do this.Some students used these exercises very seriously and did an extensive study in order todetermine which graduate school they would attend. Some of the other speakers andtopics covered in the seminars include: ≠ Librarian for engineering on how to research data bases. ≠ Financial consultants on how engineering students should begin to invest their money ≠ Representative from the Institute of Sustainability and how engineering intersects with sustainability ≠ Industry representative who informed the students on how they could become quality auditors on either a part-time or full-time basisThe two most popular types of meetings were speakers from industry and the graduateschool panel. The engineering
grant, on which this supplementalfunding proposal is based, is to characterize and model the phenomenon of Master’s-leveldeparture from the engineering PhD from the perspectives of departers, questioners, and faculty.This transformative research explicitly addresses Master’s-level departure as a subcategory ofattrition. The research aims this study seeks to address are: Aim 1: Characterize common narratives of Master’s-level departure and model departure decisions over time. Broad questions include: How do narratives of attrition vary by characteristic (e.g., stage of graduate study at time of departure, gender, race)? How do factors of attrition from higher education literature manifest in an engineering context
task) and the researcher is ready to put their knowledge to use through publication, presentation, or other means[28], [29].The ISP has been applied to engineering students to guide the development of interviewquestions in an qualitative examination of the differences between beginning and advancedstudents’ understanding of information skills [24]. In that study, a semi-structured interviewframework was used in discussions with beginning engineering students (identified as first- orsecond-year undergraduate students) and advanced engineering students (identified as final-yearundergraduate or graduate students) [24]. A thematic analysis of the interviews revealed fivebroad themes underscoring the differences between the
for Graduate Studies in the Department of Informa- tion Sciences and Technology at George Mason University. She received a B.S./M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Automated Control Systems Engineering and Information Processing. Her research interests lie at the intersection of Data Science and Big Data Analytics, Cognitive and Learning Sciences, Educational Data Mining, Personalized Learning, and STEM Education.Dr. Mihai Boicu, George Mason University Mihai Boicu, Ph.D., is Assistant Professor of Information Technology at George Mason University, As- sociate Director of the Learning Agents Center (http://lac.gmu.edu), Co-Director of IT Entrepreneurship Laboratory (http://lite.gmu.edu) and Co-Director ofHarry J Foxwell
longitudinal study of engineer- ing students, team assignment, peer evaluation, and active and collaborative teaching methods has been supported by over $12.8 million from the National Science Foundation and the Sloan Foundation and his team received Best Paper awards from the Journal of Engineering Education in 2008 and 2011 and from the IEEE Transactions on Education in 2011. Dr. Ohland is past Chair of ASEE’s Educational Research and Methods division and a member the Board of Governors of the IEEE Education Society. He was the 2002–2006 President of Tau Beta Pi.Richard A. Layton, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
students who may be interested in the medical and environmental fields andwould otherwise not consider graduate study in an engineering discipline, therefore providing anadditional avenue for broadening participation. Additionally, students have the opportunity topursue independent projects in a variety of different engineering disciplines and departments,which allows us to accommodate a wide range of student interests. FREEDM provides anexceptional opportunity with the combined interests of power engineering, power electronics,and advanced vehicle technologies and battery storage.The REU ExperienceThe ten week REU program offers participants opportunities to develop their research,professional, and technical skills. Each student pursues an
Experiences for Undergraduates (REU) programs promote persistencein STEM fields, increased interest in graduate school, and development of identity as aresearcher for REU participants. While most REU programs operate on a single campus, agrowing number offer participants the opportunity to engage in research at geographicallydistributed campuses united around a common theme. Though logistically challenging, such aprogram can expand participants’ networks while maintaining a sense of cohort and community,which is important for researcher identity development. The current study investigates theoutcomes of an REU Site run across four campuses within the National Science Foundation(NSF)-funded Engineering Research Center (ERC) for Re-inventing the
Session 1396 Why NOT Engineering – Perspectives of Young Women and the Influence of the Media Monica J. Bruning Iowa State UniversityOverviewThis pilot study is developed to assess how young women (10 th grade girls) come to know theengineering profession. The study analyzes young women’s career exploration approach and theinfluence that the engineering language and imagery has upon the young women as they explorethe profession. The pilot study employs a qualitative research design and utilizes feminist theoryto better understand the
is Professor of Engineering Education, Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and Director of the Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Diversity.Crystal M Pee, Virginia Polytechnic and State University Crystal Pee is a graduate student at Virginia Polytechnic and State University pursuing a Ph.D. in Engi- neering Education. She currently is a graduate research assistant under the direction of Dr. Jeremi London. Her research interests include broadening participation in industry. Prior to attending Virginia Tech, she received a Bachelor of Science degree in Chemical Engineering with a minor in Business Administration from Clemson University.Teirra K Holloman, Virginia Tech Department of Engineering Education
taught middle school, high school, undergraduate and graduate level technology education in his 30 year career as a teacher and researcher. He has extensive research and curriculum development experience in STEM disciplines. His research includes the study of thinking processes, teaching methods, and activities that improve technological problem-solving performance and creativity. He has expertise in developing technology and engineering education curriculum that inte- grates science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) concepts. Dr. Deluca is Co-PI on NSF project Transforming Teaching through Implementing Inquiry (DRL 1118942). This project focuses on developing research-proven professional development
from curricular options by which they can tailor theireducational paths. One type of option allows students to combine their undergraduate andgraduate study and to accelerate the completion of a first graduate degree. These curriculaoptions are identified by a variety of program names, e.g. accelerated masters, combined BS/MS,and 4+1 programs [1,2]. Common features are double-counting courses to satisfy bothundergraduate and graduate degree requirements and a degree path with shortened time-to-completion. Both thesis (research-based) and non-thesis-based programs exist. Institutionsadapt the details to the discipline and to their local situations [3-6].The Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) Department at Missouri University of
Associate Chair for Graduate Studies in the Department of Informa- tion Sciences and Technology at George Mason University. She received a B.S./M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Automated Control Systems Engineering and Information Processing. Her research interests lie at the intersection of Data Science and Big Data Analytics, Cognitive and Learning Sciences, Educational Data Mining, Personalized Learning, and STEM Education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Transforming STEM Education through Inquiry-Based Approach: Examination of Metacognition, Cognitive and Teaching PresenceAbstract: In this exploratory study, we examined how engineering graduate students
research associate. Her current teaching and research interests are robotics, wireless sensor networks, signal processing, embedded software and engineering education. Page 26.1440.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Summer Engineering Enrichment Program Results Exceed ExpectationsAbstractA long term ten week residence summer engineering enrichment program for incoming first yearengineering majors with ACT Math scores of 17-25 (equivalent SAT Math scores of 470-620;35%-80%) is exceeding retention/graduation in engineering expectations
content but also the critical practices ofworking as a team and taking initiative to study whatever is necessary to address a challenge.While such a configuration is not physically possible in all research contexts, these results offerthe reader key insights into building an REU experience that successfully uses teams andmotivates faculty and graduate students to be strong mentors. Page 14.1255.2The Structure of the REU Site: SPIRE-EITSPIRE-EIT (Summer Program for Interdisciplinary Research and Education – EmergingInterface Technologies) at Iowa State University is a 10-week interdisciplinary summerexperience for 15 undergraduates that integrates
of women in engineering and highlight the nuances in their graduate mentoring relationshipsto contest the experiences of White, cisgender men as the normative standard in engineering spaces[15], [16]. This paper is part of a larger study that aims to delve into positive, effective mentoringrelationships between women doctoral candidates in engineering disciplines and their mostinfluential mentors during their dissertation research process [17]. The overall study is guided bythe following research questions: 1. What does effective, inclusive graduate mentorship look like for women doctoral candidates in engineering? 2. How does this mentorship affect the way they navigate their dissertation process?This subset of the research
our BME program do not have a clear sense of the jobs or career trajectories available tothem upon graduation, and that many do not hold realistic expectations of what they can expectto do in an entry-level job.1 In Fall 2015, we piloted a set of reflection activities with our co-taught section of this BMEsuccess course (18 students, of which 15 consented to participate in the research study). Throughthese activities, students were encouraged to reflect on their choice of BME as a major, toarticulate their career and personal goals, and to identify actions they could take while in collegeto help achieve their personal and professional aspirations. By integrating regular reflection, weaimed to empower students to take ownership of their
in the planning for our specificproject, the synthesis of the extant works can inform other faculty and industry leaders who areinterested in teaching and applying project management techniques in their courses orcompanies.Keywords: project management, literature review, graduate education, engineering Part I: Context of the Study Students in graduate programs in STEM dedicate a significant amount of time and energyin learning the research process and applying these processes to individual or collaborativeresearch initiatives. This myopic focus on research skills and the scientific process ignores othercritical skills needed in their careers post-graduation (Leshner & Scherer, 2018; Wendler et al
Paper ID #45009Amplifying Unheard Voices: Energy Literacy as a Path to EquitableStakeholder ParticipationMs. Naomia A. Suggs-Brigety, The George Washington University Naomia is conducting research on energy equity. Naomia graduated from Jackson State University, an HBCU in Mississippi, with a bachelor’s degree in Civil Engineering. After working for the Mississippi Department of Transportation, she shifted into policy working in the U.S. House of Representative on U.S. – Africa relations, global health and international development. Naomia also has a master’s degree from the Elliott School of International Affairs in
LA Program, Improving Minority Partnerships and Access through CISE(Computer & Information Science & Engineering)-related Teaching, is an NSF Graduate STEM(Science, Technology, Engineering and Math) Fellows in K-12 Education Program designed toaddress these concerns. The program partners graduate fellows who are conducting master’slevel research in a CISE-related field with a middle or high school teacher from the East LosAngeles area. Fellows work closely with teachers to develop hands-on activities designed toenhance the educational experience of students and increase their interest in STEM-relatedfields. The NAE study found that female students in particular relate well to role models, andthus, the program actively and
shownsignificant gains in increasing the presence of students from various backgrounds in the STEM fields.3Mentoring provides participants from underrepresented groups with exposure to role models, supportnetworks, and other mechanisms that help them succeed in STEM fields.7 Attracting more students fromunderrepresented populations into the STEM workforce will maximize innovation, creativity, andcompetitiveness.The present research study reviewed, characterized, and analyzed the various practices, procedures, andpolicies of successful mentoring programs. Survey instruments composed of 22 questions were used tolearn about the mentoring experiences of graduate students in STEM fields during their undergraduatematriculation, particularly if they benefited or
research conducted by their faculty. Graduate programs provide the obvious benefitto a research mission of students that need to assist/conduct research and investigations in orderto pursue theses and projects. The availability of graduate students can, of course, also assistfaculty with the undergraduate program by serving as teaching assistants for labs and other taskssuch as grading assignments. Construction programs can have both a professional and researchfocus. Certainly the precedent-setters for professional construction graduate programs at manyinstitutions have been those programs in law, architecture, business, and medical specialties.A further benefit for the institution is that graduate programs help in retaining and recruitingmore
Education. His interests are centered around mentorship, mental health, and retention in STEM students and faculty. He was awarded the 2019 NAGAP Graduate Educa- tion Gold Research Grant award to study engineering faculty perceptions of graduate student well-being and attrition. Before studying education at UIUC, Joseph earned an MS degree in Physics from Indiana University in Bloomington and a BS in Engineering Physics at UIUC.Ms. Mia Ko, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Mia is a 4th year undergraduate student studying Bioengineering with a minor in Material Science and Engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign. On campus, she actively participates as an Engineering Ambassador
study providesinsight into the role of research experiences prior to graduate school in the transitionof REU trainees into their professional career development. The findings stronglysupport that engagement of REU trainees provides thrust in their transition tograduate schools. Specifically, joint publications, interaction strength with theirREU mentors post-REU training, and professional community activities are the topthree contributing factors to the engagement.Objective and MotivationResearch Experience for Undergraduates (REU) has been a very effective way to foster students’interest in research, attract more students to pursue advanced degrees in STEM-related fields,and promote a well-trained diverse workforce in STEM-related career path
students’ outcomes, researchers areincreasingly deploying a method called Social Network Analysis (SNA). SNA examines therelationships and interactions between individuals or groups to provide an understanding ofsocial structures and behaviors. Research applying SNA helps researchers understandengineering student interactions and has shown that students who have more connections withother students or have stronger connections to other students, demonstrate higher performance onengineering assessments than peers with fewer or weaker connections [2].Important concepts in SNA include nodes, edges, and SNA measures. In SNA, networks are thecollection of individuals and connections a researcher wants to study. Nodes are individualentities in the study
presently a Doctoral Students at Engineering Education Transformative Institute at the University of Georgia College of Engineering.Md Ulfat Tahsin, The Ohio State University Md Ulfat Tahsin is a Ph.D. student and a Graduate Fellow in the Department of Engineering Education at The Ohio State University. He is from Bangladesh. He has previously worked closely with engineering faculties and students in Bangladesh from where his love and interest for engineering education started to flourish.Lexy Chiwete Arinze, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Lexy Arinze is a first-generation PhD student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University and a Graduate Research Assistant with the Global Learning
intellectually challenging. Suggestionfrom the teacher participants for improvement mostly involved requests for more guidance onhow to incorporate what they were learning in their research into lessons for their classrooms.By describing this program and the successes and challenges encountered by the participants andorganizers, we intend to help others considering implementing REU/RET programs or othersummer research experiences to design and implement successful programs.IntroductionNumerous studies have shown that research experiences can have a strong influence onundergraduate students’ decisions to pursue graduate education in a science, technology,engineering, or mathematics (STEM) discipline.1–3 These programs can help students developvaluable
first-year engineering coordinator at the University of Indianapolis. He focuses his work between teaching the first two years of introductory en- gineering and engineering design and research in student progression. Previously, he was a special title series assistant professor in electrical engineering at the University of Kentucky, and the KEEN Program Coordinator at Gonzaga University in the School of Engineering and Applied Science. He completed his doctorate in engineering education from Purdue University’s School of Engineering Education. Pre- viously, he received an M.S. in earth and planetary sciences studying geospatial imaging, and an M.S. in physics studying high-pressure, high-temperature FT-IR
science students.The paper includes a brief description of these successful programs and how they encourage andsupport the students to do well academically as well as broaden their general knowledge aboutengineering, including resumes, internships, research, networking, portfolios, career planning,graduate school, industry (through industry speakers with graduate degrees), and academia.This paper details the Fall 09 semester program and the end of the semester evaluation. Thisstudy includes 79 current students in the programs. The evaluation completed by these studentsmeasures how well the program covered the topics of graduate school, research, networking,engineering careers, portfolios, engineering contributions, communication skills, and study
projects at Cal Poly Pomona. TheREU site has so far hosted a total of 31 diverse group of students for 8-10 weeks of summer searchduring the three year period, with the projects focusing on research on the Dynamics and Controlof UAVs, Collision Detection and Avoidance System for UAVs, Artificial Intelligence, ComputerVision, Navigation in GPS-Denied Environments, and Flight Test experience. Another goal is toattract students from community colleges to STEM programs at 4-year institutions and encouragethe participants to pursue their studies for graduate degrees.The paper discusses the effectiveness of the Program in meeting its goals and objectives and onstudent success. The Program has been tracking the participants. Most of the participants are
-materials• Partnerships with NIH, FDAMaterials & Manufacturing Water Sustainability & Climate (WSC)• BIO, ENG, GEO, SBE• Three Categories: • Exploratory, Incubation Grants • Place-based Observational and Modeling Studies • Synthesis & Integration Grants• $16M Anticipated• 8-14 Awards Anticipated• Letter of Intent Due March 15, 2010• Full Proposal Due April 15, 2010 NSF/FDA Scholar-In-ResidenceInteragency partnership for the investigation of scientific andengineering issues concerning emerging trends in medical devicetechnology.Enable investigators in science, engineering, and mathematics todevelop research collaborations within the intramural researchenvironment at the FDA.Four flexible mechanisms for support of