. Transcriptions were also reviewed against theaudio recordings for accuracy. The themes of each interview/survey were then analyzed based onthe research questions of this study. Responses to the questions were grouped under broaderthemes related to each research question to analyze overlapping themes for consistency andcoherence.RESULTSParticipants included doctoral students and master’s graduates working in the fields ofbioengineering, biomedical engineering, mechanical engineering, electrical engineering and civilengineering.Thematic analysis of the interview transcript identified three main points of focus in this study:(1) differences and similarities in implemented structures to support successful engineeringcareers for women in Ghana and in the USA
year 2030. The recommendations of Vision 2030 include significant, broad changes tomechanical engineering education at the undergraduate and graduate levels. They also bring tolight the dualistic nature of engineering education, with faculty and courses focused either on thepractice of engineering, or on an academic research-oriented approach to engineering. Thispaper discusses the potential effects of the recommendations on mechanical engineeringprograms, including the curriculum, faculty, and reward structure. The mechanical engineeringprogram at the University of Minnesota Duluth is analyzed as a specific example, and a plan forimplementing the Vision 2030 recommendations is presented along with a discussion of potentialdifficulties
finishit; these perspectives would provide a fuller picture of the barriers to academic success forcaregivers. Additionally, research using methods other than surveys and interviews, both of whichsuffer from limitations such as low response rates and difficulty in scaling, could create a fullerpicture of the experiences of CSt.As mentioned above, no studies in this review focused specifically on engineering students.Previous research suggests that engineering students differ from other students – including fromother students studying science – in a variety of ways, including time to graduation, number ofmajor changes, number of credits completed, and number of hours attempted each term. [40]Thus, there is reason to consider whether CSt studying
Department Head for Graduate Programs in Vir- ginia Tech’s Department of Engineering Education. She has her doctorate in Engineering Education and her strengths include qualitative and mixed methods research study design and implementation. She is/was PI/Co-PI on 8 funded research projects including a CAREER grant. She has won several Virginia Tech awards including a Dean’s Award for Outstanding New Faculty. Her research expertise includes using motivation and related frameworks to study student engagement in learning, recruitment and retention in engineering programs and careers, faculty teaching practices and intersections of motivation and learning strategies. Matusovich has authored a book chapter, 10 journal
Paper ID #38429Something Old, Something New: Lessons Learned fromPivoting an REU Site during the COVID PandemicBrittain Sobey (Academic Advising Coordinator) Brittain is the Academic Advising Coordinator for the department of Biomedical Engineering at the University of Texas at Austin. She completed her Ed.M. at Boston University.Ariel Chasen Graduate Student researcher in STEM education at the University of Texas at AustinMaura Borrego (Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, CockrellSchool of Engineering Professor, STEM Educ) (University of Texas at Austin) Maura Borrego is Director of the Center for
contribute to technological innovations that require a multi-disciplinary team and a systems-oriented perspective. The expectation is that theprogram can capitalize on this uniqueness and compete aggressively and successfullyagainst well-established research universities for research funding in many venues.A total of 92 quarter credit hours of graduate course work are required of which 36quarter credit hours are in designated microsystems core courses. 32 quarter credit hourselective courses in one or two specialized areas will be required. An additional 24 quarter Page 8.875.2credit hours (minimum) are expected in dissertation research. Students are
Paper ID #38375Promoting pedagogical change around writing: Observationsof discursive turbulenceRyan WareMegan Elizabeth Mericle Megan Mericle is a PhD student in Writing Studies at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. Her research focuses on the construction of expertise and citizenship in literate activity surrounding citizen science. She is an Assistant Director for the Center for Writing Studies and a member of the research team Writing Across Engineering and Science (WAES) where she is conducting research on graduate student experiences in a STEM writing course.Paul Prior Paul Prior is a
selected toparticipate in various additive manufacturing design, processing, and fabrication research projects.Over a ten-week program, students are mentored by faculty, post-docs, and graduate students, andparticipate in training via coursework as well as guided and tiered mentoring within and acrossmaterials science laboratories associated with project investigators and their teams.E. Sampling The sample included in this study consists of five representative students sampled from alarger group of 60 REU student participants surveyed and interviewed by the author team (Blackand/or Latinx women) across five cohorts. These students were drawn from the most recent pre-pandemic cohort (Summer 2019), to limit potential noise associated with COVID
enrolling in college than men, women only make up 22% of the share ofengineering degrees awarded. White students make up 64% of the share of engineering degreesawarded, while Black and Hispanic students make up 4% and 12% respectively (NCES, 2021)Research QuestionsThis research focuses on the following three research questions: 1. What impact, if any, does a project-based STEM curriculum have on the graduation rate of high school students? 2. Compared to matched non-PLTW students, how does participation in PLTW courses affect students’ likelihood to graduate with an engineering major compared to matched non-PLTW students? 3. Are there differential impact of the PLTW program on traditionally disadvantaged groups
writingseminars which incorporate a significant element of library research assignments. Graduate studentsattend library orientation sessions as part of their departmental orientations, where they are introduced tothe library services available and the main resources, both print and electronic, specific to their field ofstudy and research. While this type of services are considered standard and are offered to the entire 1student population, regardless of their fields of study, they are not sufficient and may not always betailored to address the information needs of international students.Information and library science scholars have conducted
a goodteacher (“The first requisite for a good teacher is that he have something to teach”). The nature of this statement 3seems more directed at graduate studies rather than undergraduate studies. The statement also makes one ponderthe nature of research. Is research the search for truth, the exploration of an area of study to enhance knowledge$or is it-the amount of money and publications that can be generated? Sadly, many of our research projects mdirected where we can more readily find research funds.Strong Inference We as a profession (engineering management) have looked at the educational issues involved in preparingour students (see [8], [10], [12
participate across 66 projects (8 projects did not match with anystudents and so were dropped from the program). Each project currently has 1-5 first-year studentsworking on it, often alongside more senior undergraduate researchers and/or graduate students andpostdoctoral researchers. In January 2022, the Office of Undergraduate Research started anUndergraduate Research Peer Mentor Program, with more established student researchers servingas optional peer mentors to existing First-Year Scholars. The peer mentors hold office hours andlead workshops on topics relevant to new undergraduate researchers.Case Study ExampleEngaging in a well-defined research study under a qualified mentor is the most impactful learningopportunity for a freshman engineering
participants’ initial view of possible careers in the field was narrow. Overthe course of the study, some participants changed their view of career possibilities; for thosewho had not yet decided on a career, concrete exposures to possible BME careers contributed tomore optimistic career outlooks. Suggestions for future research to more broadly understandBME students’ career exploration are also presented.IntroductionBiomedical engineering (BME) degrees are often advertised as a means to pursue many careerpathways upon graduation [1]; however, at the same time, their curricula has been criticized asbeing too broad and not deep enough to prepare students adequately for industry work [2]–[4].Studies have explored these criticisms by looking at measures
Paper ID #35619For Us, By Us: Recommendations for Institutional Efforts to Enhance theBlack Student Experience in EngineeringKatreena Thomas, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus Katreena Thomas is a graduate student at Arizona State University in the Engineering Education Systems and Design Doctoral program. She is a member of the Shifting Perceptions, Attitudes, and Cultures in Engineering (SPACE) Lab group and her research interests include broadening participation in engineer- ing, engineering leadership, and experiential learning experiences in engineering. She received her B.S. in Industrial Engineering from
career success, making SCCT particularly relevant to the study ofpersistence among graduate women in STEM.EMPOWERING STEM PERSISTENCE AMONG GRADUATE WOMEN 8 MethodParticipants The data reported here were collected from 33 women from 21 different Research 1universities in the United States. Twenty participants had completed STEM PhD programs and13 participants had chosen to discontinue STEM PhD programs before completion. Participantsranged in age from 27 to 33 years and identified as Latinx (n = 6), Black/African American (n =10), White/Caucasian (n = 11), and multi-racial (n = 6). Thirteen different STEM fields wererepresented across participants
made up of academic scientists andpostgraduates.1.2.1 Academic scientistThe academic scientists from prestigious departments are more likely to be centeraffiliates, so are prolific scientists, former postdoctoral scholars ,and the eldercohorts. In the meantime, academic scientists can overcome the incentiveincongruity with academic departments, as is evidenced by a higher likelihoodamong junior scientists to secure center connections.[12] The study concludes witha discussion of the scientific human capital theory and policy implications in thescience enterprise.[13]1.2.2 Graduate studentIn addition to academic scientists, graduate students account for a very highproportion of university researchers, so graduate students can also be regarded
chemical engineers compare with regard to factors such as demographic background oracademic performance. Furthermore, to our knowledge, no studies have yet investigated thesedifferences across two or more institutions, thus limiting findings to institution-dependentconclusions.In previous work1,2, we performed cross-institutional studies to determine the effects of variousfactors on graduation and retention of engineering undergraduates. Our results demonstrated thatSAT math scores, SAT verbal scores, high school GPA, gender, ethnicity and citizenship all playa significant role in both engineering student graduation and retention rates. Given that thesefactors have been shown to be important to success in engineering, it is interesting to see
Paper ID #16452Exploring Societal Interaction with Emerging TechnologiesMs. Priya Balasubramanian, Grand Valley State University Ms. Priya Balasubramanian is a visiting professor of electrical engineering department at Grand Valley State University. Her primary areas of teaching is digital systems and micro-controller programming. She joined her Alma-mater as a full time professor after completing her degree in Master of Science and en- gineering with an emphasis in biomedical engineering. During her graduate studies, she was involved in research at Van Andel Institute’s small animal imaging lab and the epilepsy monitoring
early stage of the program will be able to invasionthe immediate need of the science and math components they study.4. Impact of the Program on EducationThe newly developed track provides a departure from the traditional teaching and learningmethodologies. It provides three modules of research based courses in three years, in addition tothe team capstone design project that students must pursue at the senior year. Below is a detailon these two components. The track also offers project based portfolio courses where laboratorycomponents are associated with the course projects. The curricula of this track are rich withhands on experience to prepare graduates to the graduate program and the industrial workforce in
participation, transforming students into more active and responsible citizens[4]. These innovative approaches collectively highlight the potential of technology in enrichingcivic education and preparing informed citizens.The aim of this mixed-methods systematic review is to evaluate the effectiveness of integratingdesign-thinking enhanced by technology in civic education to enhance student engagement andlearning outcomes. By examining existing research, this review seeks to highlight current trends,such as the use of gamified elements and collaborative tools, while also identifying significantgaps, particularly in long-term efficacy studies. The findings from this review will offer insightsfor educators, curriculum developers, and policymakers to
, innovative and novel graduate education experiences, global learning, and preparation of engineering graduate students for future careers. Her dissertation research focuses on studying the writing and argumentation patterns of engineering graduate students.Dr. Monica Farmer Cox, Purdue University, West Lafayette Monica F. Cox, Ph.D., is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue Univer- sity and is the Inaugural Director of the Engineering Leadership Minor. She obtained a B.S. in mathemat- ics from Spelman College, a M.S. in industrial engineering from the University of Alabama, and a Ph.D. in Leadership and Policy Studies from Peabody College of Vanderbilt University. Teaching interests
for graduate students and postdoctoral scholars. ThePROMISE AGEP: Maryland Transformation (AGEP-T) project is dedicated to increasing thenumber and diversity of PhD graduates in the STEM fields (Science, Technology, Engineering andMathematics), with a focus on developing a new generation of professors. Our goal for 2014 is toprovide graduate students with more experiences that go beyond a traditional undergraduate student-based study abroad program. We seek to develop programs that open doors outside of the U.S. toprovide graduate students w with groups of experiences that will lead to international jobopportunities and long-term research collaborations.IntroductionAs the University of Maryland Baltimore County (UMBC: An Honors University in
predictorfor learning and development, finding that generally, higher engagement is linked to gains inprofessional outcomes and persistence. Engineering student engagement research has beenperformed on co-curricular experiences and has led to an increased emphasis from institutionson students’ participation in those experiences. Similarly, BME students regularly engage in co-curriculars to supplement their experience in the formal curriculum because of concerns abouttheir professional marketability when they graduate. To help students make an informed co-curricular engagement choice, it is important to understand not only what professional outcomesstudents gain from their co-curriculars as has been previously studied, but also what about theco
disciplines.Mr. Matthew Paul Pusko, University of Nevada - Las Vegas Matthew is a 4th year PHD student studying nanomaterials for thermoelectric waste heat recovery in the department of mechanical engineering at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas. He also serves as part-time instructor for Engineering Dynamics and a newlVanessa W. Vongkulluksn Ph.D., University of Nevada - Las Vegas Dr. Vongkulluksn is an Assistant Professor in the Educational Psychology program at University of Nevada Las Vegas. She received her Ph.D. in Educational Psychology from the Rossier School of Education, University of Southern California. Her research examines student engagement as situated in specific learning contexts. She specializes in
challenging goals in higher education: increasing the number of African American,American Indian, and Hispanic bachelor degrees in science, mathematics, engineering, andtechnology. This alliance, known as the Western Alliance to Expand Student Opportunities(WAESO), has relied heavily on engaging students in academic and research activities outsidethe classroom involving science and engineering faculty and student peers in order to improveretention and increase graduation rates of underrepresented students. Over the past six years we have had 4,251 student participations within our alliance activitieswhich include: (1) peer study groups; (2) summer bridge programs; (3) faculty-directedundergraduate students research; and (4) graduate preparation
Engineers (NSBE) Chapter and an active member of Delta Sigma Theta Sorority, Incorporated, a service organiza- tion, Shannon is no stranger to mission and vision of the academic excellence and cultural responsibility.Dr. Karen L. Butler-Purry, Texas A&M University Karen Butler-Purry is the Associate Provost for Graduate Studies and Professional Studies as well as a Professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas. Her research interests include computer and intelligent systems applications to power distribution systems and engineering education. She can be reached by e-mail at klbutler@tamu.edu.Judy Kelley, West Texas A&M University Judy Kelley
2006-92: USING PHOSPHORUS RECOVERY FROM WASTEWATER AS ACONTEXT FOR TEACHING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT WITH USEPA P3SUPPORTDaniel Oerther, University of Cincinnati Associate Professor of Environmental Biotechnology, University of Cincinnati. Dr. Oerther teaches graduate and undergraduate courses in biology and molecular biology as applied to natural and engineered environments. His research focuses upon microorganisms in wastewater treatment plants, drinking water treatment plants, bioremediation field sites, and natural surface watershed.Cinnamon Carlarne, University of Cincinnati Assistant Professor, Environmental Studies Program, University of Cincinnati. Dr. Carlarne teaches graduate and
. This study describes how in three consecutive courses, we preserve academicrigor of the UOL course while incorporating components such as experimental design, projectdevelopment and teamwork, which aim to meet the needs of professional careers. We follow upthe course outcomes with a survey targeting the graduates of the program. The results show thatgraduates employed in industry frequently rely on these skills during job interviews, research andproduct development, whereas those who pursue advanced degrees in academia use these skillspredominantly for their research, highlighting the need for adaptive approach for differentgraduate trajectories in designing the course. For both groups of graduates, the skills introducedduring the UOL courses
.— - . . Session 3215 . .. . . . USE OF PERSONAL COMPUTERS TO ENHANCE THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING EDUCATION l M. Zoghi , Ph.D.Abstract The integration of personal computers in teaching the geotechnical engineering courses including thesoil mechanics and foundation design, as well as soil mechanics laboratory will be described herein. Inaddition, the potential use of microcomputers in undergraduate and graduate special projects as part ofindependent studies will be
2021 ASEE Midwest Section Conference Predicting Student Success in an Electrical Engineering Program Edward Carl Greco, Jr. and Matthew Garett Young Electrical Engineering Department, Arkansas Tech UniversityAbstractSuccessful completion of course of study leading to graduation in electrical engineering wasfound to be linked to a couple of key gateway courses. Students that performed below athreshold in these early courses had a lower probability of graduating and could then beidentified for additional assistance. Based on these results, changes were implemented in thecurriculum to enhance student success in these preliminary courses to facilitate