San Antonio, Texas
June 10, 2012
June 10, 2012
June 13, 2012
2153-5965
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
14
25.1322.1 - 25.1322.14
10.18260/1-2--22079
https://peer.asee.org/22079
382
Atsushi Akera is Associate Professor of history in the Department of Science and Technology Studies and the Director of First-year Studies at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. He has published Calculating a Natural World: Computers, Scientists and Engineers During the Rise of U.S. Cold War Research with MIT Press (2006) and is currently working on a book on the history of engineering education reform in the United States.
The MIT Lewis Survey: Creating a Blueprint for a Cold War Technological University, 1947-1949ABSTRACTAlthough there are many conversations related to structural changes and the “reengineering” ofU.S. higher education today, historical perspective can serve as an invaluable resource forgaining a more reflexive vantage point from which to reflect on these changes. This paperapproaches this opportunity through a study of MIT’s Committee on Educational Survey (morepopularly known as the Lewis Survey) whose 1949 report came to be regarded by many as the“blueprint” for MIT during the Cold War era. Rooted in conversations that originated within oursociety (SPEE, then ASEE), MIT faculty embraced the notion of a broader and morefundamental education for all engineers, even as they grappled with MIT’s unique wartimeexperience and the prospects for an expanded program of sponsored research. Without question,the MIT administration, beginning with MIT President Karl Compton, played a key role inMIT’s postwar transformation. Yet it was the Committee on Educational Survey that built aconsensus among the faculty, advanced a “Four School” model that altered MIT’s organizationalstructure, and began the work of redefining the role of the faculty in a “technological university”that was consistent with MIT’s expanding postwar opportunities. The paper will look closely atthe intense efforts of the Lewis Survey—the five members of this committee met no less than119 times over the course of two years to deliberate about MIT’s future—and how their viewsevolved in conversation with the MIT administration and others working to transform highereducation institutions in their time. Especially amidst present-day concerns about the erosion ofshared governance at many U.S. colleges and universities, a historical study of the Lewis Surveyprovides one window into the challenges and benefits of a collaborative approach towards thetransformation of a key institution in the U.S. system of higher education.
Akera, A. (2012, June), The MIT Lewis Survey: Creating a Blueprint for a Cold War Technological University, 1947-1949 Paper presented at 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, Texas. 10.18260/1-2--22079
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2012 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015