individuals who identify with more than one historically disenfranchisedgroup simultaneously (Crenshaw, 1991, 2015; May, 2015). For example, rather than assume thatthe implications of identifying with a minoritized racial/ethnic group in a particular context willbe similar for both men and women, an intersectional approach starts from the assumption thatindividuals with each combination of gender and racial/ethnic identity will have uniqueexperiences (Essers et al., 2010). Research in entrepreneurship has considered the influence ofintersecting racial/ethnic, gender, social class and religious identities (Romero & Valdez, 2016),with a limited number of studies focusing on academic entrepreneurship specifically (Jackson etal., 2022; Mickey &
FrameworkSchilling [5] states that innovation programs aimed at economic growth have a strong relationshipwith activities promoting economic growth. The core practices of these institutions emphasizeleadership and management programs that support global innovation programs. Although manyinitiatives exist to encourage creativity and entrepreneurship among undergraduate students, notall of them may be successful or long-lasting. The goal of sustainable innovation programs is toensure their long-term viability. Research group [4] note that many programs are not designed tomeet the unique needs and interests of the students they serve, which is a major factor in theirsuccess. For instance, students interested in social entrepreneurship, or the arts may not be
commercialization at an HBCU. The purpose of this study is to assess the level ofawareness of engineering graduate students at an HBCU about innovation commercialization.We strongly believe that supporting the commercialization of innovations in HBCUs will likelyenable HBCUs to grow into new or stronger research-oriented institutions and ultimately havegreater economic, employment, and lifetime impact.Innovation commercialization/Entrepreneurship and engineering educationInnovation commercialization seeks to transform products/services from the laboratory to themarketplace or the end-user. Pynnönen et al, see innovation commercialization as a process thataims to create and implement a feasible business model for an innovation-based product-servicesystem in
Paper ID #44200On the Potential Role of Artistic Process Workshops to Develop CreativeThinking Skills of Engineering Students: Preliminary Results and InsightsProf. Elif Akcali, University of Florida Dr. Elif Akcali is an Associate Professor in the Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering and Michael Durham Professor in Creativity at the University of Florida (UF) and a UF Entrepreneurship Faculty Fellow. She is an industrial engineer, a visual artist and an explorer of the interplay between engineering and the arts.Braxton Rae, University of Florida Braxton Rae is a Visiting Assistant Professor of Devised
problems. We believe one way to do this is through thedevelopment of an EM that fosters an appreciation for curiosity, making connections, and creating value.Instilling a mindset in students to think entrepreneurially has been gaining popularity, especially in engineering [3].Faculty and administrators have been supportive of increasing entrepreneurship education in engineering classes [4].It has been commonly thought that entrepreneurial spirit is something that people are born with [5]. However,research has shown that these skills can be developed through education [6]. An EM encourages students to seek newinformation, make connections between topics, and constantly think about how the product or service they arecreating as an engineer is useful
. Social capital (people in their social group that can helpthem become an engineer) provides feelings of acceptance and belief that others desire to see aperson perform well [3]. Students who feel engaged within their major and classes oftendemonstrate a higher sense of belonging than those who do not [5], [6]. Research has also showna strong positive correlation between engineering identity and sense of belonging within anengineering major [1]. Students more often see themselves as an engineer when they feel theybelong. In many cases, there is also an underlying assumption that undergraduate students desirea high sense of academic belonging. A lack of sense of belonging can feed into the absence of astrong engineering identity for some students
University School of Engineering and one of the co-founders of Aalto Design Factory, a multidisciplinary experimentation platform (adf.fi). Having grown into a network of over 35 platforms across the globe, the Design Factory leverages design approaches to promote innovation across disciplines and academia and industry alike. Dr. Björklund leads a multidisciplinary team investigating innovation practices in engineering, design and entrepreneurship. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.comStudent perceptions of the societal linkages of engineering innovation1. IntroductionInnovation is one of the core elements of engineering
surfacesimilarities with convergence. EML has gained prominence since a significant recent source offunding in engineering education has been through the Kern Family Foundation’s KEEN EMLprograms [6]. These programs make awards to schools to integrate EML into the curriculum.Both the Federal support of convergence and the private support of EML draw on similar, but notidentical belief systems. Both center on technology as a major driver of solutions to issues facingsociety. Both have a distinctly neoliberal character - convergence, through activities designed toscale innovations beyond the traditional academic sphere into the free market, and EML’s focuson entrepreneurship. Both imply the value of free market competition and emphasize sustainedeconomic
kappa of 0.627indicates a moderate level of agreement between the researchers. The results from this paperprovide insight into how students interpret Curiosity and can be used to develop materials aboutEM that might better resonate with first-year students. Future work will explore the remainingtwo “Cs”: Connections and Creating Value.IntroductionThis study involves integrating fortnightly reflective practice into a first-year engineering coursewhile simultaneously beginning to instill an entrepreneurial mindset (EM) (as defined by theKern Engineering Entrepreneurship Network (KEEN)) in the engineering students at a mid-size,Mid-Atlantic, public university. Of particular interest is understanding students’ conception ofCuriosity, one of the
compare the statedobjectives and learning outcomes of engineering leadership programs9.Engineering leadership programs described in the literature range substantially in theirfocus, delivery channel, and pedagogy. Three recurring foci are entrepreneurship andinnovation10-11, personal and professional growth12-14, and global citizenship15-17.Delivery channels include integration into core courses18, smaller cohorts11, curricularminors19-20 and co-curricular programs21-23. Pedagogical strategies range even morewidely from direct instruction24-26 to problem-based learning27 to case studies28-30.The extent to which these strategies support the development of successful or sociallyresponsible engineering leaders has not yet been determined in any
needed for America to compete in the diverse globaleconomy. This outreach effort has been designed and implemented with the aim of instillingan interest in computer science, engineering and entrepreneurship among the futureinnovators of America.LEAD-SEI’s three-week core curriculum consists of a team-based research project andcomputer science. These components allow groups to develop innovative solutions,products/prototypes, business plans and technology driven presentations to address real worldproblems; including the global challenges of the 21st century. In addition to theaforementioned, participants learn the scope of the different engineering fields fromUniversity professors and graduate students. Beyond discovering computer science
technology with ExxonMobil, in- cluding traveling to many worksites around the world and a 30-month expat assignment in India. Ad- ditionally, she is an active member on the Board of Directors for Limitless Ambition Inc., a non-profit organization focused on empowering women to achieve their career potential. Her passion has always been helping to guide others in their careers and is committed and motivated to do so through Rising Careers, LLC.Ms. Allison Goodman, ArtCenter College of Design Allison Goodman is a professor at the ArtCenter College of Design in Pasadena, California where she teaches classes in both communication and information design. Professor Goodman received her BFA in Design from Carnegie-Mellon
discussed the value the project experience provided, indicating that they demonstratedidentified regulation. Below are example excerpts that align with one or both themes: “The most enjoyable part, however, was the actual building of the design. This took place in class almost entirely within the Mars in the Making Project, which took up almost the entire semester of the class. This was easily the most memorable part of the course, as well as being the most useful and enjoyable. It helped me learn skills such as working with power tools, workplace safety, and generally granted me experience in craftsmanship. Should I be able to do something similar like this again, I would definitely perform better than I had
engineeringthat students can specialize in. To meet the additional goals of strengthening teamwork andproject management skills, the team-based project was organized into a series of phases andmilestones. During the first phase, students focus on project management and team-building bydeveloping a Team Working Agreement. Phase 2 introduces students to the electrical andmechanical engineering applications of the offshore wind industry, where they apply the EDP tocreate blades for model scale wind turbines. The phase culminates in a class-wide competition tosee which team can produce the most power. In the final phase, civil and environmentalengineering applications are introduced. Students again follow the EDP, but this time the focus ison designing
self-esteem and self-confidence. In contrast, when we integrate practical-orientedlearning methodologies and experiential learning with the curriculum in the class to improvestudents’ creativity and help students to learn from previous experiences and avoid repeating thesame mistakes. The common factors leading to a lack of integrating experiential learning [9], • Lack of faculty experience and techniques. • Insufficient educational spaces and equipment • Not paying attention to parallel and additional experiences • Insufficient class management by the educators and techniciansAnother way to compensate for and overcome the lack of practical experience and hands-onskills is to seek an opportunity for internships or coops
, includinganalyzing markets, understanding the importance of context, and learning from mistakes [13].Additionally, in 2015, a survey of American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE)members indicated that both faculty and administrators believe that engineering students shouldhave access to education regarding entrepreneurship and innovation [14]. Therefore, there is anincreased effort to fuse EM concepts into engineering coursework.The Entrepreneurial Mindset at Ohio StateOne organization focused on integrating EM concepts into engineering coursework is the KernEntrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN) [13]. KEEN is a network of more than 50universities across the United States that seek to instill an EM into their students through theircurriculum
SkillsStudents’ ability to make connections within both the 2021-2022 and 2022-2023 academic yearsincreased, with significant increases occurring for CF1 and CF4 in the first cohort and all fourfactors in the second cohort. All four factors relate closely to the work required of students inboth types of second semester design projects. CF1 (Integrate Outside Information) directlyaligns with the work students complete in both projects. Specifically, students read journalarticles and used newfound knowledge to inform their project designs in the research-basedproject and use knowledge gained from class and their constraints in the robot design/buildproject to create their final prototypes. CF2 (Consider Social, Economic, and EnvironmentalFactors) relates
of their ability to become engineers (Figure 4). Asmall percentage (4%) of students strongly disagreed in the post-survey with the statement thattheir long-term career goal would include entrepreneurial involvement (Figure 4A). Though onemight hope for this class to make engineering entrepreneurship more desirable to the students, itcan also be viewed as a positive outcome when the course helps students clarify their careergoals in general, even if they choose not to pursue entrepreneurship. There was a decrease inneutral responses for both questions in Figure 3 (27% to 18% and 12% to 4%, respectively),which suggests that this course can help solidify students’ career goals either toward or awayfrom entrepreneurship or engineering
, the Canadian economy is the 9th largest economy in the world in terms of GDP[1] [2].However, real GDP growth in Canada has been staggering. Canada is currently investing inentrepreneurial activities to boost its economy in the coming decade. The Government of Canadahas established entrepreneurship as its main priority. Canada has been on a mission to promoteresearch and development (R&D) within the higher education sector with the aim of increasingthe production of new knowledge and attracting and retaining world-class researchers [2]. Canadahas reported a strong and stable state of entrepreneurship compared to other countries in the world[3]; however, there is a call for an increase in entrepreneurship education in Canada as it
failure.” 4. Acceptance of Failure as part of the learning process: “This semester has made me appreciate failure much more.” “This semester and all mastery-based classes remind me how important it is to practice and fail in order to learn and progress.”To test H3 we plotted the composite mindset score against the number of skills the studentsmastered in the EGR360 course. In each of these courses, the number of skills mastered directlycorrelates to the grade earned in the course. We found no correlation between these two measuresin this group or any of the other groups (Figure 2).Figure 2: Composite Failure Mindset vs. the number of skills passed in this MBL assessed course.At the Greenway off-site project-based
toNative American students in a culturally aligned and engaging learning space. This soft roboticsapproach also allows exploring how natural assets can support innovation, deepening the needfor interdependence between academic disciplines with cross-disciplinary connections betweenthe arts, science, and engineering (STEAM).Besides enhancing engineering education, soft robotics encourages students to discover,evaluate, and exploit opportunities through engineering principles and design. Soft robotics [16]is a growing field with applications – medicine, agriculture, and STEAM learning kits thatstudents could see the potential for entrepreneurship opportunities.The evaluation of the effects of integrating soft robotics on Native American students has
can be satisfied using a machinery with sixbar or fourbar linkages, - to formulate design criteria and constraints for the need, qualitatively or quantitatively, - to ensure criteria and constraints include bio-inspiration and aesthetics of human-machine interface, - and to develop two prototypes using graphical methods of linkage synthesis.The learning approach included lectures, team-based problem solving in classes, and laboratoryexperiments. Students were introduced to eight different synthesis algorithms of variousmechanisms. Each algorithm enables them to identify the exact dimensions of a fourbar or sixbarlinkage which generates a prescribed output motion. In addition, they were introduced to criticalfeatures of linkage
seek dual STEM majors. Of the students responding, halfidentify as female and half identify as male. Because of the low number of respondents in thestudy, no attempt is made to dis-aggregate data based on class year, academic major, or genderidentity. While detailed insights from such groups are certainly worthwhile to pursue, the currentstate of the selective fellowship with rather small numbers of student preclude meaningfulstatistical analysis of anything other than the whole.To characterize the responses of the students, an entrepreneurial assessment framework was used.EntreComp: The Entrepreneurship Competence Framework was selected as this framework [24].This type of framework has been shown to be effective in evaluating the
Paper ID #43663Embracing a Fail-Forward Mindset: Enhancing Engineering Innovation throughReflective Failure JournalingMitra Varun Anand, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Mitra Anand serves as the Associate Director of Makerspace, and Innovation and Entrepreneurship, in addition to being an Adjunct Faculty of Mechanical Engineering at Worcester Polytechnic Institute. Anand’s research interests lie in combining hands-on Maker skills with an entrepreneurial mindset and value creation, aiming to develop practical solutions for real-world problems. He is enthusiastic about innovation in engineering education, design thinking
every level, a certificate will be issued. In addition, instructors willalso be certified when they conduct a workshop.2) Reflection of technopreneurship practices to engineering education At SIT, authors team are seeking interdisciplinary approach to its engineering education.Among 14 classes for the Micro Electro Mechanical System (MEMS) subject, 1 is allocatedto the special lecture about entrepreneurship. Its learning objective is to nurture awarenessabout applying MEMS technical knowledges to the products and solutions in the daily humanlife. While most of the students will work for companies, research institutes, or anyorganizations as employees rather than becoming founder of new business, entrepreneurialthinking is extremely critical
course in 2010. Within a few years we built a suite of eight graduate coursestaught by instructors and practitioners, engineers and non-engineers with experience in a range ofsubjects: engineering, leadership, education, psychology, business, and executive coaching [15,16]. In the 2019-2020 school year, 226 graduate students completed a Troost ILead course with175 of those students being enrolled in course-based, professional Masters degrees. Each coursehas thirty-nine hours of instruction over thirteen weeks and typically has twenty to fifty students.Smaller class sizes are preferred to enable in-depth discussion and individual attention. Eachcourse offers a deep dive into a range of leadership topics such as emotional intelligence,personal
. bus stop to attend Learning Cert classes. He didn’t want her to take that time away from studying, because he was focused on helping her earn a college degree to ensure a steady income and stability later. 4. First This is the first trial encountered She resisted joining engineering and even cried. Finally, she agreed to Threshold by the student. Typically, there is join the engineering course even though she had no interest in the an awareness that the first subject or its foundational topics. She was afraid of her father’s threshold will be a challenge
activities [5], activelearning not only improves students’ academic performance [6, 7], but also significantly enhancestheir retention rate in the STEM fields [8].In spite of the benefits reported by a myriad of studies, the translation of theory into classroompractices has unfortunately remained relatively slow in progress [9]. Besides the reluctance frominstructors to spend the necessary time to prepare interactive teaching materials [10], students’resistance to active learning also plays a crucial role. It is understandable that lack of students’participation would further hinder the instructors’ motivation to develop in-class activities. Toclearly assess such resistance, DeMonbrun et al. [11] developed a systematic questionnaire knownas the
to the incorporation of active learning techniques such as game- based learning in undergraduate classes as well as integration of innovation and entrepreneurship into the engineering curriculum. In particular, she is interested in the impact that these tools can have on stu- dent perception of the classroom environment, motivation and learning outcomes. She was selected to participate in the National Academy of Engineering (NAE) Frontiers of Engineering Education Sympo- sium in 2013, awarded the American Society for Engineering Education Educational Research Methods Faculty Apprentice Award in 2014 and the Raymond W. Fahien Award for Outstanding Teaching Effec- tiveness and Educational Scholarship presented by
committee. The facilitator also reminded the committeemembers to be respectful of what is and was within the control of the advisory committee.The committee provided considerable input that was distilled to the following vision.Vision • Our University is the BEST place for women in engineering and computing because it leverages world class best practices to recruit, retain, and graduate women, setting alumni up for lifelong success. • On our journey to achieve equity for women, the Women’s Advisory Committee continues to be a resource to the administration, faculty, students, and graduates. • Recruitment Vision: Incoming classes in the college include women at world class levels of representation, • Retention Vision