their search for theright type of practitioners, to enrich the academic process by bringing the practice into the classroom. After Foundation Engineering was over, and the final course grade was out, a“questionnaire” was sent to those who enrolled in the class seeking their opinions, evaluations,and any comment(s) they may wish to offer. Twenty six out of a total of 30 students returned the“questionnaire” on time! The opinions expressed and comments made were, by and large,positive to say the least. After regrouping, and rephrasing to correct the English language; thecomments offered by the ex- students, could be summarized as follows: The adjunct was easy to approach every time and everywhere, and was always helpful, His
usedthroughout the undergraduate industrial engineering curriculum at the UPRM’s Mayagüezcampus were the most effective and efficient to facilitate a better learning process to moststudents. We wanted to identify teaching strategies and styles that, from the students’perspective, were more effective in ensuring that students could learn, and retain knowledgewhile approving their courses all at the same time. We also wanted to understand the high schoolexperience of students and its usefulness of this background in university life style. Conclusionswere based on the observations made at the focus groups, after the characterization of the results.In section 3 we present a brief review of some of the basic concepts related to cognitive styles,teaching
engineering ethics, more engineering programs inculcatedethics into their curriculum. Various approaches were tried with some success; however,engineering ethics overall has limited exposure in programs and is pushed to the periphery ofengineering education. In 2016, The National Academy of Engineering conducted a call forsubmissions to support an effort to select exemplars of engineering ethics education. This effortyielded 44 submissions from universities throughout the US. Review of the content revealed thatthe submissions ranged from short activities used in engineering courses to multiyear courses ofstudy with the preponderance of work structured in a case study type activity [6]. Some claimthe best way to teach engineering ethics is through
thatengineering education would adopt and embrace group work for labs and projects. It is naturalthen to promote and foster collaborative learning with peers. Developing an interactive learningstyle has become nearly essential to survival in engineering academics and into industry.Peer-Assisted Teaching. The report “Peer Teaching: to Teach is to Learn Twice” informs usthat peer teaching is not a new concept.11 Historically, the Greeks used student leaders asarchons and in the 19th century, English and American schoolmasters used older students to drillyounger students in classrooms. Accordingly, the reasons why peer teaching has developed sucha broad appeal are:Ü Individuals who experience a course as a student and then return to the same course as a
with an internet connection, the problem could be reframed as, “You studiedsomething like this in Mechanics of Materials. If you can’t remember how this works, trylooking it up online.” This often led to considerable discussion among the students as they triedto remember their past courses, debated the merits of various online sources, and checked witheach other and with the instructor about whether a particular approach made sense. Another gooduse of technology was to have them look up sensor specifications on manufacturers’ websites.These specs are often confusing to students who are new to them, and they can be difficult to Page
, and because there is little room in most engineering programsfor additional courses, we believe that numerous attributes will need to be addressed as part ofexisting courses. In order to gain the efficiency needed to cover these additional objectives, insureconsistency and integrate across courses, the entire curriculum needs to be carefully managed andorganized. We have looked at several ways of doing this using computer-based tools, including acurriculum matrix and relational database. We are in the process of developing a new web-based Page 3.397.13tool which combines the advantages of both of these approaches. We anticipate that by
in fracture at a specified location in the part material. Unfortunately, a simplemodeling approach could not be found that yielded reasonable convergence and clear results.Therefore, this exercise, too, was deemed beyond the current level of the Tool Engineeringcourse.III. ImplementationThe new curriculum design with FEM lecture and exercise material was integrated into theSpring 2000 offering of Tool Engineering at Cal Poly. 10 students were enrolled in the class andall participated in the new material. Approximately 3 hours of lecture time were used to presentthe FEM material described above. Only one of the computer exercises was assigned (#1 above)because the others were not in a completed state at the time of the offering. About an hour
engineering curriculum.• Integrate design and open-ended problems into the first two years.• Develop innovative ways to teach engineering.• Cooperative work in teams.• Provide a perspective on engineering in society.• Develop learning modules using video and/or software for use by other institutions. In response to input from NSF, the Engineering Dean’s Council and other sources, ABETencouraged the Engineering Accreditation Council (EAC) to develop new approaches toundergraduate engineering accreditation by providing a path for engineering schools to maintainaccreditation while making the appropriate curricula changes. With the new Engineering Criteria2000, ABET/EAC will focus on processes and outcomes while placing less emphasis on credit
that they would likeexpanded or added in the future and among the topics include more on meetings,international consulting, and how to negotiate, and a session on golf etiquette. 2007 ASEE North Midwest Sectional ConferenceConclusionAs engineering departments look to introduce leadership and business principles intotheir curriculums to meet new ABET objectives, a course in consulting engineering maybe an attractive option to consider. The topics and content are evolving but the feedbackfrom two years of offering this elective at Michigan Tech has been extremely positive.WILLIAM J. (BILL) SPROULE is a Professor, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering,Michigan Tech University, Houghton, MI. Bill has over 30
AC 2010-1458: TEACHING SUSTAINABILITY AND SUSTAINABLEENGINEERING PRACTICE IN THE CIVIL ENGINEERING CURRICULUMSteven Burian, University of Utah Page 15.1188.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Teaching Sustainability in a Civil Engineering CurriculumAbstractThe objectives of this paper are to (1) present the approach used to integrate sustainabilitycontent into the civil engineering curriculum at the University of ____, (2) assess theeffectiveness of the approach, and (3) provide general recommendations to improve theintegration of sustainability into the civil engineering curriculum. The approach beingimplemented at the University of ___ involves brief
Carolina University. Page 14.281.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Bioprocess Engineering Curriculum Development and AssessmentAbstractEast Carolina University’s new general engineering program is built around the goal ofexcellence in undergraduate education. The faculty of the program are encouraged to pursuenovel approaches to engineering education in order to achieve this goal. The newly createdconcentration in bioprocess engineering provides an excellent opportunity to develop andimplement a novel curriculum based upon proven pedagogical approaches designed to engagethe students and improve their mastery of
Edrees is a PhD student at New Jersey Institute of Technology, specializing in Transportation En- gineering. Ahmed has received his master’s in civil engineering from the University of Texas at Arlington in 2014. After, graduation Ahmed worked as a research assistant at Umm Al-Qura University in his hometown in Saudi Arabia. He also held a position as a teaching assistant and lecturer at the University of Jeddah. Ahmed plans to return as a faculty member at the University of Jeddah upon completion of his study.Dr. Jaskirat Sodhi, New Jersey Institute of Technology Dr. Jaskirat Sodhi is interested in first-year engineering curriculum design and recruitment, retention and success of engineering students. He is the
), learning sciences and technology, embodied interaction, embodied learning, HCI for accessibility (especially for individuals with blindness), multi- modal verbal/non-verbal interaction, multimodal meeting analysis, vision-based interaction, multimedia databases, medical imaging, assistive technology for the blind, human computer interaction, computer vision, and computer graphics. http://teilab.tamu.edu American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Design and Development of a Horizontal CTE Curriculum to Prepare Students for the New Manufacturing Economy (Work in Progress)1. BackgroundHow we educate students is
A Project-based Computer Engineering CurriculumAbstractThis paper documents an innovative, project-based approach to teaching computer engineering.A project-based undergraduate computer engineering curriculum, with an embedded systemsfocus, has been offered since 2004 at a small, private college in the Northwestern US. The maingoals of the curriculum are twofold. The first is to engage students in engineering problemsstarting in the first semester of the Program, thus providing them with a sense of pride andownership in their work. The second is to prepare students for engineering careers by involvingthem in complex, team projects, which are typically only conducted outside of requiredundergraduate coursework, at the graduate level, or in
2006-980: DESIGN FOR FRONTIER CONTEXTS: CLASSROOM ASSESSMENTOF A NEW DESIGN METHODOLOGY WITH HUMANITARIAN APPLICATIONSMatthew Green, LeTourneau University MATTHEW G. GREEN is an assistant professor of Mechanical Engineering at LeTourneau University, Longview. His objective is to practice and promote engineering as a serving profession, with special recognition of opportunities to improve the quality of life in developing countries. Topics include the design of affordable transportation, training engineers to design for marginalized populations, needs assessment in frontier design environments, assistive devices for persons with disabilities, and remote power generation. Contact: MatthewGreen
between the quarter and semester calendars.Four categories of courses were established as part of the conversion process: semesterequivalent courses, semester replacement courses, new courses, and deleted courses. Theseclassifications assist the registrar in mapping equivalency for students who complete coursesunder both calendar models. The Electrical Engineering Technology (EET) curriculum is usedhere as an example to demonstrate the types of courses in each category.A semester equivalent course, denoted by SE, is defined as a course converted from quarters tosemesters without substantial content change. A semester replacement course (SR) is a coursethat has been modified or repackaged to maintain the majority of content from the
curriculum), the authors of this paper believe that it would be abetter alternative to have these learning objectives discussed above incorporated into the entiresystems engineering curriculum. Sustainability is not a separate idea from systems engineering, itis a concept that could be and should be applied at every step of the systems engineering process,going hand in hand with the systems engineering concepts. On the other hand, development of anew course such as “Sustainable Systems Engineering” may be useful as well. This new coursecan go into more in-depth coverage of topics such as life-cycle assessment, energy audits,greenhouse gases and carbon footprint, environmental standards, and software/technology forsustainable system design. But we
engineering education. The explicit addition of Energy to the MechanicalEngineering curriculum is a new model of engineering education that parallels the innovations ofour current Learning to Learn (L2L) project oriented concept course with the addition ofinnovative approaches for mechanical engineering and emphasis on energy engineeringeducation. The new Mechanical and Energy Engineering (MEE) baccalaureate-level programwill provide the intellectual foundation for successful career preparation and lifelong learning forthe students. This innovative curriculum has been designed with a system-level approach to ME-based design, on the fundamentals of undergraduate level energy engineering within themechanical engineering discipline, and will provide
Engineering education. Resource. July (pp. 13-15).4. Wells, J.H. and Taylor, T.A. (1996). First principles in Biological Engineering education. Resource. April (pp. 12, 22).5. Lauffenburger, D.A. (2003). Biological Engineering, The New Fusion of Biology and Engineering at MIT. http://web.mit.edu/be/about.html.6 . Gharib, M. (2003). Personal Communication.7. Ornstein A. C and Hunkins, F.P. (1988) Curriculum--foundations, principles, and issues. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.8. Anderson, J. A. (1998). Learning and Memory: An Integrated Approach. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.9. National Academy of Engineering. Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century. National Academy of Sciences, 2005. http
AC 2011-1002: OLD TRICKS FOR A NEW DOG: AN INNOVATIVE SOFT-WARE TOOL FOR TEACHING REAL-TIME DSP ON A NEW HARD-WARE PLATFORMMr. Michael G. Morrow P.E.,Cameron H. G. Wright, University of Wyoming Cameron H. G. Wright, Ph.D, P.E., is an Associate Professor with the Department of Electrical and Com- puter Engineering at the University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY. He was previously Professor and Deputy Department Head in the Department of Electrical Engineering at the United States Air Force Academy, and served as an R&D engineering officer in the U.S. Air Force for over 20 years. He received the B.S.E.E. (summa cum laude) from Louisiana Tech University in 1983, the M.S.E.E. from Purdue Uni- versity in 1988, and the Ph.D
. Reisel is a member of ASEE, ASME, the Combustion Institute, and SAE. Dr. Reisel received his B.M.E. degree from Villanova University in 1989, his M.S. degree in Mechanical Engineering from Purdue University in 1991, and his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Purdue University in 1994. Page 15.609.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010GAINING THE RESPECT OF YOUR STUDENTS: FUNDAMENTAL TIPS FOR NEW ENGINEERING TEACHERSAbstractMost new engineering teachers enter their jobs with a strong background in research, and withhigh expectations placed on their research productivity. Yet, a significant
Session 1647 New Issues for Administrative Action Warren R. Hill, Dean College of Applied Science and Technology Weber State University Ogden UT 84408-1801IntroductionThere are a number of important issues facing administrators in Engineering Technologyprograms today. Beyond the more obvious issues such as tenure, teaching loads, what constitutesresearch, faculty salaries and terminal degrees, there are a host of other critical issues, five ofwhich are discussed here. While one can come up with
1semester abroad agenda strained Northern Arizona University's BOK2 curriculum redesignefforts. Without relaxation of the requirements that liberal studies courses must come fromoutside the major requirements and that creation of new courses is to be minimized, four of the“challenging” BOK2 outcomes are not achievable at the prescribed LOA. Furthermore,concerns were developed about the BOK2 curriculum’s impact on students’ future success withthe FE if this exam is not aligned to the BOK2.IntroductionThe first edition of the Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge for the 21st Century1 (BOK1) wasreleased in January 2004. Based on various inputs, a second edition of the Civil EngineeringBody of Knowledge for the 21st Century2 (BOK2) was developed and
simple factors. most likely to be used directly by students after graduation. It is sufficiently generic to be valuableHow important is engineering economics for the in a large variety of chemical engineering jobs. ItChemical Engineering curriculum? In what ways is also quite realistic (at least in some of its topics,does it enhance engineering problem-solving skills? such as the time value of money) so that theWhat likely changes in the structure of the barriers between the course material and a practicalcurriculum will involve engineering economics, and application confronting a new engineer are quitewhat are their
undesirable byproducts [9].Lead is among the most toxic elements and has widespread presence in the environment [10, 11].Common treatment technologies for lead removal include chemical precipitation and adsorption.However, precipitation becomes less effective and more expensive at high metal concentrations[12] and successful adsorption depends on finding low-cost, high-capacity sorbents [12-23] ormicroorganisms that accumulate toxic metals [24-26]. Innovative nanospheres have shownpromise for lead complexation.Despite the research progress that has been made, there is very little effort to introducenanotechnology into undergraduate environmental engineering curriculum. The objective of thisproject was to introduce nanotechnology experiences into
students a great deal of specialization. This latter approach ismore wide open at larger institutions where more courses are offered, and less so at others, wherethe number of courses available in any one area prevents students from concentrating tooheavily. Page 6.94.6 Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2001, American Society for Engineering Education Table 1. AAU Institutions and their Curriculum Web Sites Institution Primary Web Site UsedUniversity of Arizona
enterprise management and business operations norms to societal,safety and environmental concerns in order to maximize the public welfare while minimizingpotential harm and damages as a result of ongoing construction activities or the future planning.Therefore, there exists a growing interest in incorporating a senior-level/graduate course thatfocuses on construction regulations and multiple aspects related to organizational managementand organizational behavior issues within an engineering enterprise. Therefore, a new courseentitled “Constructional Regulations and Organizational Management” is introduced into theCivil/Construction Engineering curriculum at Syracuse University in 2015 spring semester. Theobjective of this new course is to better
Engineering EducationIntroduction The United States Military Academy (USMA), located in West Point, NY, about 50 milesnorth of New York City, was founded in 1802 as an academy that educated officers for theUnited States Army. In 1812, upon recognizing the need for engineers, USMA changed itscurriculum to educate engineers for the Army and a young nation. In addition to offering a broadvariety of majors, it is still known primarily for its engineering programs. USMA also remainsone of the ways to become a commissioned officer in the United States Army. There are approximately 4,000 cadets at USMA. Although about 10,000 applications arereceived annually, they are screened for grades, athletics, extra-curricular activities, and physicalfitness
Paper ID #33016Exploring Engineering: Peer-sharing Presentations in First-yearEngineering CurriculumDr. Elizabeth Anne Stephan, Clemson University Dr. Elizabeth Stephan is the Director of Academics for the General Engineering Program at Clemson University. She holds a B.S. and a Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Akron. Since 2002, she has taught, developed, and now coordinates the first-year curriculum. She is the lead author of the ”Thinking Like an Engineer” textbook, currently in its 4th edition.Ms. Abigail T. Stephan, Clemson University Abigail Stephan is a doctoral candidate in the Learning
develop curriculum that improve students’ contributionto society and that encourage students to seek opportunities to create value when designing. Thismodule has the potential to meet the need of higher-educational institutions’ mission to supportDEI initiatives on campuses.Keywords: student engagement, diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI), Entrepreneurial-MindedLearning (EML), Kern Engineering Entrepreneurial Network (KEEN) frameworkIntroductionHigher education institutions are currently seeking new approaches to address the new ABETcriteria to include diversity, equity, inclusion, and justice in engineering education. Institutions arecurrently seeking methods to integrate DEI into curriculum, assessment, workplace climate,faculty practice and