Minneapolis, MN
August 23, 2022
June 26, 2022
June 29, 2022
Biomedical Engineering Division: Supporting and Evaluating Student Learning in BioE/BME Courses
14
10.18260/1-2--40458
https://peer.asee.org/40458
526
Julia M. Williams joined the faculty of the Humanities and Social Sciences Department at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology in 1992, then assumed duties as Executive Director of the Office of Institutional Research, Planning, and Assessment in 2005. From 2016-19, she served as Interim Dean of Cross-Cutting Programs and Emerging Opportunities. In this role, she supported the work of faculty who create multi-disciplinary learning opportunities for Rose-Hulman students. Williams’ publications on assessment, engineering and professional communication, and tablet PCs have appeared in the Journal of Engineering Education and IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, among others. She has been awarded grants from Microsoft, HP, the Engineering Communication Foundation, the Kern Family Foundation, and National Science Foundation. Currently she supports the work of the Revolutionizing Engineering Departments (NSF RED) grant recipients. She has received numerous awards including the 2015 Schlesinger Award (IEEE Professional Communication Society) and 2010 Sterling Olmsted Award (ASEE Liberal Education Division).
This paper examines the impact of an ungrading approach to classroom assessments on students’ perception of their learning experience in two freshman level courses. We discuss the interviews conducted at mid-term and end of term with our students in order to determine course grades and promote self-reflection and metacognition. The interview process was central to how we adopted ungrading (Blum 2020) as an assessment method for our courses and was the primary tool for determining course grades. All students involved were first year STEM students enrolled in either Intro to MATLAB programming (n=36) or First year composition (n=37). Ten (10) students were enrolled in both courses. Early findings from this approach found that students expressed an improved sense of agency and independence when it came to their course work and in the MATLAB course and used language that suggested the foundation for life-long learning. The grade conferences provided an opportunity for student-teacher calibration in terms of course expectations and self-reflection among the students. While it is still a developing field, the ungrading approach provides an alternative to the traditional classroom that allows for student agency and increased involvement in the learning process while decentralizing authority. The power shift away from the instructor impresses upon the student their responsibility for taking control of their own learning.
Dosmar, E., & Williams, J. (2022, August), Student Reflections on Learning as the Basis for Course Grades Paper presented at 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Minneapolis, MN. 10.18260/1-2--40458
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2022 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015