c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 The MIT Lewis Survey: Creating a Cold War Blueprint for a Technological University, 1947-1949Amidst the structural changes and the “reengineering” of higher education, historical perspectivecan provide us with a vantage point from which to reflect upon the many changes we are seeingtoday. In my talk, I approach this opportunity through a study of MIT’s Committee onEducational Survey, or the “Lewis Survey,” whose 1949 report is regarded by many as the ColdWar “blueprint” for MIT. Rooted in conversations that originated within our society, MITfaculty members embraced the notion of a broader and more fundamental approach toengineering education, even as they
on theengineering team. IntroductionRochester Institute of Technology (RIT) is a private university in upstate New York that enrollsmore than 15,000 full and part-time undergraduate and graduate students preparing for technicaland professional careers in more than 200 different academic programs. RIT attracts studentsfrom every state and more than 80 foreign countries and offers students work experience throughthe university’s co-operative educational program. RIT, a pioneer in career-oriented educationand a leader in cooperative education since 1912, has one of the oldest and largest co-opprograms in the world, with more than 1,300 employers and 2,500 students participating. RIT’seight colleges
guidance for all interactions between the student and the communitycollege. Two of the STEM programs that we have studied for our research employed suchpedagogical support through targeted advisement and mentorship, and found it effective inhelping students to transfer to four-year colleges and universities. This is fundamentally differentfrom the segmented departments of recruiting, admissions, advising, academic support, degreeprogress, bursar, and academic departments with which students must negotiate (ofteninteracting with virtual strangers in one-off encounters) in other community colleges and, for thatmatter, universities.(3) Classroom and Program Performance Support. The third type of pedagogical practice thatwe noted in our research
presentations as assessed by various cognitive assessments of these workshops’ content?MethodParticipants: The targeted program participants were undergraduate and graduate master’s students atvarious stages of their program with major emphasis on upperclassman.Design: The design used to address the research questions was a cross-sectional design whichallows for the gathering of individual’s perceptions and opinions about fundamental aspects of aprogram, issue, or intervention. This type of design is very effective since it provides a quick“snapshot” of current skills, behaviors, attitudes, and beliefs in a particular population.Instruments: As a means of assessing the quality of the individual workshop presentations, a
waytechnology is used and produced”13. For example, Huff has his computing students write “SocialImpact Statements” to outline the impact a computing technology would have on the socio-technical system (STS) in which it is being integrated. Students triangulate their impact claimsthrough day-in-the-life scenarios, participatory observation, and surveys; any claim made on theimpact of a technology has to be substantiated through three different methods of observation14(in private conversations).Socio-technical systems exhibit several important characteristics. First, a STS can be divided Page 25.991.5into components such as hardware, software
AC 2010-958: AN IMPORTANT EXPERIMENT AND PROJECT IN THE FIRSTMEASUREMENT COURSEBijan Sepahpour, The College of New Jersey Bijan Sepahpour is a Professional Engineer and a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at The College of New Jersey (TCNJ). Currently, he is serving as the chairman of the department and is actively involved in the generation of design-oriented exercises and development of laboratory apparatus and experiments in the areas of mechanics of materials and dynamics of machinery for undergraduate engineering programs. He has served as the Chair of the Division of Experimentation and Laboratory Studies (DELOS) as well as the Mechanical Engineering Division of
2024 ASEE Midwest Section Conference Comprehensive Case Study of Project Based Learning in Engineering Hamzah Mousa1, Margarita Orozco Genes1, Adam Carlton Lynch2 1-Wichita State University – Department of Industrial Systems and Manufacturing Engineering 2- Wichita State University – Department of Applied EngineeringAbstract In the contemporary engineering education system, project-based learning is now seen as aninnovative pedagogy that maintains the constructive collaboration of content knowledge and real-world practice. PBL exposes students to real-life problems, increases the practice of problem-solving coupled with teamwork, and the fundamental skills
within theengineering school or have permission of the instructor. It should be noted that the instructor is aco-PI on the grant team and has an extensive background in data science. Students wereintroduced to fundamental concepts in data science. It focused on three major themes: Datacharacteristics, data science pipeline, and data-driven applications. Some of the topics discussedin the course include data diversity, data products, data collection methods, data cleaning, andformatting, storing and sharing data, privacy, and confidentiality of data, data security, small dataanalysis, statistical analysis using R studio, presentation of analytics, and data applications forthe society. Data for the projects were obtained from data.gov, Pew
Paper ID #21704The Influence of an Externship on BME Predoctoral Students’ Career Devel-opmentMs. Julia N. Savoy, University of Wisconsin-Madison Julia N. Savoy, M.S., is an Assistant Researcher in the Wisconsin Center for Education Research, Univer- sity of Wisconsin-Madison. One aspect of her research examines the effects of professional development participation on the career pathways of doctoral students, postdoctoral scholars, and early-career faculty.Prof. Mia K. Markey, The University of Texas at Austin Dr. Mia K. Markey is a Professor of Biomedical Engineering and Engineering Foundation Endowed Faculty Fellow in
Consulting firm for sustainable construction Formal Job Architect / Design ManagerExperience in the field can be considered a good way to enhance the required skills tointerdisciplinary teamwork. The participants’ voices show that prior experience is an importantfactor in conveying self-confidence to students, such as one of the participants commented:“Yes, having 4.5 years of experience in the AEC industry gave me good fundamentals on NetZero Energy buildings which helped me a lot in participating successfully in competition.”When questioned about influential experiences to prepare her to work collaboratively, STLhighlighted her experience in the Race to Zero competition in the previous year as paramount interms
aftermath of the events of September 11 will affect those seeking educationalopportunities in the US, may be as profound as the psychological bursting of the ‘go anywheredo anything insulating’ bubble that has been such a fundamental part of the culture of Americanstraveling abroad. How this program can continue to attract and expand the ever-importantfemale engineering population will become more critical than ever before. There is also thehandling of the changing nature of the competition in higher education with corporate-baseduniversities and distance learning-based universities going head-to-head with the moretraditionally campus-based universities, and the role an international exchange component will
]. The 2009 paper detailed initial findings ofthe project which include students showing a lack of internalization of professional ethics despite therebeing, “much real engineering ethics being taught” [21, p. 13], and students not seeming resistant to ethicseducation. As research continued, eight more institutions were included in the data set [11]. This studyindicates that although students identify a high quantity and quality of ethics during their undergraduatecourses, the lack of ethics knowledge amongst students indicates there is still a disconnect in studentinternalization of ethics knowledge. The study assesses this knowledge through responses to five ethicsquestions based on the Fundamentals of Engineering (FE) exams. The focus on
Paper ID #38036Introducing Engineering through the Sociotechnical Histories of EverydayTechnologiesDr. Sarvnaz Lotfi, Loyola University, Maryland Sarvnaz Lotfi holds a PhD in Science, Technology, and Society. Her historical research into R&D, busi- ness, and valuation as well as her commitment to radically rethinking STEM pedagogy draw inspiration from early-20th-century pragmatist philosopher and education reformer, John Dewey. She is currently a Postdoctoral Teaching Fellow at Loyola University Maryland where she teaches in the Departments of Engineering and Philosophy.Dr. Raenita A. Fenner, Loyola University, Maryland
2005, Dr. Campbell has served as faculty for the Penn- sylvania Governor’s School for the Sciences (a summer program at Carnegie Mellon) and currently sits on the Board of Directors for the PGSS Campaign, a nonprofit that is responsible for raising the funds to finance and sustain the program. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Inspiring Future Engineers: Teaching Basic Electronics to Create Theremin Based Musical InstrumentsAbstract To encourage high school students’ interest in electronics and electrical engineering,team projects can be designed that involve adapting and integrating circuits to construct uniquemusical instruments. The Theremin was
worth noting that theefforts at Lawrence Technological University grew into what became the KEEN IntegratingCurricula with Entrepreneurial-mindset (ICE) Workshops. A conference article by BaylorUniversity notes that their approach is “different [as] it concentrates on [their] efforts to changefaculty members” [6]. Their efforts included leveraging the ICE Workshops for facultydevelopment, faculty lunchtime seminars, end-of-term faculty workshops, and in-houseinnovators program. It is worth noting that Baylor joined the KEEN network in 2008 and a majorcomponent of their institutional grant was on faculty development. At the time of writing theirpaper, they reported that their faculty had produced approximately 32 papers over the 7-yearspan of
maximize extensibility and enforce software engineering principles ofencapsulation, modularity, reuse, abstraction, inheritance, and polymorphism. Figure 5 shows aUML class diagram of a very small subset of concepts from the domain layer of the application.The software itself has afforded itself as a teaching vehicle for classic software design patterns[26] such as Factory, Observer, Strategy, Builder, Flyweight, Façade, Decorator, and Composite.The OO nature of the software has also afforded many students the opportunity to contribute tothe PET codebase for over a decade. Figure 5: Key Domain Layer Software ClassesAs Figure 5 illustrates, the fundamental domain concept in PET is an abstract Logic Circuit,which may be
objectivesto write a paragraph that will be read by peers and professors has also shown to increase theperception of learning among students (Meyer, 2003).Another advantage of online learning is the immediate interaction available through online tools.This has generated both a greater satisfaction with the course and sense of proximity to peers andprofessors (Collins, 2000; Fredericksen, Pickett, & Shea, 2000). In addition, Rabe-Hemp et al.(2010) suggest professors may enjoy a reduction in class preparation time. While it is true that thefirst time a professor teaches an online course, it requires copious amounts of time to produce thelearning materials for the course. After that first year, the professor can often reuse those materialsand make
PASCO Stress-Strain experiment is given below.(Show your work on the graph below when you use a value from the graph) a) Should this material be classified as ductile or brittle? Explain your reasoning. (4 points) [ABET (b) analyze data] b) Due to limitations in the PASCO apparatus, data near the origin had to be extrapolated from an empirical model. i. Which fundamental engineering axiom ensures this extrapolation is accurate? (3 points) [ABET (h) identify fake data] (a) Hooke’s Law (b) Moore’s Failure Criterion (c) Poisson’s Ratio (d) Castigliano’s Theorem (e) Clausius Theorem ii
skill development on the worksite in even more fundamental terms, explaining:“This experience is really important to me since I learned basic things such as using drills on the wall and cuttingthe [dry] wall.” Another student talked about generally about how the day confirmed her choice ofmajor, but also helped her see engineering opportunities and constraints differently: “Yesterday, wehad our construction day for H for H and I absolutely loved it! The work made me realize that I really do loveconstruction and made me more confident with my choice to be in CE…It took a little trial and error to makemeasurements. I realized that every mistake we made would cost them money.” Some students also directlyconnected the experience to concepts
engaging in the activity Attainment value: the individual’s perception of how the activity contributes to the conception of who he or she is fundamentally Utility value: the individual’s perception of the advantages that result from engaging in the task for future goals or rewards Cost: the individual’s perception of the sacrifices required, including effort, time, and psychological impactWe used this theory to scope out the types of questions we would in our survey to understandstudents motivations to enroll and persist in graduate school. Examples can be seen in Table 4. Page 23.377.5B. Preliminary ResearchIn
integral in the process of operationalizing Jonassen’s andHung’s framework. Third, we wanted to align our classification framework with the program’sphilosophy on PBL. Not only did we want to classify the projects using theoretically basedindicators of structuredness and complexity, we also wanted to classify them according to otherindicators that are important to the program.Table 1 illustrates the PBL classification indicators that we utilized during this effort. As statedabove, the framework of Jonassen and Hung8 provided some fundamental inspiration during thisprocess and aided us in operationalizing indicators to meet the needs and context of our effort.Their categorization is shown in the first column. Our modifications are shown in the
Paper ID #45212Use of a multi-level self-study to engage campus stakeholders and improveSTEM student learning outcomesDr. Jennifer Speed, Texas State University Jennifer Speed, Ph.D., is Assistant Vice President for Research Development at Texas State University, a Hispanic-Serving, public research university. For more than ten years, she has supported the development and implementation of programs intended to improve STEM student success, especially among students from underserved and underrepresented backgrounds. She has served a consultant for institutions of higher learning seeking organizational changes that improve
project was funded by the U.S. Department of Education Fund for theImprovement of Post Secondary Education (FIPSE), and was carried out over the last four years.The assessment was carried out under the auspices of UMR’s Laboratory for InformationTechnology Evaluation (LITE), and guided by the LITE model for evaluation of learningtechnologies. The fundamental premise of the model is that evaluation should consist of thetriangulation of multiple research methodologies and measurement tools. Five representativeevaluation studies, consisting of eight experiments, are presented here. The studies range frominitial research consisting of basic experimentation and usability testing; to applied researchconducted within the class room; to a large multi
to working as a civilengineer requires passing two exams (FE and PE) and M/30 that other engineeringdisciplines do not require. So more clear communication on these issues is important.Clearly outlining the necessity for requiring an M/30 prior to professional licensure will beimportant. The reasons that students used in their writings may provide insight into thearguments that they found most compelling. It is important that this message comes fromindustry and practicing engineers rather than academia. A number of the seniors usedlanguage that reflected their belief that the M/30 requirement was motivated by greedyuniversities. Some students proposed changes in the BS degree or changes in the PE examthat could ensure competency. There
of the story. Universities used to be considered among the institutions that stood for the best in society, not the average. They were supposed to be inspiring, in the way no one thinks of a TV station or even a political party as something that is supposed to inspire. As universities have acted more and more like businesses, they have lost some of the old spirit that they were dedicated to the service of society, and should reflect the best of the human spirit, not whatever happened to be going down at the moment.53Lewis is simultaneously lamenting the current, shallow trends in higher education whilereminding us of its deeper potential. Schrecker, Lewis, and many other scholars writing on theseshifts in
, Page 25.784.6and why each principle is applicable. In addition to providing a basis for design decision-making,these principles also provide an abstract structure for the developing system to help facilitatenavigation through the design space through the use of the pattern structure. The process element of the P 3 F is based upon Alexander’s Fundamental DifferentiatingProcess. 7 This process provides a template for identifying and iterating over generative designdecision sequences that allow a system’s structure, behavior, and interaction with its environment tounfold as a coherent whole that smoothly integrates with its environment. With each new iteration,the student is directed to refresh the view of the system as a whole, incorporating
. Besides teaching both undergraduate and graduate design and education related classes at Stanford University, she conducts research on engineering education and ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 The CARE methodology: a new lens for introductory ECE course assessment based on student Challenging And Rewarding ExperiencesAbstractIntroductory Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) education is of great importance tostudents interested in exploring the field, as it introduces them to the fundamental conceptualunderstanding of the governing laws and theories of ECE, as well as to indispensable hands-onlab skills to apply theory in practice. These
paying attention, she or he would be the next student queried for input. Another methodthat was used to help the students learn was what could be called “put your pencils down andlisten”. The professor would go through a problem with the students watching and listening andasking questions. Then after the problem was solved, the students would copy the problem fromthe whiteboard. Many students seen by this professor cannot effectively listen to a lecture, watchwhat is written, and write notes at the same time. Therefore, the slower lecture technique wasutilized to allow students to listen and watch, and then to write their notes. The main challengewith this technique was the disparate rates at which students copy the problems from thewhiteboard
Paper ID #18122Being Female and an Engineering Student in Qatar: Successes, Challenges,and RecommendationsSara Hillman, Texas A&M University at Qatar Sara Hillman is an Assistant Professor of English as a Second Language (ESL) in the Liberal Arts Pro- gram at Texas A&M University at Qatar. She has extensive experience teaching and researching Arabic- speaking university students. As an applied linguist, her main areas of research include second language learning, sociolinguistics, and discourse analysis. She is particularly interested in language learner iden- tities, language practices, and language
a common approach to this is designing conceptinventories that are intended to assess students’ conceptual understandings andmisunderstandings [4, 5].Our purpose in this paper is to investigate an instructional innovation—collaborative quizzes—and understand its role in supporting student development and learning. We detail our reason fordesigning a collaborative assessment—as a means to align assessment to other socio-constructivist learning approaches already adopted. Although others have previously studiedforms of collaborative assessment, we contribute research on a less studied form, andadditionally provide a stronger theoretical backing for the approach: co-regulation.Learning is a fundamentally social processResearch on how people