programhave motivated them to pursue advanced degree or a career in research and development field.The research project of one of the teams resulted in a technical publication; more can beexpected in future.ConclusionsThe undergraduate research program in combustion engines and related areas at the University ofMichigan-Dearborn has provided excellent research experience to undergraduates, both fromresearch universities and 4-year colleges. Working closely with the supervising faculty andgraduate research assistants the participants have excelled in acquiring knowledge, techniques,skills and inquisitive mind needed to be good researchers. The research program has resulted in Proceedings of the 2005 American Society of Engineering Education Annual
Paper ID #22105Misconceptions and the Notional Machine in Very Young Programming Learn-ers (RTP)Prof. Tony Andrew Lowe, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Tony Lowe is a PhD student in Engineering Education at Purdue University. He has a BSEE from Rose- Hulman Institute of Technology and a MSIT from Capella. To pass the time between classes he works for Anthem as a software architect and teaches as an adjunct at CTU Online. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018Misconceptions and the Notional Machine in Very YoungProgramming Learners (RTP)AbstractThis study looks at very
created an innovative graduate program in Systems Engineering (SE). Themain objective of this SE program is to offer to selected graduate engineers already employed in indust~ aMaster’s Degree curriculum which can significantly enhance their understanding of disciplines directly related totheir own assignments, increase their worth, and enhance their perilormance in the U. S. industry marketplaceusing up-to-date SE related disciplines and skills. Introduction A key issue of high industrial and national importance is the identification and translation ofsophisticated, state-of-the-art system techniques from independent research and isolated complex militaryprograms to university research, to
Paper ID #15142Integrating Research and Education in Engineering Design ProgramsDr. Martin Edin Grimheden, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) Martin Edin Grimheden is an associate professor in Mechatronics at KTH, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, and head of the Mechatronics and Embedded Control Systems Division. Martin Edin Grimheden is also Program Director of the KTH Degree Program in Mechanical Engineering. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Integrating research and education in engineering design programsAbstractThis paper addresses some of the challenges related
these programs also enhances the internationalization of the curriculum,improves breadth of technology and engineering issues, appeals to larger international firmshiring engineering graduates, provide avenues to learn about globalization and internationalengineering projects to meet market trends, and opens new opportunities for internationalresearch collaboration.Study abroad programs take many forms. The most common are exchange programs wherereciprocal relationships are established between the home institution and numerous internationalinstitutions where specific courses and articulations are approved. A related form is exchangeprograms at affiliated institutions. The difference being reciprocal exchange programs havestudents pay tuition to
with active learning pedagogies on student learning, and effective strategies for increasing gender diversity in STEM disciplines.Prof. Margaret B. Bailey P.E., Rochester Institute of Technology (COE) Professor Margaret Bailey, Ph.D., P.E. is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering within the Kate Gleason College of Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology. Dr. Bailey teaches courses and conducts re- search related to Thermodynamics, engineering and public policy, engineering education, and gender in engineering and science. She is the co-author on an engineering textbook, Fundamentals of Engineering Thermodynamics, which is used worldwide in over 250 institutions. Dr. Bailey is the Principal Investi- gator (PI
. Graduation is not delayed for students who participateand successfully complete the prescribed academic requirements. The MSOE EE program isfully ABET accredited.The Milwaukee School of Engineering (MSOE) is a private university in Milwaukee, Wisconsin,with a primary focus on engineering, business, and medically related programs. The LübeckUniversity of Applied Sciences is a government supported University of Applied Sciences inGermany with a primary focus on applied engineering, business, and the natural sciences. Bothinstitutions are teaching institutions with similar missions.During the first two academic years, the students at MSOE and from Lübeck pursue the normalcourse of study at their home institution. This would constitute the “Grundstudium
Paper ID #14296Creative Engineering & Programming with MaKey MaKey invention KitsBeau Vezino, University of Arizona Beau R. Vezino is a Ph.D. student at the University of Arizona’s College of Education. His focus is engineering and science education. Beau currently teaches the science/engineering methods course for pre-service teachers and works on several related research projects. Beau is certified teacher and holds a MS in Education in Curriculum and Instruction (2009) and a BS in Mechanical Engineering (2005). Beau’s research focus involves K-12 teacher education related to engineering. He is the curriculum writer
Radhakrishnan, National University Prof. Ben D Radhakrishnan is the Lead Faculty for MS Sustainability Management Program in School of Engineering and Computing at National University, San Diego, CA. He develops and teaches Engineering and Sustainability Management graduate level courses. Ben has conducted Sustainability workshops in Los Angeles (Army) and San Diego (SDGE). His special interests and research include promoting Leadership in Sustainability Practices, energy management of Data Centers and to establish Sustainable strategies for enterprises. He spent part of his 2011 and 2012 summers as an Affiliate Researcher at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, focusing on the energy efficiency of IT
reallocating faculty time, providing laboratory space, and a small amount ofoperating funds. The program is lead by the department heads from Computer Science, Electricaland Computer Engineering, and Mechanical Engineering as well as other faculty members fromthese departments. The courses are being designed and taught by an interdepartmental facultyteam from all three departments and we are currently searching for a faculty member explicitlyidentified as holding a joint appointment.In addition to resources committed by the Institute, we have sought and received external supportfor two related activities. One is a small pilot grant to work with FIRST to strengthen socialnetworking among teams in the competition. This is particularly important for
. Page 13.957.9 Table 5 - Summary of the Results of Direct and Indirect Measures Program Assessment Method & Performance Criteria Actions for Continuous Improvement Outcomes Indirect Direct Decision Include at least 3 hours for review of math required in each related courses. Encourage students to use math help center. Outcome 1 85% - 100% 67% Concern Explore developing an integrated math/science/engineering math course to improve the
2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2002, American Society for Engineering Education”Results At Mercer University, during the 2000 – 2001 AY, approximately 25% of the enteringfreshman class participated in the resume and interview workshops. Of those, 45% obtainedsummer employment in engineering internships. The types of internships ranged frommanufacturing operations, programming, various engineering tasks, and special engineeringprojects. Practically all of the students did engineering-related functions. The salaries for the IFEstudents ranged from $9.75 to $13.25 per hour. Typical industries that placed our studentsinclude aerospace, heating and air
. Bronzini holds the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from Penn State and a B.S. degree from Stanford University, all in Civil Engineering. He has 40 years of experience in transportation and civil engineering research, teaching, and consulting, and is a registered Professional Engineer. He is a member of ASEE and ASCE, has been an ABET civil engineering program evaluator for many years, and is a National Associate of the National Academies.John Matusik, The Engineering Groupe John Matusik, PE is an Adjunct Professor in the Department of Civil, Environmental, and Infrastructure Engineering at George Mason University in Fairfax, Virginia, and in 2003 was recognized as the Outstanding Adjunct Professor in the
on the specialized training that veterans received and aid in their academic journey.This paper will introduce three pilot programs for advancing engineering education for militaryveterans focusing on forming a support base for veterans to assist them in overcoming traditionaleducational barriers. Introduction Various studies have been done focusing on phenomenological research related to theveteran student and their transition from military service to the academic environment in highereducation (Jones, 2013). The studies focused on identity development related to the connectingcomplex experiences such as service member, then veteran, and forward to the student identity.The American Council of Higher Education’s recent data has
careful considerationof resources availability; and what is more important, the total costs associated with outcomesassessment. Description of assessment methods is plentiful in the literature but on the other hand,the literature is also rather poor on determining the true cost of assessing learning outcomes atinstitutions of higher education. The few available studies on this subject reveal costs that areusually a complete surprise to many faculty and administrators.The cost factor is especially critical for engineering technology programs trying to adaptassessment methods used by larger and wealthier departments. On the other hand thesedepartments can assess their outcomes by methods that are not available to other disciplines dueto the
Paper ID #38539DEIB in Engineering Teaching programs in the USDr. John L. Irwin, Michigan Technological University As Professor for Mechanical Engineering Technology at Michigan Technological University, Dr. Irwin teaches courses in Product Design & Development, Parametric Modeling, and Senior Design. Research interests include STEM education in Manufacturing and CAD/CAM/CAE technical areas.Prof. Martin E. Gordon DFE P.E., Rochester Institute of Technology Martin E. Gordon, PE, DFE is Professor and Director of External Academic Relations in the College of Engineering Technology at the Rochester Institute of Technology
distribution, power economics, and public policy. Following thecore, students take more focused courses that go deeper into power and energy topics within theirspecific engineering discipline. For the graduate certificate, there is an Energy Experiencescourse where students make weekly visits to regional power and energy related sites. Students inthe program are also eligible for scholarships for a 4-week international renewable energyprogram offered in Pamplona, in the region of Navarre, Spain. Page 25.76.3 Figure 1. Education
futurecollaborative projects have been identified and performed with very good results.References1. http://www.vinnova.se/. Accessed 2009-01-15.2. http://www.piep.se/. Accessed 2009-01-15.3. Grimheden, M., Hanson, M., Norell Bergendahl, M. and Wikander, J. PIEp: Product Innovation Engineering Program. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED 07, Paris, France, August 2007.4. Grimheden, M. And Ölund Sandström, G. Examples of research areas related to the Product Innovation Engineering Program, PIEp. 2008 (Report TRITA-MMK 2008:05, KTH Machine Design).5. Grimheden, M. Product Innovation Engineering Program: Training Students in Entrepreneurial Thinking. In: Proceedings of the 114th Annual ASEE
Session 2213 Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Talent Expansion Program: A Focus on Diversity Taryn Bayles, Anne Spence, Claudia Morrell University of Maryland Baltimore CountyBackgroundThe exponential growth in military spending in Maryland has left educational institutions withthe enormous challenge of meeting workforce needs, particularly the need for individuals withdegrees in computer science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Given theneed, universities and colleges must meet the growing challenge to identify and enroll
packaging machinery Industry products and Page 22.864.7 processes Establish program criteria for Mechatronics Engineering Technology-related educational programs The center in its second year has already received an endowment from an industry partnerto support the operation of the center. The School has provided resources to support the centerdirector, clerical help, graduate students, and office space. An active advisory board has beenformed that represents industry professionals, high school teachers, and college faculty. Theresponsibilities of the advisory board are to provide advice and guidance for academic programs,center
Session 2455 Quality Assessment of an Engineering Management Program Mel I. Mendelson Loyola Marymount UniversityAbstractAn assessment process is described for LMU's Engineering and Production Management graduateprogram. Six quality characteristics were defined and measured. The process utilized the tools oftotal quality management and statistics. Improvement was benchmarked using hypothesis testingof the mean results between 1994 and 1998 using six assessment methods. Quality improvementwas evaluated by plotting the results on a radar chart.I. IntroductionIn 1993, Loyola
Paper ID #32236Running A Virtual Summer Undergraduate Research Program: Lessons learnedDr. Johannes Weickenmeier, Stevens Institute of Technology (School of Engineering and Science) Prof. Johannes Weickenmeier completed his PhD at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich in 2015 and worked as a postdoc in the group of Prof. Ellen Kuhl at Stanford University. His research includes the experimental and computational characterization of soft tissues with a specific interest in the skin and brain. His current work focuses on our fundamental understanding of mechanobiological prop- erties and mechanisms in the
capstone course is done at the end, students are encouraged to identifyand select a project about six months before graduation. Typically, projects are proposed bycorporate sponsors, frequently employers of the students or corporations looking for answers to aproblem through the lead faculty (faculty in charge of program). As a result, students deal withreal problems of significant issue to the sponsor and typically involve engineering, technology,science, and business related issues. Interdisciplinary teams of two to three students are assignedto each project. These teams work with faculty members and representatives of the sponsors todevelop detailed, implementable solutions. At the end of the course, students present the projectpresentations to
Science program (which culminates withthe completion of a Master thesis) and a Master of Engineering degree program (which doesnot require the thesis). Both programs are titled “Sustainable Engineering”. The objectives ofthe programs are to equip engineers with the tools they will need to meet the challengesassociated with delivering goods, energy and services through sustainable means. Theseprograms will deliver education on sustainable design methods related to the design ofproducts, processes, and energy related systems as well as end of life management decisiontools and technologies.The structure of the M.Eng. program is shown in Figure 1, and that of the M.S. program inFigure 2
the students with an opportunity to meet engineers from variousdisciplines and to see them in assorted work environment.Goal 6: Instruction/Tutorial sessions in Engineering, Mathematics, English/reading, Science, andPSAT/SAT.Expected Student Outcome: Students will have the ability to apply mathematical, scientific andengineering principles to the identification, formulation, and solution of engineering problems.Students will also learn about reading comprehension. Students will be better prepared for theSAT.Assessment Process:The program coordinators established an assessment process and tools to ensure that the JETSparticipants achieved the expected program outcomes. The data related to each outcome wascollected from various resources such
scale and open-endedquestions. The attribute framework developed provides the basis for the test. The pre-tests aremoderately difficult with an expected score of 50% to provide evidence of improvement. Ananalysis of the test results will contain: 1. Graphs of the results of each pre-test versus test questions. 2. Graphs of the results of the individual related test questions. 3. Graphs of the results of the class grade, pre-test, and final exam 4. Scatter plots of pre-test versus final exam. VI. SummaryEC-2000 impacts educators of engineering programs by requiring the development of curriculumto meet stated program outcomes and then mandating the use of assessment tools to
Session 3209 Engineering Criteria 2000 Challenges for Large Programs Joseph L. A. Hughes and William E. Sayle School of Electrical and Computer Engineering Georgia Institute of TechnologyIn 1997 Georgia Institute of Technology, with ten undergraduate programs and one graduateprogram accredited by EAC/ABET, participated as one of five pilot evaluations underEngineering Criteria 2000. Each of the institutions selected for pilot visits has unique attributeswhich must be addressed within the context of the new criteria. Georgia Tech is a publicly-supported, highly-ranked
Session 3232 Engineering Criteria 2000 Challenges for Large Programs Joseph L. A. Hughes and William E. Sayle School of Electrical and Computer Engineering Georgia Institute of TechnologyIn 1997 Georgia Institute of Technology, with ten undergraduate programs and one graduateprogram accredited by EAC/ABET, participated as one of five pilot evaluations underEngineering Criteria 2000. Each of the institutions selected for pilot visits has unique attributeswhich must be addressed within the context of the new criteria. Georgia Tech is a publicly-supported, highly-ranked
Session 1421 Assessment of ABET Program Criteria for Engineering Curricula Enno “Ed” Koehn Lamar UniversityAbstractThe Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) has adopted a revised set ofcriteria for accrediting engineering programs. Nevertheless, as in the past, civil (construction)engineering departments will be required to demonstrate proficiency in specific subject areaswhich are included in the ABET program criteria.This paper investigates, according, in part, to construction related students, the level at which thesubjects in the civil
mathematics as if they weremathematicians14, as attractive as the concept may be. One major concern must be related to themath knowledge that future engineers can and most likely will use15.The review and integration of math and engineering are to be conducted not only for freshmancourses but for the whole range of electrical engineering courses within a unitary structure.There is a considerable mismatch between traditional mathematics content for engineering andthe actual mathematics education needs of engineers within the development of a newengineering program, a point that is well expressed in the following quote6:“Clearly the engineering curriculum needs a major overhaul. To some degree, this will requiremodernizing the approaches to science and