. Paredes, “The impact of learning styles on grouping for collaborative learning: a case study”, User-Model-User-Adap. Inter., vol 16, pp 377 – 401, 2006.[13] H. Pachler, M
prepares students to engage insuccessful team behavior themselves, as per ABET Outcome 3d.This paper traces the development of engineering capstone courses at ERAU/Prescott, from thesolo instructor model through the team-teaching model to the current teaching team model,describes the evolution of one specific capstone course (Aircraft Detail Design) and as ajustification of the need for teaching teams, identifies the diverse professional backgrounds ofsome members that have joined teaching teams at ERAU/Prescott, outlines several benefits of theteaching team model, notes challenges that have arisen in integrating instructors and advisors withdiverse backgrounds into the teaching team, and suggests ways that solo instructors might beginto develop
is a program of KISS Institute for Practical Robotics, a private non-profiteducation and research organization that uses robotics as a means to engage students inscience, engineering, math, and computer programming. In Botball, teams of middle andhigh school age students are given two challenges: 1) build and program a team ofautonomous mobile robots to play the current tournament game; 2) create a website thatmeets this year’s defined challenges.The mission and purpose behind BotballBotball’s mission addresses three populations:For Educators: Botball exists to provide educators with knowledge, resources andequipment with which to foster an engaging and continuous hands-on learningenvironment for science, technology, engineering and math.For
eat in restaurants or engage inother social activities with the rest of the study abroad group. Differential access to resourcesmight result in differential leveraging of co-curricular programs. Because of substantial fundingbarriers to participation in co-curricular support, students from low socioeconomic backgroundsoften utilize financial aid refund check/dollars such as, grants, scholarships, and or loans asmonthly spending money for participation in all different types of co-curricular activities.Visibility and Perception One aspect of visibility is accessibility relating to placement, language, and format ofbranding, advertising, and physical artifacts, all of which impact who is aware of opportunities inco-curricular programs