performance are as follows: ▪ Quality of Instruction o The institution must ensure the requirements of the big-University related to level of experience and qualifications for hired faculty at the satellite campus. The faculty at the satellite campus must be provided with the same, if not better teaching / learning tools to conduct their job duties. The faculty at the satellite campus should be exposed to the same level of professional development opportunities, to help them enhance their teaching methodologies and emerging technology in the field of education. ▪ Resources Available to Students o The availability and quality of resources
Paper ID #12200Students Seeking Different Paths to Entrepreneurial EducationProf. Sergio Celis P.E., Universidad de Chile Sergio Celis is an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering and Sciences at the Universidad de Chile. He conducts research on higher education, with a focus on teaching and learning in STEM fields. His primary research interest is in how multiple forces, internal and external to the institution, influence what and how we teach in colleges and universities. His doctoral thesis investigated how social and intellectual movements influenced the emergence of entrepreneurship education in
AC 2012-4344: FUTURE ENGINEERING PROFESSORS’ VIEWS OF THEROLE OF MOTIVATION IN TEACHING AND LEARNINGMrs. Ana T. Torres-Ayala, University of South Florida Ana T. Torres-Ayala is a doctoral candidate in higher education at the University of South Florida. She holds a B.S. degree in computer engineering from the University of Puerto Rico, Mayagez, and a M.Eng. degree in computer and systems engineering from Rensselear Polytechnic Institute. She has experience in the telecommunications industry where she worked for Lucent Technologies. Torres-Ayala was previously an information technology instructor. Her research interests include faculty development, scholarship of teaching and learning, graduate education, and
Paper ID #43227WIP: Examining the Multifaceted Significance of Scholarship Programs inSTEMSkylar Hubbarth, Clemson UniversityAnna Grace HunterShannon Conner, Clemson UniversityDr. D. Matthew Boyer, Clemson University Dr. Boyer is a Research Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering & Science Education in the College of Engineering, Computing, and Applied Sciences at Clemson University. His work focuses on how technology supports knowledge building and transfer in a range of learning environments. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 WIP: Examining the Multifaceted
South Florida in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. She is advised by Dr. James R. Mihelcic. Colleen was part of the Peace Corps Master’s International Program where she served and conducted research in Mali, West Africa for three years as a Water and Sanitation Engineer. Her research was focused on ”Monitoring and Evaluation of an Appropriate Handwashing Technology.” Colleen’s dissertation research involves a human and embodied material energy analysis of the Shea Butter process; mapping the Shea Butter belt using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) to estimate the area and population that work with and consume Shea butter; and quantifying emissions of carbon black from the smoking and boiling
learning.“ISEUC is based on international best SE education practices, accreditation standards, creditprograms and professional education” and provides undergraduate and graduate credit courses,as well as post-graduate professional education courses 11. The goal for the ISEUC is to provideaccess to software engineering education for software-intensive industries on a global scale frominternational universities with established programs or degrees in software engineering. Thecourses are primarily delivered asynchronously using Web-based technology, but also includesome synchronous delivery, including either face-to-face, video conferencing, or interactivesessions. For more information or to consider becoming a member, visit www.iseuc.org.Current
need, e.g., counseling services, research support services. An email newsletter was suggested as a way to help parents stay better informed about whatis happening in the BSME program, and about resources available for their children. Withcurrent knowledge about the program in hand, they felt they could do a better job of guiding theirchild via phone and e-mail chats, home visits at break times, etc. They want to continue to beparents, in partnership with the faculty, to their emerging adult children. Finally, one parent who herself is a professor at another university, urged the BSME facultynot to get too caught up in research and grant soliciting because of its potentially adverse impacton the strong faculty-student relationships that
engineering and mechanicalengineering. The motivation for the program is twofold: First of all, the dramatic drop in the costof sensors, computers and actuators is making possible entirely new classes of products, capableof both automating nontrivial tasks as well as performing functions not possible before.Secondly, robotics has proven to be an excellent means to excite pre-college students aboutscience, technology, and engineering. While much of the technical foundation for the newprogram is drawn from Computer Science, Electrical, and Mechanical Engineering, we believethat Robotics Engineering is on the path to emerging as an independent discipline with its ownintellectual goals and body of knowledge. Thus, graduates from the program are expected
AI-Generated Performance Feedback ReviewsAbstract his empirical research, research brief paper, explores engineering students perceptions ofTAI-generated performance feedback reports (PFR) crafted from peer comments in a project-based learning (PBL) class.Peer feedbackis an effective tool for promoting accountability and reducing social loafing among student teams. However, students are often ill-equipped to write constructive, actionable feedback that helps their peers effectively improve their teamwork behaviors.Therefore, feedback literacyhas emerged as an important skill for students to develop in order to take action on the feedback they receive, and one of the key constructs of feedback
assessment of the gaps in institutional services and resources and providethe required feedback, while informing the institution and the research community about theways to develop a resilient support network for engineering students in the times of crisis. Futurework will consider how student responses change under the altering societal and work/academicconditions with or without COVID-19 pandemic being present at that time. Results from thecurrent study also provide recommendations for effective online instruction in the future.Keywords: Needs Analysis, Learning Technology, Engineering StudentsIntroduction During times of local and national quarantine due to the COVID-19 pandemic,universities had to close campuses and expediently convert
writing assessment attitude survey conducted at Oregon Institute of Technology,identifies areas of concern, and offers suggestions for improvement. The SurveyIn informal corridor and cafeteria conversation, faculty are not shy about expressing theirdiscontent regarding student writing. As a communications instructor who has frequent contactwith technical faculty, I decided to explore these complaints via a survey, in hopes of pinpointingareas of concern and offering suggestions that would help alleviate the frustration of technicalfaculty as they deal with the paper load. All 43 full-time engineering technology faculty weresent the "Writing Assessment Attitude Survey" (Appendix A), requesting
community partners. To evaluate the effectiveness of the critical learning community,students will be prompted at various points in the quarter to use the reflection journals todescribe any aspects of the community partnership that have influenced how they understandthemselves, others, and the communities with whom they will work. Students’ reflection journalswill be analyzed for themes that emerge.(c) Community partners’ perceptions: Finally, because this course collaborates withinternational partners, their feedback must be sought in understanding the impact of the course.We plan to design a questionnaire that is collaboratively informed by the community partnersand faculty. We wish to understand the expectations and priorities of the community
Industrial Revolution, or the InformationAge, major societal changes led by technological advances emerged out of various needs of ournation. Since the 1970s, our current society has searched for methods to ensure greatersustainability. As discussed in a report to the European commission authored by Walter Staheland Genevie Reday, circular economies and thereby emerged as a potential solution to gapingeconomic loops and their significant impact on waste. Stahel suggested a ‘closed loop’ process.A ‘closed loop’ allows for waste to be reused as inputs for the system. William McDonoughand Michael Braungart introduce a biomimetic design system, cradle to cradle (C2C) thatmimics nature’s process of a regenerative approach to waste [7]. Tim Jackson coined
systems across different domains: Interconnectivity – interactions between systems’ parts and components Integration – multiple sub-entities combined to produce new capabilities and goals Evolutionary development – rapid changes in technology, requirements, and environment Emergence – unpredictable events and system behaviors only apparent after occurrence Complexity – dynamic interconnectivity precludes complete understanding Uncertainty - incomplete knowledge of systems leading to unintended consequences Ambiguity – lack of clarity necessary to support decisive action and commitment to alternative courses of actionIn responding to these attributes, a systems thinking instrument is developed using
find less material, or older material. Consequently, my students will get less help in theirstudying, and I will get less help in updating my lectures. It is a shame that the Web, which oncegave us access to a whole new world of information, is now beginning to snatch it away.When someone declines to furnish material for our course database, we ask why. We have beenfinding two reasons [3]: Copyright concerns—some instructors had taken their material fromtextbooks, and some of them were thinking of including it in books they were writing—anddiffidence—many instructors just simply didn’t think that their work was good enough to beviewed by people at other schools. Both of these would seem to motivate instructors to keeptheir material out of
Nafalski, University of South Australia Andrew Nafalski's career spans several decades in academic and research institutions in Poland, Austria, the UK, Germany, France, Japan and Australia. He holds BEng(Hons), GradDipEd, MEng, PhD and DSc degrees. He is Chartered Professional Engineer and Fellow of the Institution of Engineers, Australia, Fellow of the Institution of Engineering and Technology (UK), Senior Member of the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (USA) and Honorary Member of the Golden Key International Honour Society. He is currently a Professor of Electrical Engineering at the University of South Australia in Adelaide and Professor of Information Technology and
Construction Project Management. Dr. Lee’s main research areas include Construction Informatics and Visual Analytics; Building Information Modeling (BIM), Information and Communication Technology (ICT) for construc- tion management; and Interactive Educational Games and Simulations. E-mail: leen@ccsu.edu.Dr. Glynis Fitzgerald, Central Connecticut State University Dr. Fitzgerald became Associate Vice President, Academic Affairs and Dean of Graduate Studies in August, 2013. She formerly served as Department Chair and Professor of Communication at Central Connecticut State University. Her area of specialty is organizational and corporate communication. She is recognized as an expert in relationship building and has focused
teachers.Introduction to PMSThe use of PMS, in the construction industry, as a tool for managing and organizing work hasgrown and continues to grow at a rapid pace in many other industries7,11. A recent study hasshown that since 2000, over 95% of construction companies use PMS for control and planning oftheir daily activities11. Multiple studies show that if present companies want to compete intoday’s market, they must become adaptive and use information technology systems such asPMS7-10. There are a few PMS available for use in the construction industry and of these thereexist two favored PMS packages; Primavera and Microsoft Project7-11. Primavera systems(http://www.oracle.com) became available in 1983 and is today’s leading provider to theconstruction
techniques, skills and modern tools of their (b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as disciplines, well as to analyze and interpret data b. an ability to apply current knowledge and adapt to (c) an ability to design a system, component, or emerging applications of mathematics, science, process to meet desired needs engineering and technology, (d) an ability to function on multi-disciplinary c. an ability to conduct, analyze and interpret teams experiments and apply experimental results to (e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve improve processes, engineering problems
Central Texas Food Bank, Houston Food Bank, and local food pantries. She is part of the Master of Engineering Technical Management program staff helping with coursework and curriculum development.Dr. Behbood Zoghi, Texas A&M University Ben Zoghi is the Victor H. Thompson endowed Chair Professor of electronics engineering at Texas A&M University, where he directs the College of Engineering RFID Oil & Gas Consortium and teaches appli- cation of emerging technologies. Over the past 10 years ©American Society for Engineering Education, 20232023 ASEE Engineering Management Division (EMD) Design of A Unique Industry-Oriented Project-Based Capstone Course For Engineering
Paper ID #48501Title Air and Missile Defense Threat Scenario Variation to Reduce PretestSensitization, Video Games as a Case StudyJulie R Szekerczes, Indiana State UniversityDr. M. Affan Badar, Indiana State University M. Affan Badar, PhD is Professor, former department chair, and current Director of the PhD in Technology Management Program in the Bailey College of Engineering & Technology at Indiana State University. In 2016-18 he was on leave and worked as Professor and Chair of the Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management Department at university of Sharjah, UAE.Dr. James Nevin McKirahan Jr., Indiana State
degrees in computing and related fields. Information Systems Education Journal, 8(50). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1146770*Sorkin, S. (2018). Long-term follow-up of STEM scholarship students to degree attainment. Information Systems Education Journal, 16(5), 45–55.*Sorkin, S., Braman, J., & Yancy, B. (2019). Interim awardee outcomes after four years of a STEM scholarship program. Information Systems Education Journal, 17(1), 49–63.*Smith, C., & Wingate, L. (2016). Strategies for broadening participation in advanced technological education programs: Practice and perceptions. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 40(9), 779–796.*Stofer, K. A., Chandler, J. W., Insalaco, S., Matyas, C., Lannon, H. J., Judge, J
underserved, community-based organizationsAbstractIn 2011, the Scientist for Tomorrow (SfT) initiative was created after receiving a grant fromthe National Science Foundation’s Informal Science Education program. The SfT initiative isdesigned to utilize a science-based curriculum to provide urban youth in Chicago withinformation and skills related to science, technology, engineering, arts and mathematics(STEAM) careers and foster positive attitudes toward STEAM subjects and related careers.This grant financially sustained SfT and allowed it to serve 15 out-of-school-timeorganizations for two years. Today, the SfT initiative is in its sixth year, serving more than 40out-of-school time organizations, 600 middle school student and 150 parents per
Paper ID #25132Board 100: Work in Progress: Developing a Body of Knowledge to IllustrateAdvanced Manufacturing Competency and IdentityDr. Marcia A. Mardis, Florida State University Marcia A. Mardis is a Professor and Associate Dean at Florida State University’s College of Communica- tion & Information and Associate Director of the Information Institute. Author of numerous publication and recipient of over two decades of federally funded research grants, Dr. Mardis’ work focuses on professional identity creation, educational text and data mining, and technician education improvement.Dr. Faye R Jones, Florida State University
Educationstudents merely recalling the facts we present in class; however, many of our students feel thatthey have done a good job if they can repeat the examples from class on the test.Bloom presents cognitive learning as the recall of information and "the intellectual skills:comprehending information, organizing ideas, analyzing and synthesizing data, applyingknowledge, choosing among alternatives in problem-solving, and evaluating ideas or actions."1Typically these intellectual skills are referred to using the hierarchy presented by Bloom and hiscolleagues: 1. Knowledge (least complex) 2. Comprehension 3. Application 4. Analysis 5. Synthesis 6. Evaluation (most complex)Obviously, faculty and employers want students who can perform at
coaching cohort model is two pronged: first, Butler shares her leadership and career successacumen to facilitate self discovery and goal planning while offering tangible and relevantstrategies for career progress to the coaching cohorts; second the cohort sessions offer anopportunity for participants to share their own wisdom about faculty advancement and become avaluable source of information and support for one another. The main focus of the cohort iscoaching, which is directed and performance-oriented with the purpose of facilitating theachievement of specific goals. The secondary benefit is the opportunity for the participants toestablish peer mentoring relationships. Mentoring in this case plays a different role thancoaching. Mentoring is a
research investigation conducted at the Universityof Toronto whose goal includes understanding workload-related learning barriers for first-yearengineering students and suggesting approaches to mitigate those barriers.Attrition of students in STEM (science, technology, engineering, and math) fields can be as highas 50%. A number of studies have attempted to elucidate the learning barriers that perpetuatesuch high loss rates for first-year college majors, citing both structural and cultural challenges inundergraduate STEM programs. The motivation for this work at our instiution emerged inresponse to anecdotal evidence (i.e. informal student conversations and feedback), suggestingthat students are overwhelmed by their transition from high-school to
respondents that consider specific extracurricularactivities beneficial for developing ethical understanding. The extracurricular activity that mostrespondents mentioned beneficial was conversations with family and peers (85% ofrespondents). This response option emerged from qualitative information. Although it does notnecessarily depend on the school approach, it reflects the concern on family influence overindividual moral reasoning (see Figure 4). Other extracurricular activities that most respondentsreported as beneficial were individual learning and volunteering activities (63% and 52%respectively).Table 11: Extracurricular activities perceived as beneficial for developing ethical understanding according to
environment conducive to professional growth and collaboration.Research has shown that such multifaceted approaches, including skills development, access toresources, and informal networking, are robust predictors of success in academia. As we delveinto the results and discussion, it becomes evident how these intentional strategies contribute tothe overarching goal of enhancing the academic journey for faculty members across variedcareer stages.Results and DiscussionIn this section, we delve into the results of the Faculty Development Symposium (FDS),shedding light on attendance trends, patterns, and key considerations that emerge from the data,offering insights into the symposium's impact and areas for potential improvement.We have consistently
-Normative Identities in the Cultures of Engineering (InIce)Introduction to the ProjectTraditionally, engineering culture has limited rather than fostered diversity in engineering. Toaddress this persistent issue, we examine how diverse students identify with engineering andnavigate the culture of engineering. We define diversity not by making a priori categorizationsaccording to traditional demographic information (e.g., race, gender, sexual orientation, etc.), butinstead by investigating the variation in students’ attitudinal profiles on a host of affectivemeasures. Using these measures, we develop an identification of large, “normative” groups ofengineers as well as “non-normative” students who emerge as having distinct