robots. Once the target was detected the robots would reach the target using the PSO algorithm. Results of initial exploratory efforts were encouraging. The students got a first-hand experience of implementing swarm robotics as a real-time engineering application.Key words: Swarm robotics; swarm intelligence; Lego NXT; school students’ researchexperience; Java programming; demonstration.I. IntroductionRobotics is viewed as an emerging field that has potential to significantly impactthe nature of engineering and science education at all levels, from K-12 tograduate school [1-7]. A recent development in robotics is swarm robotics [8].The use of a large group (swarm) of small, simple and cheaper robots with
University). He has developed and/or taught courses in systems engineering, systems modeling & simulation, integration, testing, & evaluation, production systems engineering, construction engineering, engineering economics, engineering probability & statistics, project engineering, engineering optimization, risk & failure analysis, reliability engineering, and engineering research methods. His current research interest includes modeling, analysis, and optimization of complex operational systems and infrastructures susceptible to disruptions.Kellie Schneider Dr. Schneider is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Management, Systems, and Technology. Her research interests are in engineering
out visits that include discussions with practicing engineers, managers, marketing people, etc. Schedule meals with your hosts whenever possible to allow the students to talk with them informally. Intersperse technical visits with historical or cultural sites.• Clearly layout your expectations for student behavior and set strict guidelines. Make everyone aware of the penalties for offenses. Page 3.302.5• Assign pre-trip homework to students that involves researching one of the sites you will visit 5• Have a contact person back home that can receive and pass on emergency messages
of gender, race, and disability. Allowing for selfidentification through an open text box was the most inclusive way to ask for gender.Our initial outreach questionnaire contained 7 open ended questions along with 15likert scale questions which were all framed from a standpoint of resiliency, support,and success. We distributed the outreach questionnaire nationally to departmentchairs and deans at ABET-accredited engineering programs and engineering LGBTQorganizations. We aimed for over 100 responses to give us a diverse picture which isnot possible at a single institutional study.The themes that emerged from the outreach questionnaire informed the design ofthe follow-up personal interview schedules, which is a part of a feminist
specifically, differ from truly fundamental subjects.Mechanics is closer to engineering applications, unlike subjects such as mathematics, physics,chemistry, biology, astronomy and geography. It is distinct from the purely technological areasbecause of its strict system of logic. Due to this, and partly because of the large number ofconcepts and formulas that the students need to learn, MOS has been regarded as one of the mostdifficult undergraduate courses at Rutgers University. This can be validated by a two-tail t-testwith an α=.05 comparing the average D,W,F percentage spanning ten semesters for MOS at30.1% which was determined to be statistically significantly higher than any other courseofferings from the department with the next closest average
area of Human Work Design, Educational Scholarship and Environmental Sustainability.Dr. Letitia M. Pohl, University of Arkansas Letitia Pohl is a Clinical Assistant Professor in the Department of Industrial Engineering at the University of Arkansas. She holds a Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering from the University of Arkansas, an M.S. in Systems Engineering from the Air Force Institute of Technology, and B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Tulane University. Dr. Pohl served as an officer in the U.S. Air Force for eight years. At the Uni- versity of Arkansas, she has served as the Assistant Director of the Mack-Blackwell Rural Transportation Center and conducted research in warehouse design and operations, transportation
above.Instead, the analysis discussed above reveals students’ articulation of these benefits and learninggains in their own words. It is possible other activities and instructional techniques fed into thesuccess of the peer sharing presentations. For example, the peer sharing presentations alone werelikely not the sole reason students felt comfortable discussing their personal challenges, but theyinstead acted as an indicator that many students viewed the learning strategies course as a safespace to disclose information about themselves.Based on the emergent themes, a key factor contributing to the effectiveness of the peer sharingpresentations were the post-presentation reflections. Knowing they would be responsible forrecording the most impactful
height, wind speed, atmospheric stability, and the source emission rate, the customapplication created a geo-referenced grid of plume concentrations aligned to a map. Theapproach provided an opportunity for two unique disciplines within our academic department,Geospatial Information Science and Environmental Engineering, to collaborate and develop amethod for students to visualize the effects of dispersion while simultaneously becoming morefamiliar with information technology.5 In 2012, an upgrade to the ArcGIS program at ouruniversity, from version 8.3.1 to 10.0, forced us to relook the application’s scope and structure.The changes to the application and resulting modifications to the project’s structure andrequirements are described in this
Intelligence Operations Center. Each ofthese examples is of interest in learning how IBM has developed a culture of innovation that itdirectly connected to and learning from current and potential customers and markets.Smarter Cities Program: IBM sends out teams to cities as part of their Smarter Cities Program.These teams help the cities’ leaders to understand how information technology can be used torenew/revive/improve their vitality, irrespective of whether or not they employ IBM technology.This also provides valuable insight to IBM; returning teams provide the company with deeperand broader understanding of urban and human needs, and how IBM might apply what they havelearned to their innovation process and the development of new offerings.Watson
others, which areessential for success in the 21st century and necessary for the Fourth Industrial Revolution[24]. In addition, integrating STEM into the school curriculum contributes to creating newsolutions to social problems, improving people’s quality of life, and facing challenges suchas climate change for a more sustainable world and social development [25].B. Inclusive classroomInclusive education requires Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) to ensureaccess to quality education and to overcome social, economic, and cultural barriers [26]. ICTsin inclusive learning spaces eliminate barriers between teacher and student because theyfacilitate interaction for students with special educational needs and make teaching moreflexible
Paper ID #35616The New Normal: Student Perspectives on Supportive University Policiesduring COVID and BeyondMaimuna Begum Kali, Florida International University Maimuna Begum Kali is a Ph.D. student in the Engineering and Computing Education program at Florida International University (FIU), in the School of Universal Computing, Construction, and Engineering Ed- ucation (SUCCEED). She completed her B.Sc. in Computer Science and Engineering at the Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BUET) in Bangladesh. She began her Ph.D. study in Com- puter Science but changed her program to Engineering and Computing
2024, researchers from engineering education and human resources management in technological development laboratories conducted a thematic analysis of reported incidents to identify patterns, trends, and areas for improvement. The analysis aims to uncover the most common types of disciplinary incidents, underlying causes, and implications for the field in how engineering education addresses (or fails to address) these issues. Our findings identify recurring themes, analyze root causes, and offer recommendations for engineering educators and students to mitigate simi- lar incidents. This research has implications for informing curriculum development, professional development, and performance evaluation
AC 2012-5462: IMPLEMENTING SELF-REGULATED LEARNING PRO-CESS MODEL AND ASSESSMENT FOR FACILITATING CIVIL ENGI-NEERING STUDENTS TO MASTER ENGINEERING CONCEPTSProf. Wei Zheng, Jackson State University Dr. Wei Zheng is an Associate Professor of Civil Engineering at Jackson State University. He received his Ph.D. degree in Civil Engineering from University of Wisconsin-Madison in 2001 and has over10-year industrial experience. Since becoming a faculty member at JSU in 2005, he has made continuous efforts to integrate emerging technologies and cognitive skill development into engineering curriculum.Dr. HuiRu Shih P.E., Jackson State University Dr. HuiRu (H.R.) Shih is a Professor of Technology at Jackson State University. He
with a deep knowledge of this borderland area as a localinhabitant, a first-generation student, and a Mexican American mixed-race person. My educationin history, anthropology, and technology education along with my professional experiences inSTEM focused on K-12 and higher education informs my approach to supporting undergraduatestudents in STEM. I know how to connect with students and enjoy interacting with them in myrole as a graduate research assistant.Author3. I am a Hispanic engineer eager to provide mentoring and guidance to minorityundergraduate students, interest them in scientific careers, and encourage them to pursuegraduate studies. I have experience in advising student organizations, such as the Society ofHispanic Professional
previously felt encouraged topursue STEM. Summer of Innovation (SoI) was designed to give students an opportunity toengage in OST learning at an early age and during a critical period in the education cycle:summer. While professionals in STEM may attribute their decision to pursue STEM careers toan out-of-school experience, many formal and informal educators do not feel they have the skillsand knowledge to successfully engage youth in programs to positively impact STEM learning.In 2009, President Obama announced the “Educate to Innovate” campaign to foster a renewedcommitment to strengthen Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) education. InJanuary 2010, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) launched theSummer of
, serving as a regional partner for the Museum of Science, Boston’s Engineering is Elementary cur- riculum program, and participating in the Family Engineering project. She currently serves as the Chair of the American Society for Engineering Education K-12 and Pre-college Division. Other professional affiliations include the International Technology Education Association, the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics and the National Science Teachers Association and serving on the Board of Directors for the Triangle Coalition for STEM Education. Prior to joining NCSU, Parry worked in engineering and management positions at IBM Corporation for ten years and co-owned an informal science education business.Dr. Malinda S
engineers at three different technology companies of varied size and withindiverse product sectors. The study focused on how engineers working on cross-disciplinarydesign teams use artifacts to communicate and how those artifacts affect design decision making.Examinations of the artifacts practicing engineers use supported the development of designprinciples for instructors to create modules, assessments, and activities for engineering designclassrooms. The educational design principles, presented in this paper as ‘how might we’statements, include: (1) How might we encourage students to report honestly and accuratelyabout status? and (2) How might we foster the use of documentation in student engineeringprojects? Findings from this study will be
increasedinterest in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) careers5-8. REU fostersincreased persistence in the pursuit of an undergraduate degree5-9; increased interest in pursuinggraduate education5-11; and gains in skills (conducting research, acquiring information, andspeaking effectively) by REU alumni over comparison groups5-12. REU helps develop careerpathways for underrepresented students by increasing minority retention5-8 and the number ofminority students pursuing graduate degrees5-13. Similarly, numerous other references could befound that demonstrate the benefits and significance of an REU program. The main focus of ourpaper is to share our experience and the lessons that we have learned with the others who want torun REU
differencesto form engineering design teams," Engineering Education, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 54-66, 2007. [Online].https://doi.org/10.11120/ened.2007.02020054.[12] R. Sach, M. Petre, and H. Sharp, "The use of MBTI in software engineering," 22nd AnnualPsychology of Programming Interest Group, 19-22 Sep 2010, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid.[13] A. B. Soomro, N. Salleh, E. Mendes, and J. Grundy, "The effect of software engineers’personality traits on team climate and performance: A Systematic Literature Review," Informationand Software Technology, vol. 73, pp. 52-65, 2016.[14] A. R. Gilal, J. Jaafar, A. Abro, M. Omar, S. Basri, and M. Q. Saleem, "Effective PersonalityPreferences of Software Programmer: A Systematic Review," Journal of Information Science
learning.Dr. Lisa D. McNair, Virginia Tech Lisa D. McNair is a Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she also serves as Director of the Center for Research in SEAD Education at the Institute for Creativity, Arts, and Technology (ICAT). Her research interests include interdisciplinary collaboration, design education, communication studies, identity theory and reflective practice. Projects supported by the National Science Foundation include exploring disciplines as cultures, liberatory maker spaces, and a RED grant to increase pathways in ECE for the professional formation of engineers. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Testing a Reflective
), 827-844.10. Halal, W. E., Kull, M. D., & Leffmann, A. (1998). The GWU Forecast of Emerging Technologies: A Continuous Assessment of the Technology Revolution. Technological11. Skumolski, G. J., Hartman, F. T., & Krahn, J. (2007). The Delphi Method for Graduate Research. Journal of Information Technology Education, 6.12. Khosravi, S., & Afshari, H. (2011). A Success Measurement Model for Construction Projects. IPEDR, 11, 186.Forecasting and Social Change, 59, 89-110.13. Morgan, G. A., Leech, N. L., Gloeckner, G. W., & Barett, K. C. (2011). IBM SPSS for Introductory Statistics: Use and Interpretation. New York: Taylor and Fracis Group, LLC
andapplication of new technology that will have a direct and lasting impact on society. The greateran engineer’s ability to work with groups of others, to work within a team, the greater theopportunity to synthesize larger amounts of information, faster, and into more impactfultechnologies. There is strength in numbers. Scientific discovery and the creation of newtechnology do not occur without the most important ingredient, people. Engineers that wish toleave a lasting and magnanimous impact on society may increase their chances for doing so byperfecting their ability to lead – to successfully infuse a common vision within groups of diversepeople that will allow them to execute efficiently and successfully towards a common goal,specifically with
us to conduct research “with” and not “on”another, situating the Other as equals not to change the other but to change self [18].MethodsAnuli and Glory discovered that they had similar interests at an online conference and thereafterthe idea of writing a duoethnography emerged, they then invited Kelly to join the team, and webecame a trio-ethnography. Our research process started in July 2022 when we participated in a 5-week workshop where we worked with mentors to refine our research plan. Thereafter, we metevery Monday for an hour over 6 months to execute our study. Collaboration tools utilized wereZoom, Google Drive, WhatsApp, and emails. After our interview questions were drafted to guideour dialogue, we emailed them to a faculty member
thestudents as is.As a general takeaway from the student survey, it appears that students most enjoy and value theactivities that allow them to apply their engineering knowledge gained in the classroom in apractical setting which encourages interactions with others. This is consistent with what has beenfound in other programs [11]. The least enjoyment appears to come from times when they aremeeting with faculty and TAs, either for help or for the expected mentoring needed in the program.However, receiving help when needed through office hours appears to be highly valued by thosewho utilize the opportunity.Eleven of the PECS program scholars attended the 2020 Annual Emerging Researchers National(ERN) Conference in Science, Technology, Engineering and
Paper ID #34768Operation and Student Perceptions of a Large-scale, In-person UnitOperations Laboratory Course During the Covid-19 PandemicDr. Andrew Maxson, The Ohio State University Andrew Maxson is an assistant professor of practice in chemical engineering at The Ohio State University where he teaches Chemical Engineering Unit Operations. He earned his B.S. in chemical engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology and his M.S. and Ph.D. in chemical engineering at Ohio State. Having worked as a manufacturing process engineer for ten years, his focus is on optimizing the process of teaching, as well as hands-on
understand the interconnections among systemelements of technical, social, socio-technical, or multi-level nature. They show closed-loopthinking and provide several possible explanations when analyzing system failures [18, p. 275],[19], [20].3. Understand system synergy (emergent properties). Engineers derive the synergy of asystem from integrating the subsystems under their responsibility and identifying thesynergy and emergent properties of combined systems [18, p. 276].4. Understand the system from multiple perspectives. Engineers avoid adopting a one-dimensional view and describe a system from all relevant layers (technological, economic,social, mechanical, etc.) [18, p. 276], [20].5. Understand systems without getting stuck on details
newly-created knowledge of technologies in a traditional or emerging advanced Page 12.258.7 specialized technical area appropriate to civil engineering. (Bloom’s Level 6) Table 2 (continued) P r o f e s s i o n a l O u t c o m e s 19. Communication Plan, compose, and integrate the verbal, written, virtual, and graphical communication of a project to technical and non-technical audiences. (Bloom’s Level 5) 20. History and heritage Explain
, and change in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education. Primary research projects explore the preparation of engineering doctoral students for careers in academia and industry and the development of engineering education assessment tools. She is a National Science Foundation Faculty Early Career (CA- REER) award winner and is a recipient of a Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE).Glen DePalma, Purdue University Glen DePalma is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Statistics at Purdue University.Ms. Pouneh Eftekhari Page 23.520.1
use Bird, Stuart and Lightfoot’s text which was originally published in 1960. Older chemicalengineering text-books are outdated because they rely on examples almost exclusively from thepetrochemical industry6. Focusing on a single field fails to inform students of the broad rangeof applications for chemical engineering principles6. Engineering instructors must thereforetake extra measures to prepare students for careers in modern-day industry and academia.Graduating engineers must have the skills to handle non-traditional problems and also be ableto address emerging areas of research and development. One such emerging area within thechemical engineering giants is biology. The gap between the traditional chemical engineeringcurriculum and
, participants collectivelyidentified meal options as an area necessitating improvement. Residing in dormitories onMarshall University’s campus, the dining hall emerged as the primary source for meals.Regrettably, during the summer period, meal choices were limited, particularly for those withdietary restrictions, and the perceived quality of the food fell short of expectations. This concernwas communicated to the organizers during the experience, prompting a clear commitment toexploring alternative meal provisions in subsequent years, informed by the constructive feedbackprovided by the participants.In its inaugural year of 2023, the program demonstrated overall success. The participants,constituting a diverse cohort, actively embraced their research