. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Work in Progress: Impacting Students from Economically Disadvantaged Groups in an Engineering Career PathwayAbstractThis work in progress describes the overall initiative in the program for engineering access,retention, and low-income-student success. It discusses the program structure, implementationof activities, outcomes for the first of five years of project, and reflections on our initial findings.IntroductionThe Program for Engineering Access, Retention, and LIATS Success (PEARLS) was establishedwith the objective of increasing success statistics of low-income, academically talented students(LIATS) in the College of Engineering (CoE) of the University of Puerto
skills pretest, an emailintroduction by each student of himself, an impromptu speech by each student introducinghimself, and an impromptu written paragraph in which each student assessed his presentation.Initial surveys were also administered asking the students to score their skills, confidence, andenjoyment with respect to communication. Outtake assessments were made of planned andimpromptu written prose, process internalization, and mechanics. Post-surveys wereadministered on skills, confidence, and enjoyment. Finally, ABET/IMSE outcome items (f) [anunderstanding of professional and ethical responsibility], (g), (i) [a recognition of the need for,and an ability to engage in life-long learning], and (p) [be able to provide leadership in multi
ofcommunication during the design process. Therefore, in the fall 2008 semester the teams werealso evaluated on their ability to effectively communicate their design with their team membersand with other teams in their discussion session. The class consists of 210 students; broken intoseven discussion sessions, with five teams each – for a total of 35 design teams. Thecommunication criteria was assessed in addition to the design project criteria. Each team wasrequired to complete their design, mathematical model and testing plans well in advance to theirscheduled testing date. Each team gave their design project construction materials and designplans (which include CAD drawings and instructions) to another team in the class whichconstructed the design
statistically significant increases in bothstudent knowledge about learning and teamwork and how often students implemented thisknowledge. Faculty benefited from the learning communities by gaining perspective on howstudents think about learning and teamwork and by developing a closer relationship withstudents in their learning communities.IntroductionEngineers are increasingly being valued as much for their ability to learn new things and operateas a member of a team as for their technical skills. Indeed, accreditation of engineeringprograms depends on students attaining proficiency in functioning on multidisciplinary teamsand recognizing the need for and the ability to engage in life-long learning1. For these reasons, asignificant goal of engineering
J. Shryock, PhD, is the Raymond Foundation Inc. Endowed Associate Professor in Multidisciplinary Engineering and Affiliated Faculty in Aerospace Engineering at Texas A&M University. She is also a fellow of the American Society for Engineering Education. She is an experienced educator specializing in student engagement and development of innovative educational practices with a focus on preparing the engineer of 2050. Her research encompasses helping educators understand and integrate strategies that enhance student success, particularly in response to rapid disruptions in education, such as the impact of generative AI. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025Lived Experiences
Paper ID #45197Gendered Impacts of Code Critiquers on Self-Efficacy in First-Year EngineeringStudents.Mary Benjamin, Michigan Technological University PhD Student in the Dept. of Civil, Environmental, & Geospatial Engineering at Michigan Technological university.Laura Albrant, Michigan Technological University After completing a bachelor’s degree in computer science, Laura Albrant decided to challenge how she viewed software development, by switching departments. Currently working towards a master’s degree in human factors at Michigan Technological University, Laura pursues interests on both sides of the fence
the SFFA cases to have an impact on their institution’s admissions either because their statealready disallowed it, or because they believed that their focus on their local community has alarger effect on the demographics of their student body than any adherence or lack thereof toaffirmative action policies. Karter, for example, was somewhat hopeful that their institution’sstatus as a minority-serving institution (MSI) focusing on local communities will somewhatshield them from any major impacts of the SFFA cases. Bowie, also faculty at an MSI, expectslittle change in demographics except as a possible consequence of “students applying to otheruniversities where they may or may not get into. We know a lot of our students do talk about
for improvingstudents’ learning experiences with respect to stakeholders and holistic issues, as well as theirunderstanding of how to communicate with an external client by working on these kinds ofprojects. By introducing project partners who have identified a problem on the campus where thestudents are studying, we hope to help foster a sense of appreciation for the importance ofholistic issues and the broad potential impact of engineering projects. Whereas the authors haveobserved that students in past years have anecdotally remembered this course as “the MATLABclass,” community engagement projects, by putting students in a context where they can see thedirect results of their work in researching these broader topics, have the capacity to
influenced by faculty behaviors, using methods that involve extensive self-reports by students.15, 16, 17 Our study adds to this literature by using STEM classroom observations in addition to student self-reports to understand these connections between student engagement and faculty behaviors. 4. Instructional modes such as active and problem-based learning are known to impact student engagement.18, 19, 5 In this study, we look not at the impact of interventions on engagement but on the student engagement impacts of what faculty are already doing. 5. Some research has examined the role of informal academic communities (e.g., lab groups, study groups, learning communities) on student engagement.20, 13 This
Students’ Leadership Development,” Journal of Civil Engineering Education, vol. 149, no. 3, p. 04023002, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1061/JCEECD.EIENG-1870.[20] “AWE.” Accessed: Feb. 06, 2024. [Online]. Available: http://aweonline.org/efficacy.html[21] A. Agustanti and K. Astuti, “Relationship Between Social Skills and Social Support with Peers’ Academic Confidence on Boarding High School Students,” Journal International Dakwah and Communication, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 97–110, 2022.[22] S. K. Patrick, “Organizing Schools for Collaborative Learning: School Leadership and Teachers’ Engagement in Collaboration,” Educational Administration Quarterly, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 638–673, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1177/0013161X221107628
and next steps. Figure 1. Project ComponentsApproaches and TheoriesThe project draws on ideas, methods, and content from four key fields and concepts (see Figure2): engineering ethics (EE), responsible innovation (RI), cultural theory (CT), and engagedscholarship (ES) (see Figure 2). The first two of these (EE and RI) provide content for thefacilitated discussions. Cultural theory (CT) provides the methodology for the survey work andidentifying core and policy values in order to test Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) theoryand how coalitions relate to meanings of responsible innovation that stakeholder communitieshold. Engaged scholarship (ES) positions students in communities of practice by having
projects in the community. Senior year relevant service projects into the academic context.3”Civil and Environmental Engineering students worked on four California State University at Stanislaus regards S-L as beingprojects, including green roof and biomass energy considerationsat a local elementary school (engaging a fifth grade classroom), central to both students’ academic experiences as well as theirwater quality testing (engaging high school chemistry students), social awarenss4. Norwich University defines S-L as theresearching the environmental impacts from a proposed biomass incorporation of service into the curriculum5.plant
Paper ID #14053Developing Industry Partnerships for Student Engagement in ChinaProf. Scott I. Segalewitz, University of Dayton Scott Segalewitz, P.E. is a Professor in the Department of Engineering Technology at the University of Dayton (UD). His areas of interest include using technology to enhance the learning environment, devel- oping global technical professionals, distance and asynchronous learning, and technical communication. He served for 2-1/2 years as Director of Industrial and Technical Relations for the University of Dayton China Institute in Suzhou, China where he established corporate partnerships and training
? 6The first theme, “Unpacking the teaching toolbox,” describes some of the “tools” we recognizedas essential for our success were essential for our roles as apprentice instructors. These toolsincluded constantly communicating with and listening to the students in the class, being flexibleand adaptable in responding to unpredictable situations, and leveraging the experience of ourteaching mentors. “Putting on a good show” describes the emotions, effort, and time investedinto creating effective lessons. These investments in time and effort were rewarding when weperceived things went well but draining and discouraging when the class did not go as planned.RQ2: How did our understanding of teaching change by the end of our apprenticeship?The third
state legislators who can influence university resources.Keywordscommunity engagement, capstone, effectiveness, accreditation,Introduction This paper will focus on describing the structure and general content of the two-semestercapstone course sequence used in CEES at OU. The generic course content, student peerevaluation, and Final Report review templates are readily available for use at other institutions.An extensive list of historical projects is presented to highlight the variety of governmentalentities (clients) that can participate in, and derive positive community impacts from, university-practitioner partnerships. The discussion then covers the unique aspects and crucial elements ofthe two-semester sequence. Data are presented
Understanding better young people’s views on technology in FinlandIntroductionSeveral studies have reported that there are groups among young people that view technologydifferently from each other and thus have different motives for studying or opting out ofengineering. The contemporary youth are not only a diverse group in themselves, but they arealso quite different in certain respects from previous generations. Therefore, understandingthe perceptions and motives of young people is crucial in order to engage them in engineeringstudies. To advance the development of technology in the future, it is important not only toattract a sufficient number of young people, but also to achieve a diverse pool of applicants toensure
cooperativeeducation programs in the United States to assess their views about the academic value of co-opeducation. The results suggested that HEI should more aggressively seek ways to better engagefaculty with cooperative education to maximize the co-op student‟s learning experience.Curriculum-Co-op relationshipsAs a co-operative education faculty coordinator, I have come to understand that learning can beachieved in many ways. While there are definitely opportunities to learn in the classroom,learning comes, for many students, from hands-on experiences such as co-op. The co-opexperience can be extrapolated to the mechanical engineering curriculum to benefit all studentsin the program. This will ensure faculty engagement because faculty are passionate
are ongoing in some capacity and have been offered for various amounts of timesince the early 2000s.This paper will be two-part. The first will highlight each community outreach program theschool offers. The second will summarize a survey of the school’s current students. The surveywill cover students’ exposure to the school’s programs and any subsequent impact on their careerchoices. It will also poll the students on any P-12 exposure to architecture or architecturalengineering they may have experienced.Introduction:Studies have shown that children consider careers much earlier than thought. By age 7, childrenhave realistic career aspirations (Moulton, et al, 2014). During developmental stages, childrenwill shape these aspirations based on
AC 2011-291: CREATION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF A BACKPACKCOURSE TO TEACH CROSS-CULTURAL AND VIRTUAL COMMUNI-CATIONS SKILLS TO STUDENTS IN AN INTERNATIONAL CAPSTONEEXPERIENCEHolt Zaugg, Brigham Young University Holt Zaugg is a doctoral student in the Educational Inquiry, Measurement and Evaluation program at Brigham Young University. His research focus is on communication patterns within Global Virtual teams and test item evaluation using IRT and CFA.Randall Davies, Brigham Young University Assistant Professor Instructional Psychology & TechnologyDr. Alan R Parkinson, Brigham Young UniversityDr. Spencer P. Magleby, Brigham Young UniversityGreg Jensen, Brigham Young University Professor of Mechanical Engineering; Former
related to their ability to access or engage withthe course.Discussion & Continued WorkBased on our analysis so far, students do not seem to be having trouble accessing the tools typicalof Oregon State’s Ecampus programs or engaging with the course material. For example,respondents appear to have good internet connections and computer access, despite ouruniversity’s high cross-section of students from rural communities. Survey results indicate thatstudents are having success interacting with course material, but also that very little or nointeraction with their peers or instructor are happening in their Ecampus work. This idea returnsas the main disadvantage that participants noted for Ecampus courses; almost all respondentsexperienced lower
psychology from Teachers College, Columbia University (1999). c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 What activities and practices sustain the engagement of highly diverse communities of young engineering students in an out of school fellowship program?AbstractThis paper reports on the process and findings of a participatory action research project with adiverse group of high school youth who were participants in an engineering design fellowship ata major urban science center. Participants were trained in action research techniques, exploredthe “engineering habits of mind” (National Research Council, 2009) as a framework forunderstanding their own work with visitors
embedded within engineeringdepartments [9]. By using the expertise of graduate student and postdoctoral peer coacheswithin a given discipline, the Communication Lab provides a scalable, content-aware solutionwith the benefits of just-in-time, one-on-one [10], and peer [11] training. When we firstintroduced this model, we offered easy-to-record metrics for the Communication Lab’seffectiveness (such as usage statistics and student and faculty opinion surveys), as arecommonly used to assess writing centers [12], [13]. Here we present a formal quantitative study of the effectiveness of Communication Labcoaching. We designed a pre-post test study for two related tasks: personal statements forapplications to graduate school and graduate
important for student retention at all stages of theiracademic journey, having an engineering identity or seeing oneself as an engineer also greatlyinfluence student retention. In chemical engineering, women tend to show a high sense ofbelonging in the discipline, however, the engineering identity of women compared to men is stilllow [10]. Community-oriented approaches have shown success in contributing to factors that aidin student retention. One study found that meetings with faculty, peer support groups, andleadership opportunities resulted in higher academic performance and enhanced retention ofunderrepresented students in electrical and computer engineering departments [11]. A universityengineering program facilitated engagement activities
for posterity and toencourage engagement within other academic institutions and professional societies. Some of ourexamples and strategies can be scaled and adapted to address institutional or regional challengesor to increase awareness and engagement in other national societies. Outcomes seen throughinitiatives have resulted in increased connections with previously disenfranchised members tothe ASEE community, engagement across divisions, and expanded programming in support ofdiversity, equity, and inclusion practices.1. Importance of Diversity, Equity, and InclusionEngineers have a significant impact on society. Their actions shape future technology,infrastructure, and innovation. Improving workforce diversity has been shown to
Paper ID #26443The Impact of Multidisciplinary Teams on Sustainability Projects in EPICSDr. Stephanie M. Gillespie, Arizona State University Stephanie Gillespie joined the EPICS@ASU program after finishing her Ph.D. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology. She has extensive experience in K-12 outreach and curriculum development, and is passionate about giving students opportunities to make a difference throughout their academic career. As the EPICS Director of Instruction, Stephanie leads the EPICS pro- gram’s curriculum development, EPICS-Community College program, and program
of students inSTEM fields studying abroad remains low in comparison to other disciplines, the data suggeststhat efforts to develop international programs for these students may be having an impact. TheInstitute for International Education reported that for 2012-13, STEM fields overall showed thegreatest growth in students abroad, from 59,921 students in 2011-12 to 65,223 in 2012-13, an8.8% increase in only one year. Looking at the fields of study most applicable to the studentcohort studied in this research, among engineering students this represents an increase of 7.4%among engineering students 4.5% among students in the physical & life sciences.12 Onepossible area for growth in international engagement among S&E students is through
. Dr. Alemdar currently serves as PI and co-PI for research on various NSF funded projects that focuses on engineering education, teacher networks and STEM learning environments. Her expertise includes program evaluation, social network analysis, mixed methods, and advanced quantitative methods. Dr. Alemdar is passionate advocate for equitable and inclusive STEM education. She actively engages with educators, students, and communities to promote the importance of STEM disciplines and education research in preparing the next generation for the challenges of the future. She received her Ph.D. in Educational Policy, with a concentration in Research, Measurement, and Statistics, from Georgia State University.Dr. Sunni
discussions and comments on the work of others. The synergy that exists in the student- centered Virtual Classroom is one of the most unique and vital traits that the online learning format possesses. Self-motivation – Students can log into their programs at their convenience and learn at their own pace. If they’re having difficulty with a course, they can take more time to study it. Student-centered - While students should read all of their classmates' contributions, they actively engage in only those parts of the dialog most relevant to their needs. In this way, students control their own learning experience and tailor the class discussions to meet their own specific needs. Level playing field - In the online environment
in [19], as others have, that there is not a difference in innate mathematical abilitybetween genders to explain the gaps. Furthermore, [20] studied the role of the communitycollege in closing the gender gap and reported that the most cited barrier for female students inSTEM fields was a “chilly climate” negatively impacting the likelihood of persisting.D. Community CollegesCommunity colleges, originally known as Junior Colleges, were authorized by the Land GrantAct officially called the Morrill Act of 1862 and 1890. There are more than one thousandcommunity colleges. These are primarily two-year, non-profit institutions, that are lower-costcolleges providing the first two years of a four-year degree [21].The growth of community colleges was
research as it relates totechnology and engineering education and the contribution of this model to understandingstudent attitudes in the domain of engineering and design thinking. While collaborative learningis important the present research is an opportunity to assess its impact on students beyond theacquisition of new knowledge.Introduction Collaboration is frequently listed among skills required for graduates to succeed in the21 century workforce. Engineering standards include developing “an ability to function on stmultidisciplinary teams” as well as “an ability to communicate effectively.” Active learningapproaches, including collaborative learning practices, foster student engagement and learningthat is better aligned with the