developing new military-related aircraft.Ivan Cortes, Texas A&M University Ivan Cortes is a mechanical engineering student from Harker Heights, Texas. Some areas of interest to him are the automotive industry and product design, but ultimately he simply enjoys the challenge of solving problems and innovating through the use of technology. One of Cortes’s long-term goals is to travel abroad and gain international experience. Through involvement in programs offered at Texas A&M University, he sees an opportunity to learn by solving real problems through teamwork and collaboration. Page 25.530.1
engineering program approximately $10,000 per year for the last six years in directsupport of EngE’s hands-on instruction. From 1998 to present, they have given a total of nearly$200,000 to the college in support of undergraduate engineering instruction.3In 2004, the EngE faculty, in collaboration with faculty from other engineering departments andthe School of Education, were successful in getting a major engineering education project fundedby the National Science Foundation (NSF) through its departmental level reform (DLR)program.4 The goal of the DLR project is to reformulate the freshman engineering (i.e., GEprogram) within EngE and the bioprocess engineering option within the Biological SystemsEngineering (BSE) program using a theme based spiral
Paper ID #33095Leveraging Curriculum to Mitigate Engineering Killer CoursesDr. Stephen Andrew Wilkerson P.E., York College of Pennsylvania Stephen Wilkerson (swilkerson@ycp.edu) received his PhD from Johns Hopkins University in 1990 in Mechanical Engineering. His Thesis and initial work was on underwater explosion bubble dynamics and ship and submarine whipping. After graduation he took a position with the US Army where he has been ever since. For the first decade with the Army he worked on notable programs to include the M829A1 and A2 that were first of a kind composite saboted munition. His travels have taken him to Los
ASEE Board of Directors’ Advisory Committee on P-12 Engineering Education.Dr. Richard J. Freuler, Ohio State University Richard J. (Rick) Freuler is a Professor of Practice and the Director for the Fundamentals of Engineer- ing for Honors (FEH) Program in Ohio State’s Department of Engineering Education in the College of Engineering. He teaches the two-semester FEH engineering course sequence and is active in engineering education research. He is also affiliated with the Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department and conducts scale model investigations of gas turbine installations for jet engine test cells and for marine and industrial applications of gas turbines at the Aerospace Research Center at Ohio State
exception of the Private institution (Chemical was highest there at the startof the semester only). The interest in a particular major remained rather stable at the UrbanPublic and the Large Land Grant. However, there were substantial change in the distribution atthe Private and Large Urban schools.One potential reason why the Large Urban University saw a decrease in the interest inMechanical Engineering stems from an interesting issue related to major selection. As indicatedpreviously, the Large Urban University allows for direct matriculation to degree programs,though a sizable percentage (approximately 10%) of the incoming class chooses to enter asundeclared engineering. These students must then select a major by the end of their first year
2006-2023: LEVERAGING REHABILITATION NEEDS INTO FRESHMANENGINEERING DESIGN PROJECTSBruce Ankenman, Northwestern University Bruce Ankenman received a BS in Electrical Engineering from Case Western Reserve University and an MS and PhD. in Industrial Engineering from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Prior to his graduate work, he worked for five years as a design engineer for an automotive supplier in Ohio. He is currently an Associate Professor in the Industrial Engineering Department at the McCormick School of Engineering at Northwestern University. His research interests include the statistical design and analysis of experiments. Although much of his work has been concerned with physical
below. Corporate Mentoring Program: The CEAS Emerging Ethnic Engineering (E3) Program andGeneral Electric (GE) Aviation have developed a mentoring program for ethnic minorityengineering students. At the end of the freshman year, Summer Bridge students who take SCLCand are on-track are candidates for this program. The mentors arrange to meet with their studenton a regular basis during the academic year to make sure that the student is participating in 1) theGE social functions planned for the students and 2) the STEP retention program. The students 1)maintain consistent communication with their mentor, 2) provide their mentor with allinformation related to their academic progress and status, and 3) participate in all activitiesplanned by the
AC 2008-1319: DEVELOPMENT OF PERFORMANCE CRITERIA FORASSESSING PROGRAM OUTCOMES IN ENGINEERING, ENGINEERINGTECHNOLOGY & COMPUTER SCIENCE PROGRAMSPaul Biney, Prairie View A&M University Dr. Paul O. Biney is a Professor in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Prairie View A&M University, and the Director of the Future Aerospace Science & Technology (FAST) Center. He is a registered professional engineer in Texas. His areas of expertise include processing, fabrication and characterization of high temperature polymer matrix composites, multifunctional nanocomposites and energy systems design. He is also the chairman of the College of Engineering Assessment Committee and
Annual Conference Proceedings, June 15-19, 2019, Tampa, Floridasurvey respondents in the study indicated that they would not encourage their children to pursue amanufacturing career.Consequently, the problem is two-fold: First, the public perception, or misperception, regardingadvanced manufacturing impacts enrollment of students in manufacturing-related education programs.Second, traditional programs within educational institutions, for the most part, are not currentlyproducing graduates with core competencies sought by manufacturers, which include programming andhands-on operation of state-of-the-art manufacturing equipment, technology/computing, mathematicsand problem solving. For instance, many graduate engineers are not
Calif. and New York. He led the restructuring of these design, development and manufacturing organi- zations; substantially reducing operating and overhead costs and increasing productivity and profitability. He joined Northrop to establish and lead the Washington D.C based Northrop Analysis Center, a unique ”think tank” providing international strategic and marketing analysis as well as consulting services to the corporation. Mr. Silverstein began his engineering career at TRW, where he held various engineering and program management positions. While at TRW, he became an expert in satellite systems and was recruited to support the director of Central Intelligence. He was responsible for the oversight and evalua
semiconductor devices, electronics, and renewable energy and his research areas include solar cells, battery monitoring systems and electric vehicles.James O’Brien, Villanova University Prof. O’Brien is a faculty member in the Department of Mechanical Engineering. He is the Coordinator for the New Freshman Program.Gerard Jones, Villanova University Dr. Jones is Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, where he has taught courses in heat transfer, fluid mechanics, thermodynamics, computational fluid mechanics, and solar thermal analysis. Currently, he serves as associate dean for the 900-student undergraduate engineering program. His recent service-learning work on analysis and design of
RF communications equipment and 19 years of teaching experience in engineer- ing and technology undergraduate programs. His research interests include in digital image processing, biomedical signal processing and engineering education. Page 24.854.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 LEARNING OUTCOMES OF INTRODUCTORY ENGINEERING COURSES: STUDENT PERCEPTIONSAbstractThis paper evaluates the learning outcomes of an introductory level engineering course andcompares the assessment data of these outcomes to student self-evaluation of the achievement
adaptation of existing work is one way to increase the number of activitiesavailable. Also, the adaptation of university-level projects to these outreach programs issignificant because it begins to show participants what STEM students do and accomplish withinthe university environment.IntroductionThe first-year engineering program at Michigan Technological University (Michigan Tech) iscomprised of two (or three) semester courses depending on math readiness. Each course isdesigned to promote active, hands-on learning. Within each course, students complete in-classactivities and a semester design project as a part of an engineering team typically composed offour students. A wind energy project was developed as part of the NSF funded IDEAS project(DUE
is part of the development team for Clarkson’s First Year Engineering/Interdisciplinary course described in this paper. Her current research interests include the implementation and evaluation of evidence-based effective learning practices in STEM education, environmental education, and energy education.Dr. John C. Moosbrugger, Clarkson University John C. Moosbrugger, PhD, is a Professor of Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering and Associate Dean for Academic Programs for the Wallace H. Coulter School of Engineering at Clarkson University.Prof. Peter R Turner, Clarkson University Currently Dean of Arts & Sciences having previously served as Chair of Mathematics and Computer Science, and before that on the
sustainability of theethanol process by developing a facility to eliminate waste from the production process.This paper will describe the incorporation of the biomass-to-ethanol design project into our firstyear engineering program, the assessment methodology used and the expected educationaloutcomes of the project.IntroductionAll first year engineering students who enter our program Calculus-ready take a two semestercourse sequence: ENG1101 (Engineering Problem Solving and Analysis) and ENG1102(Engineering Modeling and Design). These courses are designed to introduce first yearengineering students to basic engineering topics: 3D visualization and modeling, ethics,engineering design and problem solving, software proficiency, and technical communications
programs, a balanced mixture of real, virtual, andremote labs [4]. Some researchers studied virtual/remote labs for various aspect: effectiveness ofremote engineering laboratories and simulations [5], the role of virtual and remote labs inpromoting concept understating [6], the evaluation of remote labs in terms of learning outcomes[7], comparing learning outcomes and student preferences for several different lab formats [8],the social involvement involved in remote experimentation [9], software requirements for remotelaboratories [10] , and the technical approach of a dynamics remote experiment [11]. Someresearchers studied the engineering labs for first-year students [12, 13]. Many educators reportedtheir tips on converting biomedical
2006-933: INTEGRATED PRE-FRESHMAN ENGINEERING AND PRECALCULUSMATHEMATICSJanet Hampikian, Boise State University Janet Hampikian is Associate Dean for Academic Affairs at Boise State University and Professor in Materials Science and Engineering at Boise State University. She received a Ph.D. in Materials Science, a M.S. in Metallurgy and a B.S. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Connecticut. Her current research interests include freshmen engineering programs, recruitment and retention issues in engineering, biomedical device development and the development and characterization of biomaterials.John Gardner, Boise State University John F. Gardner is Chair of the Mechanical
Paper ID #13517Evolution of a First-Year Engineering CourseDr. Noah Salzman, Boise State University Noah Salzman is an Assistant Professor at Boise State University, where he is a member of the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department and IDoTeach, a pre-service STEM teacher preparation program. His work focuses on the transition from pre-college to university engineering programs, how exposure to engineering prior to matriculation affects the experiences of engineering students, and engineering in the K-12 classroom. He has worked as a high school science, mathematics, and engineering and technology teacher, as
Paper ID #26257Putting Discussion-Based Engineering Education Courses OnlineDr. Audeen W. Fentiman, Purdue University Audeen Fentiman is the Crowley Family Professor in Engineering Education at Purdue University. She served as Associate Dean of Engineering for Graduate Education and Interdisciplinary Programs at Purdue from 2006 through 2017. Dr. Fentiman is a Fellow of the American Nuclear Society and the American Association for the Advancement of Science.Emilie A. Siverling, Purdue University Emilie A. Siverling is a Ph.D. Candidate in Engineering Education at Purdue University. She received a B.S. in Materials
. The ABET criterion 3 outcomes are a driving force inmaking sure the course outcomes are appropriate.Freshman Engineering courses have undergone significant evolution in the past few decades. Inrecent years great emphasis has been placed upon broadening the freshman engineeringexperience and improving retention in engineering programs. Several programs have madesignificant changes in recent years to address these issues. 1, 2, 3, 4, 9 Many programs are lessskills-based instruction and more project-based instruction with an emphasis on problem solvingand engineering design. 1, 6,7,8 The United States Air Force Academy, as well as otherinstitutions, have taken a multidisciplinary approach in the first year by making the course opento or required
2006-349: LONGITUDINAL STUDY OF U.S. NEWS RANKINGS OFENGINEERING PROGRAMS IN INSTITUTIONS WITHOUT DOCTORALPROGRAMS IN ENGINEERINGJames Farison, Baylor University Dr. Jim Farison is currently professor and chair of the ECE Department at Baylor University, and is also administratively responsible for Baylor's B.S. in Engineering program. He currently serves as chair of ASEE's Multidisciplinary Engineering Division, and is a member of the ASEE Accreditation Activities Committee. He received his B.S.E.E. from the University of Toledo and his M.S. and Ph.D. from Stanford University, before returning to serve on the faculty at UT in the EE and then the Bioengineering departments, and including 10 years
MULTIDISCIPLINARY ENGINEERING SCIENCE PROGRAM AT TRINITY UNIVERSITY Mahbub Uddin Department of Engineering Science Trinity University, San Antonio, Texas1. IntroductionTrinity University is an independent, coeducational university in the tradition of the liberal arts andsciences. Trinity’s principal focus is on undergraduate education. Academic programs in the liberalarts and sciences and preprofessional and professional fields are consciously intertwined to providemutually reinforcing intellectual experiences for students and faculty.The mission of the Engineering Science Department at Trinity
2006-588: GROWTH OF A YOUNG ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT PROGRAMYesim Sireli, University of North Carolina-Charlotte Yesim Sireli is an Assistant Professor at the Engineering Management Program at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte. She received a Ph.D. degree in Engineering Management from Old Dominion University, and also holds MSc and BSc degrees in Electrical Engineering. Her research interests include business forecasting, decision analysis, customer-oriented product development, quality management, and technology management.S. Gary Teng, University of North Carolina-Charlotte S. Gary Teng is the Director of Engineering Management Program and Center for Lean Logistics and
Paper ID #17906Exploring Impacts of Flexible, Balanced Engineering Program CurriculaDr. Marissa H. Forbes, University of Colorado, Boulder Marissa H. Forbes is a research associate in the College of Engineering and Applied Science at the Uni- versity of Colorado Boulder and lead editor of the TeachEngineering digital library. She previously taught middle school science and engineering and wrote K-12 STEM curricula while an NSF GK-12 graduate engineering fellow at CU. With a master’s degree in civil engineering she went on to teach advanced placement and algebra-based physics for the Denver School of Science and
programs.The CEAB has two goals: - that engineering programs offered by Canadian universities will meet or exceed minimumeducational standards acceptable for professional engineering licensure in Canada;and - that the quality and relevance of engineering education will continuously improve.The CEAB strives to meet these goals by continuously reviewing and updating the policies andprocedures for evaluating university engineering programs.In addition to advising Engineers Canada on all matters related to engineering education, theCEAB works closely with Canadian universities to ensure that accredited engineering programsare able to impart to their graduates the skills and knowledge needed to become productivemembers of the profession. It also
Paper ID #17462Teaching Chemical Engineering Courses in a Biomolecular Engineering Pro-gramProf. Faisal Shaikh, Milwaukee School of Engineering Dr. Faisal Shaikh joined MSOE about 6 years ago in a unique interdisciplinary engineering program called BioMolecular engineering. The program was a combination of molecular biology and chemical engineering and is unique in the nation. Being the lone chemical engineering faculty member in the pro- gram, he was tasked of developing a significant number of the core chemical engineering courses, albeit with a focus on biology. The program recently successfully went through the
Paper ID #37740Material selection in Electric Vehicle Engineering ProgramsClaes Fredriksson Currently working as Lead Academic Development Manager at Ansys Academic Program, Cambridge UK (Formerly known as Granta Design). Also, part-time Associate Professor of Materials Science at University West, Sweden, where he was Director of a Master’s Program in Manufacturing Engineering before moving to the UK nine years ago. He has over 20 years of experience teaching materials-related subjects to undergraduate and post graduate students in Sweden, Canada, Belgium and the U.S.A, mainly in Mechanical Engineering, still
proposed program at Old Dominion Universitydiffers from these two existing programs in that it is not affiliated in a manner to obtain licensureas a 3rd Assistant Engineer from the US Coast Guard2,3,4, but is focused to support theshipbuilding and repair operations of the Hampton Roads Area. The core curriculums of bothaccredited Marine Technology programs were very similar to the existing MET program atODU. By adding the three electives at the senior level to create an Emphasis in MarineEngineering Technology this allows for the introduction of marine applications of theory taughtin the core of the existing curriculum.LaboratoriesCurrent Laboratories have experimentation directly relating to the Emphasis in MarineEngineering Technology, and
resources, listen, and in particular relate to their protégés, and that this was of value inencouraging persistence.13There are a number of different efforts to promote retention of engineering faculty, initiatedthrough a variety of different organizations. Some of these organizations are Institute ofElectrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) and Women in Engineering Programs & AdvocatesNetwork (WEPAN), both of which hold webinars for new faculty members. IEEE has hostedfive virtual events of varying in length from a few hours to multi-day conferences for earlycareer faculty.14 Topics of these events have ranged from broad topics like launching asuccessful academic career to specific topics like standards education and student assessment.WEPAN
construction related students, at which theconstraints have been considered in a specific curriculum. In particular, the findings suggest thatboth undergraduate and graduate students believe that 3 design constraints have beenincorporated into the civil engineering program at a high level. These include: engineering codesand standards, manufacturability (constructability), and ethical considerations. In contrast, 3areas have been rated at a lower level. They include: social ramifications, political factors, andlegal issues.IntroductionOver the years there have been recommendations for employers and varioustechnical/professional organizations to revise the engineering curriculum to ensure that studentsare prepared for the professional practice of