toundergraduate and graduate students in engineering. Hence, similar to studies focused on femalestudent retention in engineering, which is being extensively studied, there is a need to explore therecruitment and retention of female faculty within this profession, as they too faced various kindsof challenges within and outside their department. Consequently, this adversely affects theretention of female students in engineering [2]. Hence, similar to studies focused on femalestudent retention in engineering, which is being extensively studied, there is a need in exploringthe recruitment and retention of female faculty within this profession, as they too faced variouskinds of challenges within and outside their department [3].To start exploring this topic
Kemelgor and Etzkowitz15, Lindholm16,Lindholm, Astin, Sax and Korn17, and Tindall18 suggest that quality of their experiences asgraduate students influences their decision to stay in the academy. In fact, based on a study ofscience faculty and doctoral students at Research I and II institutions, Kemelgor and Etzkowitz15note that that while “women who have reached the graduate level and beyond, have usually hadpositive, encouraging experiences with educators,” women faculty “unanimously cited at leastone mentor as essential in their provision of strategies, access to professional networks, and tosee themselves as bona fide scientists-to-be.”Role model theory presumes that increasing the numbers and visibility of women faculty inSTEM disciplines
community and the perceptions of its validity. Brewer et al. (2012)describe how the use of undergraduate research data is lacking validity as there is a commonfocus on the experience and contribution from graduate students, and that exploitation ofundergraduates as human subjects of research without proper data reporting does occur.Similarly, Antes et al. (2003) mention that lacking the reporting of undergraduate research data,due to the small size of testing populations, can be perceived as unethical and should beremedied. The perception of undergraduate research is important especially when it comes todefining what studies can be considered research. Much earlier, Edwards et al. (1997) made thenotable point that many “underpowered” studies
year to students who are pursuing bachelor'sdegrees in Applied Chemistry, Applied Computational Physics, Applied Mathematics,Biomedical Informatics, and associate degrees in Computer Science and Chemical Technology.Students continue to receive support if they maintain a qualifying GPA with a full-time creditload. Based on evidence from research studies, successful programs at other universities, andevidence of success from our current and previous NSF S-STEM grants, we are implementing aholistic programmatic approach [10, 11, 16] to support STEM students in the following ways: a)increased student exposure to research experiences [14]; b) student participation in variousprograms as a cohort; c) a mandatory academic advisement and one-on-one
challenges instructors facewhen implementing innovative practice into traditional engineering settings. If that gap can beaddressed, there may be the potential for the research community to have significant, real impacton student learning and success in the classroom.MethodsThe primary purpose of this study was to understand the challenges and dynamics of integratinginnovative pedagogical materials and practice into a traditional engineering classroom.Participants and ContextParticipation in this study was voluntary, though assessment was discussed and primarilycollected during the course of a regular class. Participants in this research were from a sample of25 students enrolled in a course that met daily for 8 weeks during a summer 2009 semester of
Paper ID #49449Expanding and Sustaining BP-AE: Scaling Mentorship and Building CollaborativeInfrastructure in Aerospace Engineering (Experience)Dr. Carl Anthony Moore Jr, Florida A&M University - Florida State University Carl A. Moore Jr. is an associate professor at the FAMU-FSU College of Engineering. He earned his B.S. in mechanical engineering from Howard University and his M.S. and Ph.D. from Northwestern University. Before entering graduate school, Dr. Moore worked as a research engineer and manufacturing engineer for Eastman Kodak Company in the Copy Products and Single-Use Camera divisions. He also has
overcome is that of traditional departmentalboundaries. As stated earlier, team teaching across departmental and college boundaries can bevery cumbersome. Blending these departments together into an effective interdisciplinaryteaching and research Center, recognized internally by the University Administration andexternally to industry, was a primary objective.Although still under development, the course sequence structure is shown in Figure 1. Mostcourses are interdisciplinary in some fashion although the degree of cross fertilization varies. On acautionary note, advanced study courses are quite involved and contain sufficient fundamentaltheory with the necessary mathematics to ensure that a quality advance-degree graduate isproduced. Other
programs as well as the motivating factors that lead students there to beginwith. What is it about engineering that interests students and motivates their initial pathway intoengineering? And were those factors significant in maintaining student engagement through the“valley of despair” to degree completion? These were the research questions asked at theUniversity of Notre Dame beginning in the Fall of 2007. That cohort of students was asked aspart of a homework question, in the Introduction to Engineering Systems Course, “Engineeringis a very broad field of study. What is it about engineering that interests you?” The essayresponses of 163 students were reviewed by two engineering education researchers (initiallycoded independently and then codes
Paper ID #23354Product Life-cycle Management Scholarship ProgramDr. Robert P. Van Til, Oakland University Robert Van Til is the Pawley Professor of Lean Studies and Chair of Oakland University’s Industrial and Systems Engineering Department. He earned a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Michigan State University as well as M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Mechanical Engineering from Northwestern University. Dr. Van Til is also associated with Oakland University’s Pawley Lean Institute. Dr. Van Til’s educational and research interests focus on the modeling, analysis and control of manufac- turing systems, lean and Product
research study was an experimental quantitative study, utilizing the existing learning stylesmodel and measurement tool of the Felder-Silverman Index of Learning Styles (ILS) to assessthe learning styles of CM students [2]. Using the same methodology as in previous studies in theengineering disciplines [13, 15, 16, 21], this study focused on CM students instead of studentsfrom engineering disciplines, as called for by Felder and Brent (2005).The population of the full study was undergraduate and graduate college students in CMprograms that were members of the ASC for the spring semester 2015. The participant sample ofthe full study was chosen based on their related discipline (purposive sampling) and because theywere available (convenience
undergraduate mechanical engineering major anticipating graduation in May of 2019. I am a member of the Beyond Professional Identity research group based in Harding University located in Searcy, Arkansas. I plan to further my studies in engineering education in graduate school particularly in regards to equipping students to work in development and sustainability. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Paper ID #22967Dr. Jeremiah SullinsDr. Shari E. Miller, University of Georgia Shari E. Miller is an Associate Professor and the Associate Dean of the School of Social Work at the Uni- versity
. During his time as an undergraduate and as a graduate student at NCSU, Dr. Adams actively participating in a wide range of efforts aimed at increasing the recruitment, retention, and advancement of minority student groups studying engineering on campus. These personal experiences fueled his desire to pursue research opportunities in the field of Diversity in Higher Education, specifically in STEM disciplines. During his time as a postdoctoral research, Dr. Adams has established the Minority Summer Research Program at NCSU and is conducting research related to various diversity issues on campus.Mr. James Samuel Carter III, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill Mr. James Carter is a Ph.D. student in Education
simultaneous reactionsand the role of convective mass transfer in electrochemical systems, while simultaneouslyexposing students to the excitement of nanotechnology.Environmentally Benign Ion Exchange. The largest single graduate research effort currentlyongoing in the author's graduate laboratories involves studies of electrochemically switched ionexchange processes as alternatives to traditional ion exchange.4 In traditional ion exchange,chemical potential is normally modulated (via changes in solution concentration) to cause ions toload and elute from the exchange matrix. In this laboratory, students deposit and characterizeelectrodes derivatized with a nickel hexacyanoferrate (NiHCF) ion exchange material. Bychanging the potential on the electrode
Systems, and has recently developed a new graduate course in Modeling and Simulation of Mechanical Engineering Systems. He is very active working on industry- academia projects within the Modeling & Simulation Lab. In addition, he is part of team that has been awarded a $650K NSF grant to study and improve retention and graduation rates of engineering students. Don is the author/co-author of over 50 technical publications and is currently working on modeling solar collectors, energy systems, and heat loss from buildings. He is a licensed professional engineer and is a member of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers and the American Society of Engineering Education.Dr. Josue Njock Libii, Purdue University
effective is stilllacking. A major review of relationship-based STEM interventions highlighted thescarcity of research in this area, emphasizing the need to set an objective aiming toexamine the best practices and lessons learned for building impactful women-focusedSTEM mentorship programs for global reach.PurposeThe present study aims to gain a more profound understanding of practical and evidence-basedinsights into women-focused STEM mentorship initiatives, specifically to better understand theefficacy of mentoring programs aimed at supporting women in STEM, particularly those at thegraduate and early career stages in academia – which includes students stemming at thebachelors, graduate and doctoral level. The following overarching research
programs such as S-STEM for just such students with unmet financial need. Thescholarships allow the students to work less or not at all, and to put more of their energy intoacademics. At Arizona State University, the author has led such scholarship programs with anAcademic Success and Professional Development classes for nearly 15 years. During this timeshe has continually done research on the best way to support and encourage students to do wellacademically, to graduate, and to go right on to graduate school. This research has used groundedtheory and Social Cognitive Career Theory to understand how best to recruit and retain students.Beginning with seminars, over the years, the author developed a successful two-credit AcademicSuccess and
used.Aselsan Academy was founded in June 2017 [18] as an official company directorate toregulate and manage engineering graduate studies of the Aselsan employees towards needsand benefits of the company. Employees can obtain their Master of Science and Doctor ofPhilosophy degrees upon completion of the specific program requirements. Aselsan Academyexpects from students that, their graduate studies to match with their projects in Aselsan withrespect to main campus university regulations. Employees are required to carry out their jobresponsibilities and graduate studies at the same time.OrganizationAselsan Academy is officially recognized and formed by the agreement between Aselsan,Higher Education Council (YÖK) of Turkey and four major state research
Paper ID #41714Board 246: Early-Career Engineers’ Experiences with Equity and Ethics inthe WorkplaceChika Winnifred Agha, Colorado State University Chika Winnifred Agha is a graduate student in the Civil and Environmental Engineering department at Colorado State University, working towards her master’s degree. She holds a bachelor’s degree in Civil Engineering and has acquired expertise in both Civil Engineering and Engineering Education. This unique combination of knowledge has equipped her with a distinctive set of skills. Her research interests primarily revolve around engineering education, with a specific focus on
stimulatingactivities.DisseminationDespite the COVID-19 worldwide pandemic, the MIDFIELD team has continued to disseminateresults from research using MIDFIELD in Year 6 in various venues including conferences andinvited talks [8, 9]. At the 2021 ASEE Annual Conference, we presented a summary in the NSFGrantees session [10]. At the 2021 EDUCON conference [11], we presented research comparinginternational and domestic students in engineering. The abstract summarizes the work as follows This study focuses on quantitative analyses of international and domestic students pursuing undergraduate degrees at institutions in the USA. Metrics used include representation at start of university studies, representation at graduation and six-year graduation rate
women into the engineeringfield, and while women now represent 19 percent of all undergraduate engineering students,women remain more likely than men to switch out of the field, particularly in the first two yearsof college (Goodman, 2002; National Research Council, 2006). A number of universities andresearch studies have concentrated on determining and creating effective ways to recruit womeninto engineering throughout the educational pipeline from elementary school to graduate school(Anderson-Rowland, 2000; Anwar, Acar, & Rung, 2002; Cohoon, 2006; Goodman, 2002;National Research Council, 2006; Thom, Pickering, & Thompson, 2002). Goodman (2002),found that the reason women drop out of engineering majors is not a lack of academic ability
education, (c) cultivate a world-class STEM workforce, (d) expand students’scientific literacy, and (e) promote research that advances the frontiers of knowledge in STEMmiddle and high school education.Introduction Engineers and scientist utilize the principles and theories of science and mathematics todesign, test, and manufacture products that are important to the future of a nation’s citizenry.With the exception of biological sciences, however, the percentage of college students seekingdegrees in math, science and engineering disciplines has been declining for the past two decades.Furthermore, fewer potential engineering majors are completing rigorous college preparatoryprograms and graduating in the top quarter of their high schools. This
Engineering Education and MBA in Sustainability and Operations from Purdue University, she is proud to currently share her expertise as an Engineering Professor at CU Boulder.Marlene Sulema Palomar, University of Colorado BoulderLyndsay Rose Ruane, University of Colorado Boulder Lyndsay Ruane is a PhD student at the University of Colorado Boulder, studying aerospace engineering. Her research experience is broad, including medical and nuclear physics, GNSS, signal processing, as well as STEM and engineering education. Currently, she is focused on diversity and retention in aerospace engineering. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 PALAR IN
Ph.D. in Engineering Education and MBA in Sustainability and Operations from Purdue University, she is proud to currently share her expertise as an Engineering Professor at CU Boulder.Miss Lyndsay Rose Ruane, University of Colorado Boulder Lyndsay Ruane is a PhD student at the University of Colorado Boulder, studying aerospace engineering. Her research experience is broad, including medical and nuclear physics, GNSS, signal processing, as well as STEM and engineering education. Currently, she is focused on diversity and retention in aerospace engineering.Marlene Sulema Palomar, University of Colorado BoulderHannah Sanders, University of Colorado Boulder ©American Society for Engineering
funding and publishing for various research projects. She’s also the founder and advisor of the first ASEE student chapter in Puerto Rico at UPRM. Her research interests include investigating students’ understanding of difficult concepts in engineering sciences, especially for underrepresented populations (Hispanic students). She has studied the effective- ness engineering concept inventories (Statics Concept Inventory - CATS and the Thermal and Transport Concept Inventory - TTCI) for diagnostic assessment and cultural differences among bilingual students. She has also contributed to the training and development of faculty in developing and evaluating various engineering curriculum and courses at UPRM, applying the
is an Assistant Professor of Practice in the Engineering Education Innovation Center and the Department of Civil, Environmental, and Geodetic Engineering at The Ohio State Univer- sity. She earned her B.S. and M.S. degrees in Civil Engineering from Ohio State where she specialized in construction and researched sustainable bridge practices for her masters’ thesis. She earned her Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech in 2013 where she studied the motivation and identity of graduate teaching assistants in first-year engineering programs. Additionally at Virginia Tech, Rachel was a Dean’s Teaching Fellow, which afforded her the opportunity to teach first-year engineering courses along with graduate level
. Adams, University of Texas at Dallas Dr. Stephanie G. Adams is the Department Head and Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. She previously served as Associate Dean for Undergraduate Studies in the School of Engineering at Virginia Commonwealth University and was a faculty member and administrator at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln (UNL). Her research interests include: Teamwork, International Collaborations, Fac- ulty Development, Quality Control/Management and Broadening Participation. She is an honor graduate American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021
hold much potential for illuminating how teamwork is undertaken,thereby pointing to strategies for successful collaborations. Drawing on prior work in Scienceand Technology Studies (STS), and based upon a one-month ethnographic study of aninterdisciplinary graduate research team, we found that the team used boundary negotiatingartifacts (BNAs) to navigate their work. In this paper, we discuss the significance of boundarynegotiating artifacts—which build on boundary object literature—and propose the concept as auseful framework for investigating and facilitating interdisciplinary graduate and undergraduateteams. This new framework has the potential to shed light on aspects of interdisciplinarycollaboration and cooperation that have previously
the ways in which this identity is influenced by stu- dents’ academic relationships, events, and experiences. Dr. Groen holds B.S. and M.S. degrees in Civil Engineering from the South Dakota School of Mines & Technology.Dr. Lisa D. McNair, Virginia Tech Lisa D. McNair is a Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she also serves as Director of the Center for Research in SEAD Education at the Institute for Creativity, Arts, and Technology (ICAT). Her research interests include interdisciplinary collaboration, design education, communication studies, identity theory and reflective practice. Projects supported by the National Science Foundation include exploring disciplines as cultures
minority backgrounds as well [3]. Existing researchhas shown that compared to their college peers, FG students are generally less prepared forentering college and have lower retention and graduation rates [1, 3, 4]. However, not muchresearch has been conducted to study how high school American College Testing (ACT) scoresaffect the college Grade Point Average (GPA) of first-generation engineering undergraduates.ACT is a standardized test employed for college admissions in the U.S. ACT scores usuallyinclude ACT English score, ACT math score, ACT reading score, and ACT science score.Conducting research on how high school ACT scores affect college GPA is important due topressing demands to increase engineering retention and graduation [5-7].Research
Engineering at The University of Texas at Austin as well as Adjunct Professor of Imaging Physics at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. Dr. Markey is a 1994 graduate of the Illinois Mathematics and Science Academy. She has a B.S. in computational biology (1998). Dr. Markey earned her Ph.D. in biomedical engineering (2002), along with a certificate in bioinformatics, from Duke University. Dr. Markey has been recognized for excellence in research and teaching with awards from organizations such as the American Medical Informatics Association, the American Society for Engineering Education, the American Cancer Society, and the Society for Women’s Health Research. She is a Fellow of both the American Association