supported the goals of theworkshop to improve the participation in STEM careers.One limitation to the widespread adoption of this approach over traditional lectures is theresources needed to create the instructional materials. We discuss example programs that haveassembled and evaluated instructional materials in computational science and engineering.These include a National Science Foundation funded digital library as well as several otherprojects that have assembled datasets, models, and exercises that can readily be adopted in avariety of engineering classes. Sharing such materials should reduce the barriers to adoption andencourage more faculty to undertake this approach to instruction
Paper ID #36426Communities of Practice: Developing, Evaluating, andImproving a Program Aimed at Supporting TransformativeLearning Among Underrepresented Undergraduate Studentsin EngineeringRachael E Cate (Instructor od Communications) Instructor of Communication, PhD in Educational Research Dr. Cate conducts program development research related to teaching professional skills and promoting student success with a focus on empowering and supporting marginalized students in engineering.Aiden Jarrid Nelson © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022
systems approach by creating an educational andorganizational framework for conducting interdisciplinary, systems engineering-based SeniorDesign Projects that allows us, and others, to institutionalize this type of project as the normrather than the exception. It should be noted that a valuable contribution in this area wasprovided by Gershenson under a 2008 NASA-sponsored program directed at capstone coursedevelopment in areas of NASA interest4. His approach embodied some significant systemengineering concepts in the design process applied.The opportunity to establish the SE project described in this paper is a result of the recognitionby the Department of Defense (DoD) that it is critical for their future needs to have theengineering graduates
Paper ID #9235Development of a Systems Engineering Course for Multiple Delivery Meth-odsRichard Sugarman, United States Air Force Richard is an instructor of systems engineering and program risk management with the Air Force Insti- tute of Technology at Wright-Patterson AFB in Ohio. Prior to becoming an instructor at AFIT, he was a systems engineer and program manager at Tinker AFB in Oklahoma. He is currently a visiting faculty member at the University of Dayton through the Air Force Education with Industry Program, where he is developing and teaching a graduate course in systems engineering. Richard holds a B.S
from utilitarian goals supporting career development and professionalism to moreholistic goals of citizenship and broad liberal education. Appropriate definitions andmeasures of “success” for such efforts vary, and faculty members involved in theseefforts have concerns that narrow understanding of these efforts can marginalize theseinterdisciplinary and integrative experiences. The goal of this work is to support ongoingconversations in higher education about integrative and interdisciplinary education effortsby providing a shared language and classification system for understanding these efforts.This paper presents a classification system for integrative engineering education effortsand applies it to examples from our own institutions. This
education and a discussion of challenges involved in educating engineers, whoarequalified for work on software intensive systems. Page 23.1074.2Graduate Software Engineering Reference CurriculumThe GSwE2009 project team, consisting of forty-three authors from more than 24 organizations,was formed in the summer of 2007 and worked for two years developing the Graduate SoftwareEngineering 2009 (GSwE2009): Curriculum Guidelines for Graduate Degree Programs inSoftware Engineering1, 2. An underlying focus of GSwE2009 was how to advance the state ofsoftware engineering practice and to support a better understanding and agreement about thenature of
Technology program at East Carolina University, wehave deployed multiple virtual lab systems and approaches over the past 5 years. The focal pointof this paper will be two centralized virtual lab automation systems and our experience usingthose systems.Virtualization allows multiple guest operating systems to run concurrently on a physicalcomputer. This technology has facilitated the development of cloud computing which allocatesinformation technology services and applications dynamically and on-demand to end users.Virtualization and cloud computing have been rapidly adopted in information technology (IT)education because they provide cost-effective ways of delivering complex, hands-on learningexperiences. The benefits of virtual labs include, but
Technology Program Development Ray Miller, Max Rabiee and Elvin Stepp University of CincinnatiAbstract:A major issue in the electric power industry is the staffing of the electric power infrastructure. Asthe Baby Boomer generation retires over the next decade as much as 75% of the current industrystaff will have retired. This will affect hourly operations and maintenance personnel,engineering design staff and transmission and distribution professionals. The impending demandfor power engineers has spurred the utility companies to work with the College of AppliedScience to develop programs for new Engineering Technologists in Power Systems. A majorgoal of this paper is to describe and
optimize operations. Other research interests include the Deming System of Profound Knowledge (SoPK), developing continuous improvement programs as well as sustainable management systems based on ISO 9001, ISO 14001, and other international standards. He has over 20 years of experience in the quality management field as a quality engineer, corporate quality manager, consultant and trainer. His experience is extensive in quality management systems as wells as Lean and Six Sigma methods. In addition, he coached and mentored Green & Black Belts on process improvement projects in the manufacturing and service industries. Dr. Shraim is a Certified Quality Engineer (CQE) & a Certified Six Sigma Black Belt (CSSBB
for concurrency and user control allows a measureof real-time support under control of the programmer.Teaching Sensor Mesh Networks: Objectives and outcomesTeaching sensor mesh networking within the context of an embedded systems course depends onthe background of the students and the objectives of the course. We have been teachingembedded systems for some years and are able to cover embedded systems principles in a singlesemester-long course. Prior to taking the course the students have had other classes in computerarchitecture, digital logic, object-oriented programming, assembly language programming,operating system and networking concepts (in a desktop-computing environment) and othercomputer-oriented topics. The main part of the embedded
AC 2011-1009: SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND SPACECRAFT SUBSYS-TEMS MODELING AS PREREQUISITES FOR CAPSTONE DESIGNLisa Guerra, NASA Headquarters Ms. Lisa A. Guerra Research Fellow NASA / Exploration Systems Mission Directorate Lisa Guerra has 25 years experience in the NASA aerospace community. Ms. Guerra is currently working with the UTeach Engineering Program. She recently completed a 4-year assignment from NASA Head- quarters to establish a systems engineering curriculum at The University of Texas at Austin, as a pilot for national dissemination. Ms. Guerra’s most recent position at NASA Headquarters was Director of the Directorate Integration Office in the Exploration Systems Mission Directorate. In that position, her
Freshman Engineering Program, in the Benjamin M. Statler College of Engineering and Mineral Resources at West Virginia University (WVU). She graduated Summa cum Laude with a BSME in 2006, earned a MSME in 2008, and completed her doctorate in mechanical engineering in 2011, all from WVU. At WVU, she has previously served as the Undergraduate and Outreach Advisor for the Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering department and the Assistant Director of the Center for Building Energy Efficiency. She has previously taught courses such as Thermodynamics, Thermal Fluids Laboratory, and Guided Missiles Systems, as well as serving as a Senior Design Project Advisor for Mechanical Engineering Students. Her research interests
Health Preparedness of the School of Public Health of the University ofMedicine and Dentistry of New Jersey. To wit, the Just-In-Time Training for EmergencyIncidents System (JITTEIS) serves “Skilled Support Personnel” (SSP).17, 18 SSP are deployed toaid first responders in emergency incidents, and include laborers, operating engineers,carpenters, ironworkers, sanitation and utility workers. Often exposed to the same hazards asresponders, SSP lack incident preparedness because their employment reinforces skilldevelopment and the range of potential scenarios is too broad. These factors increase personalrisk to the SSP and mission risk at the incident site. Providing education and training is essentialto the protection of workers. The Occupational
engineering content sequence toeither become eligible for state science certification or enrich their current science background.Elementary teachers in the program typically have minimal science and engineering backgroundwhile middle school teachers have some science background but little engineering experience. Page 26.1213.2The course, Engineering Solutions to the Challenges of Energy and Global Change, examines thescience principles supporting the engineering solutions pursued for issues related to energyproduction/consumption and climate change. Discussions from a systems perspective driveapproaches being implemented to move toward a more
Session 1877 Reassessing Capstone Courses to Support TC2K Program Accreditation Paul I-Hai Lin and Hal Broberg Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Technology Indiana University-Purdue University Fort WayneAbstract: An assessment and evaluation of an outcomes-based two-semesterundergraduate capstone design course in our electrical and computer technologycurriculum and its value for supporting TAC/ABET, TC2K accreditation was conducted.The discussion topics include course objectives and outcomes, description of projectdesign phases, assessment and evaluation
programchanges were implemented at the UW.The first change, occurring in 1974-1975, involved adding four courses to the program, twofrom the mechanical engineering program and two architectural courses, namely acoustics andillumination. In 1990 – 1991, the second program change was implemented, adding buildingsystems to the program, as well as other optional courses, such as Advanced Building SystemsDesign I and Advanced Building Systems Design II. The courses from mechanical departmenthave been removed. The third significant change, in 2000-2001, involved adding several coursesto the architectural engineering curriculum that were strictly elective courses. It is only laterthat these courses have become requested for mechanical option of architectural
Center, a United States Department ofTransportation research, education, and outreach center funded through the UniversityTransportation Centers Program of the Research and Special Projects Administration, organizedthe Workshop. Sponsors included the University of Wisconsin-Madison, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Marquette University, the Wisconsin, Ohio, and Michigan Departments ofTransportation, among others. The mix of academia and practitioners on the organizingcommittee assisted in the development of a program that reflected the needs and motivations ofeach organization in the area of diversity encouragement. For the purposes of this Workshop,transportation was not limited to traditional civil engineering-based opportunities.Several
. Page 11.1374.8Bibliography1. Barton, A. C. (1998). Examining the social and scientific roles of invention in science education. Research inScience Education, 28(1), 133-151.2. Blanchard, B. & Fabrycky, W. B. (1998). Systems Engineering and Analysis. Prentice Hall.3. De Bono, E. (1986). The CoRT Thinking Program (2nd ed.). Oxford: Pergamon Press.4. Gibson, E. J. (1968). Introduction to Engineering Design. New York: Holt, Rhinehart, and Winston.5. Kolodner, J. L. (2002). Facilitating the learning of design practices: Lessons learned from inquiry into scienceeducation. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 39(3).6. Kolodner, J. L., Crismond, D., Fasse, B. B., Gray, J. T., Holbrook, J., Ryan, M., et al. (2003). Problem-basedlearning meets
program at the Naval Postgraduate School with anemphasis on the spacecraft design program. “Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2005, American Society for Engineering Education”II. SPACE SYSYEMS PROGRAM The NPS space system program responds to sponsors’ Educational Skill Requirements(ESR’s), Ref. 1. The program has two curricula: Space System Engineering (SSE) and SpaceSystems Operations (SSO). Figure 1 shows ESRs for the curricula. The NPS space program istailored to defense needs. Over 20 years of development work has gone into the curricula,tailoring the coursework and research efforts in support of military space warfare. There
, which requires prior knowledge of abstract class objects).Similarly, the water flow / electric flow model used in LabVIEW reinforces skills that thesestudents are required to use in their subsequent electrical engineering courses. By building off ofand further developing skills used in other environments, LabVIEW use promotes deepunderstanding of transferable knowledge, and its use is thus supported by constructivism andother learning theories.The other graphical programming language that the students used is called “RAPTOR.” LikeAlice, RAPTOR was designed specifically to be an educational language. Unlike Alice, it is agraphical programming language based on flow charts1. As a result, its use in introductoryprogramming courses has many of the
AC 2007-2568: INTRODUCING RENEWABLE ENERGY EDUCATION INTOENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY PROGRAMYouakim Al Kalaani, Georgia Southern University Youakim Al Kalaani graduated from Cleveland State University with MS and Doctoral degrees in electrical engineering with a concentration in power systems. He is a member of IEEE and ASEE professional organizations and has research interest in electric power generation, renewable energy, unit scheduling, and optimization. He is currently an Assistant Professor in the Mechanical and Electrical Engineering Technology Department at Georgia Southern University.Kurt Rosentrator, USDA
Education, 2019 Disparate Electrospray Systems for Undergraduate and Graduate EducationAbstractElectrospray thrusters are low thrust, high efficiency devices that use electrostatic fields toaccelerate droplets of non-volatile liquid propellants. With numerous applications in precisionattitude control and propulsion of small satellite platforms, electrospray systems are gainingprevalence in the field of electrostatic propulsion. These thrusters present unique educationalopportunities to expose students to comparatively novel technologies in a laboratory setting,requiring only modest university resources and development time.In support of its “Learn by Doing” pedagogical philosophy, the Aerospace
Columbia University and a dual BS degree in Statistics and Computer Science at Peking University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Development of a Survey Instrument to Evaluate Student Systems Engineering AbilitySystems engineering skills are difficult to teach in a university setting. As a result, new graduatesmay require significant on-the-job-training and experience before they and their employers areconfident in their systems engineering skills. For example, NASA developed the SystemsEngineering Leadership Development Program (SELDP) to provide “development activities,training, and education” to more quickly cultivate systems engineers. We need
knowledge management systems, suchas, Blackboard [1], and WebCT [2], as well as the distance education systems developed atvarious academic institutions [3-14]. A majority of e-Learning systems concentrate mainly ondelivery of course contents over the Internet with little or no room for interactivity. Interactivity Page 9.192.11 This research is supported by National Science Foundation s Science, Technology, Engineering, and MathematicsTalent Expansion Program under grant #0230425. “Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American
-the-art facility for education and research in the areas of automation, control, and production systems. Dr. Hsieh received his Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering from Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX.Landon Gray, Texas A&M University Landon Gray is a graduate student in the College of Architecture at Texas A&M University. Page 11.326.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Cognitive Support for Learning PLC Programming: Computer-Based Case StudiesAbstractStudents who wish to learn programmable logic controller (PLC) programming often face manyobstacles
% implementation of training and integration of lean manufacturing principles at the 3.7L and 4.7L Mack Engine Facilities. In her current position as Minority Engineering Programs Director for Purdue, Virginia looks forward to continuing the legacy of MEP and addressing retention and matriculation issues using a ’lean manu- facturing’ engineering approach. Her current passion in this effort is to assist in the establishment of a standardized metric system that can be used to demonstrate the impact MEP has had (and continues to have) on increasing the number of engineering graduates from historically under-represented populations. Her passion is to assist in developing, assessing, and sustaining effective STEM initiatives. MEP
accreditation processes. The platform utilized in this investigation,the Academic Evaluation, Feedback and Intervention System (AEFIS) – from Untra Corporation,provides systemic support and knowledge management allowing for the development of anInstructional Decision Support System (IDSS). The IDSS is designed to ensure that theengineering education system co-evolves appropriately with student characteristics and the needsof the global community. The present implementation of the system, as well as current studies todetermine proof-of-concept, are described.The problems faced by modern engineering educators have much in common with thedifficulties experiences by physicians and for very similar reasons. In the past, the family doctortreated the same
improving the classroom experience for both students and instructors. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023How much deadline flexibility on formative assessments should we be giving to our students?AbstractRecent studies have proposed new ways of providing learning experiences and measuringstudents’ achievement of learning goals, grounded on the principles of growth mindset, masterylearning, and specifications grading. In one initiative called “A’s for All (as time and interestallow)”, students are given the support to achieve the proficiency they want (not necessarily an A)as long as they are willing to put in the time and effort, thus providing students more control
- ital Signal Processing, Very-large-scale Integration Circuit Analysis, Electromagnetic Fields, Electron- ics, [Mathematical] Transform Methods for Electrical Circuits, Process Control Systems, Programmable Logic Controllers, Hardware Description Language, Introduction to Engineering, Robotics. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Testing of Small Satellite Systems and Impact on Engineering CurriculumAbstractThe aerospace systems field has recently been attracting more and more interest in the industry,academic and government sectors. The scope of activities in this area includes vehicles for spaceexploration, communication, tourism and national
provides an interface to the questioning system. Each question nodecontains: 1. Inherited properties from Node 2. Knowledge key - a key defining the knowledge area to be tested by the questioning system.4.3. Null NodeThe null node is simply a placeholder in the structure to support multiple entry and exit nodes. Page 6.669.6 Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2001, American Society for Engineering Education CircuitsI CircuitsII Electronics Digital Adv. Digital