municipalclient and the projects were conducted as explicit competitions. The judging panel wascomprised of the four faculty mentors and client representatives. The winning team had theirnames placed on a departmental plaque. The new course design has been popular. However, itis unclear if the success of the new course is based on the real nature of the projects with clientinvolvement or the competition itself. Within an Information Technology course at JuniataCollege, a mention of informal competition between student teams working on different projectswas noted to be fostered by students posting their progress toward project milestones on a white-board that was visible to all of the teams within the course.9Alternatively, many capstone courses are
to establishperformance levels in each of the sub-areas of the rubric. Due recognition was given to thediscussion regarding Evaluation and Synthesis levels and which represents a higher level ofperformance.17, 18, 19, 20, 21 For our purposes, we were satisfied if students performed at any of thetop three highest levels and were not as concerned about didactic issues of which of the top twolevels should be regarded as higher.The rubric components represent an attempt to evaluate student progress not just within individualcourses but more broadly across all four levels of the program and thereby establish a baseline ofstudent-learning outcomes for the department. In the spirit of a pilot study, it must be noted thatthe rubric was used more as
student wrote “I firstdiscovered this terminology in industry on [an] internship and it made me feel uncomfortable.”Furthermore, the post-CAR survey contained positive feedback along the lines of “I liked howthe [CAR Strategy] video was a step by step solution to this societal issue” and “confronting theissue and acknowledging it in the classroom is a valuable learning experience”There was also some negative pushback on the pedagogy such as “anthropomorphizing things isextremely common and can often help people understand new concepts faster” and “it isimportant to remember the violations of the past, and replacing anything that reminds us of [thepast] helps obfuscate those violations.”But for the most part, students’ comments in the post-CAR
contact hours and active learning strategies will require buy-in from allthose involved.Transition to New StructureMeasures we could employ to assist in making this transition would include: 1) initiate a bi-weekly or monthly (at the minimum) informal interdepartmental pedagogy and best practicessharing session, 2) employ the current SI – Supplemental Instructor tutoring service to the MAT1125 and MAT 1130 courses, and 3) encourage fellow faculty to take advantage of the TLC –Teaching and Learning Center workshops provided through our institution. SI – SupplementalInstructor tutoring is currently being used in the introductory level mathematics courses. SI is atutoring program where a current student, who can provide tutoring in the topic area
faculty Page 24.1006.2members, who taught in both conditions, also completed reflection papers related to theirexperiences. The following describes guiding research questions for the study.Research questions: 1. Do students in inverted classrooms spend additional time actively working with instructors on meaningful tasks in comparison to those students in control classrooms? 2. Do students in inverted classrooms show higher learning gains as compared to students in traditional classrooms? 3. Do students in inverted classrooms demonstrate an increased ability to apply material in new situations as compared to students in
student documents theirachievement of the course outcomes. At graduation and as part of the senior design course,students are required to submit a “graduation portfolio” in which the student documents theirachievement of all program outcomes. The instructor, as a part of the course grade, evaluatescourse-level portfolios. Department faculty and members of the department’s external advisoryboard evaluate graduation portfolios.Most of the curricular and course-content changes to support the change from the originalprogram outcomes to the new program outcomes were made as a result of potential lack ofeducational development relative to one or more of the new outcomes. The result of thecurricular and course-content changes was a curriculum that
itinerary, passports, visas, luggage packing, airplane, bus, train tickets,foreign currencies, and potential health/safety issues (i.e. recommended vaccinations, water andair pollution concerns, safety practice, and travel accidental insurance) were discussed prior tothe departure.5. Student FeedbackAfter the 2014 GTI* trip, students submitted a reflection paper based on their time spent on thetrip. The reflection paper was considered the final exam for the Tech 198 class. The responseswere all positive, with comments ranging from the food, the cheap costs, public transportation,and friendly people during their stay. Most notably, all of the students responded that the tripwas a valuable experience. One of the students wrote, "Through this
the CoE.As reported in the January 2005 issue of the ASEE’s Prism, Virginia Tech was awarded a five-year $2 million NSF STEM Talent Expansion Program (STEP) Grant to increase its number ofgraduates in engineering and computer science.1 As part of the efforts to that end, the peermentoring programs were expanded during the fall semester 2005 to include all interested first-year students admitted to the CoE. Building on the success of the initial CEED programs, theprojected increase was to serve 400 students with the creation of two new peer-mentoringprograms, General Undergraduate Engineering Support Teams (GUEST) and Network forEngineering Transfer Students (NETS). With the implementation of GUEST and NETS, thenumber of first-year students
Center. The Evaluation and Assessment Center for Mathematics and Science Education at MiamiUniversity will act as the external evaluator for the project. Schools accredited by, or subscribing to, the attributes of the Accreditation Councilfor Cooperative Education will act as a reference group, ensuring a transferable end process. The ultimate goal of the project is to move schoolsengaged in cooperative education to a new era of market alignment. The objective is to build feedback structures that keep the schools abreast ofa rapidly-changing environment. The inclusion of a wide array of programs and a large, diverse reference group caters to building a process thatcan be effectively utilized in schools engaged in cooperative education within a
skills commensurate with students’ educational levels. • To formulate a plan for skill-building and delivery in an interdisciplinary engineering curriculum, interfacing with existing courses on power and energy generation and distribution. • To instill a sense of urgency for learning and training in green energy, addressing current, new, and future challenges, and responding to the urgent impacts of global warming on human health, the environment, and overall well-being.The curriculum integrates diverse educational levels, faculty expertise, disciplinary areas, studentbackgrounds, industrial requirements, learning methodologies, and practical applications aligningwith students
were identified:The Technology Survey Course, The Technology Focus orTopics Course, The Technology Creation Course (Design Course), The Technology Critique,Assess, Reflect, or Connect Course. The technology survey courses offer a broad overview of anumber of areas of engineering and technology. The technology or topics or focus course isnarrower in scope and develops one well-defined area. The engineering design course, ortechnology creation, places an emphasis on the engineering design process to developtechnological solutions to problems. The last model to emerge is concerned with assessingtechnological impacts, connecting technological developments to other areas of society, historyand culture, or reflecting on engineering in a broader
ambiguity, intellectual developmentand development of a science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) identity inundergraduate students. This work-in-progress paper provides preliminary data on tolerance ofambiguity in college students. Some results from the analysis of the data are included.KeywordsHBCU, STEM identity, tolerance of ambiguity, intellectual development, academic successIntroductionThe low rates of persistence and graduation of students from underrepresented minorities inscience, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) is a matter of concern. Many structuraland pedagogical reasons have been identified for this trend. The development of a STEM identityhas been reported as one of the important aspects influencing persistence
starting anew to get the shape in Fig. 1d. This1d breaking of the assumed rules is the essence of lateral thinking.We teach a related thinking style to students when we teach “brainstorming.” One of thefundamental rules of brainstorming is that no idea may be criticized, no matter how crazy. Allpresent must be free from any assumed rules in order for the process to work. This relief fromconventional rules is essential to inspire ideas that, in the end, are often very practical. We mustguard against encouraging students to believe that there is only one right answer to eachproblem. Suspension of critical faculties is essential to identify new solutions to a
) while the first author was on the faculty of the Department of EngineeringTechnology at the University of Houston. First, two separate Master of Technology programswere merged in 2005-06 to feature a set of core courses and two tracks. Then, in 2010 thedegree was renamed Master of Science and the department introduced two new specializations inMechanical Engineering Technology and in Systems Control Technology. The program seeks toprepare individuals with advanced technical competencies, capable of engaging in translationalresearch applications, and who also have opportunities to develop a basic level of business skillsrelated to project management, business planning, technology forecasting, entrepreneurship,organizational leadership, logistics
undergraduate computer science coursework and in software development professions, with the hope of addressing the severe shortfall of qualified developers.Kevin Coogan Kevin Coogan is an instructional faculty member at Hampton University in Hampton, VA. He received his Ph.D. from the University of Arizona where his primary research focus was on malware obfuscation techniques. Over the past eleven years he has taught a wide variety of courses including information security, networking, operating systems, data structures, and introductory programming. His current teaching is focused primarily on introductory programming and data structures, and his current research interests center on improving student outcomes in these and
Retention of Under-Represented Minority Engineering Students through Practice-Oriented Experiential Education Richard Harris1, Hameed Metghalchi2, Claire Duggan3, Emanuel Mason4, Rachelle Reisberg5, Deepti Dutt6Abstract – New England is home to several universities that have engaged in a well-established National ScienceFoundation (NSF) Louis Stokes Alliance for Minority Participation (LSAMP) partnership, referred to as NortheastLSAMP. The NELSAMP members include Northeastern University, The University of Connecticut, The Universityof Massachusetts Amherst, The University of Rhode Island, and Worcester Polytechnic Institute. The NELSAMPare pursuing an NSF-funded
ease ofuse/patron perception. These three serve as an encapsulation of several motivations suggested inthe literature. For the most part, other motivations are variants of these major categories. Space In the pre-electronic era, space concerns were paramount. Shelving space was at apremium to the point that some crisis-based rationale included weeding titles that were “thicker”or whose volume set size took up large amounts of shelf space.10 In most situations, electronicacquisitions and auxiliary storage schemes have provided enough shelf space relief that removalfor size rather than content is less of an issue. This is not to say that space is still not a primaryconcern. Some might argue that the ability to load thousands of
Biological Systems Engineering at the University of Nebraska - Lincoln. She received her B.S. and M.S. in Food Science from Cornell University and her Ph.D. in Food Process Engineering from the Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering at Purdue University. She was an inaugural faculty member of the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She is currently a Professor in Biological Systems Engineering at the University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Her role in the College of Engineering at UNL is to lead the disciplinary-based education research initiative, establishing a cadre of engineering education research faculty in the engineering departments and creating a graduate program. Her research focuses
researchers are currently resolving. Open research issues andchallenges are identified to spark new interests and developments in this field. However, thedesign of wireless sensor networks introduces formidable challenges, since the required body ofknowledge encompasses a wide range of topics in the field of electrical and computerengineering, as well as computer science [3, 4]. The use of WSNs has improved thefunctionality and smartness of many existing applications.Home Security and AutomationHome security is a growing industry in the world. This industry is getting more popular in theresidential properties because according to Assaf: “A home security system will reduce thechances of intrusion and thus, can protect both lives and property” [5
measurement of spatial ability. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education Vol.1, Issue 2, March, 2009.[15] Bodner, G. M., & Guay, R. B. (1997). The Purdue visualization of rotations test. The Chemical Educator, 2(4), 1-17[16] Piaget, J., Inhelder, B. (1967). The child’s conception of space. New York, NY: Norton.[17] Huttenlocher, J., Newcombe, N., & Vasilyeva, M. (1999). Spatial scaling in young children. Psychological Sciences, 10(5), 393-398.Appendix A: Instructions Provided to Students Label on Outside of Envelope Lego™ Spatial Visualization Assessment As part of the spatial visualization assessment you will be given some Lego™ pieces with an image of a finished shape, but no building
of the New Ecological Paradigm: A Revised NEP Scale,” J. Soc. Issues, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 425–442, 2000, doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00176.[4] C. L. Ruff and M. A. Olson, “The attitudes of interior design students towards sustainability,” Int. J. Technol. Des. Educ., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 67–77, Mar. 2009, doi: 10.1007/s10798-007-9038-0.[5] “SOLIDWORKS Sustainability Overview - 2022 - SOLIDWORKS Help.” Accessed: Feb. 06, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://help.solidworks.com/2022/english/SolidWorks/sldworks/c_Sustainability_Overview.h tm[6] “Disassembly and Recycling | Sustainability Workshop.” Accessed: Feb. 06, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://sustainabilityworkshop.venturewell.org/products/disassembly-and
theworkplace. Research results showed that some of the top weaknesses in engineering curricula(according to industry perspective) include the lack of understanding of safety, regulatory and Proceedings of the 2024 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration Copyright ©2024, American Society for Engineering Education ETD 435liability. Industries also complain that new graduates lack experience with the design process andhands-on activities because engineering schools focus too much on teaching theory [6-8].Engineering technology programs have made progress in addressing some of these issues byadding more hands-on
curriculum design techniques. His current interests also include life-long learning, engineering education evaluations and product lifecycle engineering and trade studies. Past work in Aerospace School involved working within the NASA URETI Center to enhance the education outreach of this center both at the industry, academic and K-12 perspective. For twelve years he worked to keep the College of Engineering at the forefront in the area of continuing education by working with the schools within the college of Engineering. He also worked with The Logistics Institute within the ISyE school to increase their presence within the industrial community with new continuing education
support with their peers. In theclassroom, student instructors and teaching assistants are widely used to help bridge the gapbetween students and faculty.Similarly, the traditional program seeks to introduce topics and problems in class that studentscan relate to issues in the world around them. They also provide mentoring and advising.However, the larger scale of the department makes coverage of students’ needs morechallenging.Professional Affect FactorsFraming and Solving Problems and Analysis – Concerning Framing and Solving Problems andAnalysis, much remains the same between the traditional and non-traditional departments. Amajority of the core engineering theory courses the non-traditional students take are taughtoutside the department
firstmeeting and feeling a level of excitement during the meeting and also for sustainingexcitement in what comes next. When a meeting is “not in-person” it is limited by sensorychallenges. The look and sounds of connection are muted. The beginnings blur into themiddle, and tough new challenges emerge for finding ways to start working together.Communication feels like one switch: for on or off, in or out of the room. Beginning andending becomes technically, personally touchy. Keeping the momentum going means beingalert, paying close attention as the lead (faculty or student) and as a participant. Making senseof apparent distortions in time becomes a consistent issue for all of us: the lead, participants,and the audience. As a result, first moments are
literature, defining the designchallenges, and understanding the vehicle’s kinematics and motion. In the second half of the Fallsemester, students used the collected information to work as a team in building the vehicle’shardware. Students devoted three-fourths of their Fall’s time to implementing the vehicle with allrequired sensors, motors, cameras, and software. For the Spring semester, the team included onlythree of the undergraduate students, the mentor-student, a new member who is a graduate studentwith a Computer Science background, and the faculty member. The first half of the Spring wasutilized in the software building and the configuration of the Robotic Operating System (ROS)libraries, and settings. The results and reflections are
member’s grade will be adversely affected. If astudent has unexcused absences and fails to do the assigned work, a zero grade is given on thatportion of work. Faculty and teaching assistants monitor teamwork and intervene to assistdysfunctional teams. Teams of 4-5 students are created by random assignment at the first of thesemester.Case Study One – Wastewater Treatment Process DevelopmentThe first case study introduced is Wastewater Treatment Process Development which involvesresearching and proposing the best possible solution to a real world manufacturing plant’swastewater problem. The problem is a real life example of a typical open-ended engineeringproblem, constrained by time, money and safety issues. In this study, the students are given
Bello in Santiago, Chile, where currently collaborates with the Educational and Academic Inno- vation Unit, UNIDA (for its acronym in Spanish), as an instructor in active learning methodologies. Her research interest topics involve university education in STEM areas, faculty and continuing professional development, research-based methodologies, community engagement projects, evaluation tools and tech- nology, and gender issues in STEM education. https://orcid.org/0000- 0002-0383-0179 ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Analysis of factors that influence the academic performance of first-year Chilean engineering studentsAbstractThis complete research paper
AC 2010-565: AN INVESTIGATION OF FIRST YEAR STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONSOF GLOBAL AWARENESSSarah Zappe, Pennsylvania State University Sarah E. Zappe, is Research Associate and Director of Assessment and Instructional Support for the Leonhard Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Education at Pennsylvania State University. In her current position, Dr. Zappe is responsible for supporting curricular assessment and developing instructional support programs for faculty and teaching assistants in the College of Engineering. Her work in engineering education focuses on assessment, faculty development, and teaching and learning issues. She can be reached at ser163@psu.edu.Thomas Litzinger, Pennsylvania State
surroundings, dealing with academic integrity within the bounds of theUniversity. This opens the door for addressing the professional engineering frameworkbased on well-established societal codes of ethics that define expectations for thepracticing engineer. Ultimately though, the instruction strategy recognizes that ankpfkxkfwcnÓu"rgtuqpcn"eqpxkevkqpu"rncy a key role in ethical decisions and so finally, thecourse provides an opportunity to host open discussions on a number of contemporary,professional, societal and/or global issues including diversity matters such as race andgender. Page 13.762.2Page 13.762.3Page 13.762.4 1. Honesty and Truthfulness