NX CAE tool has been carried out and theresults compared with the results from 1D simulation have been compared with an earlier workthat used the AutoDesk simulation tool. The main design variables in these stands are thegeometry, material and safety factor. The teaching and learning outcomes of the work along withthe safety and ethical issues have been discussed. It is hoped that through this study the studentsdevelop a clear understanding of assumptions made in the CAD and FEA course topics onframes and how they address the CLOs.Introduction and Literature ReviewStructural analysis of space frames is not a new subject. There are numerous textbooks andresearch papers available on this topic [1-4]. In addition, several CAE tools have been
for the National STEM Digital Library).Dr. Christine E. Hailey, Utah State University Christine Hailey is Dean of the College of Engineering at Utah State University and a Professor of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering. She has served as a senior associate dean in the college and was the director of the National Center for Engineering and Technology Education, a National Science Foundation-funded center for learning and teaching. She was a member of the ADVANCE-US team, another NSF-funded program to address issues that impact the effectiveness and satisfaction of female faculty in the engineering and science colleges at USU
Engineering’s Harry L. Solberg Best Teacher Award (twice), Robert W. Fox Outstanding Instructor Award, and B.F.S. Schaefer Outstanding Young Faculty Scholar Award; the ASEE Mechanics Division’s Ferdinand P. Beer and E. Russell Johnston, Jr. Outstanding New Mechanics Educator Award; and the ASME C. D. Mote Jr., Early Career Award. In 2014 Dr. Rhoads was included in ASEE Prism Magazine’s 20 Under 40.Dr. Edward J. Berger, Purdue University at West Lafayette Edward Berger is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education and Mechanical Engineering at Purdue University, joining Purdue in August 2014. He has been teaching mechanics for over 20 years, and has worked extensively on the integration and assessment of specific
identifying they might need assistance and preemptively requesting tutoring assistance orjoining a student group. Once students were identified to have issues around Math literacy, theywere encouraged to be more proactive. This concern around Math (and Science) literacy wasreflected in several institutional retention policies in addressing the needs of NTs. Studentsshould be encouraged to seek tutoring assistance from available learning-centers, and facultyshould play an active role in continually identifying and recommending qualified students towork as tutors [7]. The successful implementation of these learning-centers consisted ofproviding adequate and appropriate facilities, preferably located in convenient locations for theseNT students
concerns regarding any partof the laboratory or design experiment. Table 1: Instructions on how to use the Mobile Studio IOBoardTM.EEGR 202 Dr. Yacob AstatkeMobile Studio (MS) Lab 4 – Thevenin Equivalent Circuit and Max Power Transfer1. Mobile Studio and Instrumentation BoardMS is a technology-based new learning tool comprising a tablet PC (or any PC) and an instrumentation board, whichreplaces most of the lab equipment. Therefore, MS allows a small foot print, mobile laboratory experiments anyplace any time. The measurement by MS is possible by a Windows-based software, Mobile Studio Desktop, whichis already installed in the tablet PCs. The icon for the Mobile Studio
mathematics by approximately 14 to 17 percentage points[4].In terms of career ambitions, Social Cognitive Career Theory [5] suggests experiences likeundergraduate research can impact career ambitions and student occupational self-efficacy.Students completing undergraduate research experiences often identify gains in self-efficacywhen asked to describe the impact of those experiences, with women being more likely toexpress gains in confidence [6].Pierszalowski et al. [7] suggest thirteen barriers to the undergraduate research experience,ranging from physical resource issues (frequently cited) to lack of faculty diversity (less oftencited). Frequently cited barriers that are also a concern for our department include lack of time,lack of faculty
content”;and the “computer software”. In addition, participants who had some equipment for a basicunderstanding of SMSs and robotics at the elementary level expressed their interest in adding someof the equipment introduced in the workshop, particularly the virtual reality equipment and theeducational robots to expand on what they already have. Participants’ responses regarding the challenges that they might face when trying todevelop a manufacturing education program at their educational institutions were also collected.According to the results, financial issues could be considered the most important barrier inadopting new and advanced technologies in educational programs, as it was mentioned by themajority of participants in statements
providingaccommodations that would result in several equal benefits and privileges.The second specific aim is to assess DHH student employment by conducting semi-structuredfocus group concerning the student employee’s work experience and their working relationshipwith the employer. DHH student employment would report it is beneficial for them to work witha deaf faculty-led student-centric organization.Based on first and second specific aims, it will allow DHH student employees to be on muchcloser equal baseline with their hearing peers.Background and ProjectsDespite recent improvements in the ability of DHH students to access information through theuse or adaptation of technologies such as the Internet, mobile devices, text messaging, andvideophones, these
the experiences of MFG 407 instructors regarding how to set up a project-based learning environment in the engineering course. Keywords Engineering education; Facilities Planning; Material Handling; Project-based learning.IntroductionProject-based learning (PBL) is any learning environment in which the problem drives thelearning 1. PBL emphasizes learning activities that are interdisciplinary, student-centered, andintegrated with real-world issues and practices 2. It is currently the most-favored pedagogicalmodel for teaching design 3 and has the following significant benefits as far as learning, workhabits, problem-solving capabilities, and self-esteem are concerned 2, 4-7: • PBL is learner-centered. It
7 35% Close faculty supervision and/or limited lab times 5 25% Other (please specify)* 2 10%*Two specific answers were given to this questionWireless capability will only be available in and around our new Technology Building. Studentswill have to register IP addresses and students who use the wireless will not be able to access ourcampus network.We began with teaching 802.11A; we now tone down the AP and use the available security toprevent unauthorized access.4. Would your capital budget support a shielded wireless laboratory environment includingwireless equipment and laboratory exercise supporting 12 students
acknowledged the need for engineers of the 21st century to havea broader skillset than in the past. For example, ASCE’s Civil Engineering Body of Knowledgeoutlines a vision for the profession that expands into areas such as sustainability, public policy,teamwork, and globalization [1]. ABET has also addressed this need by incorporating similarconcepts in student outcomes such as “knowledge of contemporary issues” and ability to“understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, andsocietal context.” [2].Diverse ResponsesEngineering educators have responded to these new demands with co-curricular and curricularinitiatives. For example, many students have gained exposure to global issues in engineeringthrough
AC 2008-908: MESSAGES FOR IMPROVING PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OFENGINEERINGDon Giddens, Georgia Institute of Technology Don P. Giddens is Dean of the College of Engineering, the Lawrence L. Gellerstedt, Jr. Chair in Bioengineering, and Georgia Research Alliance Eminent Scholar at the Georgia Institute of Technology. He chaired the NAE Committee on Public Understanding of Engineering Messages. Dean Giddens received all three of his degrees (BSE 1963, MS 1965, and Ph.D. 1966) from the Georgia Institute of Technology. Giddens joined the Georgia Tech faculty in 1968. In 1992 he left his position as the Chair of Aerospace Engineering to serve as the Dean of the Whiting School of Engineering and
learning in the classroom with real-world experiences in thecommunity. Studying abroad provides students with opportunities to learn how to navigatedifferent cultures, work with diverse peers, and gain new perspectives and global awareness. TheMercer on Mission (MOM) program at Mercer University in Macon, GA bridges service-learning with short-term, faculty-led study abroad opportunities to provide transformativeexperiences for students through academic instruction, cultural immersion, applied research,meaningful service, and personal reflection. In this study, the MOM program was evaluated forits impact on student participants. Program evaluation included a holistic assessment of theprogram. Research goals included evaluation of effectiveness in
it atheory. Likewise, a new, successful industrial product development process requires the use of anexperimental approach (at least the proof-of-the-concept portion). Consequently, mechanicalengineering students need to be equipped with hands-on experience in instrumentation andmeasurements. This involves conducting physical experiments concerning what measurements to use,how to develop a feasibility study program, how to conduct computer-based data acquisition andanalysis processes, how to validate experimental data for both deterministic and random processes,how to design experiments, and how to disseminate results. There are, however, many obstacles thatmust be overcome in order for this type of process to be successful. The most common
tocommunity college for their students. By working cooperatively and sharing scarce resources,we can educate the professional needed to compete in the new world economy.In partnership with BC, CSUB is moving forward rapidly to develop a Center for CollaborativeInterdisciplinary Teaching and Research to accelerate the establishment of a modern STEMeducation program, which produces equitable learning and degree completion. This Center willhave all the qualities recommended by the National Academy of Engineering (NAE) as "levers"of change in educational practice. Faculty development will be the main lever for university-wide progress toward becoming more learning-centered. STEM faculty at CSUB will adoptevidence-based best practices for promoting
or co-authored over 50 publications and has served as principal or co-principal investigator on nine grants from the National Science Foundation. At Lafayette College Dr. Roth has served as Department Head of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Director of Engineering, and Associate Provost for Academic Operations in addition to multiple faculty committee assignments. She has led campus-wide accreditation and assessment initiatives, implemented new faculty orientation programs, collaborated on the development of multiple proposals to private foun- dations, and coordinated interdisciplinary academic programs. She has received a number of awards in recognition of her scholarship and teaching including a Fulbright
structuraldesign of such facilities has to be multidisciplinary and robust so that integration withadvanced technological developments can occur. To prepare the next generation of engineersso that they can meet these challenges, the School of Engineering and Computer Science atthe University of the Pacific has committed to build an innovative structural testing lab tosupport the civil and mechanical engineering programs.This paper addresses the development of a new lab that is to be used collaboratively bystudents, faculty, and industry. This lab is planned to support experiential learning andtraditional classroom pedagogy including lab instruction. Currently, the civil engineeringcurriculum covers four areas: construction, environmental, hydraulics, and
operate autonomouslywithin its environment, detect and avoid obstacles, and communicate with other robots. Theproject is analogous to unmanned aerial vehicles autonomously searching for and destroyingtargets. Once we discuss the desired learning outcomes that guided the execution of theproject, we share the lessons we learned from this multidisciplinary project experience andpoint out important pedagogical issues observed by both students and faculty.1. IntroductionRecently, an increasing number of higher education institutions are adopting team-based seniorcapstone design projects in their engineering senior design courses. The primary driving forcebehind the change is the requirement the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology(ABET
designing and developing such courses and successfullyteaching and managing a project-based course. This paper explores the role of simple tools that areavailable for free and more complex tools that provide live two-way audio- and video communication inonline learning environments.IntroductionThe purpose of this paper is to describe tools and techniques and the methods and procedures of teachingproject based courses at a distance. It is a very vast topic so we scope our paper to two key topics. Thefirst half of the paper introduces the online and blended model for teaching courses at a distance. Thesecond half introduces the topic of simple and complex tools to teach the course and to manage projectsonline. We also address quality issues as they
be less successful the next year. We must be prepared to make changes during the semester to our teaching style. The students will appreciate the fact that their concerns Page 6.724.5 Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2001, American Society for Engineering Education were heard, their ideas considered and some changes made. The overall result is an improved learning environment.Bibliography[1] Guskin, A. E. (1994), ‘Restructuring the role of the faculty’, Change, 16-25.[2] Norman, D. (1993), Things that make
initial contact are invited to visit the Four-Year College early on. Anumber of specialized one-day programs with extensive college student and faculty contact areoffered for High School students likely to benefit most from the Scholarship. These highly-personalized, relatively intimate visit programs of 10-40 participants are crucial in attractingstudents to the University and introducing them to the Scholarship program. They allow theAdmissions staff to address two significant concerns. First, parents are often reluctant to allowtheir children to consider such a rigorous education. Second, the idea of spending an extra yearin college is initially unappealing to many students. Depending on their entry point into the admissions cycle, students
AC 2012-5454: ENHANCING STUDENTS’ HIGHER-ORDER SKILLS THROUGHCOMMUNITY SERVICE LEARNING USING SCAFFOLDING FOR CRE-ATIVE PROBLEM SOLVINGProf. Wei Zheng, Jackson State University Dr. Wei Zheng is an Associate Professor of Civil Engineering at Jackson State University. He received his Ph.D. degree in Civil Engineering from University of Wisconsin-Madison in 2001 and has over10-year industrial experience. Since becoming a faculty member at JSU in 2005, he has made continuous efforts to integrate emerging technologies and cognitive skill development into engineering curriculum.Dr. Jianjun Yin, Jackson State University Jianjun Yin, Ph.D is a professor of education in the College of Education at Jackson State University. His
influenced.Finally, complete proposals, modified as necessary in response to the feedback and assessmentof department plans, were submitted through the university curriculum committee for approvalof these plans. It is to the credit of the faculty involved that they had anticipated and providedinformation on virtually every concern expressed by members of the advisory committee and byuniversity course and curriculum committee. It was the consensus of all concerned that the two-track curriculum detailed below would guide the department in the correct direction for theforeseeable future. Page 11.1118.7Department of Aerospace Engineering (ASE) – New Curriculum
with Engineers Without Borders and other professional service organizations. Dr. Striebig was the recipient of the 2010 Peter Bosscher EWB-USA Faculty Leadership Award. Page 22.979.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 ISES – A Longitudinal Study to Measure the Impacts of Service on Engineering StudentsAbstractOver the last few years, concerns have escalated among many national organizations thattechnical expertise is no longer solely sufficient for the development of future engineers.Additionally, in the United States engineering programs
theirdoctoral degrees at Research I universities, focusing primarily on research, and then end upteaching at schools where there is a greater emphasis on teaching. Typically, a graduate studentwill have the opportunity to be a teaching assistant for one or more semesters, but as thesepositions are commonly for lab classes or discussion sections, the student does not gainexperience in the actual preparation, delivery, and assessment of an entire course. However, ifthe student graduates and is able to obtain an academic faculty position, that is exactly what theywill be expected to do, most likely during their first semester on the job. Depending on what hasbeen left behind by the last professor to teach the class, a new professor may have to develop
Machine Dynamics and Mechanisms; loop CL in the schematic),the program faculty are concerned that students are meeting the APCs for their course and withinstituting course changes that will remove measured deficiencies. While the faculty is activelyengaged in establishing the learning objectives in the program, the constituency most relevant tothis process is the student body.At the program level (e.g., mechanical engineering program; loop PL in the schematic), theprogram curriculum committee is concerned with defining the APCs for the individual courses inthe program. It is responsible for monitoring the program objectives in courses and for settingachievement standards or metrics consistent with those identified for the engineering school
, confidence, and careeradvancement for women in tech. They can also create unique opportunities for participants togain hands-on experience, collaborate with peers, and build professional networks. Theseorganizations can promote inclusive practices and increase women's participation in softwareengineering by providing financial and technological support through scholarships and stipendsas well as provide mentorship programs connecting women with industry mentors.As such, legislation against any programming related to issues of diversity, equity, and inclusionis of major concern to organizers, instructors, and participants in these programs. Movingforward, our research team seeks to understand how the remaining organizations adapt to thischallenging
instructional and socioemotional challenges that manystudents encountered during the shift to remote instruction. This study and its findings add tonascent research exploring rapid responses by faculty to address issues associated with remoteinstruction and document effective instructional practices. References[1] Andre, E., Williams, N., Schwartz, F., Bullard, C. Benefits of Campus Outdoor RecreationPrograms: A Review of the Literature. Journal of Outdoor Recreation, Education, and Leadership.2017, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp 15-25.[2] Bailey, T., Alfonso, M. Paths to persistence: An analysis of research on program effectivenessat community colleges. Indianapolis, IN: Lumina Foundation of Education. 2005.[3] Bauman, S
trip.IntroductionEngineers Without Borders (EWB) is an international organization whose mission is to provide Page 14.1107.2humanitarian aid on an international level and increase the standard of living throughengineering solutions. In 2006, a new chapter of EWB was founded at Brigham YoungUniversity. Once the chapter was founded, faculty advisors and student officers implemented atechnical elective course that was focused on the creation and implementation of humanitarianengineering projects. The course was titled Global Projects in Engineering and Technology.Details of the original course, along with the purpose of the course, were previously presented.1During
,social, and political concerns. Economic considerations include the life cycle cost and estimatedunit cost of electricity generated. System efficiency must also be determined, including thepossibility of utilizing waste thermal energy. A major factor in this design is the transfer of thetechnology to rural Alaskan communities which have limited technical literacy.IntroductionThe need for energy-efficient electric power sources in remote areas is a driving force forresearch in alternative and hybrid energy systems. This topic is very important for Alaska whichhas more than 200 remote communities [1] and for developing countries such as Mexico, whichhas approximately 85,000 villages each with a population less than 1000 persons. Most of theremote