in academia he worked as Assistant, Associate, Full Professor, and Departmental Head at Kazan Aviation Institute, and Visiting Full Professor at Mechanical, Aerospace and Biomedical Engineering De- partment at University of Tennessee, Knoxville. In 2007 he joined CCSU School of Engineering and Technology as an Associate Professor. He taught about 30 undergraduate and graduate courses; was sci- entific advisor of multiple Ph.D. and Dr. of Science Dissertations. Area of research and teaching interests - Propulsion, Aerothermodynamics, Combustion and Heat Transfer. Instrumentation. Performed research projects for Russian and French Aerospace Agencies, NASA, DOE, DOD, and Automotive Company SAAB. Author of 3
AC 2012-4349: IMPLEMENTING AN INDUSTRIAL MENTORING PRO-GRAM TO ENHANCE STUDENT MOTIVATION AND RETENTIONDr. Matthew G. Green, LeTourneau University Matthew G. Green is an Associate Professor of mechanical engineering at LeTourneau University, Longview. His objective is to practice and promote engineering as a serving profession. Focus areas include remote power generation, design methods for frontier environments, enhanced engineering learning, and assistive devices for persons with disabilities. Contact: MatthewGreen@letu.edu.Prof. Alan D. Niemi, LeTourneau University Alan D. Niemi is an Associate Professor and Chair of engineering technology at LeTourneau University. He received his B.S. in electrical engineering
from deductive practice to aninductive teaching and learning environment with Information and CommunicationTechnology (ICT) support. The ICT support technology deployed in our research was theiPod Touch, but similar applications (Apps) could be coded for other smart devices withall downloading resources from the same databases. The basic principles implemented in the project are supported by theory based in cognitive and social constructivism6-‐9 and the substantial body of evidence that favors collaborative learning and the inductive approach over the traditional lecture driven, deductive teaching approach10-‐27. Collaborative learning, active/inquiry learning, concept learning, peer learning
technologies across protocol layers. The evolution of wireless communication andnetworking presents such a need and a unique opportunity to integrate undergraduate educationacross the Electrical Engineering and Computer Science curricula, which trains future engineerswith a deeper and holistic understanding of and skills for current and emerging wirelesscommunication and networking technologies.In this paper, we report the development of an easily replicable model of evolvable, low cost,software defined radio (SDR)-based wireless communication and networking laboratories aswell as associated teaching and learning materials that can be adopted or adapted to impactnational engineering education practices. The SDR-based laboratories are tailored to the
, holding degrees from both the College of Engineering and the School of Education. Her passion for education led her to become a dedicated K-12 STEM Educator. In this role, Jesika is committed to introducing and inspiring students from diverse backgrounds and cultures to the intricacies of STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics). With a specific focus on encouraging underrepresented students, Jesika has been actively involved in developing and implementing curriculum. Her innovative approach aims to cultivate a love for STEM subjects and motivate students to pursue higher education in these fields. Over the past five years, Jesika has played a pivotal role in directing various summer enrichment programs
Science, Engineering, and Technology Education in the Department of Chemical, Food, and Environmental Engineering at Universidad de las Americas Puebla in Mexico. He teaches engineering, food science, and education related courses. His research interests include emerging technologies for food processing, creating effective learning environments, using tablet PCs and associated technologies to enhance the development of 21st century expertise in engineering students, and building rigorous research capacity in science, engineering and technology education. Page 23.437.1 c American
commenced in 2007 with 192 graduates from the 2006 graduating cohort. Wemanaged to recruit around 60% of the overall graduating cohort from the faculty including civil,electrical, electronic, environmental, information technology, materials, mechanical,mechatronics, oil and gas, petroleum, resources and mining systems engineers. From the pilotstudy we found that at least two class appearances are needed in person to recruit a significantpercentage of graduating students. One group, software engineering, had no formal classes inthe last few months of their course so we resorted to e-mail, but without success. Theparticipation rate for electrical and electronic engineers is also less than the other disciplines forsimilar reasons. We also appeared at
, Texas, Ohio, New York, and Idaho [3]. These investmentsunderscore the urgent need for a competent workforce. McKinsey projects that by 2030, the U.S. semiconductor industry will require 300,000additional engineers and 90,000 skilled technicians. According to reports by the National ScienceBoard [4] and the Committee on STEM Education National Science and Technology Council [5],the U.S. faces a significant shortage of STEM majors and graduates. With STEM occupationsprojected to grow [6], there is a pressing need to broaden participation in STEM fields, withparticular emphasis on exposing students to the niche areas of semiconductors andmicroelectronics.Opportunities with Informal Education The need to grow the US share of
suggest that institutional constraints on providing equaleducational opportunities can limit women's career advancement in technology fields and affectthe broader engineering sector. The findings of this study show that women's participation andprogress in these fields can be greatly improved through changing information and communicationtechnology policies to better respond to their requirements.Machado-Taylor and Özkanli [28] emphasize differences in academic career developmentbetween male and female academics. They indicate the importance of institutional support toremove these obstacles. Atakan et al. [30] highlight the ethical principles of future managers andshow that female Turkish students adhere more to ethical principles in the
needs. Wethen present initial workshop evaluation results and share plans for long-term evaluation to trackshifts in faculty experiences and perceptions of climate. Next, we highlight follow-up efforts todevelop and disseminate new resources on improving department climates, including a writtenguide that builds off strategies that emerged during workshop discussion. We end by sharingchallenges and strategies to bolster support for large scale change efforts, such as engaging withdeans to secure institutional commitment for the project.II. Research Informing the WorkshopThe inclusive climate workshop grew from two distinct research projects that informed ourunderstanding of department climates at the university and highlighted the importance
students do. It requirescompelling problems and well-designed laboratories, studios, workshops, and playingspaces. It demands strenuous efforts and experts to intercede with stories, admonitions,or principles when students fail, as they must, if they are to learn. Most of the learningthat results in the expertise of the practicing scientist, engineer, or poet is accomplishedthrough hands and minds on a task. Just think of the contrast between the activities ofapprentices in a workshop and the passivity of pupils in a lecture hall.If we refocus our efforts on learning, professors can exploit information technology toprovide data, scholarly references, and simulated problems for cognitive workshops. Inthose workspaces, student investigators will
scientist, engineer, or poet is accomplishedthrough hands and minds on a task. Just think of the contrast between the activities ofapprentices in a workshop and the passivity of pupils in a lecture hall.If we refocus our efforts on learning, professors can exploit information technology toprovide data, scholarly references, and simulated problems for cognitive workshops. Inthose workspaces, student investigators will work side by side with faculty. Togetherthey will learn to create, evaluate, improve, and apply knowledge. Students will learn tobe experts and faculty will sharpen their expertise.There won’t be “a” talking head, but scads of conversations. There will be studentstearing into problems with all the vitality of youth. And there will be
A Simulation Escape Room: Verification and Validation is the Key Michael E. Kuhl Industrial and Systems Engineering Department Rochester Institute of Technology Rochester, NY 14623 AbstractIn this paper, an entrepreneurial mindset-based learning activity is designed to actively convey theconcepts of model verification and validation (V&V). In particular, we develop an “Escape Room”entrepreneurial mindset learning (EML) activity where students are given a scenario and a set of“problematic” simulation models. Students work in teams to verify/fix and validate
Paper ID #48716Creating a Course ”Dashboard” to Continually Assess and Improve the Qualityof EducationTabe Ako Abane, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Tabe Abane is a PhD student in Engineering Education at Purdue University. He holds an MA in Leadership in Education (2023) from Liverpool John Moores University (UK), a Bachelor of Technology in Renewable Energy (2018), and a Five-Year Diploma in Mechanical Engineering and Teaching (2015) from the University of Bamenda (Cameroon). His dissertation research focuses on how engineering students develop systems thinking in socioenvironmental contexts. Using Social
engineering education research and practice. Page 22.1537.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Towards More Effective Teaching Strategies of Iteration and Systems Management in Spacecraft Design ABSTRACT We propose effective teaching strategies to help teams of students in spacecraft design projects in the first or second semester in the sophomore year in the aerospace engineering curriculum move from being “beginning designers” to being “informed designers.” The focus here is on one dimension in the
.InterviewsI-1. Dr. Derrek B. Dunn, Professor and Chairperson, and Ms. Angela Lemons, Instructor, Department of Electronics, Computer, and Information Technology, North Carolina A&T State University, June 24, 2007, at the 114th ASEE Conference and Exposition, Honolulu, Hawai’i.I-2. Akilah L. Hugine, Ph.D. student, Department of Systems and Information Engineering, University of Virginia (BSEE, North Carolina A&T State University; MSEE, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University), various dates and venues.I-3. Mrs. Velma Moore, Office of the Dean of the College of Engineering, Architecture, and Physical Sciences, Tuskegee University, June 26, 2007, at the 114th ASEE Conference and
Professor of Chemical Engineering, Director of the Energy and Environmental Ph.D. program, and Director of Education and Outreach for the NOAA Interdisciplinary Scientific Environmental Technology Cooperative Science Center at North Carolina A&T State University. He received a B.S. degree in Chemical Engineering from Purdue University. He also holds M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Chemical Engineering from Northwestern University.Stephen Johnston, North Carolina A&T State University Stephen Johnston is retired after more than thirty years working with the Research Triangle Institute (RTI), his last position being Director of RTI’s Public Utility Economics program. He received a B.S
Innovation and Regulatory Science programwith the Kilimanjaro School of Pharmacy is helping to provide good regulatory practices inAfrica.This is the third in a series of three papers discussing the details of curriculum, administrationand now, lessons learned with challenges and opportunities for future program deliveryconsideration.The first paper addressed designing an applicable, theoretically sound and pragmaticallyimplementable curriculum. The second paper focused on the risks of attending class through wartorn territories, lack of information technology infrastructure, language, cultural implications,and the payment of tuition and fees as perhaps the most administratively challenging, of thechallenges and opportunities documented and
options.2 This is a critical time to introduce the fields oftechnology and engineering as exciting choices before students develop many of the stereotypesthat often discourage girls and minorities from pursuing courses and careers in technical fields.3Finally, at all educational levels, hands-on technology lessons can help make mathematics andscience content relevant to students by illustrating these subjects’ application in real-worldprojects.4Although technology and engineering are new fields at the elementary school level, elementaryteachers are under pressure to meet nationally determined learning goals around math, science,engineering, and technology. This has been particularly emphasized in the emergence of theCommon Core State Standards
-12 educators to support engineering edu- cation in the classroom. She is also the founder of STOMP (stompnetwork.org), LEGOengineering.com (legoengineering.com) and the Teacher Engineering Education Program (teep.tufts.edu).Dr. Rebecca Deborah Swanson, Tufts Center for Engineering Education and Outreach Dr. Swanson is a postdoctoral research associate studying teacher learning in an online graduate-level engineering education program at Tufts University. Prior to joining the CEEO at Tufts, Dr. Swanson worked on research projects studying professional development of formal and informal science educators, learning through citizen science for adults and youth, and pre-service elementary teaching in informal science
specific skills haspassed” [53, p. 99]. Rotating, collaborative leadership methods have been shown to increaseinnovation and technological advancement [54] particularly in globally competitive contexts[55].The CyberAmbassadors training will focus on leadership skills for working in diverse,interdisciplinary teams. Training will include information about common leadership styles [56],[57], personality types [58], and communication preferences [62], [63], as well as how to managecompeting goals and resolve conflicts between team members [59]–[61]. The CyberAmbassadorsprogram will also talk about leading through mentoring [62]–[64], particularly as it relates toworking in diverse, interdisciplinary teams [65]–[68]. Key lessons in the leader-mentor
of people, prosperity and theplanet. The technical challenge is to optimize the efficiency of the process and to design amore economical system. The process challenge is to bring multi-disciplinary, multi-levelstudents together to accomplish this task while educating them on the processes ofteamwork, service and communication. Students are often placed in teams to developtechnical expertise and yet not given the skills and information necessary to engageteamwork in a professional and competent manner. The technological task is placed as theforefront of importance while the process of engaging technology as a team is back-grounded. “Engineering work is increasingly oriented toward boundary-crossing, multi-disciplinary team activity. The
Paper ID #46649Strategies for Risk Management and Mitigation in Faculty-led CoursesDr. Yanjun Yan, Western Carolina University Yanjun Yan is a Professor in Engineering and Technology at Western Carolina University. Her research interests include engineering education, artificial intelligence, swarm robotics, and statistical signal processing. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Strategies for Risk Management and Mitigation in Faculty-led CoursesAbstractInternational exchanges are exciting opportunities for students and faculty, while risk management andrisk mitigation are critical
including emerging and non-traditional areas of practice. MacKenzie has an undergraduate engineering degree in Biomedical Systems Engineering, where her research focused on high-intensity focused ultrasound.Elham Marzi, University of Toronto, Canada Prof. Marzi is the Co-founder and Director of InVEST and has engaged in multidisciplinary research in Organizational Behaviour, Virtual Teams, and Engineering Education. She teaches in areas inclusive of OB, HR, Strategy, Virtual Teams, and Negotiations in the Engineering Business Minor and Certifi- cate Program at the University of Toronto, Canada. She has a passion for teaching and getting students engaged through active and technology enhanced learning. She is highly
Technology, highlights the need for departments to take a leading role in thedevelopment of curriculum “that engages and motivates the broadest spectrum ofstudents….”, and in the development of “meaningful connections with employers to provideappropriately responsive educational experiences for prospective … members of the workforce”, and urges departments to “foster interdisciplinary education”. Nevertheless, there iscomplacency and a lack of enthusiasm for major curriculum and pedagogical reform. Amongthe factors discouraging reform are the traditions of each discipline regarding legacymaterials, a lack of knowledge of emerging areas, and externally or internally imposed creditlimitations.The Division of Engineering at the Colorado School of Mines
for practice and policy to facilitate femaleparticipation in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM). Page 15.436.2Introduction and BackgroundThe nation’s public two-year colleges play a critical role in providing access to education beyondhigh school. Referred to as community colleges, these institutions are comprehensive in natureand offer diverse curriculum including developmental education, liberal arts, career and technicaleducation, and lifelong learning (Cohen & Brawer, 2008)5. The transfer function, in particular,provides students with the opportunity to pursue the first two-year of their general
. Specifically,these goals are spelled out in ABET student outcomes 2, 4, and 5[1]: (2) an ability to apply engineering design to produce solutions that meet specified needs with consideration of public health, safety, and welfare, as well as global, cultural, social, environmental, and economic factors; (4) an ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgments, which must consider the impact of engineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societal contexts; (5) an ability to function effectively on a team whose members together provide leadership, create a collaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks
, Material and Energy Balance and Kinetics coursessuggest that AI can enhance course material design by providing instructors with advancedproblem-solving tools and real-time feedback mechanisms. However, challenges such as AI biasesand content accuracy remain significant hurdles. This paper discusses the transformative potentialof Generative AI in engineering education, with a specific emphasis on overcoming pedagogicalchallenges in teaching sophomore and junior chemical engineering courses.IntroductionThe integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in education has emerged as a transformative force,particularly in engineering disciplines where problem-solving complexity demands innovativeteaching approaches. As generative AI technologies advance
barriers related to enrolling in and transitioning to university-level STEMprograms. In responding to how the S-STEM scholarship influenced students’ choices thefollowing themes emerged: academic choices and support, community and social engagement,and motivation and persistence.Academic Choices and SupportThe S-STEM program enabled participants to connect with mentors, alumni and fellow studentsin the program and help them to make informed academic choices. The support from advisorshelp them navigate the rigorous structure of the program and find something that is best fit forthem according to their academic strength and interest. As a participant (Luna, 22) shared herexperience about such academic support she got in the program, “the professor
.” Others attempt to quantify biological information as a measure of systemcomplexity, as in a recent paper entitled “Functional Information and the Emergence ofBiocomplexity”38. The authors rigorously define functional information to represent “theprobability that an arbitrary configuration of a system will achieve a specific function to aspecified degree”. In addition to assisting in “understanding the behavior of systems composedof many interacting agents”, they suggest that this “functional information formalism may alsopoint to key factors in the origin and emergence of biocomplexity. In particular, functionalinformation quantifies the probability that, for a particular system, a configuration with aspecified degree of function will emerge