tasks. We would encourage students to contribute to Knowdiocontent and to tag that new content using the SWEBOK taxonomy. Further, the principleinvestigator would demonstrate and encourage the use of Knowdio in his upper-division andgraduate courses and SeniorProjects.In planning this next step, we knew we were facing a number of new issues. Would otherinstructors take the time to add course content and tag it using the SWEBOK taxonomy? Whatcompels them to do so? What issues of copyright were we bumping into by making coursecontent available to students who had not taken the corresponding course? (We decided to onlyshare instructor-created content, but even then there were questions about making theinformation available to students who had not
andpost-pandemic also indicates that the student performance for these courses has not beenaffected. The important aspect of assessing the course goals is to ensure that cheating andplagiarism are minimized in a course. These issues are observed in all teaching modalities (in-person, online, and hybrid), however, it is known that online or hybrid instruction improves thechances of cheating and/or plagiarism since the students are not physically present in class whiletaking the test or assessment. But the majority of the institutions have implemented learningmanagement systems that are equipped with software that handles plagiarism such as Copyleaksfor Canvas, SafeAssign for Blackboard, and Turnitin for D2L. Therefore, the concerns ofcheating and
- impact programs for first-year students and established a new SJSU Engineering Student Success Center to help engineering students thrive. Most importantly, Wei’s commitment to expanding the sphere for student excellence has produced results that include increased access for women, African Americans, Latinos/Latinas, and other historically underrepresented communities to SJSU. Wei extends her service beyond SJSU through active engagement in national and international organizations. She serves on the Executive Board for the Engineering Deans Council of American Society for Engineering Education, chairing its Committee on Diversity. She has served on several National Science Foundation panels. And she has assumed
approaches and pedagogiesimplemented in higher education programs across the United States and globally.A new layer of complexity has recently been added with the appearance and evolvement ofgenerative AI. Many students have started using AI for their studies, but without effectiveguidance and support from instructors, it is challenging for students to navigate the limitationsand weaknesses of AI and to avoid the compromised low-quality outcomes, and integrity issues[28]. Since AI literacy is becoming a necessary skill in the workplace and the effective use of AIcreates a competitive advantage for professionals in the job market, higher education mustaddress the need to develop these skills in college graduates along with technical, professional,and
may be affecting their experiences withcar maintenance. Millennial culture also includes a type of perfectionism that may be affectingtheir desire to use their hands, either in fixing things, or in traditional ways of building. Theexistence of on-board diagnostic computer interfaces is perceived to have an effect, though it isarguable. Many gadgets, especially electronic devices such as mobile phones, PDAs, and gamingsystems, are designed and manufactured in ways that make them difficult to open up and repair,but new sites such as iFixit do provide teardowns and repair manuals. I will explore these issues,especially their implications on current undergraduate engineering pedagogy, present ‘practicalwork’ experiences from Canterbury and
members expressed apressing need for students to be exposed to business planning, financial statements and financialratio analysis with special emphasis on understanding how engineering project decisions impactcompany financial statements1.Shortly after the initial work was carried out to incorporate changes in the engineering economycourse to address the key concerns of the advisory boards, the Penn State University Presidentcalled upon faculty members to put special emphasis on developing business skills in allstudents. The university president called upon the faculty to “Invent Penn State: Let’s turndiscoveries into a great economy, together.”2 The president put forth a $30 million investmentin economic development and student career success
. student in Industrial/Organizational Psychology at the University of Tulsa. Page 26.1544.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 The Impact of International Research Experiences on Undergraduate Learning1.0 IntroductionThis paper compares the learning outcomes for students participating in domestic andinternational research experiences. This question is important given that science andengineering (S&E) research is increasingly collaborative and international in scope withresearch teams comprised of faculty and student researchers in multiple
. Additionally, the experienceextends student learning beyond the technical aspects of the problem to see what impactsenvironmental issues have on people with a variety of interests and professional backgrounds.Introduction A component of the mission statement of Tufts University is “to offer to …students arigorous education …that provides the knowledge and intellectual skills to become responsibleand productive participants and leaders of society; … to enhance learning and develop thepotential of each student beyond, as well as within, the classroom; to encourage public service bystudents, faculty and staff, and to integrate service activities and experiential learning withteaching and research…” In order to implement this broad mission, the
sum, so we considerthem part of the “volunteer” staff in the analysis presented in this paper.Since 2005, the camp, called E-Girls, has been offered annually. Based on annual feedback fromgirls on the activities they like the most, we have “tweaked” the activities each year, eliminatingsome, adding new ones based on the volunteering faculty and professional staff, and repeatingthe favorites (e.g. the Physics of Rock Climbing and Slack Lining), but the overarching approachof enveloping the girls in community, including undergraduate girls on up through professionalwomen has been faithfully maintained. E-Girls remains an activity that receives significantsupport from a volunteer base in the community, including women from SWE and others
students. First-year engineering programs are stories and conversations of the participants throughout theoften times a focus of these efforts as they are at the workshop, while identifying patterns and key points throughforefront of issues concerning the transition from high grounded theory.school to college, retention of all students with emphasis on I. Narrative Inquirypopulations that are traditionally under-represented inengineering, and developing the foundational engineering Narrative inquiry is most commonly utilized within theknowledge and skills [1]-[4]. Through these efforts, many constructivist paradigm, critical race theory, or
Engineering Education at Virginia Tech with Affiliate Faculty status in Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics and the Learning Sciences and Technologies at Virginia Tech. He holds degrees in Engineering Mechanics (BS, MS) and in Educational Psychology (MAEd, PhD).Dr. Marie C Paretti, Virginia Tech Marie C. Paretti is a Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she directs the Vir- ginia Tech Engineering Communications Center (VTECC). Her research focuses on communication in engineering design, interdisciplinary communication and collaboration, design education, and gender in engineering. She was awarded a CAREER grant from the National Science Foundation to study expert teaching in capstone design
initiate and preserve secure and productive relationships with engineering programs atfour-year institutions in their service area, engineering faculty and administrators at communitycolleges are advised to increase their awareness of the ABET Accreditation Criteria and becomemore familiar with how the four-year institutions satisfy those criteria. By integratingappropriate elements of these criteria into their own review and accreditation process, TYCprograms can strengthen their articulation agreements and enhance the success of their transferstudents. Ongoing communication between two and four year programs will generate favorableconditions to address common concerns and share best practices that will support bothinstitutions’ efforts in
Assessment.4. ABET. (2003). Engineering Criteria, Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology. www.abet.org.5. National Science Foundation. (1996). Shaping the Future: New Expectations for Undergraduate Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology, NSF Report 96-139.6. Industry-University-Government Roundtable for Enhancing Engineering Education (IUGREEE). (1997). ABET Criteria: Industry Expectations of New Engineers.7. Moore, D. and Farbrother, B. (2000). “Pedagogical and Organizational Components and Issues of Externally Sponsored Senior Design Teams”, Proceedings of 2000 Frontiers in Education Conference.8. McKenzie, L. J. (2002). End-of-Program Assessment: An Investigation of Senior Capstone Design
program consists of an intensive language course, a social science course focused on thehost country, and three technical courses taught in English by full-time faculty from the hostinstitution, for a total of five, 4-credit courses. The technical courses are designed to befunctionally equivalent to the technical courses students would take if they stayed in Boston forthe semester. The courses follow the same syllabi, use the same textbooks, and provideequivalent laboratory experiences as the Boston-based courses. All are official Boston Universitycourses, and appear directly on student transcripts, thereby eliminating transfer credit issues. Allthree program sites use the same basic model, although the constraints and opportunitiesavailable at
effectively communicating with the faculty advisor and theproject sponsor. In addition, since students graduate and move on to the real world, thereports are used to get new students “up to speed” as to what is going on in the AFEenterprise and on their project. The reports are graded by the instructor and a contactperson who works for the project sponsor.Following a suggestion from Professor Rich Felder of the Department of ChemicalEngineering at North Carolina State University, students’ individual grades for the sub-team report are weighted by peer evaluations. If a student does put enough effort onto theproject, this student does not get the grade earned by their teammates. Students are toldthis at the beginning of the semester, and it serves as
the 2001 Upstate New York ASCE Student RegionalConference K’NEX Project Management Exercise. The exercise demonstrated to both the civilengineering students and the faculty advisors the importance of quality communication.Observations of the participants during each phase are provided below. What did you learn from this exercise?: What could have helped you in this exercise?: What improvements can be made and what should stay the same with the exercise?: Figure 6: Lesson Learned Questionsa) A-E Design Observations During the design phase, the A-E groups took two approaches to the design. The groups thatbuilt a
backgroundto the problem, references the environmental (“green”) and sustainability issues present in thepharmaceutical engineering industry.Problem statement: In a metered-dose inhaler (MDI), such as those used for asthma medication,the medicine is delivered by a pressurized propellant, similar in idea to a can of spray paint.When the inhaler is activated, a set amount of the medicine is expelled from the mouthpiece tobe inhaled. In the past, chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) were used as propellants; however becauseof their reactivity with the earth’s ozone layer they have been suppressed. The new propellants,hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), are considered “greener” because they do not react with the ozonelayer.You are assigned to calculate the amount of
Assistant Systems Engineer from 2011–2012 in India. He has worked as an Assistant Professor (2014–2018) in the department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, KLE Technological University, India. He is a certified IUCEE International Engineering Educator. He was awarded the ’Ing.Paed.IGIP’ title at ICTIEE, 2018. He is serving as an Associate Editor of the Journal of Engineering Education Transformations (JEET). He is interested in conducting engineering education research, and his interests include student retention in online and in-person engineering courses/programs, data mining and learning analytics in engineering education, broadening student participation in engineering, faculty preparedness in cognitive
commitment to what I have chosen to call, thisevening, the scholarship of engagement.”2Why Community Based LearningCommunity Based Learning gives students the opportunity to apply disciplinary knowledge inauthentic contexts that can lead to positive learning outcomes for students. Furthermore, becauseCBL is inherently focused on complex and important social issues, this learning has potential tobe socially significant as the problems students grapple with affect us all and address real andpressing needs within society. In the authors’ institutions CBL is certainly not the norm andsome colleagues express concern that the work is not rigorous and distracts from content that isour mainstay. However, we believe that CBL is essential to the work of
cross-cultural issues and the benefits that international experiences hold for engineering students. Debbie completed a Master's Degree in English and counseling certification requirements from Troy University. Before joining Georgia Tech, she served various educational institutions through teaching, counseling, administration, and project coordination.Gayle Elliott, University of Cincinnati Gayle Elliott earned BS and MS degrees from University of Cincinnati and is currently assistant professor in UC's Division of Professional Practice. She is the faculty advisor for students in the International Co-op Program (ICP) and for mechanical engineering students in the class of 2008
supported the goals of theworkshop to improve the participation in STEM careers.One limitation to the widespread adoption of this approach over traditional lectures is theresources needed to create the instructional materials. We discuss example programs that haveassembled and evaluated instructional materials in computational science and engineering.These include a National Science Foundation funded digital library as well as several otherprojects that have assembled datasets, models, and exercises that can readily be adopted in avariety of engineering classes. Sharing such materials should reduce the barriers to adoption andencourage more faculty to undertake this approach to instruction
not facing BOK requirements this level of effort from the faculty islikely an unreasonable expectation. Examples of new faculty ratings to these extended EnvEBOK outcomes criteria are shown in Table 3, but we are still using the old rating system ratherthan requiring faculty to look to achievement levels.Table 3. Example of faculty and student ratings for selected courses mapped to the EnvE BOKoutcomes Instructor Ratings Average Student RatingsEnvE BOK Outcome Hydraul Ground EnvE EnvE Intro Fund. -ics Water Design Design EnvE EnvE1. Math & science knowledge M
SESSION #: 1526 Integrating BME into ECE Curriculum: An Alternate Approach for Robi Polikar, Ravi P. Ramachandran, Linda Head and Maria Tahamont Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rowan University, Glassboro, NJ 08028 Abstract: A time honored technique for introducing students to new and emerging topics is to offerelectives; however, there are a few major drawbacks to this approach: the topic must be very fo-cused, either depth or breath must be sacrificed, and in either case, only a very limited amount ofmaterial can be covered, and students who may not have prior
Session 2322 VIRTUAL COMMUNITIES AND THE TECHNICAL PROFESSIONAL Peter Wiesner, Phil Laplante, Matt Loeb, Tara Gallus IEEE / Penn State, Great Valley / IEEE / IEEEABSTRACTIn 2001, IEEE began to experiment with the use of virtual communities to support thework of its volunteers who are involved in education, publications, standardsdevelopment, and committee work. Virtual communities are making it possible toengage professionals on a global basis. They encourage cross cutting disciplines. Theymake it possible for engineers to tackle issues of great societal importance, such as
de Almeida, Fernando Carvalho. 2012, International Journal of e-Collaboration, Volume 8, Issue 3, pp. 36- 52.2. E-Collaboration and E-Commerce In Virtual Worlds: The Potential of Second Life and World of Warcraft. Kock, Ned. 2008, International Journal of e-Collaboration, Volume 4, Issue 3, pp. 1-13.3. Dorr, Meena and Kelly, Kip. Developing Real Skills for Virtual Teams. Chapel-Hill, NC : UNC Executive Development 2011, 2011.4. Five challenges to virtual team success: Lessons from Sabre, Inc. Kirkman, Bradley, et al., et al. 2002, Academy of Management Executive, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp. 67-79.5. Something(s) old and something(s) new: Modeling drivers of global virtual team effectiveness. Maynard, M. Travis, et al., et al
enter college and combine past study habits with new learning strategies in an effort tohandle the collegiate workload of 4-5 undergraduate courses. Undergraduates learn new learningstrategies from personal experience, suggestions from faculty and staff, adaptation of past habits,and observation of and discussion with their peers. Thus, their ability to incorporate newstrategies into their own academic life is in many ways limited to the people they have contactwith, both in face-to-face settings, and now through the Internet. Undergraduate help-seekingbehavior can be influenced by faculty and peers 1,2 . While faculty members, tutors, mentors, andadvisors are a valid source of advice, recent graduates and current junior/senior students
engineering programs of Chemical,Civil, Electrical, and Mechanical Engineering include a common engineering clinic throughoutall eight semesters of their programs of study. We believe that the clinic is a major hallmark ofthe Rowan engineering programs. The clinics present a broad-based approach to engineeringstarting at the freshman level, progressing in depth and industrial relevance as students advance.The nature of the clinics allows students and faculty to work together in a hands-on, projectenvironment that promotes teamwork to find solutions to complex multidisciplinary problems.The Freshman Engineering Clinic sequence, taught in the Fall and Spring semesters, haslaboratory components dealing with the four disciplines. These areas are used as
information prior to appearing in thecollege classroom on day one.The need for student preparation is not new, though exascerbated by the accelerating pace ofindustry knowledge expansion and societal expectations. Studies from as early as 2006 highlightthat “one of the major concerns of faculty is that students are underprepared for college classes.This theme persisted through faculty and advisor interviews and surveys. Faculty felt that a studyskills program for all pre-tech students should be mandatory if student persistence wasdetermined to be a goal of the college. In the area of academia, the student must be valued andmade to feel a part of the college even before the school year begins.”5 Student
the ODU TELETECHNET distance education system.A significant issue with distance delivery of a surveying curriculum concerned theaccommodation of field labs. Having all of the students travel to the campus for a‘minicamp’ proved to be unreasonable as the system expanded beyond Virginia andNorth Carolina. It was decided to make the laboratory available to the remote studentsthrough the use of a local mentor.The first surveying course to be transmitted to a location distant from Old DominionUniversity occurred in Fall 1997. Since then, the entire suite of surveying coursesoffered by ODU has been converted to the distance delivery mode. The distanceeducation classes offered by Old Dominion University (ODU) in Norfolk, Virginia, aretransmitted via
to 2002. This 62Kilometer (km) long road was developed primarily by the BDA. In addition to connecting theinner roads to the freeways, numerous national highways are interconnected by the ORR. TheORR was constructed to meet the guide lines as specified by the Ministry of Surface Transport(MOST) of India. To meet the overwhelming demands of this construction project and since theywere a large number of engineering colleges in Bangalore, the BDA decided that it would bebeneficial to them if they used final year civil engineering students from BU and VTU to assistin various stages of the project. Administrators and faculty members of the two Universities sawthat the students would get hands on training while working on this project and the