Paper ID #16737Systematic Team Formation Leading to Peer Support and Leadership SkillsDevelopmentDr. Corey Kiassat P.E., Quinnipiac University Dr. Corey Kiassat is an Assistant Professor and the Director of Industrial Engineering at Quinnipiac Uni- versity and has a BASc and a PhD degree in Industrial Engineering from the University of Toronto. He has an MBA, majoring in Marketing and International Business, from York University. Corey is a Pro- fessional Engineer and has 11 years of industry experience in manufacturing engineering and operations management with General Motors in USA and Canada. He has also been involved
Pharmacy. Most of Kate’s publication history revolves around how health and technology interact, and her primary research focus is on how people are accessing, understanding and disseminating information.Ms. Kari D. Weaver, University of Waterloo Kari D. Weaver holds a B.A. from Indiana University, an M.L.I.S. from the University of Rhode Island, and is a doctoral candidate in the Department of Instruction & Teacher Education, School of Education at the University of South Carolina. Currently, she works as the Instructional Design Librarian at the University of Waterloo Library in Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. Her research interests include co-teaching, information literacy perceptions and behaviors of students across
candidates for teacheDr. Scott R. Bartholomew, Brigham Young University Scott R. Bartholomew, PhD. is an assistant professor of Technology & Engineering Studies at Brigham Young University. Previously he taught Technology and Engineering classes at the middle school and university level.Ms. Wonki Lee, Purdue University, West Lafayette Wonki Lee is pursuing a PhD in Curriculum and Instructionˆa C™s Literacy and Language program at Purdue University. She received her B.A and M.S in Korean Language Education from Seoul National University, South Korea. She served culturally and linguisticalJessica Marie YauneyMr. Scott Thorne, Purdue University, West Lafayette Scott Thorne is a doctoral candidate at Purdue University in
, Atlanta, GA, USA, June, 2013.[8] R.F. Vaz, and P. Quinn, “Benefits of a Project-Based Curriculum: Engineering Employers’Perspectives,” Proceedings of the 2015 American Society for Engineering Education AnnualMeeting, Seattle, WA, USA, June, 2015.[9] Buck Institute for Education. “Essential Project Design Elements Checklist.” Internet:www.bie.org, 2015 [Jan. 29, 2019].[10] Death By Design. Directed by Sue Williams. Produced by Ambrica Productions, ImpactPartners, 2016.[11] Sec.gov. “Conflict of Minerals Report.” Internet:https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1294924/000119312514222143/d734490dex102.htm,2013 [Accessed 26 Nov. 2018].[12] S. Claussen and V. Dave, “Reflection and Metacognition in an Introductory CircuitsCourse,” in Proceedings of
hired employees, asked to review their knowledge of mechanical properties inmaterials and report their recommendations in a memorandum to their project manager. Thisactive laboratory exercise is part of a sophomore-level materials science course that is designedinto the mechanical engineering curriculum at Union College. The course also partially fulfills awriting requirement that all Union students must fulfill before graduation. The emphasis onmechanical properties makes relevant the understanding of materials science to the processingand design issues in mechanical engineering.BackgroundThe materials science course at Union College is taken by all mechanical engineering majorsduring their sophomore year. A chemistry prerequisite is required
students engaged in to enrich their educational journey.IntroductionAdvances in robotics and automation have led to a significant increase in the number of controlsengineers needed in industry [1]. Manufacturing is undergoing an important change in which theintroduction of robots and automation leads to reduced costs, improved safety, and an increase inproductivity [2]. Industries heavily reliant on robotics and automation include the automotiveindustry, food processing, e-commerce, and the pharmaceutical industry, to name a few. With therise of artificial intelligence and machine learning, this trend is set to accelerate in the years tocome.To meet industry demand, it is essential that modern undergraduate mechanical engineeringprograms prepare
specialty prod- ucts at the Research Center of Petroleos de Venezuela PDVSA (1983-1998). He is a founding member of Universidad Monteavila (Caracas, Venezuela) (1998—2018), became the Chancellor of this univer- sity (2005-2015), and the President of the Center for Higher Studies (2015-2018), where he also taught courses on the humanities. After rejoining the University of Pittsburgh, he has been teaching Pillar courses on Reactive Process Engineering, Process Control, Process Control Laboratory, and Process Design. In addition to technical courses, his service extends to engineering education, curriculum development, out- reach programs, global awareness, sustainability, and diversity, equity and inclusion.Dr. April
AC 2011-775: A DIRECT METHOD FOR TEACHING AND MEASURINGENGINEERING PROFESSIONAL SKILLS: A VALIDITY STUDYAshley Ater Kranov, Washington State University Dr. Ater Kranov is Director of Educational Innovation and Assessment for the College of Engineering and Architecture at Washington State University, USA. She is affiliated assistant professor in the School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science where she co-teaches the 2-semester senior design capstone sequence. Dr. Ater Kranov is a leader in university and community internationalization efforts, including developing and assessing global competencies in faculty, staff, and students. The paper describing her collaborative work with faculty in the WSU
a bettermatch to our course needs. Page 11.7.7AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering andComputers Science for supporting these efforts to develop and improve a new course tointroduce biomedical microsystems to electrical engineers.References1. I. Papautsky and E. T. K. Peterson, “Introducing biomedical microsystems into the electrical engineering curriculum,” in Proc. ASEE Conference, Portland, OR, June 12-15, 2005, CD-ROM, 8 pages.2. T.-R. Hsu, MEMS & Microsystems: Design and Manufacture. McGraw-Hill, .Boston, MA, 2002.3. J. Voldman, M. L. Gray, and M. A. Schmidt
has been a founder of Chicago PT, LLC, a start-up devoted to developing intelligent assist devices for the physical therapist. Dr. Colgate is also a member of the Board of Directors of Methode Electronics, Inc., a global, diversified manufacturer of electronic components. Dr. Colgate is currently the Director of IDEA - the Institute for Design Engineering and Applications - which is chartered with integrating design education throughout the engineering curriculum at Northwestern.Phillip Jacob, Northwestern University Phillip Jacob is the Marketing Coordinator for the freshman engineering and design course (EDC) at Northwestern University. He has been involved in recruiting real world
appliance industry for two years. Kelley is also a Graduate Facilitator with the Center for Socially Engaged Design and a Graduate Academic Liaison with the Ginsberg Center for Community Service and Learning.Shanna Daly Shanna Daly is an Associate Professor in Mechanical Engineering in the College of Engineering at the University of Michigan. She has a B.E. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Dayton and a Ph.D. degree in Engineering Education from Purdue University. In her work, she characterizes front-end design practices across the student to practitioner continuum, develops empirically-based tools to support design best practices, and studies the impact of front- end design tools on design success
Tesla. Page 11.1238.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 20061 Technological Literacy and Empowerment: Exemplars from the History of Technology As technological literacy takes form as a curriculum and field of study, we need toask ourselves continually what we are trying to accomplish. Is our goal simply to teachstudents how things work so that they can be passive employees or consumers in acapitalist economy? Or could the goal of technological literacy be broader and moreactive--that we want our students not only to understand the machine but to comprehendhow individuals, groups, and societies use
Institute and State University Janis Terpenny is an Associate Professor in Engineering Education and Mechanical Engineering, and an affiliate faculty of Industrial & Systems Engineering at Virginia Tech. She is Director of the Center for e-Design, a multi-university NSF I/UCRC center. Her research focuses on methods and representation schemes for early design process and on engineering design education. She was previously an assistant professor at the University of Massachusetts and worked at General Electric (GE), including the completion of a two-year management program. She is a member of ASEE, ASME, IIE, and Alpha Pi Mu and is the Design Economics area editor for The
- ious capacities. He served as chair of manufacturing Systems Development Applications Department of IEEE/IAS. He authored more than 25 refereed journal and conference publications. In 2009 he as PI received NSF-CCLI grant entitled A Mechatronics Curriculum and Packaging Automation Laboratory Fa- cility. In 2010 he as Co-PI received NSF-ATE grant entitled Meeting Workforce Needs for Mechatronics Technicians. From 2003 through 2006, he was involved with Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL in developing direct computer control for hydrogen powered automotives. He is also involved in several direct computer control and wireless process control related research projects. His interests are in the area of industrial
AC 2007-2710: A MULTIDISCIPLINARY GRADUATE COURSE IN BUILDINGCOMPUTER-CONTROLLED MACHINESHugh Jack, Grand Valley State University Hugh Jack is the Chair of Product Design and Manufacturing Engineering at Grand Valley State University in Grand Rapids Michigan. His interests include controls, automation, and open source software. Page 12.71.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 A Multidisciplinary Graduate Course in Building Computer Controlled MachinesAbstractA new course EGR 604 - Implementation3 has been added to the core of the graduate program atGrand
Cprograms for embedded control applications. These labs are modified from [3] and are describedbelow.In these labs the students design embedded controllers using the MC9S12C32 microcontrollersfor controlling classical position servo control systems, which block diagram is shown in Figure1. This system is available as an educational product from several different educationalequipment manufacturers. The one adopted into our course was the Mechanical Unit with model# 33-100 from Feedback, Inc. The block diagram of the Mechanical Unit is as shown in Figure 1but without the summer and the controller. The summer and the controller are to be designed bythe students and to be implemented into the microcontrollers to meet various performancecriteria
of a learning community of scholars interested inengineering educational reform, (2) reviewing the work products of the Body of KnowledgeCommittee and providing feedback, and (3) documenting how programs can incorporate theBody of Knowledge into their curriculum. A key input to this work is the second edition of theCivil Engineering Body of Knowledge for the 21st Century2.The Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge – A ReviewThe first Body of Knowledge report1 (BOK1) was published by ASCE in January 2004.Subsequent to the release of the January 2004 BOK1 report, the Curriculum Committee ofCAP^3 recommended fundamental changes to the levels of achievement, reporting their findingsin their committee report3 dated December 2005. Their
) and Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (MS and Ph.D.). His interests include Space, manufacturing, reliability, economic analysis, and renewable energy. He is a member of the ASEE, Alpha Phi Mu and the MARS Society. He also holds the rank of Engineering Specialist with the Aerospace Corporation.Nebojsa I Jaksic (Professor) NEBOJSA I. JAKSIC earned the Dipl. Ing. (M.S.) degree in electrical engineering from Belgrade University (1984), the M.S. in electrical engineering (1988), the M.S. in industrial engineering (1992), and the Ph.D. in industrial engineering from The Ohio State University (2000). He is currently a professor at Colorado State University-Pueblo teaching robotics and automation courses. Dr. Jaksic
Digest,” 2017.[4] L. L. . ESPINOSA, “Pipelines and Pathways: Women of Color in Undergraduate STEM Majors and the College Experiences That Contribute to Persistence.,” Harv. Educ. Rev., vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 209–240, 2011.[5] C. E. Foor, S. E. Walden, and D. A. Trytten, “‘I Wish that I Belonged More in this Whole Engineering Group:’ Achieving Individual Diversity,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 96, no. 2, pp. 103–115, 2007.[6] A. Godwin, “Unpacking Latent Diversity,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2017.[7] D. Bogosian and C. Rousseau, “How and Why Millenials are Shaking Up Organizational Cultures,” Rutgers Bus. Rev., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 386–394, 2017.[8] C. Smith and S. Turner, “The Radical Transformation
Bhutanese- Nepali Christian Media Ministries, which utilizes online media to address needs in Christian ministries for people in these language groups. Prior to June 2010, he was a graduate student at the University of New Hampshire, where he earned his BS and MS degrees in electrical engineering.Mr. Akshat Kothyari, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Akshat Kothyari is a Ph.D. student in Industrial and Systems Education at Virginia Tech. He received his B.Eng. in Manufacturing Engineering and M.S. in Industrial and Systems Engineering. His research interests includes theory and application of mathematical programming techniques in solving production and logistics based problems.Dr. Vinod K. Lohani
program.The Food Engineering Program Assessment Plan consists of three major parts4-10:Part I: Determining expectations. Along with stating expected outcomes, we try to identify if, infact, we provide sufficient educational opportunities inside and outside of the classroom todevelop the desired outcomes we assert we teach and/or develop. Courses may be one means, butseveral other options exist. To assure that students have sufficient and various kinds ofeducational opportunities to learn or develop desired outcomes, we engage in curricular and co-curricular mapping.Part II: Determining timing, identifying cohort(s), and assigning responsibilities. This part of theAssessment Plan focuses on how and when every Food Engineering Program faculty will
Technology, Inc., Baltimore, MD. 4. Starks, S., Beruvides, M., et.al., 1994, “Restructuring the freshman year in engineering at UTEP”, Proceedings - Frontiers in Engineering Conference, San Jose, CA, Nov 2-6, pp 331-335. 5. Hoit, M., Ohland, M., 1995, “Implementing curriculum reform: A case history”, ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, Anaheim, CA, June 25-28. 6. Van Treuen, K.W., Havener, A.G., 1998, “Teaching introductory engineering: A problem based learning experience”, Biomedical Sciences Instrumentation, Vol. 34, pp 1-6.BONNIE BOARDMANDr. Boardman is an Assistant Professor of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering at The University ofTexas at Arlington. Her primary research interests are in the
ofthe survey can be applied so that the equipment is used in the undergraduate curriculum in thebest possible manner. Page 10.864.4 Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering EducationInevitably, when a power generation plant is scaled-down and it has few efficiency-enhancingcomponents (e.g. feedwater heaters, etc.), energy losses in components will be magnified,substantially decreasing the cycle efficiency. Although the RC is a useful tool for teachingfundamentals of thermodynamics, fluid mechanics, heat
competencies and methodology requiredfor a given system will vary based upon the system and application type.The defined systems thinking competencies, align completely with those required to architect acomplex system [6], and are included to some degree in virtually all systems engineering programs[7]. The systems thinking competencies are also applicable to all domains, as evidenced by theirincorporation into the core curriculum for various domains such as mechanical engineering [8],sustainability engineering [9], engineering management [10], and in addressing socio-culturalsystems to enhance humanity [11], just to name a few. This also aligns with the INCOSE 2025 SEVision, which states that systems engineering education must be advanced such that
, together with the necessity of evaluating severalactivities in parallel are the central challenge in learning CPM. Neither the textbooks, whose textremains static, nor the existing commercial software present this actual dynamic nature of themanual computations properly, at a possible detriment to the students’ learning experience.Spreadsheet Calculator for Critical Path MethodThe augment the traditional educational approach for CPM, the authors therefore created a newand unconventional tool for teaching CPM that is particularly geared toward undergraduatestudents, who might often only take one course in construction engineering and managementbefore graduating from their four-year civil engineering curriculum. The educational unit is partof a
An Examination of Technical Interests Motivating Women and Men Engineering Majors Karan L. Watson, Ph.D., P.E., Dean of Faculties and Associate Provost, Regents Professor, Electrical Engineering John A. Weese, Ph.D., P.E., Regents Professor, Mechanical Engineering Texas A&M University, College StationIn a 1993 study of the persistence of sex segregation in education, Meece and Ecclesstated that in the US parity had been achieved in college enrollment for women, but “there was only a slight reduction in the amount of sex segregation found in courses of study selected by women. Women continue to dominate many traditional female fields, such as
Course to Engineering Program OutcomesThe following is an assessment of the twelve program outcomes for Engineering Principles I & II, asrequired by ABET Criterion 3 (a–k). The program outcomes are written to reflect the mission andobjectives of George Fox University, a faith-based educational institution that is anchored in the liberal artstradition. It is noteworthy that this freshman course covers all but one of the outcomes, more than any otherengineering course we offer. a. an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and the engineering sciences for effective engineering problem solving—Problem solving techniques rely on an understanding of algebra, trigonometry, and basic science. b. an ability to design and
, integrate the design ofsystems and components, and relate to the user group in a manner closely simulating real worldsituations, providing enhanced educational opportunities. The interplay, coordination, andcooperation between engineering, architectural, and landscape architecture students bringadditional real world experiences to the educational environment.In these multi-discipline teams, the role of mentors becomes more critical to successfuloutcomes. Instructors have traditionally met with mentors before the semester classes begin todiscuss projects, curriculum, and expectations. As part of the constructive feedback and selfcritique, the instructors have been able to better align mentor needs and expectations forindividual projects.Feedback and
Mechatronics Engineering program. His main research interests include, robotics, advanced manufacturing systems, embedded systems, and autonomous mobile robots. Since 2014 is an INEP (agency linked to the Ministry of Education) advisor, to promote the evaluation and improvement of undergraduate courses in mechatronics engineering in Brazil.Prof. Andressa Corrente Martins, Centro Universit´ario, Instituto Maua de Tecnologia She holds a master’s degree in Aerospace Systems and Mechatronics with a focus on Robotics from the Aeronautics Institute of Technology and a degree in Control and Automation Engineering from the Uni- versidade Paulista. Currently, she is a professor at the Mau´a Institute of Technology. She has experience
MechanicalEngineering. Professional engineers generally use three types of software to handle theiranalyses of various problems: Computer-Aided Design (CAD), Finite Element Analysis (FEA),and Comptuational Fluid Dynamics (CFD). Many Mechanical Engineering students are onlyexposed to CAD and FEA in the core curriculum. Furthermore, students are taught theoreticalFluid Mechanics concepts in the core curriculum, so the use of fluids-based problems with CFDsoftware is a natural fit for this study. Therefore, in the study fluid mechanics problems weresolved using a computational approach (CFD) while the software is validated using a theoreticalapproach. The educational software EasyCFD10 was used in the study for the following reasons: • EasyCFD is much less