NSF-funded projects that are advancing entrepreneurship education in STEM fields, including Epicenter and I-Corps(tm). She and her team are currently examining the experiences of innovators commercializing and scaling-up new technologies, products, and services, and are developing ways to assess the venture and product develop- ment status of innovation teams. She received her B.A. from Williams College, an Ed.M. from Harvard University and a Ph.D. in Applied Developmental and Educational Psychology from Boston College.Dr. Thema Monroe-White, SageFox Consulting Group Thema Monroe-White is a senior evaluator at SageFox Consulting Group, specializing on driving organi- zational and program performance through
, four-year university,that inspired the redesign of the course with respect to sustainability. Currently, the concept ofsustainability is integrated into the Chemical Engineering curricula at TTU through theBioFoundry Initiative which is the integration of biomimicry components into the design processof two chemical engineering courses: CHE 3550 (Fluid Mechanics) and CHE 4661 (BiotransportPhenomena). In each of these, student-team-developed prototypes of innovative technologyaddressing societal challenges are a required outcome. The integration of biomimicry representsan expansion of the normal course-related efforts that for the last several years have leveraged thesuccessful implementation of the Renaissance Foundry Model (herein the Foundry
the data analysis teaminductively coded a subset of the data to gain a preliminary understanding of participants’ open-ended responses. We then met frequently to discuss and refine these codes, which contributed tothe development of the study’s codebook. Second, we coded the remaining data set in pairs andanalyzed patterns within and across coded excerpts. Through a collective and collaborativediscussion, the research team iteratively created emergent themes. These discussions alsogrounded the data analysis team in the participants’ narratives, which in turn increased theconfirmability and trustworthiness of the study’s findings. As an additional layer of analysis, weemployed the extant frame of psychosocial support and instrumental support
disciplines to develop a curriculum forService Systems Engineering that integrates business, engineering, and the sciences and serves asa model for other universities. This is an exciting degree program that takes curriculumdevelopment beyond its current boundaries and branches into a new direction. In this paper,efforts related to the development of the curriculum will be described, as will the challengesfaced by the project team to facilitate interdisciplinary education. The successes to date will behighlighted along with the lessons learned, and collaboration experiences with other universityfaculty members on curriculum development.IntroductionIn the next decade, the role of services will continue to grow and skilled individuals are neededto
://www.park.edu/cetl/quicktips/writinglearningobj.html 14. Radwan Ali and Elke Leeds, (2009), “The Impact of Face-to-Face Orientation on Online Retention: A Pilot Study”, Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, Volume XII, Number IV, Winter 15. Huett, J. K., Kalinowski, K. E., Moller, L. & Huett, K. C. (2008). Improving the motivation and retention of online students through the use of ARCS-Based E-Mails. The American Journal of Distance Education, 22 (3), 159 Page 24.760.16
sustainable construction.Chris Rogers, Tufts University Chris Rogers received his B.S.M.E., M.S., and Ph.D. from Stanford and is presently a Professor of Mechanical Engineering, and the Director of the Center for Engineering Education and Outreach at Tufts University. He has worked with LEGO to develop ROBOLAB, a robotic approach to learning science and math, as well as with a number of other companies to try and develop ways of incorporating engineering into the K-16 classroom for all students. In addition to engineering education, Chris is involved in several different research areas: particle-laden flows, telerobotics and controls, slurry flows in chemical-mechanical planarization, and the
meet their needs [24]. Lastly, the outermost layer recognizes the ways in which thesocial, economic, and policy context shapes student college choice through changes in socialforces, economic conditions, and public policies. Potential factors include demographiccharacteristics of the population, characteristics of the local labor market, K-12 educationalpolicies, and policies that improve college access [25].MethodsThe study presented here is the second phase of a three-phase project exploring engineeringcareer choice among rural students. Phase 1 focused on undergraduate engineering students atVirginia Tech who graduated from targeted rural high schools and aimed to identify keyinfluences on their decision to attend college and major in
many, ifnot all, students, and increasing the classroom size beyond a reasonable number (e.g., twenty) islikely to provide a significant obstacle to using PBL in the classroom. It is most likely that in aclass of size say eighty, students are unlikely to engage in the kind of discussions that PBLwould require.Use of Deductive Learning in TextbooksInterestingly, most IE textbooks use a deductive approach. While we need not name such texts,it will be challenging to find a textbook on Probability, Statistics, Quality Control, ProductionPlanning, Operations Research (stochastic or deterministic), or Discrete-Event Simulation thatuses a PBL format. It is natural hence that the instructor follows a deductive format. However,with some effort, it is
could say that being creative,innovative, and problem-solving are basal characteristics at the heart of American culture. The history ofthe US is strongly colored by innovators dating back to Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, and otherscontinuing through the development and expansion of the US. The drive to succeed is so strong in theculture that it is often named as “the American Dream” and as a whole, it overshadows a more criticalpoint – what are the components of “success” and how are we measuring them? The triple bottom linetheory [2] began a very critical and much need change associated with that definition of success: itexpanded it beyond just making profit for a corporation, to factoring in some way the effect of thecompany’s actions
Paper ID #33491Student Response System Best Practices for Engineering as Implemented inPlickersDr. Timothy Aaron Wood, The Citadel Timothy A Wood is an Assistant Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at The Citadel. He acquired a Bachelor’s in Engineering Physics Summa Cum Laude with Honors followed by Civil Engi- neering Master’s and Doctoral degrees from Texas Tech University. His technical research focuses on the intersection of soil-structure interaction and structural/geotechnical data. He encourages students pushing them toward self-directed learning through reading, and inspiring enthusiasm for the
observer. In contrast, our conception of “empathy” goes beyond “sympathy” in thatthe observer takes on the perspective of the other person instead of feeling an emotional responsefrom their own perspective and position. This perspective taking can reside solely in the cognitivedomain of empathy but typically also includes the affective domain [18], [23], [24]. In addition tothe affective and cognitive domains of empathy, the ability to regulate one’s emotions andself/other-awareness have also been identified as key to empathy [26]. Finally, while care has beendefined in many ways, it is often depicted as empathy that elicits a behavioral response. In otherwords acting on the empathetic response in a manner intended to improve the situation of the
. Graphical Analysis a Text Book on Graphic Statics McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc. NY1921.[3] Dermody, R. J. "Embracing the Past: Using Historical structures to Teach Engineering Fundamentals" ASEEAnnual Conference Proceedings, 2012.[4] Dermody, R.J. "Get the Form Right!!"Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 2010.[5] Allen, E. and Zalewski, W. (Boston Structures Group), Form and Forces Wiley and Sons, Inc. 2010.[6] Liem, Yannick "Graphic statics in funicular design calculating force equilibrium through complementaryenergy", Graduate Thesis TU Delft, Faculty of Architecture.[7] Gerhardt, R., Kurrer, K.-E., Pichler, G. "The methods of graphical statics and their relation to the structuralform" Proceedings of the First International
prerequisite for a class, (3) diagnose why astudent is having difficulty in a class, (4) direct students attention at a particular facet of thematerial to be learned, and (5) trace students development of knowledge and abilities over time.At a school level, the new ABET 2000 accreditation standards will soon make it necessary forschools to be able to demonstrate what students have learned (outcomes based assessment) ratherthan simply demonstrating that they are teaching an acceptable complement of courses. This hascreated a need to develop strategies, and possibly even new assessment instruments, for assessingengineering students knowledge and abilities as they move through the curriculum.Assessment is, and has always been, very difficult. Some of the
Paper ID #47198An emerging assessment framework for problem-based learning environmentsbased on Jonassen’s design theory of problem solvingSama Ghoreyshi, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York Sama Ghoreyshi is a Ph.D student in Department of Engineering Education at University at Buffalo. Her research interests lie in the area of advancing undergraduate engineering education through the design, implementation, and evaluation of innovative, evidence-based pedagogies and assessment methods, as well as strategies to enhance engineering problem-solving skills and efficacy, with a particular focus on problem
c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Reel Entrepreneurs: Illustrating Entrepreneurship with Feature FilmsWe all learn in a number of different ways and the learning process can be facilitated through theuse of variety of viewpoints and media. Thus to reach everyone, a variety of instructionalmethods is used, each leaving a different “mental footprint.” The “cone of experience” indicatesthat people generally remember only about 10% of what they read, but 30% of what they see.In introducing entrepreneurial concepts to engineering students,, in particular content that isdifficult to describe analytically because it involves a variety of human actions, usefulenhancement is the use of video material to illustrate some
. These students were not evaluated separately; however, the overlap was noted.While both of the classes were gradeless throughout the academic term, instructors submittedmidterm and final letter grades for the students as per the institutional requirements (this institutionuses an A-F with + (plus) grades system. No - (minus) grades are used in this system. Typically,faculty assign grades based on the 10% scale with 90%-100% earning an A, etc. Plus (+) gradesusually range from the top 50%-20% of a 10% range). Beyond these midterm and final grades,no grades were used or mentioned to students throughout the academic term.At the midterm and final points of the term, the instructors met with each student individually tointerview and discuss course
BackgroundIn February 2004, after nearly two years of intense work, the BOK Committee, which at thattime was a constituent committee of the Committee on the Academic Prerequisites forProfessional Practice (CAP3), published the first-ever Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge(CEBOK1) [2]. The CEBOK1 defined “the knowledge, skills, and attitudes necessary to becomea licensed professional engineer” through 15 outcomes. The CEBOK1 used ABET Criterion 3student outcomes a - k from that time for the first 11 outcomes and all the outcomes weredistinguished along three broad levels of competence: Level 1 (Recognition), Level 2(Understanding), and Level 3 (Ability) [2, 3].Table 1 CEBOK1 Outcomes [2, 3] Outcome Outcome Statement
impactful programs and services for the Hispanic STEM community.Liliana Gonz´alez, Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers, Inc. Liliana is dedicated to collaborating with families through shared learning communities. As a program manager at SHPE, she leads transformative initiatives aimed at equipping families of first-generation college students with tools to support their children’s STEM journey. Liliana specializes in program design, implementation, and scaling, with a focus on operationalizing initiatives and facilitating engaging sessions and events. She holds a Master of Public Administration from the University of Texas - Permian Basin and a Bachelor of Arts in History from the University of Houston. Her
constructivistapproaches. Furthermore, engineers must apply their knowledge in complex situations thatextend far beyond the borders of the classroom.Engineering in the real world is more than number crunching. It involves making decisions suchas making the appropriate assumptions, model simplification, material/size selection, costanalysis, etc. As a result, with the current lecture approach, students may learn to solve problemsand follow preset rules for a well-defined problem but lack the ability to transfer that learninginto additional situations. In particular, they may fail to see the connection between solving aproblem mathematically and real-world engineering application. Following the tenets of
step in a two-year study to determine scaffolding techniques thatwill enrich the learning experience of undergraduate students in chemical engineering with respectto selected TCs in undergraduate statistics. The long-term goal of the project is to formallyinvestigate factors that contribute to student engagement, learning, and performance inundergraduate engineering courses. Few studies address evidence-based design of computationalnotebooks for engineering courses [14, 15]. In this project, we explore computational notebooksas a scaffolding tool to help students develop a skillset they can translate to different workingenvironments beyond their undergraduate education. Our curricular innovation intends tosystematically design and assess
responsibilities and fosteredpositive group dynamics. Cohesion prevailed, with no significant conflicts, and studentsvoluntarily spent time together beyond planned activities. Feedback on research mentors wasgenerally favorable, and despite some project complications, the overarching goals of the studentresearch cohort were realized. Addressable issues, such as suboptimal dining choices, emergedbut were considered manageable and amendable for future cohorts. The overarching aim ofproviding engineering exposure to non-engineering students from varied backgrounds wasunequivocally achieved, culminating in a valuable and enjoyable experience for all involved. 3. Research IntroductionConcrete, a widely utilized construction material for several decades, is
of Engineering is aiming to tackle theseissues concurrently. In a first pilot run of a small slice of the new program, students developed aspace mission concept to change the power dynamics around water quality in northern Canada,giving communities direct control of data to measure their water quality and quantities. Thedesigned mission had to be implementable sustainably, with the community engaged at everystage. This concept is being developed into a full 4-year program, where students will choose amanaged path through project activities that give them all the core and complementary content ofa traditional space program. Students will design, build, launch and operate a CubeSat mission,with a community, every 4 years, to address a societal
University Amy Trowbridge is a Senior Lecturer in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State Uni- versity and is the Director of the National Academy of Engineering (NAE) Grand Challenge Scholars Program (GCSP) at ASU. Through the GCSP, Amy aims to prepare students to become globally and socially aware engineers who will lead future efforts to solve the world’s biggest challenges. Amy also helps new schools to develop GCSPs as part of the NAE GCSP Proposal review committee. She is also actively involved in the Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN), focused on students’ de- velopment of entrepreneurial mindset through GCSP and curriculum. Amy recently received the 2019 KEEN Rising Star award
composition, writing-intensive courses in the humanities and socialsciences, and reports and presentations in regular engineering courses did not fulfill the students’need for instruction in business and technical communication. The report recommended that awell-designed program begins with a good foundation delivered through a separate course orthrough integrated instruction. This recommendation is reinforced with further instructionthroughout the curriculum. Specifically, a series of courses, or integrated modules deliveredthrough team-teaching, delivered consistent instruction that emphasized skill building and thepracticed needs of the profession.Reave’s study showed that the engineering schools that have the most extensive communicationprograms
including emerging and non-traditional areas of practice. MacKenzie has an undergraduate engineering degree in Biomedical Systems Engineering, where her research focused on high-intensity focused ultrasound.Elham Marzi, University of Toronto, Canada Prof. Marzi is the Co-founder and Director of InVEST and has engaged in multidisciplinary research in Organizational Behaviour, Virtual Teams, and Engineering Education. She teaches in areas inclusive of OB, HR, Strategy, Virtual Teams, and Negotiations in the Engineering Business Minor and Certifi- cate Program at the University of Toronto, Canada. She has a passion for teaching and getting students engaged through active and technology enhanced learning. She is highly
benchmarks and milestones.Conclusions Incorporating the latest visualization technology in an upper level undergraduatesolid state electronics course presents many opportunities to both the instructor and to thestudents. This work has the potential to go far beyond the scope of most static approachesroutinely used in contemporary courseware in this area. Portraying real space andparametric space, three dimensional concepts through the use of animations andinteractive graphics provides a multifaceted learning experience that is both refreshingand “fun”. Dazzling the students with rich and interactive visualization tools as comparedto unexciting and obscure formulae at the introductory level can stimulate interest. In
leadership in the academy,” inGender and Practice: Insights from the Field. Emerald, 2019, pp. 3-21.[32] S. Laursen, K. De Welde, and A. E. Austin, “Workshop Report: ADVANCE and Beyond;Thinking Strategically about Faculty-Based Institutional Change.” Boulder, CO, Charleston, SC,& East Lansing, MI. 2019. https://www.colorado.edu/eer/sites/default/files/attached-files/advbeyondworkshopreport091919.pdf[33] Y. S. Lincoln and E. G. Guba, “But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity innaturalistic evaluation,” New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1986(30), 73-84, 1986.[34] V. H. Hunt, S. Morimoto, A. Zajicek, and R. Lisnic, “Intersectionality and dismantlinginstitutional privilege: The case of the NSF ADVANCE program,” Race, Gender &
influence are significant, meaning each element is influenced by several other elements. 4) Interactions have importance, and non-linearity exists in a capacity that allows for small decisions to have larger impacts on the system. 5) Interactions are usually short in range, typically bounded by immediate neighboring elements within the system, resulting in enhancing, suppression, or alteration as interactions flow through the system. 6) Feedback loops exist within the system. 7) Complex systems are also typically open systems; they frequently interact with their external environment. 8) Operation is far from equilibrium; a constant flow of energy is required for sustainment. 9) Complex systems have an
discussing or enacting all other activities in the script. There was time forquestions from the UTAs about the script and time for questions about grading.Description of Innovations In the spring of 2023, I joined the STS program and assumed responsibility for themanagement and development of the UTA team. As a career educator and student of teachereducation and professional development (MA ‘23, UMD) I was attuned to the quality of teachingdelivered by the UTAs in the STS program, as well as their personal and professionaldevelopment as educators and leaders. Through classroom observations focused on therelationship between the TA and their students, classroom management and leadership skills,question-asking and feedback, and instruction
and technological realms.In this framing, technological literacy is not about how to educate and comport oneself withtechnology, but rather how to make choices about the extent to, and ways through which, onewishes to engage with technology. For example to use many mobile applications one assignsrights to access of private data to the provider of the technology (Lanier, 2013); these rightsand the implications of EULAs are not usually transparent. Similarly while computers in K-12 were initially seen as a useful tool for learning, now we are having to deal with technologyas something we need to train students to defend themselves against (child pornography,cyber-bullying).Frame Four: Engineering and Plato’s CaveKrupczak and Blake (Blake &