Student Learning and Perceptions in a Strength of Materials CourseAbstractIn recent years, web-based learning systems have become more available for inclusion inengineering and technology courses. The purposes of these learning systems can vary, but theyare often promoted as enabling and enhancing student learning inside and outside of theclassroom, as well as helping reduce faculty time devoted to labor-intensive tasks such asgrading homework. Although research has been performed to investigate the effectiveness ofsome of these systems, there is a continuing need to evaluate their effects on student learning andperceptions. The study discussed in this paper explores the impact of one of these learningsystems, Mastering
the participatingstudents. As students moved into their sophomore year and began to enroll in separate,major-specific courses, the lunches helped to preserve previously formed relationships and groupidentity.While the weekly lunches focused on social interaction and provided a relaxed environment forcatching up, each lunch included professional development “nuggets” strategically timed toincrease impact. Example activities included the initial introduction of faculty mentors, talksfrom Ph.D. students, ambassadors from student organizations, discussions about academicsuccess, interview skills in preparation for upcoming university career fairs, and researchopportunities for undergraduates.This paper quantifies the impact of the lunches on
grow over the years, both technically as well as pedagogically. Currently he works in one of the most technically outstanding buildings in the region where he provides support to students, faculty, and staff in implementing technology inside and outside the classroom, researching new engineering education strategies as well as the technologies to support the 21st century classroom (online and face to face). He also has assisted both the campus as well as the local community in developing technology programs that highlight student skills development in ways that engage and attract individuals towards STEAM and STEM fields by showcasing how those skills impact the current project in real-world ways that people can
data on community impacts. These two expertswill be referred as external partners in the research.3.2 Research Methods The research described in this paper addresses the first phase of a larger project thatinvolves two phases. This project seeks to design and test innovative graduate education models.The goal of the first phase is for students to embark on a cyber-physical systems (CPS) orproduct lifecycle management (PLM) topic and in partnership with experts and faculty mentorsdevelop two online educational modules that describe an application-oriented view of CPS andPLM. In the second phase of this research, these modules will be integrated in existingundergraduate or first-year graduate courses at four different institutions (2 SUs
, and student services weresignificantly more likely to indicate they were seriously considering leaving their universitycompared to students who reported high quality relationships [3]. A lack of belonging inengineering, along with academic factors, was highly influential in students’ decision to leaveengineering majors in one study [4]. Further, 44% of students who left engineering identified alack of interaction with students and staff as a factor influencing their decision to leave [5].Social belonging and engagement impact more than just retention. A recent study found theyalso strongly impact emotional readiness as students transition to the workplace. Respondentswho agreed that their university helped prepare them for the emotional
third point of reference to reflect on and givea rich description of their experience in the US. Through qualitative analysis of these cases, wewill address the question: In what ways do Black students who are first- or second-generationimmigrants from Africa and have studied abroad leverage community cultural wealth inengineering in the US?We use Yosso’s Community Cultural Wealth (CCW) framework to highlight the strengths thesestudents leverage in engineering. CCW is an asset-based framework developed to highlight thestrengths of the students from Communities of Color. There are six assets used as a guiding lensto inform research in these communities: familial, social, aspirational, navigational, resistance,and linguistic capital that students
schools. Boynton is currently continuing teaching the high school courses to students virtually.Dr. Marie C Paretti, Virginia Tech Marie C. Paretti is an Associate Professor of engineering education at Virginia Tech, where she co-directs the Virginia Tech Engineering Communications Center (VTECC). Her research focuses on communica- tion in engineering design, interdisciplinary communication and collaboration, and design education. She was awarded a CAREER grant from NSF to study expert teaching practices in capstone design courses nationwide, and is co-PI on several NSF grants to explore identity and interdisciplinary collaboration in engineering design
development (Amari etal., 2011).Communication of ideas: While engaging in the EDP, students have to work together andverbally communicate with each other. This can take on various forms whether it be toask questions about the design problem, collaborate in brainstorming ideas and exploringmaterials, share materials, make predictions, collaborate in creating and testing solutions,evaluate the solutions, and persevere to push through initial missteps to solve the designproblem. Thus, the EDP contains immense potential for collaboration, perseverance, andproblem-solving (Lachapelle & Cunningham, 2014). These social skills form animportant part of the social skills repertoire that students need. Interactions with peers atschool provide students with
) Understanding the impact of theseperceptions on students' engagement and performance. Drawing from the ICAP (Interactive,Constructive, Active, and Passive) framework, this work-in-progress study provides the researchdesign to comprehend how students' perspective affects their learning and engagement. Wepropose an investigation using two research questions: 1) how do real-time accounts of theinstructional practices in the classroom relate to students' perceptions? And 2) How do studentperceptions of instructional practices affect their engagement and performance? This work-in-progress study explains the design using a cross-sectional quantitative approach. Morespecifically, we suggest the methodologies for data collection and analysis. We also describe
evaluation of their product to determine if it waseffective. Our results show positive outcomes related to changes in student perception of theircommunication skills, changes in student perceptions of audience, changes in student perception of theirevaluation skills, and increased student understanding of the iterative nature of design processes.IntroductionThe past few years have seen calls to encourage and support scientists who leave the lab to explainscience and their research to the public. Recent, growing research on the public understanding of science,science literacy, and science communication, are driving scientists and educators to articulate anincreased need for people to be better informed about science1,2. At the core of this movement
purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of incorporatingcollaborative teaching and learning strategies on students’ engagement and anxiety while takingintroductory programming courses. Hence, the following research questions were investigated:Research question #1: Do collaborative learning strategies like WPS and VNPS impact students’confidence and reduce anxiety with learning introductory programming?Research Question #2: For students without prior exposure to computer programming, howeffective was the intervention in reducing students’ anxiety and improving student confidence withintroductory programming? 2MethodsSetting and
, appliances, and personal computers) is an ethics-laden topic associated with the professional activity of many engineers, particularly computerand electrical engineers. In a pilot study, we evaluated 92 writing samples on the topic of wasteelectronics from a range of undergraduate engineering students in an introductory circuits class ata large public research institution. We asked students to read a journal article on wasteelectronics and recycling and then write an essay on what they viewed to be (a) the mostimportant negative impacts of waste electronics on ecosystems and public health, and (b) theengineer’s responsibility in limiting improper disposal of consumer electronics. We thenevaluated these writing samples for several types of literacy
prescribe similar solutions such asbetter emphasis on communications skills and teamwork in classrooms taught with greaterpedagogical skill. It is a bit of a puzzle that such widespread agreement has not resulted in moreeffective and sustainable change and better diffusion and pace of change.This paper takes the position that an important, largely unrecognized, reason behind the failurefor transformation efforts to take hold is that much of the effort—even much of the effort thatclaims to be student centered—remains inexorably faculty centered. Indeed there is a largeliterature of student-centered pedagogy, but the fundamental assumption behind much of it is thatteachers must behave differently to engage the student. On one level such an assertion
AC 2011-2310: UNDERGRADUATE CONCEPTIONS OF THE ENGINEER-ING DESIGN PROCESS: ASSESSING THE IMPACT OF A HUMAN-CENTEREDDESIGN COURSELora Oehlberg, University of California, Berkeley Lora Oehlberg is a doctoral student in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Cal- ifornia at Berkeley, and a member of the Berkeley Institute of Design. She received a M.S. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of California at Berkeley (2008) and a B.S. in Mechanical Engineer- ing from Stanford University (2006). Her doctoral research is on how designers use personal design information tools during collaborative new product development projects. Her background includes both corporate product design and
1engagement with international students and community members. We will consider how thisdifference in format of research impacted student learning and engagement in the researchprocess.Funded by the National Science Foundation, the Responsible Mining, Resilient Communities(RMRC) project is a multi-country, interinstitutional, and interdisciplinary research collaborationwhose goal is to co-design socially responsible and sustainable gold mining practices withcommunities, engineers, and social scientists. A key component of this work is engineeringeducation research that investigates how situated learning enhances undergraduate students’global sociotechnical competency, especially as it relates to their ability to define and solveproblems with people
addressed real world engineering problems.Students were required to write a report on the application of fluid mechanics principles learnedin the course to these engineering challenges. The professor provided the topics which werechosen to ensure that the fluid mechanics covered in our course would be easily applicable to theassignment. Assessment techniques were employed in this course to evaluate the lifelonglearning outcome. Surveys were administered after each report where the students reported onthe value of this exercise to their engagement and effective learning in the class. Additionally,testing provided further assessment of learning via directed questions. Survey results showed adistinct improvement in student appreciation of the
Education. He was named NETI Fac- ulty Fellow for 2013-2014, and the Herbert F. Alter Chair of Engineering (Ohio Northern University) in 2010. His research interests include success in first-year engineering, engineering in K-12, introducing entrepreneurship into engineering, and international service and engineering. He has written two texts in Digital Electronics, including the text used by Project Lead the Way. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Agent-Based Modeling and Simulation of Depression and Its Impact on Students’ Success and Academic RetentionAbstractIn the U.S., major depressive disorder affects approximately 14.8 million American adults.Furthermore
communication may bethe best way to both communicate engineering topics to audiences, as well as get them interestedin learning more and sharing more about their experience.While we believe the results of our study suggest significant positive effects of convergentresearch communication (i.e. research communication that is collaborative and interdisciplinaryaround a common theme) on engineering learning attitudes among broadly diverse communityaudiences, the results should be extrapolated with caution. Comparisons in the effect ofconvergent communication are based on presentations across two different themes (Movementand Elements), and we do not know the degree to which the theme might have impacted learningoutcomes. However, we do show in Appendix F
their lab skills prior to transfer.Open Access to FacultyAs a community college, our faculty view teaching as their top priority. On average our facultymembers have 10 hours set aside for student support each week. That being said, many studentsare still reluctant to seek help. The study hall to support our NSF Scholars is one of the methodsused to encourage engagement with faculty. Since this has been effective, in 2020 the study hallwas expanded to serve any current ECS student. Noting that students are more comfortablemeeting with faculty outside of their office, also prompted faculty supporting our scholars toconduct office hours in the makerspace and library tutoring center.The pandemic also impacted the modes available for office hours
Paper ID #34325Exploring the Effects of a Targeted Program on Student Social CapitalDr. Anastasia Marie Rynearson, Campbell University Anastasia Rynearson is an Assistant Professor at Campbell University. She received a PhD from Purdue University in Engineering Education and a B.S. and M.Eng. in Mechanical Engineering at the Rochester Institute of Technology. Her teaching experience includes outreach activities at various age levels as well as a position as Assistant Professor in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Kanazawa Technical College and Future Faculty Fellow teaching First-Year Engineering at Purdue
Paper ID #30947Study of the Impact of the University on Sustainability in Far West TexasMr. Anand Raj, The University of Texas at El Paso Anand Raj is a Doctoral student in the Environmental Science and Engineering Program at The University of Texas at El Paso. His doctoral studies focus on sustainability in higher education. His interest lies in the three pillars of sustainability which include social, environmental, and economic aspects. He has a master’s degree in business with industry experience. His future plan is to use his business experience to promote sustainability which is important in today’s world.Dr
, “Modelling and profiling student designers’ cognitive competencies in computer-aided design,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED21), Aug. 2021, pp. 2157–2166, doi: 10.1017/pds.2021.477.[12] S. Secules et al., “Positionality practices and dimensions of impact on equity research: A collaborative inquiry and call to the community,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 19–43, 2021, doi: 10.1002/jee.20377.[13] C. Hampton, D. Reeping, and D. S. Ozkan, “Positionality Statements in Engineering Education Research: A Look at the Hand that Guides the Methodological Tools,” Stud. Eng. Educ., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 126–141, 2021, doi: 10.21061/see.13.[14] J. C. Williams and M. Multhaup, “How
preparing them for their future careers.Figure 2: Results indicated the frequency and number of students that indicated activities that exist (black) andactivities that are wanted (gray) for training at the undergraduate level of sustainability engineers.Additionally, students expressed a desire for PBL opportunities that extend beyond the campus(PBL outside the university). One student explained that they would like to be able to “…connectacross the country with other sustainability initiatives because in a college campus, the scope issometimes only small…”. Several students had specific projects in mind; for example, onestudent suggested “Engagement with the local community to build more sustainable systems(transport, food, etc).” In addition to
asked to demonstrate competencies of working ingroups and being able to engage in problem solving [5]. “Just-in-time” tutoring techniques,utilized by the Engineering Clinic, focus on addressing student questions as they arise, in a drop-in style group setting. Clinics using this technique require fewer financial resources; however,there are few studies relating to the assessment of the effectiveness of this model. One studyfound that first-year students who used a “just-in-time” model of academic support more than 10times in a semester had higher rates of persistence [6]. Another study showed that studentsstarting their academic career, particularly those identifying from underserved populations, areable to relate better to peers than to a
right direction in my career path and that I will also have fun with my career. I really do feel more connected with my major.”By providing students with a paid opportunity to gain hands-on skills, surveys showed studentshad increased their confidence in themselves and how they view the STEM field. 6Internship Preparation: Virtual Employer, internship development series As students transition from summer programming into the academic year, Growth Sectorhas identified one of the key best practices to supported and successful community collegeinternships to include mentorship and engagement with internship host early in the pathway
, lecture, lab, and discussion sections.Through the course, students examine positionality, power, and language in the context ofsocially engaged design. Students write positionality statements before they begin their projectwork, we provide readings and discussion about social power in the engineering design process,and we examine how language can make information more or less accessible to specificaudiences. Course assignments and lectures present ethics and engineering work as necessarilyintertwined. For example, students learned the fundamentals of nuclear science and engineeringalongside qualitative research methods and completed a community engagement workshop.Additional assigned readings and videos offer opportunities to reflect on user
forresearch programs and the impact of inclusivity. As it is not necessary to have exclusively allcommunity college participants, the approach for CUREs and the UCORE program provide anideal framework to embrace two-year institution students in REU Programs.Data CollectionThe data was collected based on pre- and post-surveys. Of the 12 REU participants, four werefrom community colleges. All attended the same community college in the county in which theuniversity of the REU Program is located.All the community college participants were male, 75% were under the age of 25 and 25% of theparticipants were in the 30-34 age range. Half the community college participants were Hispanicstudents. One community college participant was a disabled military veteran
. Participants in this investigation also noted that four-year classroom environments were a major challenge for STEM transfer students [11].In her exploration of the impact of support systems on the experiences of community collegetransfer students in STEM majors, Jackson also [11] found that support systems came indifferent forms: family, community college and university faculty, and advisors. However, whilestudents indicated positive experiences with community college faculty, Jackson's findings [11]did indicate that students experienced some challenges with faculty at the four-year university.For example, one undergraduate in Jackson’s study described the four-year classroom as "chilly”[11]. Specifically, when the student participated during
called This Engineering Life, the undergraduate series. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 WIP: Why should you join? Exploring the Impact of Engineering Extracurriculars on the Undergraduate Engineering Experience 1. INTRODUCTIONAn engineering courseload is a big commitment, yet undergraduate engineering students findtime to engage in many activities outside of required coursework. Research, clubs, jobs, sports,extracurriculars, social activities, and leisure time all constitute attractive ways for anengineering undergraduate to spend “residual time”. The time available to spend on theseactivities, however, is limited to as little as 1.9 hours per
- Responses allow monitoring of individual students, -5- Demographic comparisons and assessment of outcomes are routinely available for analysis, and -6- High-school students were impressed with the technological sophistication of the system.Among the weaknesses of the ARS are: -1- Some students have commented that the ARS unnecessarily slows lectures, -2- Some students have indicated a level of intimidation via the immediate response required with the ARS, -3- In one class, weak students were inadvertently “left behind” due to the more advanced lectures, -4- There is an increased potential for technology glitches, and -5- Distribution and collection of the hand-held units must be managed to minimize the impact on class time.While care