approach to reformSC ATE started at the grassroots roots level, with faculty, to initiate reform. A cadre ofinterdisciplinary ATE faculty from across the state conducted research and participated inextensive faculty development to prepare to better meet the needs of students and solve thechronic problem of poor retention and low graduation rates. Research efforts conducted by theSC ATE Center included commissioning a research report on enrollment and retention in thestate’s engineering technology programs, presenting results of a second research study, andhosting focus group and panel discussions at a 1998 Retention Forum. The Center’scommissioned report and results from the Retention Forum have been published in a recruitmentand retention
study analytical methods in the context of TIM subtopics such as organizing and retrievinginformation and knowledge, designing systems composed of technology and of people andorganizations with (possibly different) economic interests, and managing risks and resources incommercial enterprises. These uniquely-trained graduates will be prepared to take leadershiproles in existing companies or to help create new enterprises. Our doctoral graduates will havethe breadth of knowledge to identify important research questions that require both anunderstanding of information technology and of organizations and management, and will havethe depth of analytical knowledge to address these questions. This will make them exceptionallywell equipped for careers
choices. She is also interested in nontraditional students’ access and success in engineering education and is investigating this topic at Purdue University.Dr. Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University and Central Queensland University Matthew W. Ohland is Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University and a Professorial Re- search Fellow at Central Queensland University. He has degrees from Swarthmore College, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, and the University of Florida. His research on the longitudinal study of engineer- ing students, team assignment, peer evaluation, and active and collaborative teaching methods has been supported by over $12.8 million from the National Science Foundation and the Sloan
, works on curriculum development and coordinates assessment and accreditation activities. Her engineering education area of research is devel- opment of instructional technologies for successful math to engineering transition. She also collaborates with faculty in Women’s and Gender Studies to study the impacts of interventions done to increase the number of women in engineering.Dr. Frances S. Ligler, North Carolina State University Frances S. Ligler is the Lampe Distinguished Professor of Biomedical Engineering in the Joint Depart- ment of Biomedical Engineering in the College of Engineering at North Carolina State University and School of Medicine at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and an elected
undergraduate and graduate students to obtain global engineering experiencein contemporary China. Participants study at the prestigious Sichuan University for three weeksincluding visiting Beijing, Xian, Chengdu and its surrounding areas. The program includeslectures, engineering field trips and engineering demonstrations. Experienced engineers andfaculty members in China are invited to lecture on special topics and advanced engineeringexperience. The topics may cover chemical, mechanical, electrical, manufacturing and computerengineering. Four engineering field trips are arranged through Sichuan University. The fieldtrips include visiting chemical, pharmaceutical and information technology companies in theChengdu area as well as 2600-year-old
engineering was established within aSaud University with industry. The first aspect is providing collaborative project between the government of the Kingdomconsultations by college faculty to industry companies. Thesecond aspect is supporting scientific research through the of Saudi Arabia represented by the Ministry of Education andfinance provided by industry to establish research chairs in the the UNESCO Commission of the Organization of the Unitedcollege. The third aspect is providing scholarships to the Nations. The college was under the auspices of UNESCO untiloutstanding students and awards to the outstanding graduation 1969 when it became a
studying mechanical engineering and doing research in engineering educa- tion—the perfect combination of her interests.Dr. Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University Dr. Sheri Sheppard is in the Design Group of Mechanical Engineering at Stanford. Besides teaching undergraduate and graduate courses on structural analysis and design, she serves an administrative role as Associate Vice Provost for Graduate Education. Her research focuses on the study of educational and career pathways of people interested in technical work (and how to make K-20 education more supportive of these pathways).Dr. Helen L. Chen, Stanford University
undergraduates’ decision to pursue an engineering degree.QuanCrit, challenges deficit perspectives through critical methods that interrogate eugenicapproaches and perceptions to quantitative data [3]. Given the critical nature of QuantCrit,studying survey design is a worthwhile endeavor as it examines how survey items can be framedto capture nuances in critical research. The research adopts an asset-based approach, using CCWas a theoretical framework, to understand the existing capital—assets individuals hold-- ofundergraduate engineering students and how such capital shapes their college experiences anddecision to pursue graduate school, while also evaluating the effectiveness of QuantCrit methods insurvey design. Given the significance of CCW on
and Development (NITRD) strategic plan11Education and Workforce $1 M for E2• The directorate emphasizes support for – Expeditions in Education (E2) – CAREER awards – Activities that promote the entry and retention of veterans and other non-traditional students in engineering programs $53 M for CAREER12NSF Investments in WorkforcePrimary focus: Enhancements to Flow (all levels)• K12 Pre-college programs – EHR, EEC, RET• Recruitment of undergraduate Engineers – GI Bill, PEEC• Encouragement to pursue Graduate degrees – REU• Support during graduate studies – GRF, IGERT
- - - 2009 53 43 96 - - - 2010 42 31 73 - - - 2011 38 38 76 218 58 276 2012 93 24 117 170 51 221 Total 277 180 457 388 109 497One of the primary research questions for this study is how factors from a student’s experience ina required chemistry course as a freshman impact his/her subsequent academic performance,including in particular GPA at graduation. However, not all of the students surveyed atNortheastern University are
The Benefits of an Engineering Post-doctoral Position Matthew W. Ohland and Mark A. Palmer General Engineering, Clemson University / IMEB Department, Kettering UniversityAbstractPost-doctoral positions are not as common in engineering as they are in the sciences, so somemay view as post-doctoral positions as “fallback” options for engineering PhD’s who are notimmediately hired into tenure-track positions. While seeking one’s first position, it is easy to losefocus on the long-term goals of tenure and promotion. Engineering faculty are expected to teacheffectively at the beginning undergraduate, advanced undergraduate, and graduate levels;develop and maintain a funded research program; and perform
, journal papers, industry contact information, etc. Research sponsors can also indirectly benefit teaching. Faculty that network with potential research sponsors are more likely to obtain externally funded research projects, which can then be incorporated into class lectures. In addition, research studies provide opportunities for undergraduate and graduate research. Community projects such as Habitat for Humanity and collaboration with local governments, parks and recreation authorities, etc. provide opportunities for students to take classroom knowledge to the field. Faculty Benefit to
engineering students.Vanderbilt University’s Management of Technology Minor program of study is designed to provideour students the opportunity to gain a working knowledge of the fundamentals of business andengineering management. The program is open to students majoring in one of the traditionalundergraduate engineering programs offered within the Vanderbilt University School ofEngineering (VUSE). Approximately one-half of the students graduating from VUSE assume someform of management position within five years after graduation. Babcock’s 1989 study concludesthat "two-thirds of today's engineers will spend two-thirds of their careers as managers". Clearly,engineering programs have a responsibility to prepare their students for management and
Engineering Technology programs.However, review of the literature has failed to identify an effective, comprehensive counselingmodel/tool that will enable more students to graduate and become productive technologists inbusiness and industry.The research was conducted in order accomplish the solution to the aforementioned problem byinvestigating the relationship of scores on the science and engineering questionnaire measuringthe self-efficacy, vocational interests, and academic milestones to predict the academicperformance of the students enrolled in computer science and engineering technology programs.The study also included them math SAT scores and high school GPA as independent variables.A total of 150 males and females from the computer science
Beliefs on Test Performance. Social Psychology of Education: An International Journal, 18(4), 667–684.Ong, M., Wright, C., Espinosa, L., & Orfield, G. (2011). Inside the double bind: A synthesis of empirical research on undergraduate and graduate women of color in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Harvard Educational Review, 81(2), 172–209.Passel, J. S., & Cohn, D. (2008, February 11). U.S. Population Projections: 2005-2050. Retrieved from http://www.pewhispanic.org/2008/02/11/us-population-projections-2005-2050/Peralta, C., Caspary, M., & Boothe, D. (2013). Success Factors Impacting Latina/o Persistence in Higher Education Leading to STEM Opportunities. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 8(4), 905–918
programs1. As the value of theseprograms became apparent, their number began to increase rapidly.Engineering Management, as a discipline, evolved from the need to provide a link between themanagers and engineers of all types. A quick review of master program descriptions describesEM programs as providing a strong engineering core with additional studies in management,technology and business related courses. Hicks et. al.2 classified Engineering Managementmasters programs into three groups. One group focused on traditional management concepts suchas planning, marketing, accounting, etc. The second group focused on mathematical conceptsincluding operations research, probabilistic models, and risk/decision analysis, etc. and the thirdone focused on
bachelor's degrees in engineering, underrepresented groups continue todisproportionally represent smaller percentages of engineering graduate degrees and employedprofessionals.3Whether focusing on retaining students or employees, studies have shown that engagement is akey indicator of retention. In his theory of student involvement, Astin (1984) defined studentengagement as a student’s academic commitment and application exhibited in the form of timeand energy devoted to activities that are educationally purposeful.4 Many researchers haveemphasized the importance of this concept of student engagement and suggest that enhancingengagement is essential to improving retention rates in higher education.5,6,7 The CorporateLeadership Council (CLC) defines
. Her current research interests are robotics, wireless sensor networks, signal processing, embedded software and engineering education. Page 22.1313.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Solving the Engineering Pipeline ChallengeAbstract – A comprehensive analysis of our engineering student retention and graduation ratesfor first time freshmen in a School of Engineering major quantified a compelling need forenhancing early (freshmen and sophomore) retention rates and graduation rates. A SummerEngineering Enrichment Program (SEEP) was initiated in 2009 and early
ASEE,the College of Engineering, the College of Literature, Science and the Arts and the Horace H.Rackham School of Graduate Studies sponsored this workshop. A workshop focused onacademic careers similar to this is organized every two years to allow graduate students atvarious stages of their careers to attend and benefit.The ASEE student chapter also regularly organizes a seminar to inform graduate studentsinterested in a career in academia about opportunities at small to mid-sized schools. The mostrecent one was held during the Winter 2000 semester. The focus of smaller schools is frequentlymore teaching oriented than the University of Michigan. Therefore, academic demands at theseschools are very different than those at the large research
Paper ID #35486Workshop: Using Focus Groups to Gain Insights into First-YearEngineering (RESUBMISSION)Cassie Wallwey, The Ohio State University Cassie Wallwey is currently a Ph.D. candidate at Ohio State University’s Department of Engineering Education. She is Graduate Teaching Associate for the Fundamentals of Engineering Honors program, and a Graduate Research Associate working in the RIME collaborative (https://u.osu.edu/rimetime) run by Dr. Rachel Kajfez. Her research interests include engineering student motivation and feedback in engineering classrooms. Before enrolling at Ohio State University, Cassie earned her
considering students’ information related needs (e.g.what kinds of issues students face when conducting research) and do not address informationneeds within the specific context of students’ own research and learning experiences. Eckel’sopinion piece9 entitled “A Reflection on plagiarism, patchwriting, and the engineering master’sthesis” briefly discusses difficulties that international students in engineering have when writingtheir theses and suggests that librarians and graduate programs have a role to play in educatingthese students on how to synthesize information from other sources and cite their sourcescorrectly.Information literacy needs in a research context Among research studies that examine Chinese students in other disciplines
, and largely presumed by professional associations and licensingbodies. Many formal courses and programs have in turn been created to promote professionalresponsibility and ethical integrity among engineering graduates. Other interventions (e.g.,service learning programs) have also been developed to more broadly challenge engineeringstudents to develop as engaged citizens and community members. Yet there has been a notablelack of research on measures and understandings of social and ethical responsibility amongundergraduate engineering students. Further, few studies have looked at how such indicatorschange over time and are impacted by specific kinds of learning experiences. As a result, facultyand administrators often have little evidence to
approved by the Department, the SCSE MEngDirector of Graduate Studies and forwarded to the UMD Office of Graduate Education for finalapproval.Many classes are conveniently offered in the late afternoon or evening and many courses areoffered by ITV or enhanced face-to-face at the Mesabi Range Community and Technical Collegein Virginia, MN as part of the Iron Range Graduate Engineering Education Program(7). Course Requirements Semester Course Level CreditsMajor Plan Department: ChE, CE, ECE, ME 12 Minimum 5XXX or 8XXX***, Selected(within MIE), IE (within MIE) 4XXX courses*Engineering Course Project within the Major 3 to 6
Paper ID #32722It’s a Context Gap, Not a Competency Gap: Understanding the Transitionfrom Capstone Design to IndustryDr. Marie C. Paretti, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Marie C. Paretti is a Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she directs the Vir- ginia Tech Engineering Communications Center (VTECC). Her research focuses on communication in engineering design, interdisciplinary communication and collaboration, design education, and gender in engineering. She was awarded a CAREER grant from the National Science Foundation to study expert teaching in capstone design courses, and
and Social Sciences. She holds a Ph.D degree in higher education from Beihang University. Her research interests include engineering education and international and comparative higher education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 InnovatingMotivationMechanismsandInteractionChannelsof University-IndustryEducationalCollaboration:APilotChineseCaseAbstractThis article explores the collaboration between universities and industries in the fieldof engineering education, with a focus on a case study conducted at BeihangUniversity in China.The study examines the motivations and interaction channels ofuniversity-industry educational collaboration, highlighting the impact of suchcollaboration on
wellness, engineering student career pathways, and engagement of engineering faculty in engineering education research.Jeanne Sanders, University of Michigan Jeanne Sanders (she/her/hers) is a researcher in Engineering Education. She graduated with her Ph.D from North Carolina State University in the Fall of 2020 and works as a staff researcher in the Thrive Lab at the University of Michigan.Dr. Mark Vincent Huerta, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Huerta is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. He earned his PhD in Engineering Education Systems & Design at Arizona State University and has a BS/MS in Biomedical Engineering. His research group
and perceptions of futurepathways. Second, a quantitative longitudinal cohort study investigates Flit-GAP students' perceptions tolook for factors impacting persistence, graduation, and career transitions. Third, a primarily ethnographicstudy observes the many planned interactions in the hybrid virtual/in-person cross-institutional learningcommunity and examines the nuanced context that supports the Flit-GAP outcomes. The guiding researchquestions (RQ) and study designs are:RQ1: How do students from low-income and underrepresented groups in computing conceive oftheir future graduate school or career pathways, and the value and costs associated with thosepathways?To date, there is little research on the factors that impact low-income and under
operations research, with a research emphasis on modeling systems under uncertainty. His research has been supported by the government and private sectors and disseminated in a variety of forums. He is a member of the Institute of Industrial Engineers; his honorary affiliations include Tau Beta Pi and Sigma Xi.Dr. Lisa Benson, Clemson University Lisa Benson is an Associate Professor of Engineering and Science Education at Clemson University, with a joint appointment in Bioengineering. Her research focuses on the interactions between student moti- vation and their learning experiences. Her projects involve the study of student perceptions, beliefs and attitudes towards becoming engineers and scientists, and their problem
, structural morphing, and energy harvesting. Ongoing projects range from developing high-bandwidth, high-authority actuators for vibration testing in jet engines to taking inspiration from how mosquitos eject drops from their wings before flight to discover new ways of decontaminating surfaces. His current research is funded by the Office of Naval Research, NSF, DoD, NASA, and several industry partners. Prof. Kauffman enjoys teaching a variety of courses in the MAE Department. He frequently teaches the Mechanical Systems Laboratory, which lets him interact with students and enjoy their ”aha!” moments in the smaller lab setting. He is fortunate to advise a fantastic research group with a great mix of graduate and
. Yale, UCONN,etc.) and is co-sponsored by the Connecticut Venture Group, Connecticut Innovations and the Departmentof Economic Development in the State of Connecticut.The New Dual Graduate Degree Programs Linking the Schools of Business and EngineeringAnother finding of our research was that companies were also interested in students who earned morethan one Master’s degree. This further supported the inter-disciplinary nature of and direction of ourprograms and led us to the development of the dual graduate degree program options.The Graduate Studies Division of the University of Bridgeport offers several dual graduate degreeprograms, offered jointly by the Schools of Business, Engineering and Education and Human Resources.Current dual degree