elements.ResultsFaculty perceptions. Faculty data showed overall positive perceptions of, and interactions with,the AL module technology. All faculty indicated they would be willing to participate in similarAL projects in the future. With regard to development, faculty reported devoting 5-10hours/week each during the implementation semester (Fall 2020) spent solely on platformimplementation, meetings, quality testing and debugging prior to use of the materials in Spring2021. An additional 5-10 hours per week during the deployment semester was also required fortesting and debugging given the build timeline. It should be noted that this is a separate timecommitment from writing the material and problems, as the lead faculty had substantial materialprepared prior
Paper ID #25529Developing a Design Tool for Solution Mapping: Translating Practitioners’Strategies to Support Student EngineersDr. Jin Woo Lee, University of Michigan Jin Woo Lee received a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Michigan. Jin’s research focuses on studying and developing design strategies, particularly in problem definition and concept gen- eration.Dr. Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan Shanna Daly is an Assistant Professor in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Michigan. She has a B.E. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Dayton (2003) and a Ph.D. in Engineering Edu
wereinvited to interview with a member of the research team to discuss their experience; three ofthese six students agreed and followed up, and their responses are also included in the researchfindings. The second offering of the pilot just concluded at the time of writing this paper; thus weare looking mostly at raw data to confirm what the authors saw as emerging themes from thepost-assessments.Research LimitationsOf the 99 students enrolled in the class at the end of the term, 92 took the post-survey, 63 ofwhich consented to full participation in the research study. A research limitation is that thestudents who agreed to participate in the full study by releasing their pre/post survey responsesand qualitative reflection question responses for
University. She has been with the University since 2007 and is responsible for teaching Page 26.1422.1 database fundamentals courses and introductory technology courses. Dawn has 10 years of industrial experience in the information technology field, and her research area of interest includes technology readiness, the social impacts of technology, and increasing interest in the field of computing. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Student Perceptions on the Impact of Formative Peer Team Member Effectiveness Evaluation in an
Reconstruction MEA, and feelthat the latest rendition is an improvement over the non-Excel version from previous quarters. Infuture quarters we may try to simplify the programming somewhat, but still want students to gainsome experience in programming and in creating a generalizable solution. Another challenge isthat the MEAs are not always popular, particularly in a fundamental course such asdynamics. Some students complain that they should not be writing memos in such a difficultcourse, and that time might be better spent elsewhere. One student remarked, however, “I willremember doing these projects like you said I would and I will forget doing the textbookproblems,” and another that “making one program to work four accidents did connect thedifferent
Paper ID #38554What do we learn from formative feedback? A comparison of weeklyreflection surveys to a midterm survey in a graphical communicationcourseDr. Lulu Sun, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Daytona Beach Lulu Sun is a professor in the Engineering Fundamentals Department at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical Uni- versity, where she has taught since 2006. She received her Ph.D. degree in Mechanical Engineering from University of California, Riverside, in 2006. Before joining ERAU in 2006, she worked for Arup, a multi- national professional services firm at Los Angeles office as a fire engineer. Her current research
demonstrated that belongingness and engineering identity creation are intertwined. Onestudy had shown belongingness is related to engineering identity25, but this research studydemonstrated that students feel belongingness either by being similar to their peers (separatefrom engineering identity) or having experiences that made engineering identity constructssalient thus allowing them to feel like they belonged.Two participants, Henry and Scott, talked about a unifying engineering mindset that made themfeel they belonged. Previous work examining this “engineering way of thinking”2 indicated thatthis mindset is often perceived as a fundamental component of engineering. Both Henry andScott express a fascination about the world around them and the way
part of engineering curricula. This movementrecognizes the motivational potential of design as a context for learning engineering content, but typicallyfocuses in many ways on the longer-term and iterative aspects of design experiences. A complementaryapproach, however, is the development of designiettes within design courses, general engineering courseactivities, supporting fundamentals courses toward an engineering degree, integrated and coordinateddesign activities across semester offerings, or outreach activities with the community or K-12 programs.But what is a designiette?Designiettes, “design vignettes”, or “designettes1,” are glimpses, snapshots, small-scale, short turnaroundand well-scoped design problems, or mini design projects
at her alma-mater, interned at the Center for Law & Social Policy in D.C., and attended events and hearings at the White House, U.S. Capitol, and the Center for American Progress. Felicia is currently a Master’s degree candidate in Higher Education at the University of Maryland. She currently holds an administrative assistantship at the Incentive Awards Program (IAP), a research assistantship at the A. James Clark School of Engineering, and a teaching assistant position. Felicia has conducted qualitative research, submitted drafts for conference papers, and assisted with writing a grant proposal to the National Science Foundation. Felicia will be returning this fall to University of Maryland as a doctoral student
Paper ID #33949S-STEM Student Reflections and IDP ProcessDr. Laura Kasson Fiss, Michigan Technological University Laura Kasson Fiss is a Research Assistant Professor in the Pavlis Honors College at Michigan Techno- logical University. She holds a PhD from Indiana University in English (2013). Her work has appeared in ASEE, FYEE, the NCHC Monograph Series, and elsewhere. Research areas include reflection, commu- nication, curriculum design, and Victorian humor.Dr. John L. Irwin, Michigan Technological University As Professor for Mechanical Engineering Technology at Michigan Technological University, Dr. Irwin teaches
students. The course’sprimary objective is to introduce Mechanical Engineering students to programming and toprepare students for subsequent courses including courses in numerical methods,experimentation and instrumentation, and system modeling. This course also serves as one ofthree courses introducing first-year students to Mechanical Engineering. While the course hasexisted for some time, it began a transition to its current form in Fall 2019. The courseintroduces students to C++ programming on the Arduino platform and programming in theMatlab numeric computing platform. The course focuses on fundamental programming conceptssuch as variables, conditional statements, loops, arrays, and functions and on programmingapplications in mechanical
Paper ID #36705WIP: Instances of Dynamic Pedagogical Decision Making inthe Uptake of a Technology ToolHarpreet Auby Harpreet Auby is a STEM Education MS and Chemical Engineering PhD student at Tufts University. He is a graduate research assistant working with Dr. Milo Koretsky within the Institute for Research on Learning and Instruction (IRLI). Harpreet received his BS in Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. His current work focuses on machine learning applications in educational research and evaluation, learning assistants, and uptake of an online technology
lessons learned andinnovative approaches in the new ABET accreditation process at VSU∀in this first visit arepresented.Capstone Senior Design Course:Capstone senior design experience is both a graduation requirement for undergraduateengineering majors and for ABET accreditation of these programs. A senior design course istypically the last bridge for students between undergraduate education and the engineeringprofession in their respective disciplines. The course differs from other lecture and laboratorybased courses in the engineering curriculum in fundamental ways. Many capstone senior designcourses include lectures to develop students’ knowledge of the product development process,project management, professional engineering practice, and the
professional- quality design.4. It must include industrial linkages so that students will be exposed to the industrial world early in the curriculum.5. It must integrate principles of cooperative learning.6. It must include material of an interdisciplinary nature.7. It must be pedagogically sound. 1 This project is partially funded by FIPSE grant #Pl16A-50067 Page 1.24.1 ?$ihj 1996 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings ‘..+,El#l,: ‘ 1
coursesfor engineers are offered through continuing education programs, which is the case at theUniversity of Georgia. At the undergraduate level, a survey of the field indicates that IP lawcourses are offered at the University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, the University ofWashington, and the University of California, Merced, where the course focuses exclusively onpatents.Students in engineering and computer science are, fundamentally, knowledge workers. As thesestudents join the workforce, a basic understanding of how IP enables the creation of value fromknowledge amounts to a literacy requirement. Too often, technical knowledge workers can be illinformed about this critical set of tools and constraints on their work. Given the need for
, testing their hightemperature mechanical strength?”. This concept underlies much of engineering and science.Students must efficiently and correctly apply handbook information, but they also need problemsolving skills to cope with situations not covered by the handbook, or instances when nohandbook is available.The NSPE Code of Ethics is in sense a “handbook” that evolved as a practical response to arange of ethical problems experienced by practitioners in a particular professional society.However, to engage a full variety of ethical problems, one must have a general method to solveethical problems, based in fundamental ethical principles, so that one may transcend the“handbook” code of ethics. In the technical world, handbook “experience” and
boring. The academicperformance level of these students is often below those who are learning graphics for the firsttime. Also, the educational value added by the introductory course is typically much larger for thenovice when compared with students who have mastered the fundamental graphics techniques.Historical grade distributions in these courses are either typically skewed toward the upper end ofthe grading scale or show a bimodal shape. We assume that placing students into a graphicscourse consistent with their background and preparation will enhance both student and teacherperformance. The students will be more motivated if they feel that they are learning somethingnew. Enabling the instructors to focus on the novice student population
tackle the GrandChallenges put forth by the National Academy of Engineering, the NSF’s Big Ideas, or TheEngineer of 2020[2], [6].Against this backdrop, the authors’ new B.S. in Engineering program was established. Thecurriculum is grounded in the principle that fundamental engineering concepts span acrossdisciplines, connect, and build upon one another in engineering design. Further, for thesefundamentals to be put into practice in meaningful ways critical analysis, stakeholderengagement, and a reflective, iterative process are crucial skills for students to develop in ourcourses. An outcome from this paradigm is a four-credit course structure in which each year hastwo “core” courses that cover a subset of engineering fundamentals increasing in
Paper ID #43036Board 347: Positive Predictors of Neurodiverse Students’ Sense of Belongingin EngineeringDr. Maria Chrysochoou, University of Connecticut Maria Chrysochoou is a Professor and Head of the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Connecticut. She obtained her BS in Physics at the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, her MS in Environmental Engineering at TechnisRachael Gabriel, University of ConnecticutMs. Connie Syharat, University of Connecticut Connie Syharat is a Ph.D. student and Research Assistant at the University of Connecticut as a part of two neurodiversity-centered
initialresearch on wind turbines. The class came up with three alternatives (no public comment, publicinput and implementation of “quiet” technologies), along with cash incentives for permitting andinstalling a large-scale wind farm. The alternatives were evaluated to determine their potentialimpacts and the values upheld or violated with respect to the NSPE Fundamental Canons8. Anexample is the analysis of Alternative 3, where the wind farm was installed and “quiet”technologies were used. “Quiet” technologies referred to wind turbines where the system wasengineered to reduce the noise generated during operation. This option upheld all of the NSPECanons except 2 (“Perform services only in areas of their competence”8). Students evaluatedeach alternative
AC 2008-185: A COMMON DESIGN-BUILD-TEST PROJECT INCORPORATINGFRESHMAN AND SENIOR UNDERGRADUATE ANALYSIS SKILLSMichael Plumley, US Coast Guard Academy LT Michael Plumley is on active duty in the U.S. Coast Guard and is a faculty member and 1998 graduate of the Mechanical Engineering program at the U.S. Coast Guard Academy where he has served as course coordinator for a variety of subjects including Machine Design, Heat Transfer, and Modeling and Control of Dynamic Systems. He holds Masters of Science degrees in both Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and is a registered Professional Engineer in the State of
Session 2370 The Effect of the Texas A&M University System AMP on the Success of Minority Undergraduates in Engineering: A Multiple-Outcome Analysis James M. Graham, Rita Caso, Jeanne Rierson Texas A&M UniversityI. IntroductionThe Texas A&M System Louis Stokes Alliance for Minority Participation (a.k.a. TX AMP), is amulti-institutional, multidisciplinary National Science Foundation program designed to fostersignificant increases in the number of underrepresented minority students earning baccalaureatedegrees in Science
taught in a technical context as a part of a standard engineering coursethan when they are taught in stand-alone courses 3, 4. Since most engineering faculty membershave little or no experience in teaching processing skills, efficient and effective instruction inthese skills will require well-designed instructional material that is not widely available at thepresent time. These new instructional modules should include classroom material, studentassignments and, most importantly, a guide for instructors.Module Development and SpecificationA group of ten faculty members worked over two years to develop a set of fifteen instructionalmodules that deal with a set of skills derived from Criteria 3 (a) - (k) in the EC 2000 Guidelines1.The skills were
include these skills into engineering solutions throughout theircourse. This method of using assignments throughout the curriculum allowed faculty tounderstand how students were building their competence throughout their collegiate careers toobtain the final desired level of performance 12.B. Depth of CE ProgramsThere is also motivation to ensure students are obtaining more depth on key topics, particularly Page 25.1217.4engineering design. One university implemented a converging–diverging model of design for asophomore –level course on engineering design and technical writing. This course initially useda semester long design project, but
questions (by audio or texting)4,5,6. Communication is furtherenhanced if the student also has the capability to interact in written form through the use ofTablet PCs or pen tablets in combination with the web-conferencing software7. Since studentsare not always good at verbalizing their questions, this technique allows both the student and theinstructor to share and write on the same electronic piece of paper. In addition web conferencingsoftware such as Adobe Connect Pro allows the instructor to share documents and applicationsoftware. The instructor can even give the student the ability to run applications remotely on theinstructor’s computer, allowing for troubleshooting of software application problems and remoteassessment of student computer
Paper ID #41826Work in Progress: Transformation Course-Based Undergraduate ResearchExperience (T-CURE)Dr. Heather Dillon, University of Washington Dr. Heather Dillon is Professor and Chair of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Washington Tacoma. Her research team is working on energy efficiency, renewable energy, fundamental heat transfer, and engineering education.EC Cline, University of Washington Tacoma Associate Professor in Sciences and Mathematics, and Director of ACCESS in STEM, an NSF S-STEM supported program that supports students in natural science, mathematics, and engineering at UW Tacoma.Dr. Emese
in an effort to figure out in exploring their own their place in the world. interests.The viewpoint of the learning environment for the two instructor-centered philosophies,perennialism and essentialism, is that the content and skills are transmitted from instructors tostudents. In a learning environment that reflects perennialism, the instructors serve as centralfigures, guiding discussion of timeless knowledge from seminal works in the field. Essentialism,on the other hand, illustrates an environment where fundamental concepts from the discipline aretransmitted from the instructor to the student through, most often, a lecture style format. The threelearner-centered philosophies, progressivism, social
ASEE Conference in New Orleans.8-9 This introduced the con-cept of classroom reflective exercises. That participation led to the publication of a short CPREEactivity guide on the topic of story writing as a tool for enhancing engineering education.4 Thisalso formed the basis of a companion paper at this ASEE Conference.10 The instructor receivedone of 8 CPREE mini-grants at his university. He implemented reflective practices in BR200.4From the CPREE Website:9 The ultimate goal of the Consortium to Promote Reflection in Engineering Education is [to target] an essential but oft-neglected component for effective learning: reflection. Reflecting, or exploring the meaning of experiences and consequences for future action
according toABET principles.As mentioned earlier, the work reported herein was conducted in the domain ofSpacecraft Design. The challenge of Spacecraft Design is that several of the technologiesrequired to design a credible spacecraft system are typically not covered in detail in thebasic aerospace engineering curriculum. This includes disciplines such astelecommunications and antenna design, power generation and distribution, commandand data handling, and regenerative life support. This becomes a benefit, however, not ahandicap. The professor includes lectures covering the technical fundamentals andapplications of these disciplines; but the student teams must perform additional literatureresearch into the details as they apply to the project
citizens and workers to create sustainablesolutions. Global learning outcomes provide a way to assess achievement of this knowledge andthese skills.Although programs vary among the different universities and knowledge communities, theyshare common fundamental targets for global learning outcomes. As such, we understand globallearning as “the process of diverse people collaboratively analyzing and addressing complexproblems that transcend borders.”2 It is important to note that borders in this context is notlimited strictly to geographic borders, but, rather, involves a more holistic notion of the term tosignify any social, political, geographic, or economic border that exists amongst a givencommunity. In terms of pedagogical practice, global