include modeling the transport and fate of contaminants ingroundwater and surface water systems, as well as engineering education reform.SAMUEL BOGAN DANIELSSamuel Bogan Daniels, Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering, University of New Haven, received hisPh.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Boston University and has a P.E license in CT. He is currently the freshmanadvisor for Mechanical Engineering, ASME & SAE Faculty Advisor, PLTW UNH Affiliate Professor, and hasinterests in solid modeling, electric vehicles and composites.MICHAEL COLLURADr. Collura, Professor of Chemical Engineering at the University of New Haven, received his B.S. ChemicalEngineering from Lafayette College and the M.S. and Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from Lehigh
to thestudents’ careers. Plots show a histogram of Likert Scale responses (1-5, left to right): Notuseful, slightly useful, moderately useful, very useful, essential. * p ~ 0.15 by Mann-Whitney U-test (not significant by p<0.05 criterion).Finally, we assessed the students’ ability to design a virtual prototype to a new problem uponentry into the junior-level class that follows BME282. As described above in Methods, studentswere given a challenge to make a virtual prototype of a method of detecting or otherwisecharacterizing MRSA (Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus) that could be performedrapidly and at the bedside. The faculty instructor for that course assessed each student’s virtualprototype for elements of application of the
Paper ID #15663Project-Based Approach in an Electrical Circuits Theory Course - Bringingthe Laboratory to a Large ClassroomDr. Chad Eric Davis P.E., University of Oklahoma Chad E. Davis received the B.S. degree in mechanical engineering, M.S. degree in electrical engineering, and Ph.D. degree in engineering from the University of Oklahoma (OU), Norman, in 1994, 2000, and 2007, respectively. Since 2008, he has been a member of the Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) faculty, University of Oklahoma. Prior to joining the OU-ECE faculty, he worked in industry at Uponor (Tulsa, OK), McElroy Manufacturing (Tulsa, OK
Teacher Scholarship Program. Immediately prior to doctoral study, Bernard worked as a middle and high school science teacher at a public charter school in Washington, D.C, where he coordinated the school- wide science fair and mentored students in after school enrichment programs. Bernard’s current research interests include equity in STEM education and student cognition in STEM.Dr. Jill Marshall, University of Texas, Austin Jill A. Marshall is an associate professor of STEM Education. She studies how people come to understand and engineer the physical world and how teachers can facilitate that process, as well as equity issues in STEM education. She is Associate Director of the UTeach Natural Sciences teacher
,smart materials, bio-medical engineering and micro-medical systems, etc. These areasare considerably more “high-tech” than electrical circuit bread-boarding, antenna design,engine testing, HVAC systems testing and classic controls which are some of the hands-on technologies utilized in undergraduate laboratories and design projects. Also, some ofthese “advanced” topics are not taught as part of the core undergraduate curriculum, noreven as part of special electives. The issue is then how to provide exposure to theseemerging technologies to engineering students without introducing new courses. Wehave been attempting to solve this problem through our interdisciplinary capstone designcourse with the help of faculty working in these emerging
handout was distributed to all students and was reviewedduring one class session of the course in order to set appropriate presentation guidelines.A new rubric featuring descriptive performance level indicators based on an appropriate subsetof the RSVP framework was developed and distributed to the students ahead of thepresentations, as it is important to provide specific information on expectations to both studentsand faculty prior to the evaluation process5. As presented in Appendix B, this rubric focuses onfive specific areas. As this is, ostensibly, a “one minute” presentation, the length of thepresentation is a relevant issue. The four other major evaluation areas are derived from theRSVP framework based on specific items identified as areas
developed new methods for imaging and tracking mitochondria from living zebrafish neurons. In her work for the EERC and Pitt-CIRTL, April Dukes collaborates on educational research projects and facilitates professional development (PD) on instructional and mentoring best practices for current and future STEM faculty. As an adjunct instructor in the Department of Neuroscience at the Univer- sity of Pittsburgh since 2009 and an instructor for CIRTL Network and Pitt-CIRTL local programming since 2016, April is experienced in both synchronous and asynchronous online and in-person teaching environments.Morgan V. Fedorchak American c Society for Engineering
. sources. 1 On the solution page, report the time required to write the solutions after the questions were identified. 2 creativity - demonstration of transcending traditional ideas, rules, and patterns to create meaningful new ideas, forms, methods and interpretations; imaginative 3 Solutions are not expected to be typed. This refers to the exam only. Figure 7: Write-Your-Own Exam Rubric 2.0ReflectionsWith the implementation of any new pedagogical tool or approach, faculty time investment is aconsideration. For a
extraordinary learning experiences. As a start-up faculty member at Olin College (2001-2015), Stolk created numerous project-based and interdisciplinary courses and programs that invite students to take control of their learning, grapple with complex systems, engage with each other and the world in new ways, and emerge as confident, agile, self-directed learners. Stolk’s research aims to understand how students experience different classroom settings, particularly with regard to how individuals express situ- ational motivations and develop their own beliefs about learning. A core aspect of his professional work involves translating research to practice, by equipping instructors with design tools and conceptual frame- works
) and engineering programs (EN), the HBCU institution offered onlyengineering majors and did not include engineering technology. Therefore sample selection atthe PWI included a further level of stratification by program.Interview Protocol and Interview ProcessThe focus group protocol was constructed by utilizing protocols used in our previous research onprejudice and discrimination among college, middle, and high school minority students thatincluded African American, Latino, and Arab American students. Open-ended questionsprovided interviewees ample opportunities for frank discussion about issues and concerns crucialto their lives in and outside school [29]. The protocol included questions regarding perceptionsof the campus and engineering
functionality oftheir programs in a lab setting. Deliverables consisted of completed programs. Feedback fromthe professor mainly focused on the structure of the code and commenting techniques. 31students were enrolled in this course.3.1 Quantitative Student AssessmentWith any new and novel technique, it is important that an assessment of its effectiveness occur.With a technique such as video grading, there are two dimensions which need to be assessed,namely student perceptions and faculty perceptions of the technique. For such a paradigm shiftto occur, the process must be beneficial to students as well as effective for faculty members.The first class which used video grading did not have any formal assessment technique applied.Rather, students were
significant improvements in DCI scores. Addressing student concerns about the broadcast method of delivery directly bydiscussing literature, the “The No Significant Difference Phenomenon” (reference 11),and grade results from previous semesters early in the class may be comforting tostudents. But, it does not help them maintain classroom discipline throughout thesemester. Similarly, an orientation to the importance of the study of dynamics over thefour millennia beginning with Hammurabi’s code and ending with contemporaryengineering failures caused by dynamic conditions from recent newspaper articles mayaddress the ABET program outcomes f (ethical responsibility), h (societal context), and j(contemporary issues)18, but does not engage
Session 1430 Growing Undergraduate Student Mentoring Skills Using a Reflective Practice Guided by Peer Feedback Steven C. Zemke, Donald F. Elger University of IdahoAbstractOur university is facing increasing enrollment as well as decreasing funding. Class sizes andfaculty workloads are rising. As a result, the students’ personal connection with the faculty isdecreasing. To cost effectively augment the faculty effort and simultaneously increaseconnection with students we are utilizing undergraduate student mentors. Since excellentmentoring skills
, and problem solving skills based on authentic civil engineeringtasks.During the spring semester of 1994, the Department of Civil Engineering at a large urbanuniversity in the Mid-South reviewed the courses offered for the freshman and sophomore years.The course offerings included a three-hour traditional surveying course, a three-hour course oncomputer usage, and a three-hour programming course. Each of the courses had been developed anumber of years earlier and appeared to no longer reflect the skills or needs of studentpopulations. Both faculty and student interest in these courses was waning. Students would oftenput these courses off until their final year in the program when they were "gotten over with
there, requirements wereelicited from the stakeholders. This approach has been documented in several publications [17][18] [19].While this approach provided to be highly successful at first, problems began to develop as thecourse was taught multiple times. There were timing issues with the course, as the BE studentshad already made many of their fundamental design decisions prior to determining therequirements, which made an appropriate elicitation process impossible. Scheduling proved tobe very difficult, as teams had conflicting goals and there was little chance for interaction.Ultimately, a significant change in the Biomedical engineering curriculum made this approachimpossible.New ApproachIn developing a new approach to teaching
others whowork with individuals who are entering the STEM pipeline to provide specific guidance on thecore competencies and skills necessary, as well as those that an individual will need to maintainproficiency during their career.The need for qualified engineers is expected to increase over the next seven years, with theengineering field expected to grow by 8.6% between 2012 and 2022. The result will be over544,000 job openings due to growth and net replacements during that period. It is imperativethat clear and specific guidance is given to those individuals who may be suited to fill this needand will enter into the STEM pipeline. This session will highlight the new materials which canbe used by individuals, faculty, etc. to understand the
future collaboration in different areas – this relationship establishes a foundation that may lead to other collaborations that might include: research for Villanova faculty and students on Irish issues and sites, student faculty exchange and Villanova students taking Sligo science courses via DE. Fall 2010 Mid-Atlantic ASEE Conference, October 15-16, 2010, Villanova UniversityThe current collaboration between Villanova and SligoThe MOU and the program “pilot”Villanova University and IT Sligo signed a Memorandum of Understanding in the Spring of2010 that describes the current collaboration. The document specifies the maximum number ofslots available to the Irish students – 25% of the classroom capacity
) received the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from the University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, in August 2012, and the M.S. degree in civil engineering from the Univer- sity of Texas, El Paso, TX, in December 2006. In August 2017, he joined the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach, FL, where he is currently an Assistant Professor and the Director of the Security and Optimization for Networked Globe Laboratory (SONG Lab, www.SONGLab.us). He served on the faculty of West Virginia University from August 2012 to August 2017. In 2007 he was an Engineering Research Associate with the Texas A&M Transportation Institute. He has served as an
Biological and Agricultural Engineering department, is a Lilly Teaching Fellow, and is a key faculty appointed to design a culturally inclusive Environmental Engineering program of study that will begin in the Spring of 2009. Page 13.1044.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Responsiveness of Engineering Curricula to Cultural and Societal ChangesAbstractThroughout history there has been a call for change in engineering education. Since the early20th century, there has been a national concern for the state of engineering education as can beseen by reports by the
for students4, 5 by focusing attention on more conceptually relevantfeatures6. Currently, a very large proportion of US students are ill prepared in math overall andcertainly ill-prepared to simply use existing math skill to support science learning. Fifteen-year-olds in the U.S. ranked 25th among peers from 34 countries on an international math test andscored in the middle in science and reading, while China topped the charts, raising concern thatthe U.S. is not prepared to succeed in the global economy7. A similar situation exists with respectto engineering and math: math is a fundamental component of engineering concepts andprocesses, but most students are not well positioned to use existing skills in K-12 engineeringcontexts
many benefits to forming multidisciplinary teams to tackle the leakypipeline issues in STEM.In reference to the first highlighted area of change, the “GAIN peer-mentoring program” wasrenamed to simply be called “GAIN” (Guide, Advanced, Interact, Network) and a correspondingtagline was created: “Empowering all of us to thrive in engineering.” In addition, the new GAINincludes a private Discord server to facilitate more opportunities for casual connections to bemade between peers. While a formalized peer-mentoring program is still a core component of thenew GAIN, deemphasizing this structure in the title and marketing materials helps to motivatestudents to join by connecting to what is important to them. Furthermore, one line from the newmission
11posters, public radio messages, and letters addressed to ISD students’ parents, ISD mentors,donors, and Michigan Tech faculty; and preparing a speech about her experiences as an STCmajor in ISD.Scientific and Technical Communication Lessons LearnedCross-culturalThe STC student met with a Bolivian university student studying communication, and conversedwith him through a translator.They partnered to address several questions and issues regarding locals’ riskcommunication/education, such as the following found in an excerpt of the STC student’slearning log: “…Who are the stakeholders? Who’s affected by the flooding: homeowners, aswell as people who walk through the floodwater? This is everyone’s problem, because thewastewater from homes mixes with
. Page 22.565.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Energy Harvesting for Engineering EducatorsAbstract Engineering education should include preparing and developing students not only forcareers in industry and research currently in demand, but also for those fields and technologicalareas that are emerging in the near, moderate, and long-term future. This paper serves to providea cornerstone for engineering educators concerning the emerging and exciting field of energyharvesting such that the subject may be introduced to students who will soon enter industry oracademia. An example of its use with senior-level engineering students is then presented. Thiseffort supports, but
. Asthe computer science field matured and accredited computer science programs began appearingin the universities, more attention was focused on secondary school programs. With fewexceptions, most secondary school programs fail to address the issues motivating this project,namely: a) providing students with a broad understanding of software development early in theireducation; b) dispelling myths about software development careers; and c) motivating students(especially females and minorities) to further study in this field. What is needed in mostsecondary school curricula are new modules providing students with the necessary breadth tounderstand software development career opportunities. In 2001, a pilot project, an innovativesecondary school
faculty to publish educational research. Her research interests primarily involve creativity, innovation, and entrepreneurship education.Dr. Joe Tranquillo, Bucknell University Joe Tranquillo is a professor at Bucknell University where he currently serves as the Director of the Teach- ing and Learning Center. He was the second hire in a new biomedical engineering program, which has since grown to 7 faculty, 70 students, gained accreditation and has been ranked three times in a row as the number one undergraduate biomedical engineering program by US News and World Report. At Bucknell he co-founded the Bucknell Innovation Group, KEEN Winter Interdisciplinary Design Experience and served as the co-director of the
flow. When the father/owner was presented with these ideashe accepted them readily and was willing to implement the proposed changes. In fact, thestudents and faculty assisted him in moving equipment one morning near the end of the projectso that a trial could be done with the new layout. However, one of his sons intervened before thetrial began and we had to move the equipment back to the original locations. The students were alittle discouraged that we were not able to put their suggestions into action. However, this was areasonable lesson in the difficulty of getting ideas implemented, which is something they willface when they graduate and start their careers. A detailed report was given to the owners withclear drawings of the new factory
. Accordingto the Hechinger Report1 and the National Center for Education Statistics2 fewer than one out offive students (13%) at community colleges obtain their desired degree in two years. Within threeyears, approximately 22 percent of students graduate, and within four years, the rate stands at 28percent. Thus, developing and implementing successful practices for increasing graduation andtransfer rates have been and continue to be problematic for academic leaders concerned withpromoting the pathway to the baccalaureate degree for 2-year college STEM students.Research conducted by Olson et al3 indicates that student persistence towards a STEM degree isassociated primarily with intellectual engagement and achievement. Students who play an activerole
March 6, 1945 and completed his secondary education in Snyder, Texas. He was granted the B.A. (magna cum laude) and M.E.E. degrees in Electrical Engineering from Rice University, Houston, Texas, in 1967 and 1968, respectively, and the Ph.D. degree in Applied Physics from Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, in 1974. He was employed as an Aerosystems Engineer in the antenna design group of General Dynamics, Ft. Worth, Texas, from 1968 to 1969. From 1970 to 1974 he was a Teaching Fellow and Research Assistant in applied mathematics and applied physics at Harvard University. He was also a Research Assistant at Los Alamos Scientific Laboratories, Los Alamos, New Mexico, for the summers of 1970 and 1971. In 1974
. Programs such as the FIRST RoboticsCompetition and Project Lead the Way are highly successful. The paper also highlights threeinnovative high schools in the Waco area that are addressing these issues with limited success.Lastly, the paper outlines several new activities at Baylor university to encourage students tobecome engineers. One such program is the mentor program that is being undertaken by BaylorUniversity student organizations in engineering to address some of these secondary schools’needs. IntroductionThere is a shortage of engineers, or so we are led to believe by recent headlines in the media.The bottom line is that engineers are in short supply and the demand is increasing. Currentheadlines
, practicing and applying each new stage of the life cycle together.The approach was intended to simulate how you would plan, manage, and execute a project inindustry. Previous research showed that experiential learning needed to happen in ProjectManagement to meet the needs and concerns of industry [10].Along with the topics and part of the redesign, the group project defined for the course includeda civically engaged project. The project defined for the course was to plan, manage and executean event called Girl Scout Engineering Day. The goal of the team project was to have studentsapply project management techniques using a structured approach to project management thatwas part of the theoretical learning in the class. The project was designed to